Archive for September 18th, 2007

During the housing boom, agents and mortgage brokers have done extremely well. In fact, word spread so quickly that we have seen large increases in the number of people making career shifts into the housing industry. From 1989 to 2001, the membership numbers for National Association of Realtors was around 800,000. However, from 2002 to 2007 we see a dramatic and steady increase to approximately 1.4 million active members. Why the sudden increase when for over a decade, membership numbers stayed relatively stable? Welcome to the world of basic economics. The fact that money was to be made in the industry and low barriers for entry, many folks decided to roll the dice and take a chance with real estate. Simple supply and demand. In addition, with a booming market and lending standards so low that you can smell the floor, selling homes and lending money seemed to be a no brainer. Prices kept going up in double-digit sprints and many in the industry saw this as a locked in yearly wage increase. After all, if your income derives on the underlying asset price and the price keeps going up, it is by default that you will make more money since you are paid a percentage of what a home would sell for. This was all fueled by easy credit in every aspect of life. For 7 years it seemed that housing would go up ad infinitum.

The housing market is now entering the first stages of a multi-year bear market. 2007 has seen the loss of 155+ lending institutions. Over 100,000 individuals have lost their lending related jobs. Many entering neophytes are victims of poor timing. They read and listened to the housing bull books and seminars 7 years too late. Many seasoned agents and brokers realize that housing ebbs and flows. These housing veterans have sufficient contacts to weather the storm and will try to hold the fort down during these down times. From my experience in the industry and simply looking at the wage earnings for agents, it is apparent that he Pareto Principle holds true for this industry. Vilfredo Pareto, an Italian civil engineer, observed that 80 percent of the wealth in Italy was owned by 20 percent of the population. How does this apply to agents? In the case of superstar selling agents, it is the case that 80 percent of the sales happen via 20 percent of the top producing sellers. They have deep contact lists and other attributes that make them successful. When you look at the median earnings of real estate agents in the U.S., you’d be surprised by what you find. A good agent is someone that can sell a home when no one else is able to do so. See, the last few years even amateurs were able to sell homes and oversights were masked by a booming housing market. Sort of like venture capitalist throwing money at any prospective company with a dot com in its name during the raging tech boom.

Capitalism is a great thing if you let it run its course without government intervention. For example, now that the housing market is slowing down many companies are falling flat on their faces for running poor businesses. The 155+ lenders that have imploded this year are victims of inefficient business models and the market is taking care of them. After all, these companies were raking in money during the boom times. Good businesses are built with diversification to weather multiple storms. Take a look at Proctor and Gamble and General Electric. During the good times, they ventured into other businesses that allowed them to have a buffer should one industry sector falter. Many of the lenders that are now defunct saw returns too appetizing in the housing industry. Instead of going into more conservative ventures with their revenues or build war chests, they decideded to reinvest into a business model that was unsupportable.

The internet is now a ubiquitous part of life in the U.S. Everyone uses Google to search for answers. If you don’t know the answer to a complex question, you can go to Google and find not only one response but probably a few thousand. Information is power. Even in the 90s, buying a home was a challenge because you didn’t have access to all the important pieces of information. If you wanted previous sales data, you would need to go to the clerks office or pay a title company to dig up the information. Most people never bothered to look at previous tax records. And finding comparable sales? The only viable source was the MLS which was under lock and key by the housing industry. Now with the advent of Zillow, ZipRealty, Redfin, HelpUSell, and other do it yourself services information on homes is no longer hard to find. The LA Times had a great article this Sunday about selling your home with different services. Do you want to know the previous sales price? This will be easy to find. What about comparable sales? Not only can you get this information but you will have it nicely displayed via a satellite hybrid image that you can sort out. And the best thing is most of these services are free or cost a small price. And in a market where 6 percent can mean the difference between you breaking even or going into a short-sale, many folks are opting to use discount services or doing it themselves.

So why will commissions drop? Here are three further reasons for the inevitable drop in commissions:

Misnomer: Only the Seller Pays the Fee

You always here this argument thrown out. Buyers shouldn’t hesitate in using an agent because it is the seller that pays the fee. The way the process is currently setup, the seller pays the typical 5 to 6 percent commission fee and should a buyer’s agent bring a worthy customer, will get a cut of the percent. This can be anywhere from 2.5 to 3 percent. So why is this a misconception? Like a stock that pays a dividend, the market already factors this into the price. You aren’t really getting the service for free because the underlying price is inflated to reflect this market standard. But as standards shift, say commissions go to a lower rate or flat fees, the price of the home will reflect the difference. We are already seeing this here in California where market pressure and multiple options are giving consumers different choices. And sellers that went 0, 3, or 5 percent down realize that 6 percent may be their entire equity, are willing to find creative ways to sell a home. Keep in mind in a hot market where the median price for Los Angeles County is $550,000, 6 percent is $33,000. As a seller, you may think twice about paying this especially in a tighter market.

This priced in model happens in many financial instruments. If you look at options that are nearing a dividend pay date, the market has already priced this into the premium. So you really aren’t getting a good deal even though this is a sort of slight of hand financial gain. And many professionals will argue that you can’t get the service that they can provide at a lower cost. This may be true depending on the person you hire. But look at the professional Hovnanian Enterprises cutting prices in their Deal of a Century campaign to unload homes. In some cases, these professionals are lowering prices by $100,000. Now that will get your attention. And these homes are new units so you don’t really need to worry about wear and tear and in many cases, these builders are now offering financing to move inventory. You can see why a downward market will put pressures on commissions.

Access to Information: MLS, Competition, Down Market

Have you used Zillow? Know about Craigslist? Ever browsed homes on ZipRealty? Then you are benefiting from the competition brought on by the industry. Many of these companies realize that you can make money from other venues such as advertising and taking a lower fee and making it up on volume. They realize that a small piece of $550,000 is enough money to invest millions of dollars into new business models. In addition, the competition is now fierce since sales are dropping and credit is tight, so now your option may be limited to a few qualified buyers that are absolutely determined to buy right now. A good agent is now earning his money trying to sell a home. No longer are multiple offers coming in like the good days. The market is now different. Many new industry folks are unable to deal with a down housing market and are going into this as a trial by fire. This is their first experience with a down market. And the last 7 years were a complete anomaly so anyone thinking we will be back to that is hoping for a deal of a century that will not come again for another century.

It is easy to find information on comparable home sales. You can easily access previous sale prices. These companies at the vanguard are finding that many buyers and sellers are willing to get their hands dirty if that means they will save $20,000 to $80,000. I always get a kick out when the rebuttal is, “well I wouldn’t expect to pilot a plane just because it is cheaper.” Flying a plane is not like selling a house. Doing heart surgery is not the same as showing an open house. There is a clear difference. Will it require work if you decide to do it? Of course. Just like owning a rental property. You will have issues come up but that is why you are rewarded financially. Otherwise, everyone would be doing it. Even savvy attorneys, title companies, and discount brokers are capitalizing on this market. If you are too lazy to review sales on Zillow or ZipRealty, drive around and see a few comparable homes, and read one of the thousands of real estate books out there then yes, maybe you should fork over your money to an expert.

Cost of Housing: People Will get Dirty for Tens of Thousands

When you are selling a $100,000 home in a slow market with few buyers, agents do earn every penny for their hard work if they bring a qualified buyer and the deal closes. Many agents across the US are not in prime areas and the percentage is not that much in nominal terms. But in the last few years, if you managed to get a listing in SoCal all you needed to do was list it in the MLS (if that) for $600,000 in a decent area and you would get multiple offers. In fact, sellers even put into their listings “sold as is” expecting buyers to put up or shut up. And guess what? Homes sold without inspections many times. Lenders couldn’t careless since banana republic mortgages were being bought by investors. So the sellers were in absolute control. It was the best sellers market in decades. It’ll be interesting to see how those in the housing industry that haven’t seen a downturn will react to this market shift (remember the jump of 600,000 NAR members since the boom?). Many of course are calling for a bailout and corporate welfare but this has little chance of making any impact in California or other high priced areas where prices are disconnected from the reality umbilical cord.

Many sellers that bought in 2004, 2005, 2006, and even 2007 that are looking to sell are quickly realizing that 6 percent is a big deal especially if they are swimming underwater. Any smart agent realizes that in slow markets quality buyers must be courted with lower prices and this may include rebates. No amount of marketing or savvy advertising will make a lender fund a buyer; you may have a willing buyer but if they don’t get financed, the deal is going nowhere. The market is changing and to be honest, those in housing will have to revert to old school ways of doing things. Adding repairs and sprucing up houses to catch a now dwindling amount of buyers. Throwing in discounts if possible. More aggressive marketing directed to bringing in qualified buyers (take note on Hovnanian advertising approach). And no, we are not even remotely close to a bottom. We had a 7 year housing bull market and only in late 2006, did we shift into a slower housing bear market. Heck, Los Angeles County returned back to its historical median record price of $550,000 last month so we haven’t seen a correction here. Expect this to last 3 to 4 years. Moreover, these new services are built to cater to price conscious buyers and sellers; in down markets with tighter credit, nothing is more precious than price.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information.

Filed under: MasterCard Inc’A’ (MA), Toll Brothers (TOL), Options

Toll Brothers-(NYSE-TOL) volatility decreases as the Federal Open Market Committee lowers rates to 4.75%. TOL, the largest U.S. builder of luxury houses, is recently up $1.30 to $22.20. The FOMC lowered the Fed Funds rate by .50 to 4.75%. TOL October option implied volatility of 50 is below its 7-week average of 55 according to Track Data, suggesting decreasing risk.

MasterCard-(NYSE-MA) volatility decreases as MA rallies after FOMC lowers rates to 4.75%. MA, a global payment solutions company, is recently trading up $9.31 to $146.02. The FOMC lowered the Fed Funds rate by .50 to 4.75%. MA October option implied volatility of 38 is below its 7-week average of 42 according to Track Data, indicating decreasing price fluctuations.

Daily options Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Alright, so we just witnessed the Federal Reserve dropping BOTH key rates by 50 basis points this afternoon and the stock market is rallying in a huge way. Two stocks that are powerful buys right here, right now are Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) and Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC). Why?

Arguably, these are the two best run banks in the United States and they are both trading at ridiculously low multiples. By any measure, these two are cheap and positioned for major movement over the next 6-24 months. Bank of America is trading at $51, only a 10 price-to-earnings multiple of the $4.95 estimate I have for 2007 earnings. The stock pays a dividend right now of $2.56 for a current yield of 5.1%. Bank of America is a coast-to-coast dominant bank with a powerful and complete consumer franchise. With a $5.30 earnings per share estimate for 2008, BAC should trade up to a 13-15 PE multiple putting the price target at $70.

Wells Fargo is trading at $37 for a current PE of 13 times 2007 earnings estimate of $2.75 and 2008 earnings of $3.05 per share. Wells Fargo is a leading consumer-oriented player as well. Wells Fargo has a strong mortgage business, like Bank of America, and although not totally out of the woods yet, the prospects look excellent. Wells Fargo and Bank of America have the financial muscle and the balance sheets to underwrite mortgages and KEEP them on their books. They are not forced to package and sell them like so many small mortgage companies have had to and are now out of the business. BAC and WFC have a higher credit-worthiness requirement of their customers before mortgages are taken on. Yes, both have had to raise their bad debt reserves for the past two quarters and will likely do the same for the third quarter, but they still comfortably achieved earnings expectations.

Continue reading Bank of America (BAC) and Wells Fargo (WFC): Two powerful buys

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Microsoft (MSFT)

At the TechCrunch40 conference today, we got some more buzz from Facebook. The red-hot social networking company has set up a $10 million fund to support its growing base of developers.

Basically, the mega ambition for Facebook is to build the next pervasive platform, a la Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ: MSFT) Windows. Yes, it’s a worthy goal — and billions are at stake.

As for the FB (Facebook) Fund, it is not like the typical VC arrangement. That is, Facebook is not taking an equity stake; instead, the funding is actually a grant. They will range from $25,000 to $250,000.

I had a chance to interview Phil Edwards, who is the business development director at Lonely CEO Media, which is a Facebook developer. According to him:

“I’d say that it represents Facebook’s passion for curating great applications. The term “grant”‘ is apt — it shows that the team is interested in helping developers explore new and engaging ways to leverage Facebook users and their own resources. While I don’t think it will necessarily change the level of interest in platform (it’s already at a fervor), I think it does take pressure off of developers who are having trouble monetizing on an immature system.”

Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including The Complete M&A Handbook and The Edgar Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements. He also operates DealProfiles.com.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Management, Newspapers

According to The Financial Times, September is looking to be the weakest month for announcing share buybacks in four years. The credit crunch and concerns about future liquidity are apparently leading many companies to focus on shoring up their balance sheets, rather than returning cash to shareholders through buybacks. The popular process of borrowing large amounts of money to buyback shares also appears to be fading as borrowing costs rise.

This could spell trouble for the markets: Thomson Financial estimated that more than 20% of earnings growth for S&P 500 companies would be a result of buybacks. If the buybacks grind to a halt, will earnings suffer? It seems likely.

But think about that 20% figure. If it’s accurate, that means that more than a fifth of corporate earnings growth is smoke and mirrors — phantom earnings growth created by financial engineering rather than business. And it’s unsustainable: Many of the massive share buybacks that have been announced are too large to be covered by the companies’ free cash flow: They require a dip into shareholder’s equity, and are a one-shot deal.

If corporate earnings growth is being driven by buybacks, we need to be scared. It means our economy is actually doing a lot worse than it looks.

Continue reading Credit crunch slows buybacks

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Time Warner (TWX)

Time Warner Inc. (NYSE:TWX) has some good news still cranking out of its AOL unit. comScore has just released its new Internet “Top 50″ lists today, and in August, Advertising.com remained atop the Ad Focus Ranking. comScore said that Advertising.com is reaching 89% of the more than 181 million Americans online.

If you just run some simple math, this would generate a total audience reach of roughly 161 million Americans. Obviously an audience reach is not the same ranking for search or time spent per visit on a website, but the number is more than substantial.

If AOL is or is not going to end up being its own unit or a tracking stock, this advertising.com is a major help. If you will recall, the parent just rolled out the Platform A that integrates all the online ad properties and builds upon the Advertising.com business. That should help extend the reach even more, although you have to wonder if any changes may cause a skipped beat here and there. Obviously AOL wants to increase the depth of this reach now. Even a slight incremental increase in “per user” metrics can have a major impact with numbers this large.

Jon C. Ogg is a partner in 24/7 Wall St.; he does not own securities in the companies he covers.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Google (GOOG), Next big thing, Small business

True, Revver doesn’t have the mega brand of Google Inc.’s (NASDAQ: GOOG) YouTube. However, the site has made some online video creators happy; that is, $1 million has been distributed to them.

You see, Revver allows its users to share in revenues generated from advertisements.

True, it’s not a lot of money. But keep in mind that the online video market is still in the emerging stages.

Continue reading Revver — yes, there is money in online video

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Rants and raves, Competitive strategy, Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), Yahoo! (YHOO), Serious Money, Stocks to Sell

When I look at Yahoo! Inc. (NASDAQ: YHOO) as I do periodically, I can not understand its valuation. I still have trouble with the valuation of Internet companies in general I suppose. Yahoo! closed yesterday at $24.95 per share and since it is one of our original eight blogging stocks it is on my watch-list.

During the course of the year I have read many buy (albeit speculative) opinions and it seems to stay in the news every day. But when I look at it as an investment I just cannot make any sense of it. There are many positive things I can think of about the company but a price-to-earnings ratio touching 49 is not one of them. It’s too high! (Jim Cramer makes a different evaluation in his earlier post.)

It’s nice that Yahoo! has no debt and I suppose if I wanted to speculate I would be encouraged that it is near a 52-week low. However this would not let me rest easy at night because I think that if earnings do not improve significantly it may be worth 35% less in the near future when others see what I see.

I see earnings that are weak and getting weaker. Yahoo! earned less in 2006 than 2005. In 2007 it earned less than 2006. As one of the prime pieces of web real estate this is not a good sign. Not only is Yahoo’s earnings poor, but what it does with the earnings are not good either. It has an ROE, ROA and ROI that average about 7.7. so it’s clear the company is not making a lot of money, nor does it know what to do with what it is making.

“Yahoo! Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2006 Financial Results: Net income for the fourth quarter of 2006 was $269 million or $0.19 per diluted share (including $56 million of stock-based compensation expense, net of tax, recorded under the fair value method) compared to $683 million or $0.46 per diluted share (including $11 million of stock-based compensation expense, net of tax, recorded under the intrinsic value method) for the same period of 2005.”

Continue reading Serious Money: What is Yahoo (YHOO) worth? Maybe a lot less.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Good news, Market matters, Economic data, Headline news, Federal Reserve

The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) lowered both the Federal Funds Rate and the Discount Rate by 0.50%. This move was designed “to forestall some of the adverse effects on the broader economy” resulting from recent financial market disruptions.

Most people were expecting that both interest rates would only be cut by 0.25%. My forecast had been that the Fed Funds Rate would be cut by 0.25% and the Discount Rate by 0.50%. The market has experienced a rally upon release of the news.

Although the Fed has expressed concern about the moral hazard of a rate cut that rescues financial market participants that assumed too much risk, the rate decision indicates that the economy is its primary concern. As I mentioned in an earlier post, the recent negative unemployment report is the key issue.

Continue reading The Fed decision: It’s the economy!

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Competitive strategy, General Motors (GM), Employees, Politics

As a nation, we seem to be evolving toward consensus that saddling employers with the responsibility of arranging and paying for health care is an inefficient system. Such a system demands companies develop expertise that has no relationship to their core business.

This begs the question — if not these corporations, then who? According to the GM-United Auto Workers negotiations, the answer could be, the unions that represent GM employees. Is this a good solution for the workers, the corporations, investors, and/or the country? My impressions to date are no, yes, yes, and no.

If I were a UAW retiree, I’d be very nervous about the likelihood that the UAW bean counters could do a better job than GM in allocating the right amount of money to cover future health benefits. Certainly, GM is going to sharpen its pencil in an attempt to fund this as leanly as possible, and even at that, the pot will no doubt stretch the corporation’s wallet.

Continue reading The UAW as GM’s health care plan provider?

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments