Archive for January 11th, 2008

One of Countrywide’s largest sources of mortgage volume was retail mortgage brokers. From the one person mom and pop shops, to the mid-sized regional mortgage brokers/bankers, to small locally owned banks that didn’t want to service their own mortgage loans because their volume wasn’t high enough to warrant the cost in a loan servicing center.

Countrywide was the wholesale shop that didn’t turn down loans. They had the loosest underwriting and the highest rebates (and/or SRPs) paid on Main Street. Remember all the Fast ‘N Easy 90% no (income or asset) doc loans you originated? Remember those 3.00 point rebates for Option ARMs with the 3-year prepay (plus the 1.00% origination fee)?

Fellow mortgage originators please put on your thinking caps with me.

Back in August 2007, BofA invested $2 billion in Countrywide with the option to buy the stock at $18 per share. Countrywide’s stock today is trading at $6.46. Oops!

Now BofA wants to invest another $4 billion (using BofA stock) to purchase all of Countrywide. That’s a $6 billion total investment.

What affect will this have on the mortgage origination market?

In November 2007 BofA shut down its wholesale loan centers.

Couple of reasons there for that:

The usual — that the delinquency and foreclosure rates of mortgage broker originated loans were 4-6 times the levels of BofA retail originated loans.

Wall Street’s secondary market for mortgage securities has almost gone over to tiered pricing for mortgage broker originated (if not stopped buying broker originated loans) versus retail employee originated loans.

Increased outright fraud with mortgage brokers.

And the biggie — no buyback obligations from mortgage brokers for bad loans that everyone else out there is on the hook.

What are mortgage brokers gonna do if BofA shuts down Countrywide wholesale? Do you really think that BofA will keep the Countrywide wholesale doors open? If I was a Countrywide wholesale employee, I would be updating my resume this morning.

What are Countrywide retail originators gonna do? Their options will be to work inside a BofA retail bank or BofA loan origination center. Not a bad idea for them, as long as they produce a minimum $1 million per month in fundings.

What about the Countrywide loan servicing employees? BofA services their mortgage loans in Greensboro, NC. That’s a long ways to commute for all Countrywide’s people working in Calabasas, CA.

And that doesn’t even begin to answer the $64,000 question: Why would BofA pay $6 billion for a company they could have purchased outright for $3 billion (Countrywide’s stock value yesterday)?

Yeah I know BofA already invested $2 billion that Countrywide burned through. And the $18 Countrywide strike price is now laughable (I’m glad I wasn’t the fool who came up with that number).

The real question we all want to know is how bad is Countrywide’s loan servicing portfolio? Rumors creeping out on The Street is that Countrywide has a very serious REO problem they are not reporting as of yet.

Follow me here. Merrill Lynch and Citigroup today announced another $10 billion plus mortgage related writedowns respectively for the 4th quarter of 2007. Like they didn’t already know this information 2-3 months ago? Whaddya think, we’re stupid? We already knew that. Just be honest and tell us ALL the damage upfront.

Just since April 2007, Countrywide’s REOs nationwide have climbed from 10,769 to 15,783 — a 47% increase. In California alone, Countrywide’s REOs have risen from 2,361 to 4,051 – a whopping 72% increase in just seven months. What are these numbers gonna look like in 1-2 years? Any math geeks want to extrapolate that one?

Some of us out there have been saying this subprime, Alt-A, no doc, low FICO, declining real estate values, mortgage implosion will reach $400 billion in losses. That’s some serious money.

Anyone who has ever worked with affluent customers knows one thing for certain. Affluent people don’t like to LOSE money. They don’t mind making less than market returns. They just hate to lose money.

Big corporations are the same way. It used to be that a $100 million loss was catastrophic. Multiply that number ($100 million) by 4,000 and we’re starting to get a sense of the real problems out there in the mortgage finance industry.

Let’s all understand that the real reason BofA bought Countrywide is strictly for access to the loan servicing consumers. Period. BofA wants to cross-sell HELOCs, credit cards, checking accounts, overdraft protection, business checking, auto loans, etc., etc., etc.

My only concern is the price BofA paid. Countrywide’s stock price might very well have gone to zero in bankruptcy. Why pay an additional $4 billion for something you could buy for a buck ($1) as long as the federal government would guarantee your mortgage loan losses?

Yeah, I know it’s hard telling your shareholders that you just threw $2 billion down the drain with your initial investment in Countrywide. But another $4 billion on top of that?

Time tells all truths.

Share This

Filed under: Analyst initiations

MOST NOTEWORTHY: Mechanical Technology, Range Resources and Venoco Inc were today’s noteworthy initiations:

  • Merriman assumed coverage of Mechanical Technology (NASDAQ:MKTY) with a Buy rating and expects share appreciation as they company pursues the large market for charging and powering cell phones, digital cameras, digital video equipment and PDAs. They believe a 12-month stock price range of $2.50-$3.00 is justified.
  • Jefferies initiated Range Resources (NYSE:RRC) with a Buy rating and $65 target as they believe the company is well-positioned to generate above-average production/reserve growth over the next several years.
  • Venoco (NYSE:VQ) was initiated with a Hold rating and $21 target at Jefferies. The firm thinks some slippage in the timing of pipeline projects is possible and feels the company’s 2008 production outlook could prove to be overly optimistic.

OTHER INITIATIONS:

Permalink | Email this | Comments

One of Countrywide’s largest sources of mortgage volume was retail mortgage brokers. From the one person mom and pop shops, to the mid-sized regional mortgage brokers/bankers, to small locally owned banks that didn’t want to service their own mortgage loans because their volume wasn’t high enough to warrant the cost in a loan servicing center.

Countrywide was the wholesale shop that didn’t turn down loans. They had the loosest underwriting and the highest rebates (and/or SRPs) paid on Main Street. Remember all the Fast ‘N Easy 90% no (income or asset) doc loans you originated? Remember those 3.00 point rebates for Option ARMs with the 3-year prepay (plus the 1.00% origination fee)?

Fellow mortgage originators please put on your thinking caps with me.

Back in August 2007, BofA invested $2 billion in Countrywide with the option to buy the stock at $18 per share. Countrywide’s stock today is trading at $6.46. Oops!

Now BofA wants to invest another $4 billion (using BofA stock) to purchase all of Countrywide. That’s a $6 billion total investment.

What affect will this have on the mortgage origination market?

In November 2007 BofA shut down its wholesale loan centers.

Couple of reasons there for that:

The usual — that the delinquency and foreclosure rates of mortgage broker originated loans were 4-6 times the levels of BofA retail originated loans.

Wall Street’s secondary market for mortgage securities has almost gone over to tiered pricing for mortgage broker originated (if not stopped buying broker originated loans) versus retail employee originated loans.

Increased outright fraud with mortgage brokers.

And the biggie — no buyback obligations from mortgage brokers for bad loans that everyone else out there is on the hook.

What are mortgage brokers gonna do if BofA shuts down Countrywide wholesale? Do you really think that BofA will keep the Countrywide wholesale doors open? If I was a Countrywide wholesale employee, I would be updating my resume this morning.

What are Countrywide retail originators gonna do? Their options will be to work inside a BofA retail bank or BofA loan origination center. Not a bad idea for them, as long as they produce a minimum $1 million per month in fundings.

What about the Countrywide loan servicing employees? BofA services their mortgage loans in Greensboro, NC. That’s a long ways to commute for all Countrywide’s people working in Calabasas, CA.

And that doesn’t even begin to answer the $64,000 question: Why would BofA pay $6 billion for a company they could have purchased outright for $3 billion (Countrywide’s stock value yesterday)?

Yeah I know BofA already invested $2 billion that Countrywide burned through. And the $18 Countrywide strike price is now laughable (I’m glad I wasn’t the fool who came up with that number).

The real question we all want to know is how bad is Countrywide’s loan servicing portfolio? Rumors creeping out on The Street is that Countrywide has a very serious REO problem they are not reporting as of yet.

Follow me here. Merrill Lynch and Citigroup today announced another $10 billion plus mortgage related writedowns respectively for the 4th quarter of 2007. Like they didn’t already know this information 2-3 months ago? Whaddya think, we’re stupid? We already knew that. Just be honest and tell us ALL the damage upfront.

Just since April 2007, Countrywide’s REOs nationwide have climbed from 10,769 to 15,783 — a 47% increase. In California alone, Countrywide’s REOs have risen from 2,361 to 4,051 – a whopping 72% increase in just seven months. What are these numbers gonna look like in 1-2 years? Any math geeks want to extrapolate that one?

Some of us out there have been saying this subprime, Alt-A, no doc, low FICO, declining real estate values, mortgage implosion will reach $400 billion in losses. That’s some serious money.

Anyone who has ever worked with affluent customers knows one thing for certain. Affluent people don’t like to LOSE money. They don’t mind making less than market returns. They just hate to lose money.

Big corporations are the same way. It used to be that a $100 million loss was catastrophic. Multiply that number ($100 million) by 4,000 and we’re starting to get a sense of the real problems out there in the mortgage finance industry.

Let’s all understand that the real reason BofA bought Countrywide is strictly for access to the loan servicing consumers. Period. BofA wants to cross-sell HELOCs, credit cards, checking accounts, overdraft protection, business checking, auto loans, etc., etc., etc.

My only concern is the price BofA paid. Countrywide’s stock price might very well have gone to zero in bankruptcy. Why pay an additional $4 billion for something you could buy for a buck ($1) as long as the federal government would guarantee your mortgage loan losses?

Yeah, I know it’s hard telling your shareholders that you just threw $2 billion down the drain with your initial investment in Countrywide. But another $4 billion on top of that?

Time tells all truths.

Share This

Bank of America will purchase Countrywide for $4 billion in stock, saving the mortgage lender from the threat of bankruptcy.

From MarketWatch:

Bank of America Corp. said on Friday it’s purchasing Countrywide Financial Corp. for $4 billion, effectively doubling down on a previous investment in the troubled firm and catapulting the buyer into the top spot among mortgage lenders and loan servicers in the U.S.

The stock-swap deal will put an end to the independence of the troubled California lender headed by Angelo Mozilo, and represents an increase from the Charlotte, N.C., bank’s August investment of about $2 billion.

“We believe this is the right decision for our shareholders, customers and employees,” said Mozilo, Calabasas, Calif.-based Countrywide’s chairman and chief executive, in a statement.

There has been a ton of commentary about this that I think talks best to the issues this presents Bank of America.  Most notably PJ at Housing Wire with his take on the irony of it all.

For all of its maneuvering, BofA now finds itself at the altar with the company that, along with now-defunct New Century and Ameriquest, essentially helped define the subprime lending boom.

Which could mean that BofA will have managed to avoid the profits of the subprime lending boom, while nonetheless being forced to pick up at least some the tab.

Herb Greenberg from Market Watch has some prescient points on his blog:

1. The Fed is behind the deal.
2. The Fed is behind the deal because the rumors yesterday of a near bankruptcy were probably true.
3. As part of the deal, the government likely agrees to guarantee BofA against Countrywide-related losses.

No new press release on Countrywide’s site; but we’ll bring you details when they have a written statement.

So there you have it.  A marriage that was predestined months ago is finally complete.  We’ll be back with commentary in no short supply.

Note: At the time of this posting I own some B of A stock - just as an FYI.

Share This

Filed under: Earnings reports, Intel (INTC)

Intel Corp. (NASDAQ: INTC) should hit the $0.40 EPS expectation when it reports Q4 results next Tuesday even as more doom-and-gloom is posited about the PC industry’s demand slowdown. Intel, the world’s largest microchip maker, is expected to see a 12% rise in revenue for its latest quarter to $10.84 billion, compared to $9.69 billion from the year-ago period.

Analyst houses like Citigroup have said that “pockets of PC demand weakness” do indeed exist, but overall PC trends (demand) are solid. This equates to Intel doing just fine next Tuesday. My guess is that the chipmaker will report above-average earnings of $0.41 EPS, just a penny higher than the consensus estimate. The ability of Intel to have lower-cost chips for PCs available during the last quarter of 2007 (holiday shopping season) will give Intel a boost as well.

Intel has also been taking back share lost to rival Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (NYSE: AMD), who is widely expected to report a quarterly loss next week when it reports its Q4 numbers. If Intel, who was just recently under the gun of AMD in 2006 in terms of performance, can sock it up and really blow the doors off of Q4 estimates, 2008 will indeed appear rosy for the chipmaker. Intel’s international markets will also help it weather any demand sluggishness in the U.S., even as customers snap up laptop PCs left and right this coming year.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: International markets, Forecasts, Bad news, China, Morgan Stanley (MS), Economic data

According to the Chinese customs bureau, China’s December trade surplus narrowed in December. With the country’s trade surplus shrinking, and its money supply narrowing, we may finally be seeing signs that the country’s massive economic growth may be coming to an end.

The Beijing central bank reported the November trade surplus fell to $22.7 billion from $26.2 billion. M2, which is the broadest measure of money supply, gained 16.7% to 40.3 trillion yuan ($5.55 trillion) from a year earlier. It was the smallest rise in seven months.

China is beginning to feel the effects of recent yuan gains, weaker global expansion and cuts to export-tax incentives. As a result, its exports rose by the slowest pace in two years. As we discussed, China still plans to strengthen credit controls to avoid financial problems and a possible inflation surge. Wang Tao, an economist at Bank of America Corp. in Beijing, said that “China needs to tighten monetary policy further, given that new loan growth may rebound’ as recent signs shows that the country’s “economic expansion may have peaked last year.”

Continue reading China’s trade surplus narrows in December

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Forecasts, Bad news, Economic data

The U.S. trade deficit unexpectedly widened 9.3% in November 2007 to a seasonally-adjusted $63.1 billion on a record increase in oil prices, the U.S. Commerce Department announced Friday in a statement.

Analysts had expected a $59.5 billion trade deficit for November 2007. Imports increased 3% to a record $205.4B while exports increased to a record $142.3 billion. November’s $63.1 billion total was the largest monthly deficit since September 2006.

Crude reality

The key driver of the unexpected deficit jump was the importation of oil. The United States spent a record $79.7 billion in November 2007 on oil imports, driven by, for equal measure, a record average price for a barrel of oil — $79.65, which was up $7.16. In non-inflation-adjusted terms, November 2007’s trade deficit was 8% higher than a year ago.

“It’s a disappointing number, but one has to qualify that by noting that the oil imports skewed the numbers somewhat. Without the increase in oil imports from oil’s record price, the trade deficit is decreasing, driven by the weaker dollar and increased exports,” economist Steve Affinito told BloggingStocks Friday. “That said, we still have to reduce our imports of foreign oil.”

Continue reading Trade deficit unexpectedly widens to $63.1B in November

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Analyst upgrades and downgrades, American Express (AXP)

MOST NOTEWORTHY: European chipmakers, Select Comfort and American Express were today’s noteworthy downgrades:

  • Credit Suisse downgraded European chipmakers to Market Weight from Overweight to reflect the slowdown in the economy this year and the decline in the value of the dollar against the euro. The broker downgraded STMicroelectronics (NYSE:STM) to Neutral from Outperform.
  • William Blair downgraded shares of Select Comfort (NASDAQ:SCSS) to Market Perform from Outperform, as they believe weak consumer demand for large-average-ticket discretionary goods in 2008 will impact prospects of a turnaround.
  • Friedman Billings lowered its rating on American Express (NYSE:AXP) to Underperform from Market Perform following the company’s Q4 pre-announcement.

OTHER DOWNGRADES:

  • JMP Securities downgraded Juniper (NASDAQ:JNPR) to Market Perform from Market Outperform.
  • ABN Amro downgraded Groupe Danone (GDNNY) to Sell from Hold.
  • Daimler (DAI) was downgraded to Hold from Buy at Merck Finck.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Major movement, Forecasts, Bad news, Tiffany and Co (TIF), Options, Technical Analysis

TIF logoTiffany & Co. (NYSE: TIF) stock is falling this morning after the company announced that it has cut its fiscal year 2007 profit estimate to $2.40 to $2.43 per share. It had previously forecast profit of $2.49 to $2.54 per share. TIF cited a 2 percent decrease in same-store sales for December as the major reason for the revised guidance. If you think this stock won’t be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on TIF.

After hitting a one-year high of $57.34 in October, the stock has hit a new one-year low today. This morning, TIF opened at $37.95. So far today the stock has hit a low of $34.85 and a high of $39.00. As of 10:30, TIF is trading at $34.76, down $5.56 (-13.8%). The chart for TIF looks bearish and steady, while S&P gives the stock a very positive 5 STARS (out of 5) strong buy rating.

For a bearish hedged play on this stock, I would consider a May bear-call credit spread above the $50 range. A bear-call credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of call options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn’t do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make a 5.3% return in 4 months as long as TIF is below $50 at May expiration. Tiffany would have to rise by more than 43% before we would start to lose money.

TIF hasn’t been above $30 since early November and has shown resistance around $43 recently. This trade could be risky if the economy turns around quickly, but even if that happens, TIF would have to climb above strong resistance it has formed between $45 and $50 as well as its 50 and 200 day moving averages.

Brent Archer is an options analyst and writer at Investors Observer. At publication time, Brent neither owns nor controls positions in TIF.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Analyst upgrades and downgrades, Dell (DELL), Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)

MOST NOTEWORTHY: Dell, Hewlett-Packard and Advanced Medical were today’s noteworthy upgrades:

  • JP Morgan upgraded shares of Dell (NASDAQ:DELL) to Overweight from Neutral on valuation, as they believe current levels provide an attractive entry point. JP Morgan thinks their bearish view on 2008 growth and margins has been priced into shares.
  • JP Morgan added Hewlett-Packard (NYSE:HPQ) to its U.S. Focus List, as the firm believes current sentiment is overly bearish, that printing share gains are healthy and costs savings should continue.
  • Jefferies upgraded shares of Advanced Medical (NYSE:EYE) to Buy from Hold on valuation as they believe the stock is oversold at current levels.

OTHER UPGRADES:

  • Equinix (NASDAQ:EQIX) was upgraded to Outperform from Market Perform at Wachovia.
  • Lehman upgraded Peugeot (PEUGY) to Overweight from Equal Weight.
  • UBS raised Illumina (ILMN) to Buy from Neutral.

Permalink | Email this | Comments