Archive for February 21st, 2008

Filed under: Freep’t McMoRan Copper (FCX), Serious Money, Commodities, Anglo Amer ADR (AAUK), Stocks to Buy, Best Stocks for 2008

It was only yesterday that I wrote about Freeport McMoRan Copper & Gold (NYSE: FCX), noting the favorable metrics and that I put it on my watch list. And this morning I find that Gold & platinum prices soared to new highs, with gold futures setting a new record of $952.40 an ounce.

It seems investors the world over are rediscovering the precious metal after years of neglect. How could you expect anything else with social unrest, war and recession fears on the front pages of every newspaper, with China and India growing rapidly, placing high demand on all commodities, and with a head-in-the-sand administration just now lifting itself up to take a gander at the last few months of its dubious leadership.

Despite recession fears, there is also the serious possibility of dramatic inflation in the next few years based on deficit spending, the ever expanding federal government and lack of concern for the value (buying power) of the currency. It’s pitiful. Gold has been an historic hedge against inflation, so why should now be any different?This has ignited one of my 2008 picks Chasing Value: Anglo American (AAUK) is down…but!, which has moved up sharply in the last week.

I do not know where the ceiling is on gold prices, but it does not seem historically high, and I still think AAUK and FCX belong on everyone’s watch list.

Sheldon Liber is the CEO of a small private investment company and the principal for design and research at an architecture & planning firm. He writes the columns Chasing Value and Serious Money. Disclosure: I own shares of AAUK.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Countrywide Wholesale recently terminated its wholesale relationship with the large broker/lender Clarion Mortgage Corporation in a rather dubious matter that may portend the mortgage giant’s exit from (or major reduction in) the channel. The company’s CEO sees it as a clear sign that the mortgage giant is taking its cues from Bank of America to slim down (or wind down) the unit. While drawing that line seems as dubious as the reasons Countrywide canned the company to begn with; it is an interesting turn of events that brokers who are closely tethered to Countrywide Wholesale need to be aware of.

Clarion, a company that delivered over $100 million to Countrywide through the wholesale channel last year was axed from the wholesale program for alleged poor loan performance. Clarion still maintains its relationship with Countrywide Correspondent. Below is the email from the Clarion CEO outlining Clarion’s take on the issue.

By now many of you have heard that Clarion has been notified by Countrywide Wholesale (not Countrywide Correspondent) that our relationship is over. Obviously this is very disappointing, but for more than just the fact we don’t have them as a source for our loans. What is most disappointing to me is the 12 years of relationship where Clarion sold them over $600M in loans, $100M last year alone, didn’t even warrant a phone call to discuss the matter. I heard about this rumor from an LO who works out with a CW rep. They terminated us in CO due to problem loans. What little feedback we got was on 10 LO’s. The LO’s that they identified are not even at Clarion. In other words, the whole problem was decided by fiat. No fixing the relationship. No isolating the problem. Just sayonara, hasta la vista, hit the road.

My take is that Countrywide Wholesale, which is a separate company than either Countrywide retail or Countrywide correspondent, is struggling for survival. Keep in mind that BofA recently shut down its wholesale division and may not be interested in that element of Countrywide either. Therefore, the powers that be in Countrywide wholesale probably got a list of their customers and drew a line between those whose percentage of delinquencies and foreclosures were too high, regardless of any other factor, and sent out a form letter. We got the letter a week after we heard about it from our LO’s. Wow.

The value that Countrywide wholesale brought to Clarion was two-fold: underwriting flexibility and service. The underwriting flexibility has been largely taken away given the changes in the marketplace. No longer can a deal get kicked out at one lender and accepted at Countrywide wholesale. Service levels are probably still ok. I don’t have any information to the contrary. But the average price difference between wholesale and correspondent is 60 basis points worse for the LO. So on a $200,000 loan, the LO made $900 less in commission even after taking out the 15 basis points for the warehouse line. That’s a lot of money for service. Since we sent them $100M last year, I’m sure I’m missing something. Someone please tell me what we lost here other than Countrywide wholesale bragging rights?

For those that might conclude that Clarion is in trouble because of this issue, that’s not the case. We have issues, but they are not overwhelming. We still have numerous quality lenders that, unlike Countrywide wholesale, will be in existence a year from now. Though I would have preferred to keep them around, I don’t think this will have much of an impact.

For those that have loans with them, I’m sure you’ve already heard to contact the rep to regain access to your pipeline.

Of course the email is overly reactionary, a bit of hurt feelings and the “just dumped” ethos. Of course it is just one brokerage. The bigger story is that Countrywide is cutting $100 million/year partners via form letters in what can only be a sign of things to come with the tightening in the division. How many smaller brokers will be cut? How many other banks will take this path with their wholesale channel? How far down the path is the dead man walking?

Thoughts?

Filed under: Market matters, Personal finance

In a landmark decision that will help millions of workers who participate in 401(k) plans at work, the Supreme Court ruled yesterday that participants could sue 401(k) administrators if they believe the administrators of their 401(k) did not follow instructions and that lack of action resulted in loss of funds. More than 50 million workers invest their retirement savings through 401(k) funds and the total amount invested is $2.7 trillion. I’m glad the Supreme Court realized workers needed protection from administrators who don’t follow instructions.

The case was brought by James LaRue of Southlake, Texas. His suit contends that he lost $150,000 in his 401(k) because the administrators of his plan did not move his holdings into safer investments as he instructed. The Supreme Court had to decide whether or not the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) allows individual account holders to sue plan administrators for breaching their fiduciary duties. The law specifically allows recovery to the “plan” rather than the individual. Justice John Paul Stevens said in his opinion for the court, “Fiduciary misconduct need not threaten the solvency of the entire plan to reduce benefits below the amount that participants would otherwise receive.”

Continue reading 401(k) participants get permission from the Supreme Court to sue

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Countrywide Wholesale recently terminated its wholesale relationship with the large broker/lender Clarion Mortgage Corporation in a rather dubious matter that may portend the mortgage giant’s exit from (or major reduction in) the channel. The company’s CEO sees it as a clear sign that the mortgage giant is taking its cues from Bank of America to slim down (or wind down) the unit. While drawing that line seems as dubious as the reasons Countrywide canned the company to begn with; it is an interesting turn of events that brokers who are closely tethered to Countrywide Wholesale need to be aware of.

Clarion, a company that delivered over $100 million to Countrywide through the wholesale channel last year was axed from the wholesale program for alleged poor loan performance. Clarion still maintains its relationship with Countrywide Correspondent. Below is the email from the Clarion CEO outlining Clarion’s take on the issue.

By now many of you have heard that Clarion has been notified by Countrywide Wholesale (not Countrywide Correspondent) that our relationship is over. Obviously this is very disappointing, but for more than just the fact we don’t have them as a source for our loans. What is most disappointing to me is the 12 years of relationship where Clarion sold them over $600M in loans, $100M last year alone, didn’t even warrant a phone call to discuss the matter. I heard about this rumor from an LO who works out with a CW rep. They terminated us in CO due to problem loans. What little feedback we got was on 10 LO’s. The LO’s that they identified are not even at Clarion. In other words, the whole problem was decided by fiat. No fixing the relationship. No isolating the problem. Just sayonara, hasta la vista, hit the road.

My take is that Countrywide Wholesale, which is a separate company than either Countrywide retail or Countrywide correspondent, is struggling for survival. Keep in mind that BofA recently shut down its wholesale division and may not be interested in that element of Countrywide either. Therefore, the powers that be in Countrywide wholesale probably got a list of their customers and drew a line between those whose percentage of delinquencies and foreclosures were too high, regardless of any other factor, and sent out a form letter. We got the letter a week after we heard about it from our LO’s. Wow.

The value that Countrywide wholesale brought to Clarion was two-fold: underwriting flexibility and service. The underwriting flexibility has been largely taken away given the changes in the marketplace. No longer can a deal get kicked out at one lender and accepted at Countrywide wholesale. Service levels are probably still ok. I don’t have any information to the contrary. But the average price difference between wholesale and correspondent is 60 basis points worse for the LO. So on a $200,000 loan, the LO made $900 less in commission even after taking out the 15 basis points for the warehouse line. That’s a lot of money for service. Since we sent them $100M last year, I’m sure I’m missing something. Someone please tell me what we lost here other than Countrywide wholesale bragging rights?

For those that might conclude that Clarion is in trouble because of this issue, that’s not the case. We have issues, but they are not overwhelming. We still have numerous quality lenders that, unlike Countrywide wholesale, will be in existence a year from now. Though I would have preferred to keep them around, I don’t think this will have much of an impact.

For those that have loans with them, I’m sure you’ve already heard to contact the rep to regain access to your pipeline.

Of course the email is overly reactionary, a bit of hurt feelings and the “just dumped” ethos. Of course it is just one brokerage. The bigger story is that Countrywide is cutting $100 million/year partners via form letters in what can only be a sign of things to come with the tightening in the division. How many smaller brokers will be cut? How many other banks will take this path with their wholesale channel? How far down the path is the dead man walking?

Thoughts?

The Govenator, Arnold Schwarzenegger unvelied a rather extensive plan to help “offset the housing slump” in California and by building new affordable housing and assistance retraining the 8,400 employees of former mortgage companies to help them corrupt move in to other industries such as health care and biotech. (Remind me to read the labels of any new medicines closely.)

The plan includes a bunch of worker retraining for those laid off by the industry. (As an aside we all know that the 8,400 is a joke, since many of the job losses were suffered by 1099 contractors in small shops who wouldn’t be reported as laid off.) Most surprisingly the plan calls for the building of new “affordable” housing. Which is where things start to get hazy for me. But first a recap of the plan.

From Governor Schwarzenegger’s plan to reduce the housing slump’s impact on California’s economy:

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger today awarded $73 million for 40 housing projects in 26 cities across the state, helping 1,611 California families rent or purchase affordable housing.

The Governor also announced that the federal government today awarded up to $5.6 million to help mortgage and banking industry workers laid off as a result of the subprime crisis make career transitions to high-demand jobs in other industries. “We applied for this grant because we want to help displaced workers transition to new jobs and the money will go to the counties with the greatest need. We are not just sitting by and waiting for the economy to pick back up. We are taking all the action we can to keep people working and rebuilding California,” said Governor Schwarzenegger.

“Many of these laid-off workers have skills that are transferable to jobs in high-growth, high-demand industries, such as healthcare and biotech. We want to do whatever is possible to help them make this transition,” said Labor and Workforce Development Agency Secretary Victoria Bradshaw.

The grant from the U.S. Department of Labor will focus on 12 areas with the highest needs located in the following counties: Alameda, Contra Costa, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Diego, Sonoma and Stanislaus. One-Stop Centers in these counties have been providing rapid response services to the affected mortgage and finance workers and employers. These rapid response services, conducted with Workforce Investment Act funds, include information on the availability of unemployment insurance benefits and other employment services.

More Housing?

So let me get this straight? We’re going to pump another $100 million in to government sponsored building of new homes? What are they smoking up in Sacramento, and can a brother get some love? I mean I get helping displaced workers, and providing homeowner awareness and pushing for higher loan limits; but building affordable housing seems like a tremendous waste of money.

My thinking: if they just sit tight long enough pretty much everything inside of California (save the coast) will be affordable again. More housing cannot be the answer to an economic crash caused by? A GLUT OF HOUSING!

And to add insult to injury, wasn’t this whole mess precipitated by trying to get non-traditional homeowners in to homes? People bought homes they couldn’t afford, who didn’t have the credit stability to maintain the payments. Does anyone in Sacramento remember this? Wowsers. I’m truly baffled.

Counties that Need Help the Most

I love seeing Orange County on the list of counties that will receive the most worker retraining aid. Can you see the parking lot at the government offices during a training session? Unemployed loan officers in 525 BMW’s learning how to transition to biotech. I get giggly just thinking about the irony of it all.

Schwarzenegger Hard at Work

This is not the first package put together by the California government in an attempt to relieve some of the effects of the crashing California housing market. Here are a few others:

Of course Schwarzenegger has been campaigning hard for the conforming loan limit increase from the outset of the meltdown. Passed in the recent federal stimulus package, it now seems the loan limit increases will have a decidedly smaller impact than originally hoped for.
You Can’t Stop them from Trying

So while we’re all worried about a federal government bail out the legislators up in Sacramento have been busy printing money and spreading the love with an assortment of bond and other debt measures to ensure that I won’t be seeing a state tax break any time this millennium.

When Will They Realize?

When will the realization hit that they cannot control the crashing housing market? They cannot control the overbuilding that has been done. They can’t undue the rampant fraud that was perpetuated at all levels of the California real estate and mortgage pyramid. They can’t make Riverside a more desirable place to live. They can’t make everyone who was 100% financed equity positive.

They can do a little, and it will help a little - but no matter what this state is going to hurt bad for some time to come.

Filed under: Products and services, Consumer experience, Competitive strategy, Marketing and advertising, AT and T (T), Sprint Nextel Corp (S), Verizon Communications (VZ)

Tom Taulli wrote Tuesday about Verizon (NYSE: VZ)’s unlimited wireless calling plan, and competitors AT&T, Inc. (NYSE: T) and T-Mobile (part of Germany’s Deutsche Telekom) followed suit with unlimited wireless calling plans for U.S. customers. This is a first in the wireless industry for the major carriers, but it’s a welcome one for many consumers. Both AT&T and T-Mobile will offer unlimited calling starting by the end of this week — T-Mobile starting today and AT&T starting tomorrow.

Where is Sprint Nextel Corp. (NYSE: S), you may ask? The carrier also announced unlimited calling plans two weeks ago, but just in a few select markets — and starting at $119.99 per month. Although the unlimited calling plans vary from carrier to carrier, generally, there is a $99.99 per month price of admission with all of them. T-Mobile offers the best value, with all call minutes and unlimited text messages included. Why did all the carriers — except Sprint — unveil unlimited calling within just a few days of each other?

Something has to keep growth churning along in the wireless industry. With 85% of Americans now owning a cellphone, wireless is heading for commodity status (it may already be there), where price wars will begin erupting and “me too” marketing campaigns following shortly thereafter. The PC industry knows all about this. But price wars only help the consumer — not the wireless carrier. Yes, many of us heavy wireless users may soon have lower bills, but the carriers may have lower bottom lines as well. What wireless company stocks do you have in your portfolio? Will this cause more customers to abandon landline telephones and switch to unlimited-minutes wireless only, pumping in growth into the wireless sector for the time being? Food for thought.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Microsoft (MSFT), Options

Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) is recently trading up 45 cents to $28.67 in pre-open trading.

MSFT announced “MSFT executives to make significant announcement,” today at 11:30 a.m. EDT.

MSFT overall option implied volatility of 31 is above its 26-week average of 27 according to Track Data, suggesting larger price movement.

Option Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com

Permalink | Email this | Comments

We have many important dates in history. In 384 BC Plato returns to Athens and founds a school of philosophy. In 1969 Neil Armstrong is the first person to set foot on the moon. And in 2008 we witness wedding invitations as a ploy to get people to pay their mortgages. Yes, we are rewriting economic history in ways that only a Beavis and Butthead episode could explain. We’ve had a lot of negative information coming out regarding housing and we need to share some love with lenders, banks, and all those folks that made 2/28 mortgages become something more than a date in February. I think the public is catching wind of this housing love momentum and is returning the favor. In today’s article, we will talk about wedding invitations, warm bonfires, and giving someone a spare key to join you in enjoying your maximum leveraged piece of real estate.

I Do…Commit to 30 Years of Overpriced Housing

Weddings are a time of happiness when two people decide to make a lifetime (or in California at least a seven year) commitment to one another. Wine is flowing, friends and family dance, and plans for the future get started. Many times these plans involve buying a piece of real estate. After all, if you don’t own a home you don’t love your spouse - this is common wisdom in all circles. With the current housing decline, many are faced with the prospect of not being able to pay for their resetting mortgages. Lenders have a hard time understanding how losing a job and not having income will hinder you from making your mortgage payment. They give polite calls, send out friendly reminders, yet many are still unwilling to negotiate with them. So welcome the new tactic. Remember how happy you were on your wedding day? Take a look at this interesting article by the Washington Post:

“Mortgage lenders hunting for delinquent homeowners who have dodged their phone calls and letters are employing aggressive new methods to track them down, potentially making every knock on the door or fancy envelope seem like part of the pursuit. Even wedding invitations are suspect.

…Wells Fargo estimated that it had no contact with about 30 percent of delinquent homeowners who went into foreclosure in 2006. Last year, it began testing envelopes in bold or unusual colors or resembling wedding invitations.

Last month, it began experimenting with offering $250 gift cards to delinquent borrowers who had been unreachable, said Joe Ohayon, a Wells Fargo vice president.”

It would appear that lenders are now making up for the lack of diligence they did when making loans. When lenders gave out a $720,000 mortgage to a person making $14,000 a year, how was it foreseeable to see any potential problems? There shouldn’t be any surprise that 30 percent of delinquent homeowners who went into foreclosure in 2006 have had no contact with Wells Fargo. In fact, lenders are going to put the fear of God into your non-paying heart that when you go out to your local dive bar, the person serving you your liquor of choice may also be giving you a notice to fork over the last few months of mortgage payments. From a play out of the White House playbook, some lenders are now sending $250 gift cards to delinquent borrowers. We all know that when you are $10,000 behind on your 700 square foot Real Home of Genius, $250 will go a long way just like the $600 Wal-Mart vouchers we are getting in May. Now these folks have $850 to pay for their incredibly absurd mortgage payment.

Playing with consumer behavior and psychology, the new tactic is heading toward offering the olive branch to delinquent borrowers. Apparently screaming into a phone and harassing people has a negative conditioning response on the human soul especially when the initial promise was that real estate always went up and the payment was fixed. However, many homeowners have their own solution to the problem. Lenders may get an invitation to a weekend bonfire.

Burning Down the House

The problem with many lenders is the assumption that people want to stay in these financial albatrosses. In fact, when looking at properties throughout the country in new subdivisions many deed/trust holders are actually Wall Street banks that I can assure you never stepped foot in these areas. Last time I checked, I haven’t seen many suits strolling along the inner cities of Los Angeles yet much of the toxic financing found its way here. What many of these so-called financial engineers miscalculated is that some homeowners were just as greedy as they were. And in a case of tit-for-tat, some of these homeowners are employing strategies that were once only in the domain of the uber-wealthy. Many are simply ignoring to pay for their mortgage. In a more brazen tactic, some are deciding to exercise the ultimate Hail Mary and set their home ablaze as reported by ABC News:

“Recession fears along with nationwide housing foreclosures have pushed some homeowners to take drastic and illegal measures.

Looking to cash in on their insurance rather than face foreclosure, some people have committed arson to avoid losing their homes.

Michigan authorities believe 38-year-old Sheryl Christman was one of those people, when she set her home ablaze Sept. 1. Christman was just three days short of foreclosure.

“It didn’t look like a typical fire. It didn’t look like something that caught on fire. It almost looked ignited,” one neighbor said.”

Christman, who faces up to 20 years in prison, pleaded no contest in her case and has yet to be sentenced.

“I don’t know if she thought she was going to get the insurance money or what,” said Tonya Miller, of Nova Star Mortgage Co. “But she won’t. … It will go to the mortgage company.”

My guess is we won’t see too many of these situations since most people in mega-jumbo mortgages simply do not have enough emotional connection to a home and will simply walk away. The stigma of foreclosure is fading away quickly and you will not carry a Scarlet Letter. In fact, in a few years those without a foreclosure on their record will seem as a minority. If you have any doubt about this, can you envision a person in a $350,000 California home with a $550,000 mortgage still paying away in 2010? Exactly. By then we may be upgraded to Target vouchers of $1,000.

The bigger irony in the above piece, and frankly from many mainstream media outlets, is they are asking the mortgage lenders and Wall Street firms for comments on what is occurring. If you aren’t aware, if the above company is affiliated to NovaStar Financial it is now trading in the penny stocks:

NovaStar

So riddle me this Batman, what happens in the above case if the mortgage company is no longer around once the legal investigation clears up? Let us go even further, say the insurance company is unable to pay, then what? Now you can see how deep this rabbit hole really goes. Let us not rain on this parade with details, now we will bust a move to the new dance that is hitting the nation, the moon walking away dance.

Moon walking Away from the Mortgage

There is a new phenomenon sweeping the nation. This isn’t the Macarena or Livin La Vida Loca, but it is just as catchy. It is called “walking away” and folks are practicing it throughout the United States. It is a rather easy dance. All you need to do is the below:

Housing Moonwalk

1. First, you put your right foot into an insane stuntman mortgage with terms reserved for those at San Quentin.

2. Next, you toss your partner pretending everything is okay and your payments will never reset while your home will continue to appreciate 25 percent per year.

3. This is the part of the dance that gets complicated. Your payment resets and your home isn’t worth as much as you paid for it. At this juncture, you are left assuming the life of a debt slave with an asset that will not break even for a decade and keep you on a diet of cat food and Cup-o-Noodles, or you proceed to do the next hot move, the moon walk.

4. In this next step you distance yourself from your home. No Project Lifeline. No Hope Now Alliance. These are old dances like the fox trot. What you do is bust a move and act like 007 and disappear from your lender.

5. When you get those wedding invitations you’ll pretend they are from your hated cousin Matilda and simply ignore them.

6. You may get tempted to do the turn and burn move here but this isn’t the way you want to go unless you want to go to jail (in which case you will soon be released given the Governors proposed cost cutting measures to balance the now $16 billion budget shortfall). At this juncture, accept the fact that you’ll have bad credit but everyone that is bad to the bone and moon walking has bad credit.

There are now places willing to show you how to moonwalk away from your home for a modest fee. Like learning to Tango without all the body contact. What is happening at a deeper level is a generational and societal psychology shift regarding housing. What occurred over the past decade is the commoditizing of housing and the growing desire of the McMansion life. 32 ounces of soda aren’t enough so you need 64 ounces. 42 inch televisions aren’t enough so you go to 74. Why drive a pickup truck when you can drive a tank? The simple logical extension is why live in a 1,500 square foot home when you can live in a 3,000 square foot home with a heli-pad and three-car garage?  Why go broke on $10,000 of credit card debt when you can go out in fashion with $500,000 of mortgage debt? The desire to stay in this McMansion or overpriced box will now be a hindrance from all the other conspicuous consumption. How can one live in a mansion and eat rice and beans to balance the check book? The bottom line is many will not elect to fight for their home and will simply walk away. I discussed this point in greater detail after a 60 Minute piece showed a couple not only willing to walk, but glad to do it. All they were doing is exercising their right, just like the lenders exercised their right to lend them hundreds of thousands of dollars.  What more did these lenders expect?

I think where people take exception is when we have an incredible budget shortfall and responsible tax payers are asked to bailout these speculators; that is Wall Street, lenders, agents, brokers, appraisers, and yes, buyers.  Call it what it is.  The media plays up stories of folks in Ohio or Michigan with $100,000 mortgages and struggles to pay the bill because of job losses.  I can really understand these cases here and sympathize.  The disconnect occurs when wannabe flippers bought $500,000 homes thinking they were going to flip them for $600,000 because they added platinum counter tops and gold toilets.

Wedding invitations are nice, but no thanks many will say. Vouchers are great but we already have more than enough stuff from China that we rarely use. At this critical juncture, many people are simply saying adios to their mortgages. 2008 will go down as the year wedding invitations were tossed into bonfires and folks all around the country started dancing the housing moonwalk.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information

Share This

Related Posts:
The Housing Tipping Point. 3 Factors That Will Burst the Bubble: The Negative Wealth Effect, Negative Press, and Suffocating Debt Payments.
Even the Harlem Globe Trotters Couldn’t Spin Today’s Housing News!
Putting Home Sellers on the Couch: The Psychology of why Sellers Refuse to Lower Prices.
Mission Accomplished: 3 Housing Issues: Multiple Bottoms, Declining Dollar, and More Sub-prime and Alt-A Defaults.
Of Bubbles Past. Need a Map for Housing? Ask a Housing Perma-Bull and They’ll See the World Through Colored Glasses!

Filed under: , , ,

Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) will begin to sell ads that will run with videos on third party sites. The company wants to try to take advantage of the boom in online video using a targeting system similar to the one it has developed for text ads.

According to the FT, “Google’s video ads will take one of two forms: banner ads, which will run at the top of the video screen, and “overlay” ads, which will be inserted on top of videos as they play.”

Sites with video will be able to sign up for the service the same way that they do for the Google Adsense text ad program.

The project has a lot of risk. Text ads appear off to the side of content and do not directly interfere with the user’s experience at a website. Ads that “overlay” video, insert themselves directly into the user’s line of site, which could lead to people actually deciding they do not want to watch video with market messages. Viewership at some sites could then drop.

The new Google program may look good on paper, but the consequences of the project may make it unpopular with website operators.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.

 

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Filed under: , ,

Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) will enter the medical records business with held of The Cleveland Clinic, one of the top hospitals in the world.

According to The Wall Street Journal (subscription required),Under the pilot, patients who already use Cleveland Clinic’s personal health record system can securely share medical information such as prescriptions, conditions and allergies between the Cleveland Clinic system and a Google health-profile online.”

The program is a good idea. Patients’ records currently are tied to the data held by doctors and hospitals. If a patient wants to access their data or share it with other health-care providers, they have to request and wait, sometimes for days, to get information that could be very useful in their treatment.

The Google program may ruffle feathers of both doctors and health-care software management companies. Doctors are concerned with keeping records private. Once they are stored and accessible on the web this will be harder to control. Software companies which supply programs for managing medical records may find that the Google system competes with some of their business based on organizing and storing patient information.

But, for the patient who now has new-found access to his own data, the program gives them power over their own medical data.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.

 

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments