Archive for March 22nd, 2008

It is no surprise that many lower price areas are taking the brunt of this market correction especially in many cities in Southern California. However, not much has been examined between the synergy of employment linked to real estate and housing values. It was a symbiotic relationship that fed off each other. As the market trends pushed prices lower, the next train to leave the station is jobs that were dependent on ever rising home prices and a larger volume of sales. The churn and burn economy. This of course isn’t something new to this current era of economic prosperity and won’t be the last time that we witness such mob euphoria. Yet California is uniquely positioned that it will face to a large extent, some of the worst that will come with this housing led recession. It lived by the real estate, it will suffer by the real estate. To iterate on this point, let us examine a series that CNN Money is now doing looking at individuals and how the current economic downturn is impacting their lives. This story about a mortgage banker in San Clemente California literally has a piece of each facet that has caused this massive bubble and why things have changed so quickly:

“Surf teacher and retail clerk, 62, San Clemente, CA

I was a mortgage banker for about 20 years and while it had always been a bit of a rollercoaster ride, it also had some added perks in that I set my own schedules. This gave me time for what I really love to do: Surf.

As I watched the bubble getting thinner and thinner and bigger and bigger, I tried to position myself to survive what I thought would be a short-term correction.

First rates went up. Not much, but just enough to stop my business cold. First ones to go of course were the small brokers like myself who could not continue to spend more and more money to capture less and less business.”

A couple of misconceptions to begin with. First, the bubble didn’t burst (at least he acknowledges there was a bubble) because rates crept up (they are still at historical lows) but because prices became so out of line with local area incomes, that any tightening of the secondary credit market was enough to push the entire state of California to lose 20 percent off its median peak price in one year. Next, there was a false assumption that this was going to be a short-term correction. Now you must see some irony in this when he admits there is a bubble and expects a slow down turn. By definition bubbles burst. But back to the subject at hand, we had an unprecedented decade long bubble in real estate and those in the industry expect prices to run back up after what, a one year decline? This simple one page article gives you keen insight into why this bubble lasted longer and why it will have a much longer and more profound psychological impact. If you were to watch the mainstream media, you would think that dropping prices were somehow unlawful and everything should be done to prop inflated prices. They don’t have the guts to come out in a strong statement and say, “until prices reflect local area incomes, housing will continue to decline.” In previous downturns, a declining sector in the economy usually had immediate impacts in employment numbers but not this time:

“During that period I ran up about $35,000 in debt, mostly credit card. It didn’t seem like much at the time, to try and sustain what I thought was a short downturn that turned into a long-term bad market. Make that a catastrophically bad market that is far worse then anything I have seen before and getting worse.”

Once again, we get this belief that good times can last for a decade and bad times are expected to come and go in less than 12 months. To highlight the point even further, this person without credit would have been out of the industry and looking for something else much quicker without access to credit. Instead, he was speculating with his credit card assuming that good times would be around the corner. How is this different from buying a beleaguered mortgage stock and expecting it to jump up in double-digits again? I understand on an economical level why he ran-up his credit card debt to stay afloat, but how many others kept using their credit card or home equity line as a bridge loan to ride out the “short term correction?” This is the next shoe to fall. If this wasn’t enough, we also see that his son went into foreclosure during this time but more importantly, we get a peak into the psychology of why housing prices went to the epic levels that they did:

“Then my son’s house, which I co-signed for, went into foreclosure. Not really his fault, he was in the same business and his went down as well. At that point I made a decision that since my credit was gone anyway and I was really incapable of paying even the minimum payment on the debt, that I had little to lose and I just walked away. I don’t feel good about it. If I can, when I can, I’ll work on paying it back, but at this point I don’t care much.

Now I am a clerk at a very well run food store part time at night, and I’m teaching surfing when I can. It barely is survival money, but I’ve discovered that sometimes that is quite okay actually.

Failure can be enlightening.”

As you can see, this brief one year decline has cost his son’s home, job, his job, and conversely has lessened the tax base for the state. All this is interconnected and nothing operates in a silo although some would like to believe it does in their ivory tower. It was a house of cards built on real estate and California was the ultimate foundation. A few reports out show that WaMu and Countrywide have roughly 40 to 50 percent of their mortgage portfolios in California. I’m not sure if the lesson was learned here with the story. The industry that gave this banker his life blood, credit when times were good is now relegated to a low list priority on his personal list. Whether he pays it back or not, he cares very little as he tells us. Really interesting perspective that I’m sure many behavioral economist are going to be digging into during the next few years. Walking away is passé, the new hot thing is surfing away from your debt. If you’re going to leave your debt behind, leave it in style. Now speaking of waves and surf, let us now look at today’s Real Home of Genius in Huntington Beach.

Real Home of Genius - At Least You’ll Always Have the Weather

Huntington Beach

This home in Huntington Beach is getting a quick lesson in mark to market reality. This is a 3 bedroom 2 bathroom home that sits on slightly over 1,400 square feet. This could be considered a starter home for a working professional couple. Yet according to the ad, this is a great short sale deal from the bank because they have agreed to a lower price than what it had previously been listed at. Again, this is the logic many investment banks are using with their debt and assuming that somehow when the short term kinks work out, that they’ll be able to liquidate their crap onto other unsuspecting chaps. The game may be up. I say may since it looks like the government is inching closer to assuming many bad loans just like during the Great Depression. This can prop the market up for a longer time.

So first, let us take a look at the pricing action on this home:

Price Increased: 11/14/07 — $590,000 to $619,000
Price Reduced: 11/28/07 — $619,000 to $595,000
Price Reduced: 12/20/07 — $595,000 to $565,000
Price Reduced: 12/26/07 — $565,000 to $515,000
Price Increased: 12/31/07 — $515,000 to $565,000
Price Reduced: 03/10/08 — $565,000 to $515,000

You really have to wonder what is going on here. We have a range of $619,000 to the current $515,000. Of course probably to the bank or the current seller, this is a “real” loss of $104,000 but in reality nothing is a gain or loss until you realize it in the actual sale of the property and close escrow. Otherwise, you are speculating like the investment banks assuming the best but in reality, the actual market value is operating at a different level. Let us look at the sales history here:

Sale History

02/21/2002: $349,000

So even if it sold at $515,000 this is still a gain of $166,000 in six years or a yearly increase of $27,666 (ominous). Not bad at all. Yet the ad lists this place as a short sale so there may be an additional mortgage on this place aside from the first one. Now what is the current Zestimate of this place?

Zestimate

You have to wonder if some of the investment banks you similar estimates as well. And don’t fool yourself, Wall Street wants you to believe that all the financial engineering in the world is somehow going to trump human behavior. Just remember that financial engineering is what made Real Homes of Genius possible.

This above place isn’t exactly beach front property either. So what we are now seeing is the progression of areas that are considered “prime” seeing major corrections. This particular zipcode in Huntington Beach has a median sale price of $523,000 which is down 18 percent from a year ago and sales are down by 27 percent. Meaning, that last year the median price in this area was $637,000 and I’m sure, that is where that $619,000 price came from.

Either way, many people are going to realize that life will go on with tighter credit. Yet if they try to hold onto artifacts of credit and using credit cards or home equity lines as some sort of life lines, they will be sorely disappointed. No need to worry, prices will fall but you can always enjoy the surf.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information

Share This

Related Posts:
Real Homes of Genius: Today We Salute you Huntington Park. Tweedledum and Tweedledee of housing. $500,000 Homes in Wonderland.
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Stanton.
Real Homes of Genius: Today We Salute you Artesia. 626 Square Feet of Barbie Love for $360,000.
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Huntington Park. Sold 3 Times in 4 Years.
The Housing Wave of the Future: Two Main Mortgage Tsunamis.

Filed under: Consumer experience, Wal-Mart (WMT), Columns

Welcome to the 54th installment of The Wal-Mart Weekly, a column dedicated to bringing you insight, wit, facts, results, opinions, and just a bit of everything else when it comes down to a very hot topic these days: Wal-Mart.

In this week’s Wal-Mart Weekly, I’ll be looking at Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (NYSE: WMT) merchandising of some of its consumer electronics products. Namely: the personal computer.

Last week, I reported on some of the awesome steps the world’s largest retailer has taken to merchandise its flat-screen televisions. In fact, the TV area in a few local Wal-Mart locations reminded me of a specialty consumer electronics retailer rather than a big-box discount retailer. But TVs were only the start — the chain needs to get with the program when it comes to other consumer electronics items. Here’s how.

Continue reading The Wal-Mart Weekly: PC merchandising has a long way to go

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Consumer experience, Wal-Mart (WMT), Columns

Welcome to the 54th installment of The Wal-Mart Weekly, a column dedicated to bringing you insight, wit, facts, results, opinions, and just a bit of everything else when it comes down to a very hot topic these days: Wal-Mart.

In this week’s Wal-Mart Weekly, I’ll be looking at Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (NYSE: WMT) merchandising of some of its consumer electronics products. Namely: the personal computer.

Last week, I reported on some of the awesome steps the world’s largest retailer has taken to merchandise its flat-screen televisions. In fact, the TV area in a few local Wal-Mart locations reminded me of a specialty consumer electronics retailer rather than a big-box discount retailer. But TVs were only the start — the chain needs to get with the program when it comes to other consumer electronics items. Here’s how.

Continue reading The Wal-Mart Weekly: PC merchandising has a long way to go

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Coca-Cola (KO), PepsiCo (PEP), Johnson and Johnson (JNJ), Colgate-Palmolive (CL), Comfort Zone Investing

Ted Allrich is the founder of The Online Investor and author of the just released book: Comfort Zone Investing: Build Wealth And Sleep Well At Night. In this weekly column, he’ll offer advice to investors who are just getting started.

By definition, no. Stocks carry risk. If you don’t want risk, put your money in treasury bills or under the mattress. But don’t expect much of a return, if any. Having said that, certain stocks do have attributes that make them relatively, and I emphasize this word, relatively, safer investments than others.

First and foremost, they have solid earnings. The best ones increase earnings every year for several years, no matter what the economy does. Examples: Coca-Cola Co. (NYSE: KO), Johnson and Johnson (NYSE: JNJ) Procter & Gamble Co. (NYSE: PG), Colgate-Palmolive Co. (NYSE: CL). If you’ve watched these stocks during the last 6 months, they’ve gone down but nowhere near the depths of most others. They have solid earnings investors can count on. Investors pay for that.

Continue reading Comfort Zone Investing: Safe stocks…are there any?

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Coca-Cola (KO), PepsiCo (PEP), Johnson and Johnson (JNJ), Colgate-Palmolive (CL), Comfort Zone Investing

Ted Allrich is the founder of The Online Investor and author of the just released book: Comfort Zone Investing: Build Wealth And Sleep Well At Night. In this weekly column, he’ll offer advice to investors who are just getting started.

By definition, no. Stocks carry risk. If you don’t want risk, put your money in treasury bills or under the mattress. But don’t expect much of a return, if any. Having said that, certain stocks do have attributes that make them relatively, and I emphasize this word, relatively, safer investments than others.

First and foremost, they have solid earnings. The best ones increase earnings every year for several years, no matter what the economy does. Examples: Coca-Cola Co. (NYSE: KO), Johnson and Johnson (NYSE: JNJ) Procter & Gamble Co. (NYSE: PG), Colgate-Palmolive Co. (NYSE: CL). If you’ve watched these stocks during the last 6 months, they’ve gone down but nowhere near the depths of most others. They have solid earnings investors can count on. Investors pay for that.

Continue reading Comfort Zone Investing: Safe stocks…are there any?

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Rumors, Rants and raves, Business of sports

This post is one of several on business heirs apparent. Let us know in the comments whether you think Jeffrey Jordan live up to the legacy of his father, and be sure to check out the other heir apparent posts.

By Mike Brewster, guest blogger.

Since legendary hoopster Michael Jordan retired for good in 2003, none of the “next Michael Jordans”– from Tracy McGrady to Jerry Stackhouse to Vince Carter — have come close to matching Jordan’s gaudy stats, six NBA titles with the Chicago Bulls, or impact on the game (not to mention his poker losses, but that’s another story). Perhaps we have to look closer to home to find the real heir to Air Jordan?

Son Jeff Jordan is a freshman at the University of Illinois, and the first thing that strikes you about the younger Jordan is that he earned an academic scholarship to Illinois, certainly impressive but not exactly predictive of a Hall of Fame NBA career. Jeff’s stats — he’s averaging five minutes and under one point per game this season for one of the worst Illinois squads in memory — suggest that he might have been better off playing at one of the schools where he was offered a basketball scholarship, such as Loyola University of Chicago or Valparaiso.

Continue reading Heir apparent: Jeffrey Jordan has some big shoes to fill

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Rumors, Rants and raves, Business of sports

This post is one of several on business heirs apparent. Let us know in the comments whether you think Jeffrey Jordan live up to the legacy of his father, and be sure to check out the other heir apparent posts.

By Mike Brewster, guest blogger.

Since legendary hoopster Michael Jordan retired for good in 2003, none of the “next Michael Jordans”– from Tracy McGrady to Jerry Stackhouse to Vince Carter — have come close to matching Jordan’s gaudy stats, six NBA titles with the Chicago Bulls, or impact on the game (not to mention his poker losses, but that’s another story). Perhaps we have to look closer to home to find the real heir to Air Jordan?

Son Jeff Jordan is a freshman at the University of Illinois, and the first thing that strikes you about the younger Jordan is that he earned an academic scholarship to Illinois, certainly impressive but not exactly predictive of a Hall of Fame NBA career. Jeff’s stats — he’s averaging five minutes and under one point per game this season for one of the worst Illinois squads in memory — suggest that he might have been better off playing at one of the schools where he was offered a basketball scholarship, such as Loyola University of Chicago or Valparaiso.

Continue reading Heir apparent: Jeffrey Jordan has some big shoes to fill

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Mutual funds

It’s been a tough first four months of the year for Bill Miller of the Legg Mason Value Trust (LMVTX), famous for his 15-year run beating the S&P 500. Even after a 4.12% bounce in his fund’s net asset value on Thursday, he’s down 14.95% for the year. One major culprit? His stake in Bear Stearns (NYSE: BSC) that was once worth more than $200 million, making the fund one of the firm’s largest shareholders.

According to the Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Miller’s performance reminds him of his tough run that began the 1990s: “Back then, a similar crisis was unfolding in financial markets and Mr. Miller eventually swooped in to buy money-center banks like Chase Manhattan and Citicorp that he thought were underpriced, as well as insurance companies and mortgage lenders. Financials made up as much as 45% of Mr. Miller’s portfolio by the mid-1990s, and helped drive his 15-year winning streak as they rallied over the years.”

Mr. Miller told his fund’s shareholders that “the past two years are a lot like 1989 and 1990,” and there’s a “reasonable probability the next few years will look like what followed those years.”

Maybe so. But investors should be wary of the fact that a big part of Miller’s outperformance stemmed from his exposure to financial stocks and now that same exposure is dragging his fund into the lowest echelons of mutual fund performance.

Is the Legg Mason Value Trust just a glorified bet on the bounce back in financials? If so, investors may want to tread carefully, as Miller has been wrong about the sector for awhile.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Mutual funds

It’s been a tough first four months of the year for Bill Miller of the Legg Mason Value Trust (LMVTX), famous for his 15-year run beating the S&P 500. Even after a 4.12% bounce in his fund’s net asset value on Thursday, he’s down 14.95% for the year. One major culprit? His stake in Bear Stearns (NYSE: BSC) that was once worth more than $200 million, making the fund one of the firm’s largest shareholders.

According to the Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Miller’s performance reminds him of his tough run that began the 1990s: “Back then, a similar crisis was unfolding in financial markets and Mr. Miller eventually swooped in to buy money-center banks like Chase Manhattan and Citicorp that he thought were underpriced, as well as insurance companies and mortgage lenders. Financials made up as much as 45% of Mr. Miller’s portfolio by the mid-1990s, and helped drive his 15-year winning streak as they rallied over the years.”

Mr. Miller told his fund’s shareholders that “the past two years are a lot like 1989 and 1990,” and there’s a “reasonable probability the next few years will look like what followed those years.”

Maybe so. But investors should be wary of the fact that a big part of Miller’s outperformance stemmed from his exposure to financial stocks and now that same exposure is dragging his fund into the lowest echelons of mutual fund performance.

Is the Legg Mason Value Trust just a glorified bet on the bounce back in financials? If so, investors may want to tread carefully, as Miller has been wrong about the sector for awhile.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Filed under: Goldman Sachs Group (GS), Lehman Br Holdings (LEH)

After a week in which the market finally seemed to vote that big financial companies will be OK, S&P took the holiday to slam Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) and Lehman Brothers (NYSE: LEH). No one was even on the floor of the NYSE to react.

According to Reuters, S&P revised its outlook to “negative” from “stable” on Goldman’s “AA-minus” and Lehman’s “A-plus” long-term credit ratings, suggesting a possible downgrade in one to two years.

If the call is proactive, the agency obviously believes that a great deal more bad news lies ahead in falling revenue and further write-offs.

The market open next week just gained a bit of drama.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments