Archive for April 27th, 2008

Filed under: Management, Employees, Workspace, Politics

logoFor the purposes of this examination, let’s set aside the fact that you can find reliable clinical research that shows that tobacco smokers cost the insurance industry less over their lifetimes than svelte nonsmokers do. This is simply due to the fact that we tend to die sooner. But that’s a matter of insurance industry/government/pharmaceutical hijinx, to possibly discuss another time.

That aside, the item I’m bringing forward today is how the issue of lying smokers should be pursued by Whirlpool Corp.(NYSE: WHR). I’ll not take issue against Whirlpool’s insurance plan demanding a different level of premium payment from smokers. I’ll not take issue against Whirlpool asking smokers to document their participation in the addiction. I’ll not take issue against Whirlpool taking action against smokers who lied when claiming that they don’t smoke. What I do argue against is the ludicrous notion that Whirlpool employees have turned on one another. It appears that’s what the company expects us to believe.

Whirlpool management wants you to believe that they had 39 instances of one employee reporting another for serving their nicotine addiction in violation of what should be a confidential declaration of status. Whirlpool expects you to believe that these company “rats” know which smokers lied on their paper work and which didn’t. Whirlpool expects you to believe that all policy violators are of hourly status and that violations by management staff either don’t exist or aren’t yet worth pursuing. Whirlpool expects us to believe that the company itself wasn’t at the root of this all.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Bad news, Google (GOOG)

Google, Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) has been accused of charging clients for ads they really don’t want. Google’s AdWords, the hallmark of the company’s revenue success, is under scrutiny due to a single “checkbox” inside the system labeled “CPC (cost-per-click) content bid.” Check the box, and your ad will be displayed when a customer uses one of your designated keywords. Don’t check the box, and no ads will be associated with your keywords. Maybe.

Plaintiff David Almeida claims that there is no clear distinction between Google’s own AdWords program and its AdSense program, which is used to display Google advertising on partner websites, according to Information Week. Under the AdSense program, a customer must use an entry of “0″ to ensure ads don’t run on that network instead of leaving the entry blank. The suit states that “This action arises from the fact that Google does not inform its advertisers that if they leave the content bid CPC input blank, Google will use the advertiser’s CPC bid for clicks occurring on the content network … Google does this despite the fact that ads placed on the content network are demonstrably inferior to ads appearing on search result pages.” Ah-ha — so Google is displaying inferior ads on its AdSense program compared to its search engine-related AdWords program?

The suit goes on to say that “by redefining the universally understood meaning of an input form left blank, and then intentionally concealing this redefinition, Google has fraudulently taken millions of dollars from Plaintiff and the members of the class.” This has huge implications for Google if the true meaning of its CPC business is either not well executed or if crucial pieces of verbiage are left out. that don’t demonstrate where an advertiser’s dollars “could” go based on what network (AdWords or AdSense) they use. This will be an interesting development to watch.

A Blown Mortgage reader sent me a copy of a report published in 2004-2005 titled America’s Home Forecast: The Next Decade for Housing and Mortgage Finance (pdf) that portends the continued growth of the US housing market between 2004-2013 at an annualized rate of 5-6% depending on supply/demand issues. This report is a great read to remind us of all the BS that got thrown our way as we approached the crest of the bubble.

We should have known better when we take a closer look at the authors of the report:

Published by the Homeownership Alliance

Written By:
David Berson - Chief Economist, Fannie Mae
David Lereah - Chief Economist, National Association of Realtors®
Paul Merski - Chief Economist, Independent Community Bankers of America
Frank Nothaft - Chief Economist, Freddie Mac
David Seiders - Chief Economist, National Association of Home Builders

See any pumpers on that list?

Out of the 64-pages of bubblicious BS this below is my favorite segment:

No sign of a national home price bubble
There has not been a single year over the past half century in which the national average home value has declined in the U.S. (see Figure 18). This is a period that has included periods of both severe recession and high mortgage rates, or both (as occurred during 1981-1982 when the unemployment rate exceeded 10 percent and mortgage rates reached 18 percent). In fact, the last sustained drop in national average home values occurred during the Great Depression, when the unemployment rate hit 25 percent. With the national unemployment rate below 6 percent, mortgage rates low and economic growth improving, the likelihood of a decline in home prices at the national level is quite remote.


Figure 18
U.S. Home Prices Have Grown Every Year Since 1950
Annual Growth in Nominal Home Values

What do you think - how did we think that the roller-coaster would keep going up?

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Management, Employees, Workspace, Politics

logoFor the purposes of this examination, let’s set aside the fact that you can find reliable clinical research that shows that tobacco smokers cost the insurance industry less over their lifetimes than svelte nonsmokers do. This is simply due to the fact that we tend to die sooner. But that’s a matter of insurance industry/government/pharmaceutical hijinx, to possibly discuss another time.

That aside, the item I’m bringing forward today is how the issue of lying smokers should be pursued by Whirlpool Corp.(NYSE: WHR). I’ll not take issue against Whirlpool’s insurance plan demanding a different level of premium payment from smokers. I’ll not take issue against Whirlpool asking smokers to document their participation in the addiction. I’ll not take issue against Whirlpool taking action against smokers who lied when claiming that they don’t smoke. What I do argue against is the ludicrous notion that Whirlpool employees have turned on one another. It appears that’s what the company expects us to believe.

Whirlpool management wants you to believe that they had 39 instances of one employee reporting another for serving their nicotine addiction in violation of what should be a confidential declaration of status. Whirlpool expects you to believe that these company “rats” know which smokers lied on their paper work and which didn’t. Whirlpool expects you to believe that all policy violators are of hourly status and that violations by management staff either don’t exist or aren’t yet worth pursuing. Whirlpool expects us to believe that the company itself wasn’t at the root of this all.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Want to know why stated income loans are called liar loans? Because people lie on stated income loans. Not just some people, some of the time and by some little exaggeration. It’s most of the people, most of the time by mostly large exaggerations. Take a look at this Slate article on the liar loan and you’ll see why subprime is a drop in the bucket. Pay close attention to Mish Shedlock’s analysis of a pool of stated income loans with a median FICO of 705 and tell me we’re through the worst of it.

Remember, most of the good credit loans are ticking down to adjustment as we speak. Wave number two, gaining on the horizon is going to be grim.

From the article on the liar loans:

In 2006, a man named Steven Krystofiak gave a statement in a Federal Reserve hearing on mortgage regulation, representing an organization called the Mortgage Brokers Association for Responsible Lending. The organization had compared a sample of 100 stated income mortgage applications to IRS records.

More than 90 of the applications overstated the borrower’s income at least a little. More strikingly, more than three out of five overstated it by at least 50 percent. (emph mine) This isn’t a few people fibbing a little. This was the whole system breaking down.

The consequences are predictably depressing. A blogger named Michael Shedlock has done some terrific work tracking the performance of these kinds of loans. Shedlock analyzed one particular bundle of loans from Washington Mutual consisting of 1,765 mortgages from around May 2007, a total of $519 million in loans.

These were not “subprime” loans. The borrowers’ average credit score was 705, well within prime territory. This is a fairly typical package of loans for a mortgage-backed security, but one thing that does make it stand out is the proportion of these loans that didn’t ask for income documents: 88 percent.

Historically, a year into the life of a loan, well less than 1 percent of typical prime loans would be 30 days late or more. By the end of January, when Shedlock first looked at it, just eight months after the loans were made, almost one in five were at least 60 days overdue.

Shedlock looked at it again two months later, at the end of March. The results:

  • Eighteen percent of the loans are already in foreclosure—or have already been seized by Washington Mutual.
  • One in four of this bundle of liar loans is already 60 days past due.

Source [blownmortgage]

Many people reading this blog from states with moderate housing prices have a very hard time understanding how a family earning $100,000 a year is having a challenging time staying in the middle class ranks. The idea of a six-figure income certainly doesn’t connote the same wealthy status as it did a decade ago. […]
Related Posts:
The Credit Conundrum: The New Loan Shark is the Fed.
Are you a Don Quixote or Hamlet of Housing?
Massive Inventory Decrease in Southern California. Is This the Fabled Bottom?
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Downey. $100,000 off in 3 Months.
The Invisible Mortgage Hand: Analysis of a Society That Forces You Into Debt.

Many people reading this blog from states with moderate housing prices have a very hard time understanding how a family earning $100,000 a year is having a challenging time staying in the middle class ranks. The idea of a six-figure income certainly doesn’t connote the same wealthy status as it did a decade ago. But where is all the money going then? Now that we are quickly approaching the great Wal-Mart voucher stimulus revolution and will see our accounts increase by $600 to $2,400 depending on our family situation, once we look at the cost of monthly items we realize that this money is a drop in the bucket for most Americans. In fact, there is so much debt out there that many are now saying they’ll use the money to pay off current debt or save; certainly not the intention of what the current government has in mind. They would love nothing more if you went and blew your stimulus check on a new laptop or stove and one month later, are back in the same spot.

This is the problem with deficit spending on many levels. At a certain point debt will crush an economy if it is not handled properly. We have done an abysmal job managing debt over the past few decades and now we are seeing the after effects of this. Today I want to put out a hypothetical budget for a family with 2 kids earning $100,000 a year and show you how easily it is to go into debt. This data is conservative and I will talk about a few of major line items later in the article. So now I present to you going broke on $100,000 a year:

California Family Budget

We’ll go into detail on a few line items. First, I want to show you that the above family is running a deficit of $1,076 per month. Nothing unusual from the above profile. Family bought a modest home in Southern California, has 2 cars, and has many of the items we would associate with middle class living. They also save a modest amount for retirement in their 401(k) and pay taxes unlike Blade. They have additional expenses with healthcare, feel the pinch of higher gasoline, and are seeing their grocery bill increase.

We are assuming that the above family purchased a $385,000 home here in Southern California with a down payment of $35,000. As many of you may know, over the past decade many families bought with zero, 3, or 5 percent down so we are in fact being conservative with the above number. If we were to use a smaller down payment the actual monthly debt would increase. $385,000 does not buy much home in Southern California. In fact, only until 2008 and the ongoing correction in prices, was $385,000 considered chump change and you’d be lucky to get a condo for this price in a safe neighborhood with good schools, something a family with kids would be concerned about. Where did I get this $385,000 number? I simply pulled it out of data from March 2008 sales:

“The median price paid for a Southland home was $385,000 last month, the lowest since $380,000 in April 2004. Last month’s median was down 5.6 percent from February’s $408,000, and down a record 23.8 percent from $505,000 in February 2007. That peak median of $505,000 was reached several times last spring and summer.”

You’ll also notice that prices for Southern California are now back down to April 2004 levels. Of course prices at this point were in a bubble so assuming we are at a bottom is naïve and ignoring the actual foreclosures and trends that we will be seeing for another few years. California property taxes are capped at 1 percent of the assessed value of the home plus local area bonded indebtedness:

“In 1978, California voters passed Proposition 13, which substantially reduced property tax rates. As a result, the maximum levy cannot exceed 1% of a property’s assessed value (plus bonded indebtedness and direct assessment taxes). Increases in assessed value are limited to 2% annually.”

In the above we are using a 1.25% tax rate which includes local area bonds, again a somewhat conservative assessment. I want to point out that I’ve been hearing on the radio companies looking to help you reassess your property to lower your rate. Through Proposition 8 (not to be confused with Preparation H) you can do this on your own:

“· You must demonstrate that on January 1, the market value of your property was less than its current assessed value.

  • You must file a claim form for a Decline-in-Value Reassessment Application (Prop.8)with the Assessor between January 1 and December 31 for the fiscal year beginning on July 1. If December 31 falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or a legal holiday, an application is valid if either filed or mailed and postmarked by the next business day.”

So save yourself some money and do it yourself. Just run the numbers, in the end you are probably saving a few hundred dollars to maybe a thousand a year. Why not use your rebate check to reassess your property! The ironic fact about this is you are still going to pay an appraiser to tell you your property is worth less which if you own a home in Southern California and bought in recent years, is probably the reality.

The next item we are looking at closely is fuel prices. People drive around a lot in Southern California especially in Los Angeles. The current Los Angeles average is $3.85 a gallon:

Gas Los Angeles

We’ll assume that you tack on 15,000 miles per year per car. I put on a bit over this and your numbers of course will vary. We’ll assume that both cars get 25 miles per gallon. So how much money are you spending a year on fuel?

(15,000/25mpg) = 600 gallons x $3.85 = $2,310 per car X 2 = $4,620 per year or $385 per month

I’ll leave the $300 per month fuel cost since you may have more economical vehicles and may also drive less but the above equation is simply to give you an idea that we are being extremely conservative here. Plus, how many mega gas guzzlers do you see on the freeway or streets in your neighborhood? Clearly the price can go much higher.

You know many people forget to include the additional costs of owning a home. When plumbing goes bad you have to pay to get it fixed. If your roof needs to be replaced, that comes out of your wallet. What about lawn services? Garbage pickup? There are many other unforeseen costs associated with owning a home which many people simply do not factor into their budget. They simply assume the principal and interest is all they’ll need to worry about. Also, which impacts both homeowner and renter, is the rise in energy costs for homes. Again this eats away at your bottom line. That rebate check makes no impact for the average American because the above line items seem like they are here to stay for the foreseeable future.

What if you want to send your kids to college?

College Cost

*Source: State Farm Insurance

Where are you going to save for that given that the above hypothetical family is already running a $1,076 deficit? If you pull back on say cable that will create job losses in certain areas connected to this field. Maybe you cut back on clothing. Retailers are already seeing this pain. And in fact, that is what we are seeing even with the recent announcement that Target is seeing an increase in their charge-off rate:

Calculated Risk: “Target Corp., the second-largest U.S. discount chain, said it wrote off 8.1 percent of its credit-card loans in March as consumers grappled with job losses and the biggest housing slump in a quarter century.

Defaults during the month totaled $55.5 million, the Minneapolis-based retailer said in a regulatory filing today. The charge-off rate was 6.8 percent in February.”

And there you have it. Going broke with a $100,000 income. And these people aren’t the folks leasing BMWs or Lexus cars but living a more modest middle class lifestyle. The fact of the matter is, life just got a whole lot more expensive because your green dollar in your wallet is magically disappearing and we don’t need David Blaine for that kind of magic. You can thank the true magicians on Wall Street and Washington D.C. for that.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information

Related Posts:
The Credit Conundrum: The New Loan Shark is the Fed.
Are you a Don Quixote or Hamlet of Housing?
Massive Inventory Decrease in Southern California. Is This the Fabled Bottom?
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Downey. $100,000 off in 3 Months.
The Invisible Mortgage Hand: Analysis of a Society That Forces You Into Debt.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Filed under: Forecasts, Bad news, Economic data, Housing, Recession

The United States is an enormous, diverse nation, and there’s perhaps no better evidence of that than the U.S.’s current economic cycle.

The finances of many states have deteriorated to such a degree that they appear to be in recession, even though the nation as a whole may not be, a survey of 50 state fiscal directors concluded.

The states: budget deficits abound

The National Conference of State Legislatures’ survey says that “arguing whether the national economy is in recession is almost beside the point” because the fiscal condition of some states has declined so much that they appear to be in a recession.

In all, 23 states, including hard-hit housing slump states Florida, California, and Nevada, expect to report budget deficits in the next fiscal year, fiscal 2009, with the aggregate revenue shortfall reaching $26 billion. Further, more than two-thirds of the states said they are concerned or pessimistic regarding their F2009 revenue outlook.

Historically, most states experience a decline in revenue as the U.S. economy contracts, as the economic slowdown results in lower retail sales, which lowers sales tax revenue — a major source of revenue for many states. Job layoffs also decrease state income tax revenue. Further, state social service costs typically increase, as unemployment claims increase and applications for income/food/energy assistance rise.

Florida, California hard hit

Economist Peter Dawson told BloggingStocks Friday the NCSL data is in-line with the profile of this cycle’s economic slowdown. “From the research we can see that the states under most stress are those that rank very high regarding mortgage default and housing foreclosure lists, with Florida and California being the most obvious examples,” Dawson said. “These states are going to be under fiscal stress for a considerable period of time due to the size of their housing correction.”

Moreover, Dawson said because of California’s and Florida’s size, “it will be very hard for the nation to grow at capacity until these states have started to grow.” Hence, a return to robust economic conditions nationally, “could be a year to 18 months off, assuming growth resumes nationally by late 2008,” he said.

Continue reading Many states appear to be in recession, fiscal survey shows

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Earnings reports, Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), Yahoo! (YHOO), Apple Inc (AAPL), International Business Machines (IBM)

Please join me later today when I will be live blogging Google’s earnings:
Where: Google Earnings: Live Blog
When: 4:00pm EST

Google will be releasing its quarterly earnings numbers after the bell on Thursday, April 17. This is a key quarter as many questions have recently been raised and investors are wondering if we may finally see a chink in the earnings-armor for this amazing growth story. There is sure to be a great deal of meaningful information in the earnings release, along with the conference call, that will help to give investors more insight as to the direction of the tech sector.

If IBM (NYSE: IBM) gives us any clue as to the technology sector’s ability to maintain insulation from the financial chaos we have been dealing with, we may see a glorious rebound for Google shareholders. But remember: IBM actually sells tangible products and services that can be bought with non-dollar currencies. In yesterday’s earnings release, IBM Global services was reported as the top revenue generator for the period. So, it is possible that the strength of foreign currencies helped to provide a good portion of IBM’s profits.

Perhaps Google will be able to capitalize on some of the currency exchange benefit; but probably not with any real significance. This is just one of the line items that we are going to find out after the close.


I will be taking apart the data and figuring out the answers to many of the questions that are on the minds of investors. Your input via comments will be addressed as well.

Areas I will cover (or at least try):

  • Fundamentals (the balance sheet and earnings statements)
  • Technicals (charts and indicators)
  • Upgrades and Downgrades
  • Outlook

Starting at 4:00, I will be answering your questions and starting at 4:15pm I will begin to post commentary, updates and analyst actions. Then, at 4:30pm, the conference call will be reported and we should have answers to some of these questions:

  • The earnings outlook in the face of a Yahoo!/Microsoft merger
  • Impact on Google’s near term outlook considering a global slowdown
  • Google’s plan for the 700mhz spectrum.
  • Will Google finally announce the GPhone?
  • How the 2-week Yahoo! search monetization test are fairing
  • Projections for Google’s entry into the China marketplace
  • YouTube monetization strategy
  • Effect of the new Microsoft Live Search announcement: A Google News Killer?
  • Paid clicks…ComScore shows a weak result for March. Sign of times or aberration?
  • Salesforce (NYSE: CRM) and Google. Are business’s ready for cloud computing? Are we finally “always-on?”

What are some of your concerns, questions and thoughts? I will try to incorporate them into the LiveBloggin’ session.

Live Bloggin’ Google Earnings with Andrew Horowitz, author of The Disciplined Investor and host of The Disciplined Investor Podcast.

Filed under: Earnings reports, Intel (INTC), International Business Machines (IBM), Advanced Micro Dev (AMD), Texas Instruments (TXN), Technical Analysis, Stocks to Buy

Cymer (Nasdaq: CYMI) makes excimer light sources for manufacturers of photolithography tools in the semiconductor equipment industry. It offers field support products, customized to support chipmaker customers in their advanced wafer patterning processes. It also provides deep ultraviolet light sources to lithography tool makers, who integrate the sources into their wafer steppers and scanners for subsequent sale to chipmakers. Cymer has installed more than 3,000 light sources around the world, in plants run by the likes of Advanced Micro Devices (NYSE: AMD), IBM (NYSE: IBM), Intel (NASDAQ: INTC) and Texas Instruments (NYSE: TXN).

Investors were pleased earlier in the week, when the firm announced a $100 million buyback program and then issued a solid quarterly summary. Cymer reported Q1 EPS of 41 cents and revenues of $124 million. Analysts had been looking for 35 cents and $119.3 million. Management also said Q2 revenues would be comparable to the Q1 total of $124 million ($116.6M consensus) and that gross margins would hold at approximately 48%.

Continue reading Cymer (CYMI): Prices define bullish ‘pennant’ formation

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Close
E-mail It