Archive for May 2nd, 2008

Filed under: Major movement, Earnings reports, Good news, Industry, Chesapeake Energy (CHK), Options, Technical Analysis, Oil

CHK logoChesapeake Energy (NYSE: CHK) shares are trading higher after CHK reported a first-quarter loss of $132 million, or 29 cents per share, last night. However, CHK shares are rising today, as the company’s adjusted profit came to $561 million, or $1.09 per share, beating analyst estimates of 93 cents per share. If you think that the stock won’t fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on CHK.

After hitting a one-year low of $31.38 in August, the stock hit a one-year high of $55.00 last week. CHK opened this morning at $51.82. So far today the stock has hit a low of $50.70 and a high of $52.82. As of 12:35, CHK is trading at $52.67, up $1.73 (3.4%). The chart for CHK looks bullish and steady, while S&P gives the stock a bullish 4 Stars (out of 5) buy rating.

Continue reading Chesapeake Energy (CHK) soars on Q1 earnings

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

A Blown Mortgage reader sent me a copy of a report published in 2004-2005 titled America’s Home Forecast: The Next Decade for Housing and Mortgage Finance (pdf) that portends the continued growth of the US housing market between 2004-2013 at an annualized rate of 5-6% depending on supply/demand issues. This report is a great read to remind us of all the BS that got thrown our way as we approached the crest of the bubble.

We should have known better when we take a closer look at the authors of the report:

Published by the Homeownership Alliance

Written By:
David Berson - Chief Economist, Fannie Mae
David Lereah - Chief Economist, National Association of Realtors®
Paul Merski - Chief Economist, Independent Community Bankers of America
Frank Nothaft - Chief Economist, Freddie Mac
David Seiders - Chief Economist, National Association of Home Builders

See any pumpers on that list?

Out of the 64-pages of bubblicious BS this below is my favorite segment:

No sign of a national home price bubble
There has not been a single year over the past half century in which the national average home value has declined in the U.S. (see Figure 18). This is a period that has included periods of both severe recession and high mortgage rates, or both (as occurred during 1981-1982 when the unemployment rate exceeded 10 percent and mortgage rates reached 18 percent). In fact, the last sustained drop in national average home values occurred during the Great Depression, when the unemployment rate hit 25 percent. With the national unemployment rate below 6 percent, mortgage rates low and economic growth improving, the likelihood of a decline in home prices at the national level is quite remote.


Figure 18
U.S. Home Prices Have Grown Every Year Since 1950
Annual Growth in Nominal Home Values

What do you think - how did we think that the roller-coaster would keep going up?

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Google (GOOG), Yahoo! (YHOO), eBay (EBAY), Toyota Motor Corp. (TM), Money and Finance Today, Boeing Co (BA), News Corp’B’ (NWS), Delta Air Lines (DAL)

In the News:

A new memo from Fifth Third notifies recipients that effective immediately (with a little time to fund the existing pipeline) that the bank is out of the Alt-A business entirely. And in a refreshing turn - all sales channels are affected. Retail and wholesale alike will lose Alt-A products previously offered by the “super-regional” bank.

Here’s a copy of the announcement:

Important Announcement
Please circulate as appropriate

BULLETIN

Announcing Alt A Lending Program Discontinued
Effective In All Channels

To: All Mortgage Sales and Operational Personnel

Fifth Third Mortgage is announcing they are discontinuing offering Alt A lending programs in all Channels.

What needs to happen in managing your pipeline:

Retail/Direct:

  • All Alt A applications in the pipeline dated on or before Monday May 5, 2008, must be locked by close-of-business Monday May 5, 2008 by 5PM Eastern Standard Time.
  • All loans must be closed by May 23, 2008

Wholesale:

  • All Alt A applications in the pipeline must be registered and locked by close-of-business Friday May 2, 2008, by 5PM Eastern Standard Time.
  • No registrations will be accepted after 5PM Eastern Standard Time, May 2, 2008
  • All loans must be closed and funded by May 23, 2008

NO EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED TO CLOSE/FUND BEYOND MAY 23, 2008 (ALL CHANNELS)

Thank You,
Fifth Third Mortgage Company

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Small business

This week, I looked over the financials of a struggling business (essentially, the slowing economy is taking a toll). I was seeing if I could find some ways to cut costs.

Looking through the line items, I noticed some large legal bills. And, digging some more, I learned that the company was using a big-time law firm.

“You really don’t need this kind of level of legal services,” I said. “Besides, you can shop around for an attorney.”

I also had some other suggestions:

DIY (Do-It-Yourself) Legal: You can gather your own legal advice for free. Just doing a routine Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) search, you’ll notice many legal websites. However, you need to be wary. Do you know the quality of the content?

I think a better approach is to focus on well-established sources like:

  • AllBusiness.com: The site is chock full of helpful content and is backed by Dun & Bradstreet (NYSE: DNB).
  • U.S. Legal Forms: You’ll find thousands of vetted legal forms (at affordable prices).
  • Nolo: Founded in the early 1970s, this company is now the premier publisher of self-help legal guides (and I’ve bought quite a few books from them).

Affordable Service Providers: If a DIY approach seems scary, there is a middle ground. There are online services that help with such things as incorporations, trademarks, copyrights, and even patents.

The top player in the sector is LegalZoom. Actually, I recently had a chance to visit the headquarters, which has an impressive setup. In a way, it’s an efficient supply chain - with a call center, experts, proofreaders and so on that process legal documents.

More importantly, you’ll only be spending a fraction of what a big-time attorney will charge you.

Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including The Complete M&A Handbook (www.mergerbook.com) and is also a principal in Averiware, which provides an ERP system to small and midsize businesses.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), Yahoo! (YHOO)

Bloomberg News reports that Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ: MSFT) CEO Steve Ballmer said he did not think it made sense for it to buy Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG). Ballmer cited the high price as well as regulatory and antitrust concerns. Meanwhile, Ballmer said he had no plans to raise his $31 a share cash and stock bid for Yahoo (NASDAQ: YHOO).

But if Ballmer is really interested in advertising, he would get a much more powerful player in Google. After all, Yahoo, which has four more days to consider Microsoft’s offer, saw its sales climb a modest 14% last quarter, while Google sales spiked 46%. And the stock market gave Yahoo a Bronx cheer — slicing 2% off its value this morning on yesterday’s earnings announcement — compared to a 20% surge in Google’s market capitalization on its announcement.

Could Microsoft afford to buy Google? Yes. Google’s current market capitalization of $174 billion is $111 billion less than Microsoft’s $285 billion. If Microsoft offered to swap stock with Google at a 20% premium — a $209 billion deal — Microsoft would end up paying 73% of its shares to own Google. And in so doing, it would create a company with $68 billion in revenues and $18.2 billion in profit.

Sure, there would be all sorts of regulatory challenges getting the deal done. And it’s hard to imagine that the two companies’ cultures would mesh that well. Nevertheless, it would eliminate what for Microsoft is the most vexing of competitors.

And it would be welcomed by fee-starved investment banks as well.

Peter Cohan is President of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College and edits The Cohan Letter . He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned.

Filed under: Options

Bare Escentuals (NASDAQ:BARE), a mineral based cosmetics company, is recently up 51c to $22.26. BARE is expected to report Q1 EPS after the close tonight. BARE call option volume of 487 contracts compares to put volume of 6,391 contracts. BARE May option implied volatility of 100 is above its 26-week average of 57 according to Track Data, suggesting larger risk.

Options Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

It is hard to wrap your mind around the size of the American housing market. Today’s Case-Shiller Index reported a further deterioration in the housing market. The difficulty in determining what real estate was valued at the absolute peak is somewhat hard to determine since many regions hit peaks at various different times. […]
Related Posts:
Summer and Housing in the Garden of Eden. 3 Reasons Why Housing Will Soar This Summer!
Lords of Housing: Believing in the $22.5 Trillion Housing Market.
Current Status of Real Estate Market: Boring!
Of Bubbles Past. Need a Map for Housing? Ask a Housing Perma-Bull and They’ll See the World Through Colored Glasses!
The Psychology of a Crashing Housing Market: Sending in Your Home Keys Just Got Easier.

It is hard to wrap your mind around the size of the American housing market. Today’s Case-Shiller Index reported a further deterioration in the housing market. The difficulty in determining what real estate was valued at the absolute peak is somewhat hard to determine since many regions hit peaks at various different times. The one major thing that we can do however is take a look at the composite of the 20 cities used in the Case-Shiller Index and see when the peak was reached. Why use the Case-Shiller Index? It is generally seen as the most reliable source of price changes since it uses a repeat sales pricing technique. What we can then do to get a general estimate of the total housing value is use the Federal Flow of Funds Account and take a look at the value of homeowner equity near the peak, followed by looking at mortgage debt to get a general idea of the size of the United State residential real estate market. First let us look at the Case-Shiller chart:

Case Shiller

As you can see from the chart, the peak was reached in July of 2006 for the 20 composite index. The next step we’ll look at is from the Federal Flow of Funds Account which looks to show real estate peaking at least in value in the third quarter of 2007:

Fed Flow

The next step of course will be to look at total mortgage debt during this time to see how much equity was flying around out there:

mortgage debt

So let us use the $22.2 trillion of real estate wealth that was achieved in the first quarter of 2007. Next, we will subtract the total mortgage debt of $9.854 trillion that was reached by the end of 2006.

$22.2 trillion - $9.854 trillion = $12.346 trillion in equity (55 percent equity)

Of course we can trust these numbers only so far as we believe the Fed didn’t see a housing bubble but what else do we have to work off of? So let us now fast forward and use the same data but for the current environment:

$22.48 trillion - $10.5 trillion = $11.98 trillion in equity (53 percent equity)

Well of course, this is a load of crap assuming that only $366 billion was lost as of the end of the forth quarter in 2007. I rather we use our own measurement and apply the current Case-Shiller Index drop to the $22.4 trillion total real estate wealth which seems to be as accurate as we are ever going to get in trying to assess a bubble. The recent report with 20 cities has a 12.7 percent drop. Let us run this more realistic scenario:

$22.4 trillion x 12.7% = $2.84 trillion in equity gone

Of course, this should be the bigger story as opposed to folks going insane and begging for an 18-cent tax moratorium on gas. I’m starting to realize that a vast amount of people are financially penny wise and pound foolish. Let us run a quick calculation why the so-called gas tax moratorium is a bunch of crap. We’ll even assume you drive a massive gas guzzling H2 Hummer for the sake of argument:

“Forbes notes “H2 gets a paltry 13 mpg on the highway and 10 mpg in the city” Motortrend observed 12 mpg. Car and Driver observed 10 mpg. A reviewer at about.com got 8.6 mpg. Edmunds got 9.2 mpg. Four Wheeler magazine observed 10.8 mpg in their final long term report of an H2 SUT. Their worst tank was 7.2 mpg and best tank was 15.3 mpg, pretty high for an enormous SUV.”

Okay, we’ll say that the Hummer gets 11 mpg just to be generous here. So what is the grand plan?

“NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — Amid record gas prices and a faltering economy, Sen. John McCain called for suspending the federal gas tax Tuesday - a call that was met with skepticism from many experts.

In a wide ranging economic speech at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee called for a hiatus in the 18.4 cent-a-gallon federal gas tax from Memorial Day until Labor Day - the period when vacationing Americans spend the most time on the road.

“The effect will be an immediate economic stimulus - taking a few dollars off the price of a tank of gas every time a family, a farmer, or trucker stops to fill up,” said McCain.”

“Most of the money is used to fund highway projects. Suspending the gas tax during the summer would leave a funding gap of about $10 billion.”

More deficits! Are these people really serious? Okay, from Memorial Day until Labor Day, we have roughly 4 months of driving. Let us assume you are typical and drive around 15,000 miles per year, which works out to be 1,250 miles per month. So over a 4 month period we’ll be driving our H2 for 5,000 miles. At 11 mpg let us run the numbers to see how much we’ll save:

6,000 miles / 11 mpg = 545 gallons needed

545 x 18.4 cents = $100.28 grand total saved!

Bwahahaha! Holy crap we are so screwed. All this insanity over a freaking $100 bucks? And guess how much money the average American just lost in home equity? Let us take a look at the median new home price for the United States and the median price for a home in Los Angeles:

La vs nation

And the trend is heading lower. Instead of focusing on how in one year we have lost nearly $3 trillion in real estate equity (which of course it really wasn’t lost since it was all a mega bubble mirage) we are fighting over chump change with gas at the pump. I do believe that higher fuel costs do make their way into higher consumer inflation on goods and services but to argue about a moratorium on the tax and putting us into a further hole is flat out disturbing. But clearly math isn’t the forte of our California government either:

“April 29 (Bloomberg) — California’s deficit could reach as high as $20 billion, nearly one-fifth of the state’s budget, by July because of a slumping economy and required spending, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s office said.

Schwarzenegger’s spokesman Aaron McLear says the gap could grow by $10 billion on top of $7.4 billion already expected for the fiscal year that begins July 1. The creation of a rainy day fund Schwarzenegger proposed in January would add another $2.8 billion to the gap.

The ballooning deficit comes amid release today of the S&P/Case-Shiller composite home-price index for January, covering 10 cities nationwide, which fell the most in its 21- year history and left California among the hardest-hit states. Schwarzenegger, a 60-year-old Republican, has touted the budget crisis in a push to get lawmakers to consider a constitutional amendment limiting future spending.”

Early in the year, it was $14.5 billion. Then it jumped to $16 billion. Now we’re at $20 billion? Talk about having no idea where money is going.

“Schwarzenegger in January proposed a budget with a 10 percent, across-the-board spending cut. McLear said the amount may grow. Schwarzenegger in February ordered state agencies to stop hiring and scrap new equipment purchases as part of a plan to save $100 million this year.

The Legislature on Feb. 15 passed a series of bills to eliminate $3.3 billion from the budget gap for the current fiscal year by cutting spending and deferring payments until next year. Also in February, the state sold $3 billion in deficit bonds to help close the gap this year.”

Now tell me, what other industries are going to start hiring to boost the so-called phantom housing bottom especially here in California? Never mind the astounding fact that according to the California Association of Realtors the median price statewide is now off by a stunning 30 percent.

It only logically follows that real estate declining will hurt a state that is utterly dependent and obsessed with all things real estate. My calculations above may be off by a few billion since the data itself is based on bubble prices and assessments but hey, I’m in good company with our Governator.  As long as we come in near $3 trillion we’re doing okay based on government math.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information

Related Posts:
Summer and Housing in the Garden of Eden. 3 Reasons Why Housing Will Soar This Summer!
Lords of Housing: Believing in the $22.5 Trillion Housing Market.
Current Status of Real Estate Market: Boring!
Of Bubbles Past. Need a Map for Housing? Ask a Housing Perma-Bull and They’ll See the World Through Colored Glasses!
The Psychology of a Crashing Housing Market: Sending in Your Home Keys Just Got Easier.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Filed under: Earnings reports, Exxon Mobil (XOM), Valero Energy (VLO)

Bloomberg News reports that ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM) reported a disappointing first quarter — making only $10.9 billion in net profit. This crushingly poor performance of $2.03 a share was 10 cents below analyst expectations.

Regrettably, Exxon simply cannot produce enough product to take advantage of the record prices for oil and gas. Its 17% profit increase lagged behind the gains of 25% and 63% reported this week by Royal Dutch Shell Plc and BP Plc. Meanwhile Exxon’s oil and gas production fell 5.6% and — like Valero Energy (NYSE: VLO) the profit margins in its gasoline and chemical refineries were squeezed by their inability to raise prices enough to offset the rise in the price of the oil that goes into these refineries.

Another “crushing” blow for Exxon analysts was the mere 34% rise to $116.9 billion in its revenues. This was almost $2.6 billion below analyst estimates. The good news, if there can be any in such an abysmal report, is that Exxon is planning to increase spending on new wells and plant expansions by at least 20% this year to more than $25 billion.

Continue reading Exxon’s “bitter” earnings disappointment

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Close
E-mail It