Archive for May 7th, 2008

Filed under: Forecasts, Bad news, Economic data, Housing, Recession

Sales of existing homes in fell 1.0% in March 2008, the National Association of Realtors announced Wednesday, as the prospect of continued home price declines discouraged potential buyers.

The NAR’s existing home sales index declined to 83.0 in March 2008. The index totaled a revised 83.8 in February 2008, and stood at 103.9 in March 2007.

Economists surveyed by Bloomberg News had expected the March 2008 existing home sales index to drop to 83.8%.

Regional conditions vary

Conditions varied by region. In the Midwest, the index fell 10.4% in March 2008 to 74.1; in the West, the index fell 1.4% to 91.2, and in the South, it fell 0.1% to 84.9. In the Northeast, the index rose 12.5% to 80.8%.

Continue reading March U.S. existing home sales index falls 1% as American delay purchases

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Zillow posted some interesting analysis today in which they claim that 50% of all home buyers who purchased a home in 2006 are now in a negative equity situation - underwater. That’s a mind-boggling stat don’t you think? It’s a coin flip really if you’re ahead or buried. Well probably not a coin flip as it is most likely self-selecting for the folks that stretched on financing in bubblesque territory.

To wit from Inman News on the 90% of the 2006 crop of Las Vegas home buyers who are upside down:

In the Las Vegas metro, about nine out of 10 homeowners who purchased in 2006 owe more than their home is worth.

From Zillow and their take on the housing market:

Conditions continued to worsen in Q1 as U.S. home values continued their slide down with the Zindex posting a 7.7% year-over-year decline, the sharpest decline we’ve ever seen in our data, which extends back to 1996. Not surprisingly, the market decline brought with it increasing rates of negative equity, with one out of two homeowners who purchased during the national market peak in 2006 currently “underwater” on their mortgage, or owing more on their mortgage than the home is currently worth. Even more alarming is the finding that almost 45% of homeowners who purchased last year (2007) are already underwater on their mortgages, a fact that drives home the rapidity of the market depreciation.

Here’s a great graph that represents the percentage of negative equity home owners by year purchased. 2007 was the wrong year to be buying as well.

negative equity graph

Of course, the analysis is based on the Zestimates so you have to take it with a grain of salt; but nevertheless it does point to some interesting insight for those folks looking to time the market.

From the looks of the graph it seems clear to me that we are way to early in to this thing to be calling bottom and for pointing out bargains. Nearly a third of buyers from this year (!!) are already underwater which doesn’t inspire a ton of confidence to run out there and try to find a “bargain.” Let’s duly trot out the all real estate is local refrain to placate the glass half-fuller’s but still is it an astonishing reality to anyone else that half of all home owners are underwater who purchased in 2006/2007?

And what does that mean to those markets? How long are the folks who stretched at the top of the market who are now upside down going to stick it out? How many more foreclosures are we going to see out of that ‘vintage’ of home owners? It does not portend a speedy recovery.

As I’ve said in the past don’t worry about missing this real estate bottom. As long as you’re not dead you’ll be able to spot it and take advantage of it. If you’re shopping for a home take your time if you value your money.

Source [blownmortgage]

I’m not sure at what exact point did “saving” become a four letter word. The predicament that we now find ourselves in has an origin in a decade long spending binge. For many decades in our nation’s history, we were a lender and large exporter to other countries so this is a relatively […]
Related Posts:
The Credit Conundrum: The New Loan Shark is the Fed.
Ponzi Financing – The House that Credit Built.
The Plague of Housing: Why we Will Feel and Be Poorer Because of the Housing Bust.
Are you a Debt Slave?
The Housing Wave of the Future: Two Main Mortgage Tsunamis.

I’m not sure at what exact point did “saving” become a four letter word. The predicament that we now find ourselves in has an origin in a decade long spending binge. For many decades in our nation’s history, we were a lender and large exporter to other countries so this is a relatively new phenomenon that we now have to borrow and go into deficits. I find it hard to believe that the market cheers when retail sales come in slightly lower and in another report, we find out that the public is utilizing credit cards at a higher rate to maintain these higher spending levels. What has occurred is the borrowing binge from real estate has now shifted to the last fortress of hope, the plastic credit card. And guess what? Your government doesn’t want you to save! In fact, it seems like policies are being put into place to force you back on the perpetual hamster wheel of spending. Just to give you some proof, let us look at the rate of U.S. Treasury I Savings Bonds:

Saving I Bonds

I bonds are a relatively safe and good addition to any portfolio. They provide a fixed rate of return plus an inflation rate. Or I should say, they used to provide a fixed rate of return. Currently I Bonds are paying 4.84% which includes the abysmal 0% fixed rate. The government here can easily increase the demand for people to save but take a look at the above track record. If anything, they are making it more and more difficult for those looking for safe investments to actually park their money. It is a sad attempt to punish savers and force people out to consume more which has become 72 percent of our GDP. The rebate checks are now hitting bank accounts and only time will tell what kind of impact they will have.

Yet in 2007, they reduced the maximum amount a person can invest in I Bonds from $30,000 a year to $5,000:

“If 98 percent of all annual purchases of savings bonds by individuals are for $5,000 or less, why does the Treasury Department feel it necessary to reduce the amount of savings bonds purchased?

The Treasury press release identifies a desire to get the program back to its roots of serving individuals with small amounts to invest.

It’s hard to argue with that. However, if 98 percent of the purchases already fit that pattern, why bother with the revised standards?”

Actually, there are ways people can get around this by buying both the paper form and the electronic form ($10,000) but the point is that they are making it more complicated for people to save. The logic they give for the reduction is something I do not buy. The roots of saving simply are not in line with what the fixed rate did this month. It is down right maddening how policies are being taken to punish savers. Another reason for this is I Bonds are also linked to the CPI for inflation and have you noticed the price of things recently? It is very likely that if rates spiral out of control and the market starts unwinding further, these guaranteed investments may be very lucrative. And at that point we may find out that they simply discontinued these things altogether.

The employment numbers on Friday weren’t so encouraging either giving us our 4th straight month of employment contraction:

bls.jpg

The market ended the day higher simply because the forecast was set for 70,000 job losses and we only got 20,000. This is the world we now live in. The market is simply cheering the fact that estimates weren’t as bad as projected but forget to examine the deeper meaning of this all. If we aren’t in a recession why is it that we are losing jobs?

No More Water in the Well

The absurd amount of mortgage equity withdrawals during this decade went hand and hand with the massive housing bubble. People for the most part used this new found money and pumped it back into the economy. Normally Americans used to keep most of their equity in their home but this psychological shift occurred and we saw marketing ads with messages such as:

“Why let your equity sit in your home and do nothing?”
“Tap the potential of your housing ATM!”

“Refinance and take cash out!”

“Take that trip or buy that new car with your HELOC!”

Here’s the chart to show you the insanity visually:

mew.gif

The amount of money being withdrawn has steadily been declining and now with the credit crunch and prices falling, the well is truly dry. In fact, some lenders are simply reducing home equity lines on customers in certain areas to protect themselves. So much for thinking that money was always going to be there. Given the negative savings rate and the golden goose not pumping out anymore gold, many Americans simply jumped to the final debt product, the credit card. The number is now somewhere near the $1 trillion mark:

“(Fortune Magazine) — This past summer’s subprime meltdown involved about $900 billion in now-suspect securitized debt, reckless lending, and consumers who buckled under the weight of loans they couldn’t afford. Now another link in the consumer debt chain - credit cards - is starting to show signs of strain. And the fear that the $915 billion in U.S. credit card debt (an uncannily similar figure) may blow up has major financial institutions like Citigroup, American Express, and Bank of America strapping on their Kevlar vests.”

This past decade saw Americans spending and avoiding saving because of massive consumption. But looking at this data, it looks like Americans are going to continue on avoiding saving but for another reason; this time many will not save because they simply cannot and have no where else to go. The credit unwinding will continue.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information

Related Posts:
The Credit Conundrum: The New Loan Shark is the Fed.
Ponzi Financing – The House that Credit Built.
The Plague of Housing: Why we Will Feel and Be Poorer Because of the Housing Bust.
Are you a Debt Slave?
The Housing Wave of the Future: Two Main Mortgage Tsunamis.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Back as the credit crunch was picking up steam wholesale account reps would parade in to our offices touting the saving grace of our brokerage - reverse mortgages. As a FHA-approved lender we were eligible to write reverse mortgages for seniors who had lots of equity, little cash, and no other assets to live off of (for the most part). These wholesale reps were excited because their banks had just opened up a new wave of products called “jumbo reverse mortgages” which went far beyond the lending limits of the FHA-insured Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (HECM) for high-value areas such as California.

The siren call was the same - these loans were expensive and property-owners strapped for cash had little opportunity to extract equity in any other way. The jumbo reverse mortgages were the best solution and represented a hefty payday in times that were clearly becoming more lean and more mean as the credit crunch got into high gear. Jumbo reverse mortgages allowed homeowners who lived in expensive homes to tap large amounts of equity to support their retirement by either pulling out a lump sum of cash, taking a monthly stipend or opening up a line of credit. Without a monthly payment these loans are attractive to retirees looking for additional income.

Jumbo Reverse Mortgages Disappear Rather Quietly

But as the credit crunch has accelerated and the market for residential loan products dried up reverse mortgages became less attractive to investors. With property values declining and inflation increasing the risk profile of a “jumbo” reverse mortgage became too severe for banks. Specialists in reverse mortgages such as Financial Freedom quietly pulled the plug on their jumbo reverse mortgages back in March to little fanfare at the time. More recently Bank of America, UBS and Credit Suisse did the same.

The elimination of these products makes complete sense from a lender’s perspective. With housing prices dropping like a rock in water in the most highly-priced areas (such as California) the jumbo reverse mortgage were no longer a good bet. Lenders were more likely to end up with an undervalued asset at the maturation of the loan.

Unfortunately it has crippled retirees who were banking on home equity to make it through retirement.

Seniors banking on their house find themselves stuck

Seniors in California and other high-value areas who held on to their home as their primary retirement vehicle have been completely upended by the declining housing market, tightening underwriting guidelines and the elimination of jumbo reverse mortgage products. Many who were banking on their home and a reverse mortgage loan have found their borrowing capacity with the reverse mortgage to has been filleted - and those looking for the biggest loans are staring at the prospect of a very small reverse mortgage with very little cash as a result.

To add insult to injury retired seniors have seen traditional financing options dry up as loan availability to retired persons has reverted to fully-documented income loans which with large property and loan amounts in California are unrealistic, nay unattainable, financing options. Further, in this market they may be unable to sell their home for anywhere near the value it held just a few short months ago completely eliminating all access to equity in their home.

Seniors are Victims Here?

It’s hard to say that seniors who put all of their eggs in one basket are the victims in this case. Just as one who owns all their stock in one company - these seniors either bet wrong or didn’t pay attention to the fact that they weren’t diversified. It does pain me though to see seniors who are house poor not able to convert asset they are sitting on in to capital in any way, shape or form.

An instructive lesson?

The inability of seniors to obtain these jumbo reverse mortgages does go to show that equity in your home is not anything you really ever own. It is simply a measure of the current market and nothing more. Products are ephemeral, guidelines and value too. It will be interesting to track what happens to these seniors suddenly shut out from their retirement capital. These years suddenly don’t look so golden.

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Deals, Good news, Industry, Microsoft (MSFT), Yahoo! (YHOO), Electronic Arts (ERTS)

Take-Two Interactive (NASDAQ: TTWO) announced that its ultra-violent game Grand Theft Auto IV took in $500 million in sales in its first week. According to The New York Times “The report exceeded the sales expectations of analysts.” It would mean that the company pushed out six million copies.” As it turned out, estimates were right on the ball.

The market will say that the numbers will make it harder for larger video-game publisher Electronic Arts (NASDAQ: ERTS) to take over Take-Two. The offer sits at $25.74. The stock trades about $1 less than that.

The problem with Wall Street’s view of the offer from EA is that it is not unlike Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT)’s bid for Yahoo! (NASDAQ: YHOO). The board at the portal may have viewed it as undervalued, but there are no other buyers. The bid went away and Yahoo!’s shares fell. If EA walks, TTWO shares drop.

Take-Two will tell the world that the Grand Theft Auto IV numbers warrant a higher offer from EA. If the larger company has any sense, it will walk away. That would move TTWO shares back to $17 where they traded before the offer. Management at the smaller company will look like a fool.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com and author of the Ten Stocks Under $10 letter.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Google (GOOG), Amazon.com (AMZN)

While at a credit card conference recently, I met up with a data analytics expert. He talked about how companies like Amazon.com (NASDAQ: AMZN) and Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) have dominated their sectors because of their mastery of creative algorithms (for example, somehow Amazon seems to know the books I like).

Well, he also talked up myBarackObama.com. He thought this was the future of marketing; that is, using social networking to supercharge monetization.

He has a point. In fact, a recent piece in Bloomberg.com has some good thoughts on this.

Keep in mind that myBarackObama.com has extensive profiles on about 800,000 people. What’s more, as members continue to interact with the site — in terms of comments and so on — the database gets stronger and stronger.

In other words, myBarackObama.com is a high value asset that could be instrumental for the Democrats in future elections.

OK, so what might myBarackObama.com be worth? If you look at the valuations of social networks like Facebook, the figure is likely to be substantial (by the way, Obama’s Facebook page has 790,000 friends). And according to the Bloomberg piece, the estimate is that the market value is about $200 million or so.

Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including The Complete M&A Handbook and The Edgar Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements. He also operates MergerBook.com.

Filed under: Earnings reports, AT and T (T), Sprint Nextel Corp (S), Verizon Communications (VZ), Qwest Communications Intl (Q)

Qwest Communications (NYSE: Q), a company whose competitors include Verizon (NYSE: VZ), AT&T (NYSE: T) and Sprint Nextel (NYSE: S), issued its Q1 results on Tuesday, and they weren’t inspiring to me at all. Revenues declined 1% to $3.4 billion. Net income took a dive to the tune of 25%, coming in at $0.09 per diluted share. Those are year-over-year declines — the sequential-quarter comparisons also told a tale of decline. Adjusting the earnings for some tax considerations did, however, yield a net-income increase of almost 6%.

But then there’s one of my favorite measures of growth — free cash flow. Qwest didn’t hit this metric. Free cash, on an adjusted basis, was $56 million this time around versus $156 million last time around (I give Qwest credit for increasing its operating cash flow, however). Qwest was able to carve out some double-digit gains in its broadband and video subscribers, but that seemed to be of little help right now.

Overall, I came away from the earnings report — which told a complex story of adjustments, EBITDA, and such — not wanting to add this stock to my watch list. According to Briefing.com, Qwest missed expectations by a penny, and its revenues failed to go beyond what Wall Street was looking for. Considering the low price of the shares, and the fact that the dividend yield isn’t one I’d chase, I’ll feel free to leave this one alone.

Disclosure: I do not own shares in any company mentioned here; positions can change at any time.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT)

The New York Times quotes Harvard Business School (HBS) professor David Yoffie as saying “the right way to think about” Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) is as “the next Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ: MSFT).” Setting aside for the moment, the arrogance that we need Yoffie to tell us how to think is the simple notion that he’s wrong.

Here are three reasons why:

  • Google is an innovator, Microsoft never has been. Microsoft got started by licensing an operating system for the PC. And it prospered by making it the dominant operating system and tying it to office software — each component of which it copied or bought from an innovator. Google has won because it has developed an improved a search ad technology that gives advertisers a higher return on their investment;
  • Google has succeeded because its product works better, Microsoft’s not so much. Microsoft has lost market share in search advertising since it started to focus on it — watching its share fall from 11% in 2005 to 5% today. The reason Microsoft has lost share is that its product simply does not work as well as Google’s; and

Continue reading Harvard Business School professor’s wrong way to think about Google

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Before the bell, Google (GOOG), Yahoo! (YHOO), Time Warner (TWX), Sprint Nextel Corp (S)

Sprint (NYSE:S) is up almost 7% on a rumore buy-out by Deutsche Telekom.

Yahoo! (NASDAQ:YHOO) is off 23% after rejecting a buy-out from Microsoft.

Time Warner (NYSE:TWX) shares are up 2% on news Yahoo! may buy AOL.

Google (NASDAQ:GOOG) is up 3% on the chance it may provide Yahoo! some of its search services.

Douglas A. McIntyre is and editor at 247wallst.com.

Close
E-mail It