Archive for May 13th, 2008

Filed under: Google (GOOG), Sprint Nextel Corp (S)

As Tom mentioned earlier, Sprint Nextel Corp. (NYSE: S) is merging its next-generation wireless assets with Clearwire Corp. (NASDAQ: CLWR) to form a new joint partnership that — finally — will create a high-speed wireless internet network that covers most of the U.S. Although Sprint’s Xohm service has been decried by investors as a “non-core” asset weighing down Sprint’s pocketbook, it still has enormous potential in the near future. Sprint’s not in terribly good shape — but it does have vision. Of course, vision and execution are two different things.

So, it is pleasing to think that if the new Sprint-Clearwire venture can build out is national presence successfully and capture customers tired of limited high-speed internet service, the world will be its oyster. Of course, other companies are contributing to the venture as well, including Google, Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG). Why would Google want to put money into this? Because this could be Google’s most important investment ever.

Bypassing the telephone and cable companies that have a stranglehold on most of the high-speed internet business in the U.S. has long been the dream of Google. It doesn’t want a middleman in the way of it connecting consumers and businesses with the information they seek. Although Google wasn’t successful in the recent FCC radio auctions (maybe by design), finding a way to provide internet service directly to its customer base would give Google on a much more powerful perch than it has even today. Google could even buy the new Clearwire partnership outright once it’s established.

I think they’re starting to get giddy in the Google board room.

Filed under: Management, Wendy’s Intl (WEN)

Give Triarc (NYSE: TRY) CEO Roland Smith credit for forthrightness. Less than a month after the company announced it would acquire Wendy (NYSE: WEN)’s — and well before the deal has even closed — he wrote a letter to the company’s employees saying in effect “Welcome to our conglomerate, you’re fired!” to borrow a line from Isadore Barmash’s book.

Well, not exactly. Triarc — which is the parent company of Arby’s — isn’t a conglomerate, and his letter had a bit more tact. He wrote: “There will be job cuts at Wendy’s. I don’t know how to put it any other way and say that I am acting with integrity. We will continue to be truthful with you about these as they come up.”

It’s a bold strategy. Given Wendy’s struggles in recent years, he’ll need all the help he can get in making this acquisition work, including strong employee morale. While immediate job cuts might help the bottom line, the impact on the company’s remaining employees could make it far from a no-brainer.

Smith is betting that straight talk will pay off, but most employees would probably prefer job security. This letter may lead to a less than friendly welcome when Triarc takes control.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

vindicatedHe may be “Vindicated” but Jose Canseco is letting his Encino, California mansion go in to foreclosure as the housing market has tanked. He doesn’t see any point in making the payments any more. The $7.7 million house makes for some expensive jingle mail. What happens when the wealthy start walking away? When does preserving your credit score not matter? Where is that line? When is that decision made? Will it become easier for people as we get in to this mess? Will this generation be defined by subprime, bad credit and the shirking of all financial responsibility?

Housing Wire has the amusing/scary tale via the AP:

Canseco told the syndicated TV show “Inside Edition” that he walked away from his $2.5 million, 7,300-square foot home in suburban Encino because it didn’t make sense to continue making payments …

“What about other families that we’re hearing on TV, that they’re saying, `We have nowhere else to go,’” he said. “I mean, that is amazing. I’ve got books (he’s put out two expose-type books on drug use in baseball), we’re now trying to produce the movie to both.

“Like I said, my situation was a little more different than most. I decided to just let it (the house) go, but in most cases and most families, they have nowhere else to go.”

Source [blownmortgage]

Citi released some guideline changes in the wholesale changes that can be described easily as the first big step towards killing stated income loans. I’m not sure if these are reflected on the retail side as well. The big changes? 75% max loan-to-value on rate and term refinances with a minimum FICO score of 720. That guideline change essentially narrows the universe of qualified borrowers to a thin sliver of the home-owning population these days.

Other details on the stated income guideline restrictions:

70% max LTV on cash-out refinances

Increased FICO requirements from 660-720 to 680-720 for SIVA

Increased FICO requirements from 660-720 to 700-740 for SISA

Click the thumbnail below for the full details:


Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Deals, Internet, Competitive strategy, Google (GOOG), Yahoo! (YHOO), Politics

naThe BBC reported on Saturday that demands are being made for careful government scrutiny of any potential alliances between Internet giants Yahoo Inc. (NASDAQ: YHOO) and Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG).

According to the BBC report, a coalition of activist groups including the Black Leadership Forum, the League of Rural Voters, the National Black Chamber of Commerce, and the American Agriculture Movement, is concerned that allowing any kind of unregulated working relationship between Yahoo and Google could put Internet neutrality in serious jeopardy. Gary Flowers, representing the Black Leadership Forum, is quoted by BBC as stating, “We all suffer in such mega mergers.” He further stated that the nature of such a partnership could “condense competition, increase prices and limit new business opportunity on the Internet.”

The BBC indicates that the Justice Department is already in the process of reviewing joint operation trials that the two companies have engaged in. However, the department seems to be down playing the citizen coalition’s demands, citing that the two companies have no working agreements to address. At a recently held Google shareholders meeting the matter was addressed by Chairman Eric Schmidt who stated, “If there were a deal [with Yahoo], we would anticipate structuring the deal to address the antitrust concerns that have been widely discussed.”

I would tend to echo the valid concerns of Gary Flowers: too much control over Internet communications by any one particular entity or alliance would inevitably be bad for all of us. I think the matter needs to be taken to a broader base of examination than the justice department alone can provide.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), Yahoo! (YHOO)

After Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ: MSFT) announced it was withdrawing its offer for Yahoo! (NASDAQ: YHOO) I thought that Yahoo stock would end today at $19 — which is where it traded before the deal was announced. But Yahoo is currently trading over $24.

Here are three reasons that Yahoo may be trading $5 above where it was pre-Microsoft:

  • Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) deal. Investors are ascribing some value to the possibility that Google will sell some of Yahoo’s search advertising;
  • Short covering. Investors who bet on the deal falling apart may be covering their short positions in Yahoo — keeping a floor beneath its stock price;
  • Still in play. Microsoft may buy up a control position in Yahoo at the current market price and return to negotiate a Yahoo takeover at a lower price.

One thing seems likely to me — investors are not piling into the stock because they believe that Yahoo has some money making strategy up its sleeve that will accelerate its earnings growth. But I hope for Yahoo shareholder’s sake that I’m wrong.

Peter Cohan is President of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College and edits The Cohan Letter . He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned.

Filed under: Management, Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), Yahoo! (YHOO), Apple Inc (AAPL), eBay (EBAY), General Electric (GE), Time Warner (TWX), Wal-Mart (WMT), Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A), Serious Money

About a month ago I posted Serious Money: AAPL, EBAY, GE, GOOG, MSFT, TWX, WMT, YHOO — one more look, covering the original Great Eight stocks we focused on at BloggingStocks. These were based on reader interest, which they do still generate today.

Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL) was the big winner among only four that had appreciated. The following indicates commonly used metrics for tracking and comparing stocks.

Reviewing the stocks in order of lowest to highest P/E ratio (TTM):

It is interesting to note that only two of the eight have a below market P/E ratio, while only two are average. On the other hand, four are double the average and beyond, which leads me to believe the overall market consensus is that it is still very early in the game for these stocks and their futures are yet to be determined. The P/E ratios of the four are also the most volatile as are the stock prices.

Continue reading Serious Money: Metrics anyone? — AAPL, EBAY, GE, GOOG, MSFT, TWX, WMT, YHOO

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

There are moments in history that change the world profoundly. The fall of the Berlin Wall. The industrial revolution and the impact it made on our society. And finally, David Lereah, the former National Association of Realtors chief economist telling us that that things will get worse before they get better? […]
Related Posts:
Zillowed, Disappearing Inventory, and Free Housing: 3 Major Psychological Reasons Why Housing is Still Declining and Living Rent and Mortgage Free.
Did you Feel That? Housing Just Hit the Third Rail.
Mission Accomplished: 3 Housing Issues: Multiple Bottoms, Declining Dollar, and More Sub-prime and Alt-A Defaults.
Even the Harlem Globe Trotters Couldn’t Spin Today’s Housing News!
Think Housing Can’t Go Down Significantly in Southern California?

There are moments in history that change the world profoundly. The fall of the Berlin Wall. The industrial revolution and the impact it made on our society. And finally, David Lereah, the former National Association of Realtors chief economist telling us that that things will get worse before they get better? That is correct. One of the most adamant cheerleaders for the housing orgy is now sounding like a housing bear blogger. You know the author of this following book:lereah.jpg

The book was published in February of 2006, just at the peak of the housing bubble mania. Just to give you an insight to some of the bubble rhetoric in case you forgot how it was to live in a society where everyone was drinking housing Kool-Aid:

“We are really on track for a soft landing. There are no balloons popping.” - David Lereah, NAR’s chief economist, December 2005

“If you paid your mortgage off, it means you probably did not manage your funds efficiently over the years,” said David Lereah, chief economist of the National Association of Realtors and author of “Are You Missing the Real Estate Boom?” “It’s as if you had 500,000 dollar bills stuffed in your mattress.”

He called it “very unsophisticated.” (Los Angeles Times Aug 28th, 2005)

You must understand that Daivd Lereah was one of the most adamant supporters of the housing boom. In fact, this idea that money was “stuffed in your mattress” is precisely the reason we have a negative savings rate and there is no buffer to support the continuing collapse in housing prices. But the tune is now changing as highlighted in this big story in Newsweek titled:

“It’s Going to Get Worse

Economist David Lereah was once the housing market’s biggest cheerleader. Now he says the bust isn’t near over, and home prices still have a long way to fall.”

We now have this mea culpa world tour that also includes the maestro himself, Alan “use those adjustable rate mortgages” Greenspan. There is a concern for legacy and how history will treat them but thankfully to the flow of information, it is pretty easy to pinpoint the causes and the main cheerleaders for this “irrational exuberance” to quote Greenspan himself. Let us now see what Mr. Lereah is saying given the fact that we are now seeing a housing crash:

“We’re not at the bottom,” he says. “[People] want it to be near the bottom, but we’re not there yet. The leading indicators are still very bad. Pending home sales are still in bad shape. Mortgage applications are low … There’s still supply out there in abundance … This thing is going to get worse before it gets better.”

Oh! Talk about a massive reversal in psychology here. But let us go on further and see that Mr. Lereah has learned a lesson in being careful about making hard line predictions:

“Lereah says that the industry may begin to see a slight uptick in sales later this summer, which could signal the start of the recovery. Home prices, however, will continue to fall. According to the latest numbers from the Case-Shiller index, the average U.S. home has lost around 15 percent of its value since the market’s peak. “We’re probably going to end up with a 20 percent [decline], but if I’m wrong it will be even more than that,” he says.”

The plethora of quotes during the bubble prove this person wrong multiple times and he’ll be proven wrong once again since he is estimating another 5 percent decline from the current numbers. What in the world is going to keep housing from going down 25 to 30 percent? Also, why 20 percent? Another wanton guess on the mea culpa express. This of course is a radical departure from the idea that the bubble (by definition irrational events) was grounded in logical reasons:

“That’s quite a turnabout from the view he articulated in his book, first published in 2005. There he argued that the solid economy, strong demographics (including immigration and aging boomers), and a lean supply of homes should lead prices to continue rising for years to come. “Today’s real estate market is the result of rational decision making based on supply and demand conditions,” he wrote. “With today’s economy, home owners are in no danger of experiencing a widespread fallout of home prices.”

So who do they blame? You got it. Those pesky subprime loans that somehow have wiped out $2.84 trillion in housing equity:

“[I] just didn’t realize the scope, the extent, the magnitude of the loose underwriting-not looking at incomes and wages, just providing so many mortgage loans based on [expected] future price appreciation rather than the creditworthiness of the borrower,” Lereah says. “That got so out of hand, and none of us realized the magnitude of it until it was too late.”

Bwahaha! No Mr. Lereah. YOU didn’t realize it. There were plenty of folks that just in line with the publication of the housing boom book were echoing the siren call of the housing bubble popping. I’ve noticed this new public relations move and want to stifle it once and for all. Alan Greenspan has used similar PR moves trying to give the appearance that no one saw this train coming and now, we need to adjust and please let us forget that our bubble cheerleading from a very loud podium was a main cause of this boom. Let us not forget that no large industry group has been punished. Do they own any responsibility? Listen, homeowners that took out these loans will end up in foreclosure if they thought they were going to flip a home for a quick profit and took out a destructive mortgage product. That has and will continue to go on. Yet what about restitution by the Wall Street firms and lenders that knew very well that they were going to make out like bandits while homeowners would in no way be able to payback the actual mortgage note. The profit made by these firms was based on negligent lending practices and in many cases, flat out illegal practices.

I’m sure some of you may think I’m coming down a bit hard here. But the one thing I am not hearing about is what is the punishment here? Are any groups responsible? The argument that “well buyers should of known better” is simply a distraction. Guess what? There is a clear consequence for taking out a mortgage you couldn’t pay. Its called foreclosure. The consequence for making horrible loans? Its called a bailout from the Federal Reserve. Think about this for a second. Let us say you maxed out your credit cards, took a ridiculous mortgage on a McMansion, signed on for a lease on a luxury car, and simply cannot make the payments. Can you go to your bank and drop off your lease, mortgage, and credit card liabilities in exchange for money? Of course not! Yet this is the access Wall Street firms have under the political guise of “well, they’re too big to fail.”

Back to Mr. Lereah, at least we can give him credit in that he actually followed his own advice and put some of his own money into the housing game. Many of these perma-bulls have a simple way to prove their commitment; go out and buy a home right now in Southern California. Put your money where your mouth is:

“Every time you have something like this you overreact the other way,” Lereah says. He sees Frank’s efforts to boost the FHA’s role as a solid countermeasure that may help the market. While he was an economist at NAR, Lereah was also a real estate investor himself, at one point owning 10 condominiums from Virginia to Florida, which he rented out. Today he still owns seven of them, and aside from one that’s languishing unrented, the other six are still making money, he says. So even if his forecasting record is mixed, his in-the-trenches investment record appears more solid.

Florida has the worst condominium market in the entire country. Now he is championing the FHA bailout plan which is another form of privatizing gains and socializing losses. If we are now getting David Lereah saying that things will get worse we know that things are nowhere remotely close to a bottom. The quote that comes to mind about letting single owners go down in flames while bailing out Wall Street is from J. Paul Getty:

“If you owe the bank $100 that’s your problem. If you owe the bank $100 million, that’s the bank’s problem.”

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information

Related Posts:
Zillowed, Disappearing Inventory, and Free Housing: 3 Major Psychological Reasons Why Housing is Still Declining and Living Rent and Mortgage Free.
Did you Feel That? Housing Just Hit the Third Rail.
Mission Accomplished: 3 Housing Issues: Multiple Bottoms, Declining Dollar, and More Sub-prime and Alt-A Defaults.
Even the Harlem Globe Trotters Couldn’t Spin Today’s Housing News!
Think Housing Can’t Go Down Significantly in Southern California?

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Filed under: Major movement, Forecasts, Good news, Products and services, Consumer experience, Competitive strategy

It’s been brewing ever so slowly, but AnnTaylor Stores Corp. (NYSE: ANN) has finally been able to show the results of its efforts. Shares of AnnTaylor soared about 13% today after the women’s apparel chain raised its first-quarter earnings forecast.

The company said that better-than-expected results at its LOFT stores as well as lower inventories and better expense management overall contributed to the results. Yes, surprising investors is always good, but it’s also always good to remain a little cautious with such news. The company itself warned about the rest of the year, leaving its full-year forecast unchanged.

Of course, the question is what’s ahead for AnnTaylor. One answer already came today from the company when it said it would shelve a new store concept targeting baby boomers. But following the success of LOFT, the retailer is aggressively launching an outlet version of the brand. Is it smart? It certainly seems that in the current economic climate increasing lower-priced offerings would allow AnnTaylor to keep cash-strapped customers while offering them budget clothes in a familiar brand.

Continue reading AnnTaylor shares climb on raised forecast… but it’s still retail

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Close
E-mail It