Archive for May 14th, 2008

Filed under: Analyst reports, Analyst upgrades and downgrades

MOST NOTEWORTHY: Anadigics, Crystal River Capital and Canadian Solar were today’s noteworthy downgrades:

  • Oppenheimer downgraded shares of Anadigics (NASDAQ: ANAD) to Perform from Outperform on valuation following the recent run-up.
  • Wachovia downgraded Crystal River Capital (NYSE: CRZ) to Market Perform from Outperform citing the uncertain near-term strategic outlook.
  • Broadpoint downgraded shares of Canadian Solar (NASDAQ: CSIQ) to Buy from Strong Buy on valuation following yesterday’s rally but raised their target to $45 from $29.

OTHER DOWNGRADES:

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: China, Newsletters, Las Vegas Sands (LVS), DJIA, Stocks to Buy

While many know that Bill Gates and Warren Buffet are the two wealthiest, Tony Sagami notes that few know the third: Sheldon Adelson. In his Asia Stock Alert, he explains, “Adelson is the founder and CEO of Las Vegas Sands (NYSE: LVS), our latest featured stock.” Here, he looks at the gaming company and its bright prospects in Macau.

“Due to its strategic location in the South China Sea, Macau has a rich history as an Asian trading hub. To this day, it looks more European than Asian. And its popularity with tourists is absolutely exploding - an
estimated 27 million visited Macau last year.

“The majority (55%) came from mainland China, but many more visited from Hong Kong (30%) and Taiwan (9%). These tourists are flocking to Macau not because of its history or picturesque seaside location. They’re coming to gamble.

“And boy, did they gamble! On my last visit to Macau, I saw table after table filled with boisterous high rollers routinely making $100,000 bets. These ‘whales’ account for about 80% of Macau’s gambling revenues.

“Today, Macau has become the Las Vegas of China. It is the only city in the region with fully legalized gambling. And gambling is deeply engrained in the Asian culture. Plus, Macau is within a five-hour flight of three billion people - nearly half the world’s population.

Continue reading Las Vegas Sands (LVS): Gamble on Macau

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Commodities, Oil

Oil is treading water at a near-record $125 per barrel after a U.S. Energy Information Administration report indicated that weekly crude oil inventories rose a considerably smaller-than-expected 200,000 barrels. Economists surveyed by Bloomberg News had expected crude oil inventories to increase by 2.25 million barrels last week.

Gasoline supplies fell 1.7 million barrels.

The modest increase in oil inventories had little affect on oil prices, for the moment. Oil was down 87 cents to $124.93 per barrel in Wednesday morning trading. The other major energy commodities were also virtually unchanged. Unleaded gasoline fell 1 cent to $3.18 per gallon. Heating fell about 2 cents to $3.66 per gallon. Natural gas gained 10 cents to $11.52 per million BTUs.

Meanwhile, refineries operated at 86.6% of capacity for the week ended May 9, 2008, the EIA report indicated, up from 85.0% in the week ended May 2, 2008.

A bright spot: Refinery utilization

Independent energy trader Jim Dietz told BloggingStocks Wednesday the increase in refinery utilization was the report’s lone bright spot.

Continue reading Oil stable near $125 after small weekly inventory build

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Consumer experience, Wal-Mart (WMT)

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE: WMT) made a splash in recent years by opening health clinics in its Supercenter locations to give those who could not afford medical insurance a cheap way to get medical services. As always, though, the retailer hoped that those who visited in-store clinics would hang around and do some shopping as well.

In 2008, retail clinics have seemed to shut their doors in states like New York, Nevada and Indiana. Overall, 69 clinics in 15 states have given up the ghost, including those located inside Wal-Mart stores.

What’s going on here? Is the strategy backfiring? Even one of the largest proponents of in-store retailer clinics, CVS Caremark Corp. (NYSE: CVS), indicated that it is slowing down its retail in-store clinic plans.

Continue reading Troubles for Wal-Mart’s in-store health clinics

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Deals, Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), Yahoo! (YHOO)

Even though Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ: MSFT) could have upped its offer for Yahoo, Inc. (NASDAQ: YHOO) this past weekend, it did not. Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer walked away from the deal after Yahoo held out for more money. At this time, Microsoft was wise to walk away from Jerry Yang’s ego. The reason? No company should spend over $40 billion for a bunch of unmonetized eyeballs. But then again, Microsoft needs to up its game in the consumer space; not so much in the enterprise business space.

Yahoo! has one of the most lucrative audiences on the web, if not the most lucrative. The company, to save its life, can’t figure out how to continuously grow revenue with that huge audience it has. I won’t beat a dead horse here, but if Yahoo! thinks it’s really worth $37 per share, some reality needs to be put in its pipe and smoked. Microsoft would have purchased the rights to combine its ailing Internet properties with a huge audience that Yahoo! can’t seem to squeeze money out of with any kind of strategy. Customers want everything for free, but Yahoo! doesn’t have the advertising strategy down to allow that. We can thank former CEO Terry Semel for that.

And the kicker is this: If Google, Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) will soon be providing Yahoo! with its search infrastructure (after a successful test), just what was Microsoft buying, anyway? Engineering talent? Employees with a combative culture? We all know Microsoft wanted Yahoo! badly, but the mixing of oil and water here would not have instantly made a neat company or anything. And Yahoo!? It’s not worth what it thinks it is. Period. Get over it, find out how to more effectively compete and monetize those eyeballs — then come back to the table if anyone will sit there with you then.

It’s time to take back the American Dream.  The American Dream has been repeatedly hijacked by too many people in the name of self-interest to remotely resemble what it looked like when it was first coined back in 1931. It is time to separate home ownership from the American Dream.  Or, more precisely, it is time to separate the home-debtorship from the American Dream.

Somewhere along the way we went sideways and the American Dream went from being synonymous with equal opportunity to being synonymous with material success.  And most of the shift was driven by the crafty marketing folks at your local real estate company, car dealership, big box store and other outlet where you can have a better today by simply financing the future.  It’s time to separate the dream from the debt.

I’m calling out the marketers, the hucksters, the politicians, your elected officials, your history teachers, your real estate agent, your greedy friends and everyone across the country that had their hand in the mutation of the American Dream.  Yeah - you.  The Century 21 marketing department, the NAR and everyone who bastardized the American Dream in an attempt to make a quick buck.  I’m calling out the greedy and ignorant Americans who fell in to the rabbit snare of corporate marketing in attempt to keep up with the Jonses by foolishly leveraging their three-digit FICO score for a new Escalade instead of a decent safety cushion.  I’m calling out anyone who has taken the American Dream and stretched it, rearranged it and put it back together in to an unrecognizable form that only celebrates the material wealth of a country bent on consumption.

How did Housing Get Dragged in to this?

From Wikipedia on the American Dream:

Although wealth is a generally assumed characteristic of the American Dream, there are other aspects of the American Dream that some would argue are more important than the mere accumulation of wealth. Modarres (2007) explains that a major source of wealth and intergenerational transfer of wealth is real estate. Purchasing a home is perhaps the most important investment many Americans will make. With that statement, it can be assumed that the American Dream can be achieved, but can be achieved to its highest value with the investment in real estate.

This is what has been lost in translation.  Americans stopped accumulating real wealth through real estate and started accumulating imaginary wealth (equity) through riding an asset bubble fueled by cheap debt.  Americans haven’t been amassing wealth - quite the opposite - they have been gorging on debt.

The American Dream somewhere got twisted from opportunity to an impulsive need to satisfy our material urges at the expense of sound personal fiscal policy.  Now with the credit markets in shambles, the housing market no longer able to bail us out of our debt-fueled consumption a whole generation is going to learn the hard way that the American Dream is not about two SUV’s in every garage and a turkey in every pot.

Living the American Nightmare

Listen folks the American Dream is no longer about homeownership.  Homeownership is a myth to most people who reside in single family homes.  Many are highly debt-burdened and the declining market has sapped whatever remaining equity they might have had.  Homeowners are not looking at their homes as the pinnacle of the American Dream.  To the contrary many are regarding their under-water McMansion as the American Nightmare - a prison they can’t escape without making some difficult choices that challenge their morals and who they are as responsible citizens.

About a month ago I had numerous people calling me - my friends - who were asking me how bad it would be to walk away from their homes.  Rational, intelligent, college-educated folks looking for a way out of the strangle-hold that is their ridiculous mortgage payment.  Rest assured that they are not living the American Dream - they are handcuffed to a property that isn’t worth the debt it secures and only promises to provide a life-time of payments with little prospect for true ownership.

It’s time to take back the American Dream.

Can you blame them?

So can you blame the homeowners, tied to a sinking debt-anchor, who think about walking away?   They can see the bail out of Bear Stearns, they can see the backing of Wall Street and they wonder aloud, “Where is the relief on Main Street?” And if there will be none they will take matter in to their own hands.  For they are using wisdom of the crowds.  They know that banks and lending institutions will not shut their doors to an entire generation of consumers who’ve forsaken their credit to rid themselves of the mistake of a lifetime.  They are making a calculated gamble that some politician somewhere will come along and rescue them from the effects of credit exhausted in a national spasm of gluttony.  We’re all subprime now.

A Call to Arms

So I’m putting out a call to arms for those of you that still believe in the American Dream. That believe that the American Dream is more about opportunity and less about credit.  A dream that is based on the chance of real, lasting success and wealth, and not the superfluous symbols of wealth flaunted by the Orange County bourgeoisie.  It’s time to take back the American Dream from the NAR, the Century 21’s, the Best Buys and any other company and their marketing department who extols us to just charge it.  The American Dream is not about debt - it’s the antithesis of all of the marketing messages that have been bombarding us during the current credit bubble.

Take a Stand

So take a stand.  Tell people what you think the American Dream means.  Tell them that the American Dream is about opportunity not opulence.  Talk about ownership and fiscal responsibility instead of financing and balance transfers.  Let’s take back the American Dream.  Let’s rescue it from the white-knuckled grasp of credit companies everywhere.  Let’s make the American Dream a reality once again and restore its promise to its rightful place in our hearts and minds.

Source [blownmortgage]

AIG the large financial congolmerate reported an $8 billion quarterly loss tied to $9.1 billion in credit-loss related write downs.  It picked up a nice downgrade from Fitch for its troubles and also announced it will raise new capital immediately.  Even better news for AIG shareholders is the company’s continued exposure to future losses in the CDO market and it’s inability to unwind any of its bets in the near future.

From Market Watch on AIG’s credit-market problems:

The worse-than-expected results were driven by a $9.11 billion write-down on a credit derivatives portfolio and $6.09 billion of net realized losses from AIG’s investment portfolio.
AIG’s derivatives unit had to post $9.7 billion of collateral to support those waning credit derivatives positions at the end of April. That’s up by $4.4 billion in two months.
AIG remains too exposed to complex mortgage-related securities such as collateralized debt obligations, known as CDOs, and won’t be able to extricate itself any time soon, some investors and analysts said after the results.
“We will not see the end of CDO and residential mortgage-backed security write-downs until we see a reversal in home price declines,” said Stewart Johnson, a portfolio manager at Philo Smith & Co., an insurance-focused investment firm.

The new cash raised by the company will be used as a safety-net for any future losses related to its ongoing exposure:

Credit market losses in AIG’s investment portfolio have slashed the insurer’s excess capital to between $2.5 billion and $7.5 billion at the end of March from $14.5 billion to $19.5 billion at the end of last year. That persuaded AIG to raise new capital.
“That is an excess capital cushion that is simply too low for comfort for us in this kind of volatile period,” Bensinger said. “I don’t think a company like AIG should be running at a capital position that is too close to the line.”

Source [blownmortgage]

You know you do it. Deep down you know you feel a bit sneaky when you do it like going on a clandestine secret mission. I would venture to guess that you have Zillowed yourself or homes in your neighborhood. Welcome to the major equalizing force in the housing game, information. […]
Related Posts:
Real Homes of Genius: Biggest Ever Percentage Housing Drop Ever in Santa Ana! 68 Percent Drop in 1 Year. The Journey of One Home in an Epic Housing Bubble.
Living Large on $25,000 a Year in Southern California.
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Monterey Park. 800 Square Feet for $479,000.
Real Homes of Genius: Forget Buy 1 get 1 Free Deals. How About 3 for the Price of 1. Today we Salute you Riverside.
5 Reasons Why The Housing Market Will Continue to Decline Until 2010: Extrapolating The Free Ride Bird and Dancing with the Housing Pied Piper.

You know you do it. Deep down you know you feel a bit sneaky when you do it like going on a clandestine secret mission. I would venture to guess that you have Zillowed yourself or homes in your neighborhood. Welcome to the major equalizing force in the housing game, information. In 2006 when I started this blog I had a couple of frequent readers that were adamant that incomes in California justified the sky high prices.

Every time housing prices would break a new record, I would carefully point out that local area incomes simply did not merit the increase. They would argue back that incomes in fact did not matter and that current prices were justified. It got to the point where I had to say, “it’s the income, stupid!” How can one argue that local area incomes do not matter?

Either way, there are now new forces at work that were never accessible in the past. See, even only a few years ago if you wanted to know what your neighbor paid for their home you would need to make a trip to the clerk’s office and dig up the tax records. Not only was this a hassle, it was usually a waste of time.

If you liked a home as a buyer, you simply made an offer and put down some earnest money, and let the process go into escrow. You really didn’t have a simple and quick way to see what the person paid for the home unless you dug an extra step. I would venture to say that not many people bothered with this because why would you want to know if you’ve already signed the final closing documents? Now we are in a vastly different world.

#1 Factor - Zillow and Access to Information

With many counties now having access to the assessor’s office online and easily searchable, it isn’t a massive out of the way journey to figure out what homes have sold for in your local area. In fact, excellent sites such as Zillow now make it fool proof for would be buyers to take a quick look at the price of a home they are interested with simply by opening up their browser and putting in an address. The power of this information is amazing and is another reason why this housing market is bound to keep going down. Why? Let us assume you are going to buy a home. The first step you want to take is to first assess how much “home” you can comfortably afford.

Typically this means not going over one-third of your gross monthly income to housing payments. This step isn’t a novel one and has been here for many decades. Yet sites like Zillow have now revolutionized the way you will purchase a home. Instead of walking into your agent’s office, giving him your budget and preferences like area, schools, and other key factors you can now access this information easily.

School ratings are easily accessible online with API scores and other important factors. You can even view whether you are near a park or freeway simply by using Google Maps without taking a needless trip. Yet the most equalizing factor is viewing the previous sales history. See, during the boom the perspective of many buyers was something along this line:

“Take a look at what they paid for that home in 2001 and what it sold for in 2003! I’m going to buy this place and sell it for even more!”

The psychology was one in which the idea of dropping home prices was simply nonexistent. In fact, agents and appraisers at a basal level looked at recent sales prices to ascertain the current market value of the home. Normally they would look at 3 homes of similar characteristics in the area and derive a per square foot price and applied this formula to the current home. Of course I’m simplifying the process here since the appraiser would also need to look at condition, upgrades, or other amenities but the gist is the same. The current market price was based on recent sales. This is similar to going into a mental institution, asking 3 patients if your shirt is worth a $1,000 and selling it to a 4th patient and assuming this is normal.

Interestingly enough these same buyers are now looking at Zillow and the psychology is as follows:

“They paid $200,000 in 2000 and they are asking for $500,000? No way. Not in this market. I see a home next to this person that sold for $400,000. I think I’ll wait since it seems prices are still going lower.”

Now the same tool is making buyers hesitate and actually prolonging the downturn. After all, this is a buyer’s market and why buy when you know you can get the home for cheaper next year? If we are to revert to economic fundamentals of income to price ratios we are still very far from a bottom. And now all the information is easily accessible so when an agent says, “it is time to buy” you can bet a prospective buyer is going online and typing in the address to see the previous sales price. And you wonder why this downturn will last longer than people ever imagined.

I’ve noticed a few people echoing that we are hitting bottom because inventory is declining here in Southern California. Which leads us to our next reason why housing prices are declining, inventory.

#2 - An Inventory Bottom Does not Mean a Price Bottom!

People need to think for a few seconds before they start trying to peg a bottom. Even some mainstream articles have it so wrong in terms of declining inventory. First, you need to remember that inventory only matters as much as the amount of sales. For example, say we have 10 homes for the month and 5 sales. At the end of the month, we can look at our data and see that we have 2 months worth of inventory. But what if we have 5 homes a year later? Is this better? The media pundits are quick to jump on this and say yes! But what if we have only 1 sale this month? Then we have 5 months of inventory which is worse than 2 months. You get my point but let us use some actual data to demonstrate this:

Southern California Inventory

You can clearly see from the graph above that overall inventory in Southern California peaked in September and October of 2007. You will also notice that distressed sales (i.e., short sales, foreclosures, etc) have been rising dramatically. In fact, in September of 2007 distressed properties made up 5% of the total outstanding inventory while today, it makes up 13.8% of all current inventory. And again, just to use these few months of metrics, let us show how this dropping inventory idea is deceiving:

Sales in September of 2007 for SoCal: 12,455

Total Inventory: 166,514

Months of Inventory: 13.3 months

Sales in March of 2008 for SoCal: 12,808

Total Inventory: 146,785

Months of Inventory: 11.4 months

So this is good right? The months of inventory is decreasing. This is the argument the media is telling you. The only problem is the properties that are selling are distressed properties which are growing!

Foreclosure resales - houses sold after being foreclosed on continue to dominate many inland neighborhoods. More than one out of three Southland homes that resold last month, nearly 38 percent, had been foreclosed on at some point in the prior year. This time last year such sales were only 8 percent of the market. At the county level, foreclosure resales ranged from 28.8 percent in Los Angeles County to 56.4 percent in Riverside County.”

So where is this disappearing inventory going? It is easy to speculate and rightfully so that what we have is a group of delusional homeowners thinking that they’ll simply wait until summer and get peak prices again. How can we arrive at this conclusion? Well first, 38 percent of sales had been foreclosed in the previous year. The median price in the state is tanking putting us at a whopping loss of 30 percent on a year over year basis. What we are seeing is distressed homes that have lower prices selling but also sellers that have lowered their price. Why else would home prices be falling so drastically? The assumption is most likely homeowners that can wait are simply pulling their homes off the market given the horrific market psychology. Yet those that mentally think that this drop is somehow a sign of health are flat out deluding themselves.

So if this is all too much for your mental health what about having the ability to stop paying your mortgage and living in your home for free?

#3 - Lenders are Backlogged and May be Letting Homeowners Live for Free

Now I know many of you are going to say, “how is that possible?” Given the massive amount of foreclosures in the pipeline and NODs that will become foreclosures, it may be cheaper for a lender to delay taking your home for a few months:

foreclosures

Fellow blogger Mish made an interesting observation in a post looking at a toxic WaMu mortgage portfolio lovingly named, WMALT 2007-0C1:

WaMu Portfolio

“The above image is particularly interesting. Are banks so loaded to the gills in REOs they are reluctant to start more foreclosures? If so, people are now living in their homes for free. There have been various media reports of this happening.

As bad as that sounds, from a bank perspective that is better than having a house sit there to become infested by vermin, rats, bees, mold etc. I spoke on the phone with Mike Morgan this morning and he tells me the latter is happening right now in Florida. Some homes are so infested with mold they are a health hazard and have to be bulldozed down. Total loss to the lender is 100%, perhaps greater if they have to pay to clean up the mess!”

As absurd as this may sound, lending institutions may have more than they can handle with distressed properties. In fact, it may be more cost effective to have a warm body in a home then letting the place go down the drain, or have a mosquito infested pool, or even theft of ever increasing metals:

Metal theft has been a significant problem in our County and vacant, foreclosed homes are providing new targets for metal thieves,” said Supervisor Hansberger, who represents the County’s Third District. The supervisors are considering a county ordinance similar to Assembly Bill 844 proposed by State Assemblyman Tom Berryhill.”

Psychologically this housing downturn is producing numerous unintended consequences. From technologies allowing potential buyers to carve into the anatomy of a home’s sales history, to spinning the inventory numbers, to lenders reaching an unmanageable amount of distressed properties. A few of these things will prove to make this housing downturn unlike any in our nation’s history.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information

Related Posts:
Real Homes of Genius: Biggest Ever Percentage Housing Drop Ever in Santa Ana! 68 Percent Drop in 1 Year. The Journey of One Home in an Epic Housing Bubble.
Living Large on $25,000 a Year in Southern California.
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Monterey Park. 800 Square Feet for $479,000.
Real Homes of Genius: Forget Buy 1 get 1 Free Deals. How About 3 for the Price of 1. Today we Salute you Riverside.
5 Reasons Why The Housing Market Will Continue to Decline Until 2010: Extrapolating The Free Ride Bird and Dancing with the Housing Pied Piper.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Filed under: Analyst reports, Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), Aon Corp (AOC), Analyst initiations

MOST NOTEWORTHY: Google, Boyd Gaming and Microsoft were today’s noteworthy initiations:

  • Kaufman Bros. believes Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) has “only begun to scratch the surface” of its local market opportunity. Shares were assumed with a Buy rating and $680 target.
  • Banc of America believes Boyd Gaming (NYSE: BYD) will face financing challenges with its Echelon resort, and initiated shares with a Sell rating and $14 target.
  • Lehman reinstated Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) with an Equal Weight rating and $34 target based on peaking Vista/Office 2007 cycles, uncertain online strategy, and increased investment.

OTHER INITIATIONS:

Close
E-mail It