Archive for June 2nd, 2008

Filed under: Private equity

The U.S. isn’t the only place with an ailing financial system. The U.K. is also having some problems.

Take a look at U.K. mortgage lender, Bradford & Bingley Plc. The firm was aggressive on high-risk mortgages, and, as a result, there has been a plunge in profits.

To deal with the precarious situation, Bradford & Bingley has agreed to a $353 million investment from TPG, which is a mega private equity firm. That represents about a 23% equity stake.

Unfortunately, the ailing housing market in the U.K. appears to be far from over. As a result, we’ll likely see other capital infusions of financial services firms.

This is certainly good news for TPG. After all, the firm has a long history in restructurings as well as financial services (for example, TPG helped structure a variety of deals for failed S&Ls during the late 1980s).

In fact, TPG is in the process of raising a $7 billion fund for financial services firm.

Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including The Complete M&A Handbook and The Edgar Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements. He also operates MergerBook.com.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Competitive strategy, Google (GOOG), McDonald’s (MCD)

Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ: MSFT) is getting out of the book-scanning business, an admission the software maker made late last week. Just like competitor Google, Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG), Microsoft wanted to bring entire libraries into the digital realm for customers. The only problem is this: Google’s online business is extremely profitable, while Microsoft’s is not.

So, out go the boat anchors and what will survive will be the projects best suited to compete head-to-head against Google. Microsoft said that digitizing the world’s books to make them searchable online “no longer fits with the company’s plan for its search operation.”

Is this a sign that Microsoft is becoming choosier in its battles with Google? Of course it is. The “me too” stance the world’s largest software company has taken for quite some time can’t last forever. Shareholders may demand profits outside Microsoft’s Windows and Office franchises at some point, if not right now. At least Ole’ Softie did not anger book publishers, since its book-scanning efforts centered on publications already in the public domain; Google’s efforts have centered on anything published, regardless of copyright.

Filed under: Products and services, General Electric (GE), Time Warner (TWX), Wal-Mart (WMT), Walt Disney (DIS), Sony Corp ADR (SNE), Media World, Marvel Entertainment (MVL)

I read an article out on the AP over the weekend that reflected some thoughts I’ve been having about the Blu-ray medium. It just doesn’t feel like people are that crazy for the format just yet, and it looks like my perception may be right.

The AP piece talks about how the price of the players seems to be too high for consumers. With some going for $399, the value issue is understandable in the context of an economic slowdown. Another good point was brought up: since consumers have been busy upgrading to large-screen TVs, there’s just not enough left in some household budgets for adoption of the relatively new technology.

Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT), however, was mentioned as a retailer that is planning to become competitive in terms of price on Blu-ray units. Nevertheless, pundits believe it might be a few years before Blu-ray becomes saturated in homes across America.

As an investor who holds media companies in his portfolio — Disney (NYSE: DIS), Marvel (NYSE: MVL) and, through General Electric (NYSE: GE), I have exposure to NBC Universal — I am hoping that the new format becomes ubiquitous as swiftly as possible. Compared to DVD’s initial adoption, there is some statistical evidence that the curve is actually proceeding at a faster pace.

Continue reading When will Blu-ray become a major medium?

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Wal-Mart (WMT), Ford Motor (F)

Monday, June 2

Tuesday, June 3

Continue reading Market highlights for next week: Monthly sales due out

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Struggling home builder Standard Pacific got a big-time private equity bailout today by investors who will gobble up a bunch of equity in exchange for a nice cash infusion.  They’ve also been able to restructure about $13 billion worth of debt through MaitlinPatterson.

We’ve seen this with the banks taking on huge amounts of cash from sovereign wealth funds and via other channels, it will be interesting to see how many home builders are ’saved’ in the same manner.

From the Wall Street Journal on the Standard Pacific bailout:

Standard Pacific Corp., a struggling home builder which for months has been besieged by bankruptcy rumors, is getting a much-needed equity infusion from one of its creditors, the big private equity firm MatlinPatterson.

MatlinPatterson has agreed to buy about $381 million of stock at $3.05 a share. In addition, the firm will swap $128.5 million of the builder’s debt that it owns for warrants to acquire preferred stock. The builder is also planning a rights offering, which is expected to raise an additional $152 million. If shareholders reject the proposed offering, MatlinPatterson has agreed to back stop any short fall.

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Deals, Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), Yahoo! (YHOO), XM Satellite Radio (XMSR)

News emerged late yesterday that the Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) proposal to Yahoo! (NASDAQ: YHOO) would be to buy its search business and have the portal keep its content operations and sell its foreign investments.

According to The Wall Street Journal, “Microsoft didn’t indicate how much it would pay under the plan, which was initially presented by Microsoft representatives to Yahoo.” One school of thought is that the money could be used for a share buyback to raise Yahoo!’s stock price.

It would require some perverse logic to see how the deal would benefit Yahoo! beyond an initial infusion of cash. Search is at the core of Yahoo!’s long-term plans to revive its business, even though it runs a distant second to Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) in the category. If Yahoo! is left with nothing more than a content business, Wall Street would have to wonder whether the company could generate any meaningful operating income at all.

Microsoft is playing a game by making an odd and, in many ways, unattractive offer. The only question is why?

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com and author of the Ten Stocks Under $10 letter.

Los Angeles County has witnessed every facet of the housing bubble. From historically lower priced areas such as Compton having homes sell at $500,000 to higher priced areas like Beverly Hills seeing homes sell in the multi-millions. We also were at the vanguard of interest only, option ARM, and other exotic mortgages […]
Related Posts:
Living Large on $25,000 a Year in Southern California.
Double Bubble: California Compared to the United States. Vacancy Rates up Homeownership Down.
Southern California Housing Numbers Exposed: The Bottom Falls out of the Housing Market, Again.
The Genesis of the Credit Bubble: Advertising, Deception, and $163 Billion in Subprime California Loans Resetting in 1 Year.
Are you a Debt Slave?

Los Angeles County has witnessed every facet of the housing bubble. From historically lower priced areas such as Compton having homes sell at $500,000 to higher priced areas like Beverly Hills seeing homes sell in the multi-millions. We also were at the vanguard of interest only, option ARM, and other exotic mortgages that made there way into every corner of the nation that are now dragging the economy into the gutter. There are very few people that now doubt that what we had in this decade was a housing bubble.

In looking at Los Angeles County with 10,000,000 people living here, we get an excellent representation of the housing mania. We have cities such as Lynwood, Paramount, South Gate, and El Monte that witnessed astronomical price jumps while the local family income remained stagnant and didn’t come close to keeping up with housing appreciation. We also have areas such as Santa Monica, Beverly Hills, Rancho Palos Verdes, and Brentwood that also saw amazing jumps in prices and even those with higher incomes had to stretch their dollars for these homes. Every market niche went up with little discrimination to the quality of the home, local area incomes, or any practical economic fundamentals.

Now that prices are quickly correcting and are trying to find a bottom based on fundamentals, the reality is such that the market has a very long way to go before we hit a bottom. The purpose of this article is simply to arrive at an educated figure of how many Los Angeles County homeowners are now underwater with their mortgage. We know simply by the massive price decreases and the rising tide in foreclosures that many homeowners now find themselves in the precarious situation of having a larger mortgage than the market price of their home. But how many people exactly? This of course is a difficult number but we’ll try to look at multiple indicators to arrive at an educated number.

Case-Shiller Los Angeles

Case Shiller

As we showed in a previous article highlighting the drop in Los Angeles home prices, prices in Los Angeles County have now reached levels that were seen in June of 2004. According to the Case-Shiller report which came out earlier in the week, Los Angeles now has a number of 207.11 which is nearly the price reached in June of 2004 (206.3). The base year of the index is January of 2000, which starts at 100. So even at today’s price, Los Angeles has still doubled in slightly over 8 years.

Amazingly, now that prices are quickly aligning with fundamentals even data from other sources is coinciding with the above. For example, according to DataQuick the median price of a home in Los Angeles County in April of 2008 was $435,000. If we look at the price in June of 2004, the median price of a Los Angeles County home was $414,000. So for the purpose of this article we are going to use the following data points:

June 2004 start date: Assuming data from Case-Shiller

June 2004 start date: DataQuick Los Angeles County Sales

The way we’ll construct our model will include sales from June 2004 to present. We’ll then assume the following:

2004 Sales: 50% of homes sold during this time are underwater

2005 Sales: 60% of homes sold during this time are underwater

2006 Sales: 75% of homes sold during this time are underwater

2007 Sales: 55% of homes sold during this time are underwater

2008 Sales: 25% of homes sold during this time are underwater

A couple of points regarding the assumptions above. If we look at the median price alone, we can say that all homes sold at median market value in 2005, 2006, and 2007 are underwater. What we are assuming is people with down payments that have a cushion, those that underpaid market value and have some room, and those in areas that are still holding strong. Also, we are giving a higher percentage to 2005 and 2006 simply because of the sheer amount of sales during these years. Even though Los Angeles County did not hit a median price peak until May of 2007 of $550,000, sales had already fallen drastically.

Let us now look at the data:

Total Sales Per Year:

2004: 121,695

2005: 119,050

2006: 100,206

2007: 74,772

2008: 16,145 (*data up until April of 2008)

Total Homes sold in Los Angeles County Since June of 2004: 431,868

So that gives us a raw number of sales. If we are to apply our formula from above, then we can assume the following:

Homes Underwater Purchased in:

2004: 60,847

2005: 71,430

2006: 75,154

2007: 41,124

2008: 4,036

Total homes underwater in Los Angeles County: 256,617

From this number, we’ll also have to cut it down and eliminate 20% simply because of homes being resold. That is, one household buying a home, selling it, and buying another in that same timeframe. As we are constantly told by the realtors out there, the “typical” family will only stay in their home for 7 years. So that will still give us 205,294 homes that are underwater.

Now keep in mind that we are being conservative here. First, this model is assuming that price drops will not continue. What if the Case-Shiller Index decreases further which all signs are pointing to? What if prices go back to 2003 or 2002 levels? Even with these conservative measures, we can assume that over 200,000 current Los Angeles County homeowners that bought since June of 2004 are underwater. The next issue is that many homes in distress are now going into foreclosure. The number is startling:

Notice of Defaults for Los Angeles County:

First Quarter 2008: 20,339

First Quarter 2007: 8,843

In one year, notice of defaults have gone sky high for Los Angeles County. Yet the more disturbing trend is how many of these notice of defaults are going into foreclosure. What this tells us is being underwater is a key factor in people losing their home:

“(DataQuick April 2008) Of the homeowners in default, an estimated 32 percent emerge from the foreclosure process by bringing their payments current, refinancing, or selling the home and paying off what they owe. A year ago it was about 52 percent. The increased portion of homes lost to foreclosure reflects the slow real estate market, as well as the number of homes bought during the height of the market with multiple-loan financing, which makes ‘work-outs’ difficult.”

That number is startling. What that tells us is 68 percent of these notice of defaults will become foreclosures. Just for a frame of reference, let us look at some California numbers:

California Notice of Defaults and Trustee Deeds

Q2 2006: 20,752 NODS / 1,936 Recorded Trustee Deeds = Raito of 9.3%

Q2 2007: 53,943 NODS / 17,408 Recorded Trustee Deeds = Ratio of 32.2%

Q4 2007: 81,550 NODS / 31,676 Recorded Trustee Deeds = Ratio of 38.8%

Q1 2008: 113,676 NODS / 47,171 Recorded Trustee Deeds = Ratio of 41.1%

These numbers do not bode well. In a matter of two years, we saw statewide only 9.3% of notice of defaults going into foreclosure jump up to the current rate where nearly 68% of the current notice of defaults will go into foreclosure. Interestingly enough, that 113,676 NODs being sent out is quickly approaching that 200,000 underwater estimate that we arrived at.

This is a very rough estimation of course since it is nearly impossible to get a hard number of the actual homes underwater in Los Angeles County. But given the rise in NODs and foreclosures, we have a lot more homes that will flood the market soon:

foreclosures

The only thing that can stop this tsunami is for the housing market to go into bubble mode again but that isn’t likely. What are your thoughts about this? How many people do you think are underwater on their mortgage?

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information

Related Posts:
Living Large on $25,000 a Year in Southern California.
Double Bubble: California Compared to the United States. Vacancy Rates up Homeownership Down.
Southern California Housing Numbers Exposed: The Bottom Falls out of the Housing Market, Again.
The Genesis of the Credit Bubble: Advertising, Deception, and $163 Billion in Subprime California Loans Resetting in 1 Year.
Are you a Debt Slave?

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Hat tip to the Data Mining blog for posting this gem of a graph of foreclosures from the New York Times. Check out the visual representation of foreclosures below. Stunning. Click the link above to see the full-size image.

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Newspapers, Stocks to Buy

Which would you rather own: an up and coming company or a down and out former star on the decline, recently booted out of a major index.

According to a study authored by two finance professors, “The Long-Term Impact from Russell 2000 Rebalancing”, the answer is, believe it or not, the latter. The study looked at how companies that have recently been added to the Russell 2000 fare compared with recent deletions. The New York Times sums up the results: “The researchers found that over this period, deleted stocks proceeded to perform markedly better than their replacements, on average. Over the 12 months after reconstitution, for example, the deleted stocks outperformed their replacements by an average of 9.3 percentage points. In the five years after reconstitution, the difference was 40.1 percentage points.”

How can investors take advantage of that performance gap? It’s tough because you cannot, by definition, use index funds. You have to think that an ETF will come along soon specializing in un-rebalanced index funds, but that hasn’t happened yet. Wisdom Tree, get on it!

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Close
E-mail It