Archive for June 5th, 2008

Filed under: Earnings reports, Analyst reports, Google (GOOG), Starbucks (SBUX), Economic data

Public companies with auction-rate securities on their balance sheets were, in many cases, forced to write-down the value of those assets because they have become illiquid. Firms took on the investments because they were considered as easy to buy and sell as cash, but offered better interest rates. Then the market for the securities stopped trading.

Under GAAP, the companies holding the auction-rate paper had to take a P&L charge.

According to The Wall Street Journal, “According to a study of earnings reports conducted by securities-valuation firm Pluris Valuation Advisors LLC, 402 public companies disclosed that they held variations of auction-rate securities. Half had written down the value of their holdings. Of those that did, the average markdown was 13.2%, the study shows.”

What investors should watch for is the companies which have not acted, because they could face a significant hit in future quarters. That, in turn, could mean a sell-off in their shares. Some companies which do not have huge amounts of cash, could actually face a credit squeeze.

Several fairly big and, one would think smart, companies that took a haircut in Q1 include Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) and Starbucks (NASDAQ: SBUX).

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. He is also the author of the Ten Stocks Under $10 letter.

Metlife, the insurance giant, is making a bet that the housing market is bottoming out by purchasing residential mortgage lender First Horizon.  This purchase comes on the heels of their recent pick-up of reverse mortgage lender EverBank Financial.  I think they’re crazy to jump in at this point, but I don’t have a team of over-paid analysts, so what do I know.  If they have cash to burn short-term they may find some long-term advantage, but to me the risks seem severe at this point.

From Bloomberg on the purchase:

MetLife Inc., the largest U.S. life insurer, agreed to buy a residential mortgage business from First Horizon National Corp., expanding its bet on the U.S. housing market.

The purchase includes the home loan unit of First Horizon’s Tennessee Bank National Association outside of that state, with 230 offices in the U.S., the New York-based insurer said today in a statement. MetLife said it isn’t acquiring any subprime or Alt- A mortgages in the purchase. Terms weren’t disclosed.

MetLife is expanding its banking services after agreeing in April to buy a reverse mortgage specialist from Jacksonville, Florida-based EverBank Financial Corp. Life insurers including No. 2 Prudential Financial Inc. and Principal Financial Group Inc. reiterated last month their strategies of investing in mortgages even after the meltdown of the subprime home market prompted writedowns and stock drops.

“They’re probably calling a bottom on prices or close to it,” Alan Devlin, an analyst with Atlantic Equities LLP in London, said of MetLife in an interview. “It does tell you that they are willing to step in and make investments and confident enough in their capital levels.”

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Analyst reports, Analyst upgrades and downgrades

MOST NOTEWORTHY: Hotels, Continental AG and VNUS Medical were today’s noteworthy downgrades:

  • Oppenheimer downgraded shares of Marriott International (NYSE: MAR), Intercontinental Hotels (NYSE: IHG) and Choice Hotels (NYSE: CHH) to Perform from Outperform to reflect recent weakness in the leisure segment and expectations for weakening transient business travel.
  • Societe Generale downgraded shares of Continental AG (OTC: CTTAY) to Sell from Buy on valuation, as they recommend taking profits following the recent rally.
  • Piper downgraded shares of VNUS Medical (NASDAQ: VNUS) to Neutral from Buy on valuation following the company’s patent victory.

OTHER DOWNGRADES:

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Television, General Electric (GE), Walt Disney (DIS), CBS Corp ‘B’ (CBS), News Corp’B’ (NWS), Film

News Corp.’s (NYSE: NWS) Fox network recently settled a snag with the talent behind The Simpsons. According to The Hollywood Reporter, fresh deals were struck that will keep the show on for a 20th season. That’s pretty darn long to be on television, and it’s a testament to the iconic quality that the animated series possesses.

Negotiations reportedly went on for months. In fact, next season will only see 20 episodes instead of 22 (they better still do a Halloween episode!). Some of the talent will be receiving $400,000 per show, representing a 33% raise (the cast actually wanted more than that). The Reporter article did not say who was getting what. I have to ask the following question: considering how long the show has been on, and considering that media companies are trying to discourage rampant increases in above-the-line costs (at least, that’s what they should be doing, as far as I’m concerned), should News Corp. execs have demanded that Fox just end the negotiations and refuse to give in to a 33% raise?

I’ve got to be honest, a big part of me says “yes.” However, there is incentive to keep The Simpsons on the air. Last summer, a movie version of the long-running show made a successful leap to the silver screen. The film grossed over $180 million at domestic theaters, and its worldwide total stands at more than $525 million, according to Boxofficemojo.

Continue reading Should News Corp. cancel ‘The Simpsons?’

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Google (GOOG), Apple Inc (AAPL), Dell (DELL), Exxon Mobil (XOM), Market matters, Chevron Corp (CVX), ConocoPhillips (COP), Research in Motion (RIMM), BP p.l.c. ADS (BP), salesforce.com inc (CRM), Stocks to Buy, Stocks to Sell, Cramer on BloggingStocks

TheStreet.com’s Jim Cramer says observers demand perfection, but the arrows slung at diverse thinking offer lessons in making money.

The level of perfection people demand, the level of performance they say they demand, the insistence on making money in any particular way, these are all part of what it is like to be, well, me.

One of the best calls I have ever had was with Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) (Cramer’s Take). It was a happenstance call, as so many really are but pros won’t admit that because well, then why pay them? My daughter wanted a second iPod because she had a pink one and needed a blue one. It was that “fashion statement” wakeup call that told me the numbers for iPods in the analysts’ reports were way too low.

I pushed the stock hard everywhere. When I got my own show on CNBC, I endlessly lauded Apple in the $70s, $80s and $90s, and made a major statement when I included it in my Four Horsemen of Tech.

At the end of the year I took it off the list, as I did with all the Horsemen except Research In Motion (NASDAQ: RIMM) (Cramer’s Take). The $198 price reeked of greed.

I got back on the stock when it hit the $120s. Again, happenstance. This time the iChat camera in my daughter’s room after she insisted I get rid of the Dell (NASDAQ: DELL) (Cramer’s Take) and go for the Mac. When word came down that the new iPhone would possibly include iChat, I went out and said, when it was in the $150s, that I didn’t care about price, I just cared about the time frame of the launch of the new iPhone and I would sell it into the launch. Some right before, some during and some after, and maybe to leave a quarter on, maybe not. I said last night to sell the last quarter the day after, but it might be worth keeping. I hadn’t made up my mind yet.

Why go over this litany? Because yesterday I was accosted by some fellow who was in disbelief that I recommended selling the stock. He wanted to know why I didn’t just say buy and hold, because here it is back where I told people to sell it last December — if they had done nothing, they would have done well.

I had just finished my show, and frankly I wasn’t in the mood to debate it. But the guy was insistent that I hadn’t done the right thing.

I told him, OK, on at $70, off at $190; on at $120, back to $185. How in heck could you be better than that?

He insisted that all I did was trade it. That trading was really unnecessary. I went through the arithmetic. With my suggestions you picked up 120, (190 minus 70 basis) and then an additional 65, so you got 185 points. With his method, he only got 115.

He suggested my method was riskier. I said that the riskiest thing to do was to ride $190 back to $120 and give up more than half your gain. He said it didn’t turn out that way. Buy and hold “kept you in.”

Finally, I said, forget Apple. If you can make 185, isn’t that better than 115?

He said, “They are both good.”

I gave up.

This can be an impossible business.

Most stocks, the vast majority, have stunk for several years now. Stocks have stunk as an investment unless you nailed the sector, and the sectors have been agriculture, infrastructure, minerals, defense and oil and gas, and Apple, Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) (Cramer’s Take), RIMM and Salesforce.com (NYSE: CRM) (Cramer’s Take).

Some scattered takeovers. Otherwise, that’s it.

And even when you nail it, as I did with Apple, it isn’t enough.

This weekend a guy came up to me at a restaurant in Allenhurst, N.J. I was minding my own business, trying to eat. The guy told me that he had all oils, that he had made millions of dollars, that he had Chevron (NYSE: CVX) (Cramer’s Take), Exxon (NYSE: XOM) (Cramer’s Take), Conoco (NYSE: COP) (Cramer’s Take), BP (NYSE: BP) (Cramer’s Take). I think he may have been implying that I helped him, but I am not sure.

Anyway, I told him that he should sell some, that those gains could not be sustainable. I told him that I had sold my BP.

He told me I didn’t know what I was talking about. That these were up stocks.

Here’s my conclusion. I know what I am talking about. This is a really horrid, crummy market, where the gains are all hardscrabble and can be ephemeral. Taking them is the only sure thing. You don’t have to take all of them but you have to take some of them.

Oh, and here’s another take. In the end, nobody cares what anybody else says when they are winning. The Apple guy and the oil guy are winning. They are geniuses. The rest of us are idiots.

Just like we were in March 2000. Maybe we were even more stupid because we liked them in February 2000 (much-reviled mind change when the Nasdaq moved up several thousand points in a couple of months.)

Last conclusion: I like being stupid and an idiot. It is why I have made a lot of money.

RELATED LINKS:
Cramer’s ‘Mad Money’ Recap: Wade In with Kaydon
Top Ten Most Searched Stocks on TheStreet.com

Jim Cramer is a director and co-founder of TheStreet.com. He contributes daily market commentary for TheStreet.com’s sites and serves as an adviser to the company’s CEO. At the time of publication, Cramer was long ConocoPhillips.

When you look at the current unemployment rate of 5 percent, you would think that our economy would be humming along. Yet the way that they calculate the official unemployment rate is such a joke, you are almost left guessing how many people are really out of work. Are you looking for work […]
Related Posts:
Credit Crisis Part Deux: The Noise in the Housing Attic.
The Short Sale Report: Volume 1 – The True Barometer of the Housing Market
A Bubble That Broke the World: Lessons from the Great Depression Part IX. When Credit is Debt.
The Menace of Mortgage Debts: Lessons from the Great Depression Series: Part IV: Where do we go After the Housing Crash?
Sheep Back to the Slaughter: Lessons from the Great Depression Part VIII: All the Change and Bear Market Rallies.

When you look at the current unemployment rate of 5 percent, you would think that our economy would be humming along. Yet the way that they calculate the official unemployment rate is such a joke, you are almost left guessing how many people are really out of work. Are you looking for work and simply can’t find a job and gave up? Consider yourself not counted in the numbers. Are you working part-time although you want full-time employment? Guess what? You are not counted either! It is patently absurd and frustrating to see what kind of gimmicks the government uses to massage the unemployment data.

Mish over at Global Economic Trend analysis on a monthly basis has to dig into the data to point out the stupidity of the unemployment numbers:

unemployment

It is such an utter disturbance that people are quoting 5 percent as the unemployment rate when 9.2 percent of our population is either underemployed, working part-time, or flat out given up and not working. Also, what about all the people in finance, construction, lending, or any fields associated to the credit bubble that are now receiving a lot less simply because they are commissioned based or depend on their being easy credit? These people are still hanging on by a thread with a massively reduced income yet they are still counted as fully employed. That is the issue with our current unemployment rate. So if our current rate is closer to 10 percent, wouldn’t that change the perception of our current economy?

This is part X in our continuing Great Depression series:

1. Personal Story by a Lawyer from a Previous Asset Bubble. Can we Learn from the Past and How will the Housing Decline Impact You?

2. Lessons From the Great Depression: A Letter from a former Banking President Discussing the Bubble.

3. Florida Housing 1920s Redux: History repeating in Florida and Lessons from the Roaring 20s.

4. The Menace of Mortgage Debts: Lessons from the Great Depression Series: Part IV: Where do we go After the Housing Crash?

5. Business Devours its Young: Lessons from the Great Depression: Part V: Destroying the Working Class.

6. Crash! The Housing Market Free Fall and Client #10 Contagion.

7. Winston Smith and the Bailouts in Oceania: Lessons from the Great Depression Part VII.

8. Sheep Back to the Slaughter: Lessons from the Great Depression Part VIII: All the Change and Bear

Market Rallies.

9. A Bubble That Broke the World

It may help to take a look at the unemployment rate during the Great Depression:

Great Depression Unemployment Rate

*Soucre: Gold Ocean

“The Great Depression began in 1929 when the entire world suffered an enormous drop in output and an unprecedented rise in unemployment. World economic output continued to decline until 1932 when it clinked bottom at 50% of its 1929 level. Unemployment soared, in the United States it peaked at 24.9% in 1933. It remained above 20% for two more years, reluctantly declining to 14.3% by 1937. It then leapt back to 19% before its long-term decline. Since most households had only one income earner the equivalent modern unemployment rates would likely be much higher. Real economic output (real GDP) fell by 29% from 1929 to 1933 and the US stock market lost 89.5% of its value.”

The chart above is disturbing. Yet you also need to remember that the job losses came fast and furious during this time. If you were unemployed, you were unemployed. In today’s market, anyone can get a minimum wage job with our so-called service industry yet struggle along as a walking zombie. What happens when you go from a $100,000 a year real estate career to earning $9 an hour in a service sector job? If you dig into the previous jobs report from the BLS you’ll notice that the larger increase of jobs is in service oriented jobs that pay less than the other important sectors such as finance and manufacturing. Either way, the sham of the current job report is that it covers up the true reality of the situation.

You may also be shocked to hear that California now has the nation’s third-highest unemployment rate only behind Michigan and Alaska:

“(LA Times) Although April’s unemployment rate was unchanged from March, it represented a full percentage point increase above April 2007. Almost 200,000 more people were out of work than last year, giving the state the third-highest unemployment rate in the nation, behind Michigan and Alaska.

California lost 800 nonfarm jobs in April from the previous month. But seasonally adjusted numbers for the month were up slightly — 0.2% — over a year earlier, according to the Employment Development Department.”

The Great Depression also hit hard throughout the country on farmland that was mortgaged and many local banks going into default.   But we had a backup plan then.  We were a lender as a nation!  Now we are a massive debtor. We also witnessed deflation during the Great Depression which we are already seeing asset deflation with real estate:

“Another unusual aspect of the Great Depression was deflation. Prices fell 25%, 30%, 30%, and 40% in the UK, Germany, the US, and France respectively from 1929 to 1933. These were the four largest economies in the world at that time.

To put the severity of the depression in modern perspective, consider the following. Real US GDP went down 4.4% in the five years that it declined since 1959, all added together! Unemployment has never exceeded 9.7% and we have not had one year of deflation. Maybe you’re thinking, “what’s wrong with a little price deflation?” Depending on how much and how unexpected, deflation can be a devastating economic event. Imagine wages falling by 30% and the value of debts simultaneously increasing by that much.

In the great depression it would have been nice if the suffering had been so evenly distributed. Instead the deflation caused bankruptcies, which in turn led to, more bankruptcies! Millions of people and companies were wiped out completely. The lack of adequate social programs left people of all social strata depending on relatives and friends for charity. Spending became paralyzed with fear as the downturn was so unexpected, so severe, and the bad news just kept coming for years.

Many did not realize how severe the downturn was until 1932 or 1933 when the economy had technically hit bottom and even begun to chug forward. People’s resources were depleted by then and so were many of their friends’. So the human misery caused by the Depression really started in the mid-1930s.”

The problem inherent in today’s market is as follows:

First - Unemployment is understated by underemployment and shadow workers (those that have given up looking for work).  It also does not reflect the loss of income in once high paying jobs.

Second - The FDIC although providing protection to depositors has created a sort of moral hazard. If you look on sites like Bankrate, you’ll notice that the highest savings rates normally come from the most capital impaired institutions. Many on the list will probably go bankrupt in 1 or 2 years. Now why would anyone invest their money in these institutions if they knew that their money wasn’t protected? If it weren’t for the FDIC, these lenders would be bankrupt and rightfully so; they have horrible and flawed business models and should be allowed to fail. Instead, they offer you a nice yield on a 6 month CD.

Third - Underemployment is just as bad as unemployment. In terms of economic data and spin, it is probably worse since it gives many a false sense of security. We are not at a 5 percent unemployment rate. It is simply an absurd number and even the fact that the CPI told us last month that energy prices dropped, I think that even the lay person now gets that there is something rotten in Denmark. If you look at the report, how can you consider someone working part-time but wanting full-time employment as part of the official unemployment number? The current number that should be quoted is the 9.2 percent number. As we’ve gone along, we’ve managed to allow the Ministry of Truth to massage out every kink out of the most important statistics of our economy.

Forth - Banks are being propped up on a crutch. There will be more bank failures. Think this is just hyperbole? Then why is the FDIC bringing out folks from retirement who lived through the S & L collapse to gear up for the next phase of the debt crisis?

“(MarketWatch) He’d built a new home by a lake in Texas, bought a boat and was working on his golf game. While taking on some part-time work, Holloway also traveled for months across the U.S. with his wife, from Seattle to Washington D.C., catching up with old friends and family.

That life of leisure abruptly changed about six weeks ago when Holloway got a phone call from his former employer, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., or FDIC, which regulates U.S. banks and insures deposits.

Holloway, a 30-year FDIC veteran, had worked extensively with failed lenders in Houston during the savings and loan crisis in the late 1980s and early 1990s, when thousands of thrifts collapsed.

Earlier this year, the FDIC began trying to lure roughly 25 retirees like Holloway back to prepare for an increase in bank failures. It’s also hiring about 75 new staff.

Holloway quickly went back to work. ANB Financial N.A., a bank in Bentonville, Ark. with $2.1 billion in assets and $1.8 billion in customer deposits, was failing and an expert like Holloway was needed to value the assets and find a stronger institution to take them on.”

No problem folks! Any comparison to the Great Depression is doom and gloom. Listen. I know that folks like to make light of this but the problem of complacency and mind numbing control from drones on the media is that people are now content to be under slavery to debt. Do you really own that car? Try missing a payment. Do you really own that $700,000 McMansion? Try missing your mortgage payment. The false guise of security is that consumer inflation is non-existent (hello $4 gas!), that unemployment is at 5 percent (you mean I can kick back at home and watch Montel and not be considered unemployed?), and finally assuming that things from the past cannot occur again.

Simply from looking at the data it looks like we are going to have our own lost decade like Japan. The data has gotten so out of whack, that you have rely on other measures like income to triangulated your assumptions. If we are simply to look at the CPI and employment numbers from the government we’d assume the economy is perfect like a bowl of warm porridge.

I’m not the only one that is waking up to this insanity:

“(Harper’s Magazine) If Washington’s harping on weapons of mass destruction was essential to buoy public support for the invasion of Iraq, the use of deceptive statistics has played its own vital role in convincing many Americans that the U.S. economy is stronger, fairer, more productive, more dominant, and richer with opportunity than it actually is.

The corruption has tainted the very measures that most shape public perception of the economy-the monthly Consumer Price Index (CPI), which serves as the chief bellwether of inflation; the quarterly Gross Domestic Product (GDP), which tracks the U.S. economy’s overall growth; and the monthly unemployment figure, which for the general public is perhaps the most vivid indicator of economic health or infirmity. Not only do governments, businesses, and individuals use these yardsticks in their decision-making but minor revisions in the data can mean major changes in household circumstances-inflation measurements help determine interest rates, federal interest payments on the national debt, and cost-of-living increases for wages, pensions, and Social Security benefits. And, of course, our statistics have political consequences too. An administration is helped when it can mouth banalities about price levels being “anchored” as food and energy costs begin to soar.”

So the most relied upon measures for the health of the economy are completed screwed up. Like the entire ownership society myth that was pushed (and by the way homeownership is now back to 2002 levels, pre-dating the ownership society speech in 2003). The problem that is going on is we have a silent destruction of our treasured U.S. Dollar and our productive base is being dismantled piece by piece. People were placated since they felt somehow that pushing papers around and flipping houses was somehow going to keep us competitive with nations that are pumping out engineers and scientist on an incredible basis. Time to rethink our numbers and demand the truth be reflected but it would appear that most folks simply want access to a credit card, a television, and a burger in the hand.  Time to get real and focus on improving the balance sheet of our country.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information

Related Posts:
Credit Crisis Part Deux: The Noise in the Housing Attic.
The Short Sale Report: Volume 1 – The True Barometer of the Housing Market
A Bubble That Broke the World: Lessons from the Great Depression Part IX. When Credit is Debt.
The Menace of Mortgage Debts: Lessons from the Great Depression Series: Part IV: Where do we go After the Housing Crash?
Sheep Back to the Slaughter: Lessons from the Great Depression Part VIII: All the Change and Bear Market Rallies.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

The headline is straight from Yahoo! News because I don’t think there’s a better way to say it.  Massachusetts is suing H&R Block for Option One Mortgage’s lending practices.  Option One is owned by H&R Block.  It will be interesting to see how this plays out and whether it sets the precedent for future legal action against lenders and brokers.

From the article:

Massachusetts authorities sued H&R Block Inc on Tuesday, charging that its mortgage unit discriminated against black and Latino borrowers and escalated a crisis over property foreclosures in the state.

The lawsuit is the first by a U.S. state to accuse a subprime-mortgage lender of civil rights violations following a wave of foreclosures of homes in poor, often black, neighborhoods nationwide.

The complaint, filed in Suffolk Superior Court, accuses H&R’s subprime-lending subsidiary, Option One Mortgage Corp, of engaging “in unfair and deceptive conduct on a broad scale.”

The complaint said the H&R Block unit charged black and Latino borrowers higher points and fees to close their loans than similarly situated white borrowers and targeted black and Latino consumers with marketing “that pushed the sale of predatory loan products.”

“Marketing loan products that were designed to fail not only harms individuals and families who are struggling to afford their homes, but also has a negative impact on neighboring homeowners and the community at large,” Coakley said in a statement.

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Options, Technical Analysis

NTAP logoNetApp (NASDAQ: NTAP) shares are falling after the company announced it will sell $1.1 billion in five-year convertible senior notes to institutional buyers. Terms of the debt were not disclosed. If you think this stock won’t be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on NTAP.

After hitting a one-year high of $33.84 last June, the stock hit a one-year low of $19.00 in March. This morning, NTAP opened at $23.48. So far today the stock has hit a low of $22.90 and a high of $23.88. As of 12:10, NTAP is trading at $23.85, down $0.11 (-0.4%). The chart for NTAP looks bullish but deteriorating, while S&P gives the stock a neutral 3 Stars (out of 5) hold rating.

For a bearish hedged play on this stock, I would consider a September bear-call credit spread above the $30 range. A bear-call credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of call options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn’t do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make an 8.7% return in three and a half months as long as NTAP is below $30 at September expiration. NetApp would have to rise by more than 25% before we would start to lose money. Learn more about this type of trade here.

Continue reading NetApp (NTAP) falls on new debt

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Close
E-mail It