Archive for June 12th, 2008

Filed under: International markets, Google (GOOG), Marketing and advertising, Middle East

It seems to me like the ultimate test of a tool lies not with its functionality, but with who uses it. This goes double for search tools, as their ability to access information vastly increases their popularity, and thus marketability. Personally, I firmly believe that most questions in the world can be answered by one of three sites. If it’s a movie or TV question, I head to IMDB. If IMDB doesn’t have the answer, I generally head over to Wikipedia. And if, for some reason, Wiki’s answer doesn’t suffice, I pull out the big guns and head over to Google (NASDAQ: GOOG). Of course, so does pretty much everyone else in the world.

This, of course, explains why the United States has begun investing heavily in Google Ads in foreign countries. While the government’s online presence is pretty impressive, even the best website is only useful if it can generate hits; given the United States’ overseas unpopularity right now, getting foreign nationals to visit its sites is an uphill battle. With this in mind, Google now displays ads for various United States government agencies when the user enters various key words and phrases. Currently, the terms that will generate an ad from the America.gov website include “terrorism,” “Middle East peace,” “human rights,” “press freedom,” and “U.S. elections.”

The U.S. is paying Google based on the number of hits that its ads generate. Currently, that ranges from $25,000 to $30,000 per month for the America.gov website and a further $15,000 for other Middle-East oriented sites. Given that the $15,000 expenditure generates roughly 300,000 hits per month, it seems like a pretty good deal. For that matter, it’s worth noting that an internet search platform has become the U.S. government’s go-to guy for worldwide advertising. If Google can get people in Saudi Arabia to express an interest in the U.S.’s informational website, it seems like there’s little that the company can’t do!

 

Read

Filed under: Scandals

I’ve been critical of allegedly steroid-pumping baseball player turned options trader turn TheStreet.com pundit Lenny Dykstra for awhile. I recently asked “Do you really want to take options trading advice from a guy who got his job as an investment guru at least in part because he sent Jim Cramer’s sister a signed poster?”

Now Forbes is making a startling accusation: “Yet a close look at Dykstra’s portfolio raises doubts about whether the baseball All-Star turned TheStreet.com (NASDAQ: TSCM) guru has been picking many of those stocks or relying on a seasoned stand-in.”

The juicy dirt comes from a lawsuit filed against the former slugger by Doubldown Media, a publisher that had been collaborating with Dykstra on a newslettter: “At Dykstra’s insistence, Doubledown began negotiations to pay Richard Suttmeier, a stock analyst, to provide Dykstra with research assistance for the Dykstra Report and who, upon information and belief learned subsequently, provided Dykstra lists of recommended stocks daily.”

Continue reading Lenny Dykstra: may have been busted by Forbes

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Economic data, Housing, Videos

Another quarter of rising foreclosures has been observed.


Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Great find by Paul Kedrosky at Infectious Greed. This LA Times story shows the demise of the Hummer, a popular vehicle choice in Orange County, as gas prices have spiked and credit has crumbled.

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Earnings reports, Analyst reports, Deals, Industry, Consumer experience, Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), Yahoo! (YHOO)

There have been concerns that the rate at which people clicking on the text ads next to Google (NASDAQ:GOOG) search results has been falling. These concerns caused spirited debate before the company’s last earnings report and may have even pushed the firm’s stock price down. But earnings were excellent, and much of the fear went away.

Now it turns out the Google ads are doing better and better, and clicks on ads at rivals are falling. The Wall Street Journal, using comScore (NASDAQ: SCOR) data, reports that Google’s performance improved in April and “Paid clicks for Microsoft Corp (NASDAQ:MSFT) and Yahoo Inc (NASDAQ:YHOO) meanwhile declined during the month, according to the data.” The paper reports that Google’s performance in the U.S. was 20% ahead of expectations.

Good for Google, but very bad for its two chief rivals. The information indicates that even if Microsoft buys Yahoo!, the combined operation will have a much smaller market share in search than Google, and its advertising will perform worse. If Microsoft and Yahoo! stay separate, their uphill battles could face extremely long odds.

From all the data available, Google’s search technology brings back better results for consumers. Its technology for matching ads to searches also appears to work much better. The fight for the domination of this critical portion of the internet is over. The only question is whether the second and third place firms can make money long-term.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com and author of the Ten Stocks Under $10 letter.

Filed under: Merrill Lynch (MER), Options

Merrill Lynch (NYSE: MER) is recently down $1.25 to $36.70. John Thain, Chairman & CEO of MER is participating on a conference call today at 2:00 pm hosted by Deutsche Bank’s Mike Mayo.

MER call option volume of 11,449 contracts compares to put volume of 30,405 contracts. MER June option implied volatility is at 80, July is at 71 is above its 26-week average of 49 according to Track Data, suggesting larger price movement.

Option Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Today we get the stunning announcement that unemployment “surged” from 5 percent to 5.5 percent in one month. Of course, given the way the government calculates its shoddy employment numbers this is only shocking to folks that believe in the absurd government Kool-Aid. The reality of the current market arena is we are […]
Related Posts:
Foreclosure Nation: More Like Foreclosure States. 4 States Made up 50 Percent of all Foreclosures and Distressed Property Action.
3 Captivating Housing Stories: Trouble in the 90210: When Beverly Hills Isn’t Prime. Vote yes for Multiple Foreclosures. The Coming Bank Failues.
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Pacoima. Zillow says $457,000 but Listed at $225,000?
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Stanton.
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Baldwin Park. When you Only Need to Show Concrete to Sell at $400,000+.

Today we get the stunning announcement that unemployment “surged” from 5 percent to 5.5 percent in one month. Of course, given the way the government calculates its shoddy employment numbers this is only shocking to folks that believe in the absurd government Kool-Aid. The reality of the current market arena is we are floating in a sort of no-man’s-land where Wall Street and Washington simply do not have an idea of how trying things are on the streets of America. I’m sure many politicians get their ideas of certain cities from YouTube or the regular tube and think that the OC is all like Newport Coast or Laguna Hills and conveniently leave out Santa Ana, Stanton, Westminster, and Anaheim which make a more accurate representation.

The current shift that is occurring is rather stunning. You need to remember that right now is usually the best seasonal time for real estate. Remember only a few months ago all the optimistic hogwash being put out by the housing complex that somehow California was going to bounce back? Really hard to jump back in at any price when California has the 3rd highest unemployment rate of all states. And the recent trend of distress with prime mortgages is simply reflecting the general malaise in our economy.

I was hearing on the radio yesterday an ad saying, “oil has peaked! The recent trend back down to $122 is a perfect time to get in [X company]! Don’t wait! Act now.” The irony is the ad was produced probably on the $122 day, jumped up yesterday, and today is now back near the all time high of $135. That is how quick things are changing. Now let us give you some raw numbers so you can sink your teeth in:

invshortsales.png

Inventory steadily is going lower and short sales are going up. How can that be? What we are seeing is the psychological component of real estate playing out in full force. Here are three quick observations that we can derive from the data:

1. Distress sales are going up. Banks with REOs are having to place homes on the market at a time when prices are free falling.

2. Those teetering on the edge represented by notice of defaults:

foreclosures

Demonstrate that we have a steady pipeline for the near future of distressed properties. The rise in short-sale numbers only reflects this reality.

3. Those that do have some equity and want higher prices are simply removing their homes from the market. This group is most likely the reason why overall inventory is falling. Sales are not the reason:

lavssales.png

4. The quick realization that prices were at an all time bubble are forcing the market to correct at a devastating pace. Homes are expensive at any price if unemployment is rising and good jobs are being lost. The employment report today demonstrates that. In a symbiotic relationship, the jobs that are being lost are very dependent on housing being good but housing can’t be good without those jobs. Welcome Catch-22 for housing.

And now we enter the next stage of the housing crisis when folks that were supposedly prime realize that they weren’t. Not sure if anyone caught the piece on NPR yesterday about folks cutting back on their groceries. They interviewed a couple of families about the rising cost of food. One family with a lower income was struggling simply to make ends meet and was even buying old boxes of cereal for $1 which at times, wasn’t exactly edible. The other case which ties into today’s article, was an affluent woman and what she said simply struck me. She was talking about how she only buys organic and spends about $300 per week on groceries. However, she was now having a hard time paying that bill. She went on and to paraphrase said something to the effect of, “well we have a home on the lake, a vacation home in another state, and live in a relatively affluent neighborhood so I guess we are upper-middle class?” Yes, the inflexion at the end isn’t necessary. But you better hope that your household income can support all that is going out to maintain that image.

The story went on and she mentioned that she no longer shopped at the organic store; the organic store which she mentioned is the only food she would eat. Welcome to the new reality. People are going to get a slow and painful education between needs and wants.

Today we salute you Beverly Hills with our Real Homes of Genius Award.

Beverly Hills, 90210 Distress

bh.png

The 90210 area code is getting a lot of mention in the last few days with the story of Ed McMahon going into default for $4.8 million with a Countrywide loan. Yet he isn’t the only one realizing that a posh zip code is not going to move a home without a qualified buyer. When Hollywood is impacted, you can rest assured that you’ll be hearing about it on the media.

Today’s home is a 3 bedroom 2 bath home in Beverly Hills. A nice home and by looking at the specs, would be a starter home in any neighborhood in the U.S. Yet this isn’t any area. This is the 90210 don’t you know? The ad tells us that this place is not a short sale or a bank owned property which makes us suspect if we dig deeper into the data. Let us first look at the sales history:

Sale History

10/17/2006: $1,350,000

12/19/2003: $825,000

07/16/2003: $775,000

Nothing odd about this. A pricey area that saw extraordinary appreciation during the boom. Like I mentioned before, leverage is a very heavy sword and cuts both ways. 10 percent on $100,000 doesn’t seem like much but use that same percent on $1 million and we’re talking real money. Let us look at the current pricing action on this place:

Price Reduced: 05/01/08 — $1,128,000 to $1,049,000
Price Reduced: 06/04/08 — $1,049,000 to $999,000

Now we can only arrive at two conclusions here. If this isn’t a short sale, then the buyer in 2006 must have put enough money down to have an equity cushion. In this case $300,000+. But is this really what is going on? It is hard to say without having further information but all we know is that it was purchased in 2006 for $1.35 million and is currently listed at $999,999 (essentially $1 million).

California is going to have a few challenging years. This coming recession is going to change the way people approach finances and perceive the Golden State. Today we salute you Beverly Hills with our Real Homes of Genius Award.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information

Related Posts:
Foreclosure Nation: More Like Foreclosure States. 4 States Made up 50 Percent of all Foreclosures and Distressed Property Action.
3 Captivating Housing Stories: Trouble in the 90210: When Beverly Hills Isn’t Prime. Vote yes for Multiple Foreclosures. The Coming Bank Failues.
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Pacoima. Zillow says $457,000 but Listed at $225,000?
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Stanton.
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Baldwin Park. When you Only Need to Show Concrete to Sell at $400,000+.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Filed under: Anheuser-Busch Cos (BUD), Options

Anheuser-Busch (NYSE: BUD) is recently trading at $62.36 in after-market trading, above its close of $58.35.

BUD announced it has received an unsolicited, non-binding proposal from InBev to acquire all of the outstanding shares of BUD for $65 per share in cash.

BUD call option volume of 101,677 contracts compares to put volume of 26,542 contracts. BUD June option implied volatility went out at 48, July at 41; above its 26-week average of 28 according to Track Data, suggesting larger price movement.

Option Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Great report by the Wall Street Journal on Angelo Mozilo’s penchant for handing out ’special’ mortgages to people that would be helpful to him and his mortgage company.  On the list?  Two former CEO’s of Fannie Mae, the largest GSE that purchases Countrywide mortgages and James Johnson, an adviser to Barack Obama’s campaign.  As the article states, no one really knows if the loans were improperly underwitten or used fraudulent documentation, but the special privilege excerised by CEOs of a government entity are at best in poor judgement.

My response?  Really? It’s sad nothing surprises me about any of this.

From the Wall Street Journal:

Countrywide Financial Corp. makes mortgage loans through a vast network of offices, brokers and call centers. But a few customers have gotten their loans a special way: through Countrywide Chief Executive Angelo Mozilo.

These borrowers, known internally as “friends of Angelo” or FoA, include two former CEOs of Fannie Mae, the biggest buyer of Countrywide’s mortgages, say people familiar with the matter.

One was James Johnson, a longtime Democratic Party power and an adviser to Sen. Barack Obama’s campaign, who this past week was named to a panel that is vetting running-mate possibilities for the presumed nominee.

As Blogging Stocks so eloquently put it:

Since Countrywide had business dealings with Fannie Mae, the whole deal looks a bit tawdry.

No one knows whether these loans will cause legal problems for any of the parties involved. But, it does, once again, raise the question of the wisdom of Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) buying a company with such an ugly past and so many chapters of less-than-ethical behavior.

Perhaps no one cares about the ethics part if there is money to be made.

Source [blownmortgage]

Close
E-mail It