Archive for June 19th, 2008

Filed under: Deals, Rumors, Google (GOOG), Yahoo! (YHOO)

A joint announcement by Yahoo! (NASDAQ: YHOO) and Google Inc. (NYSE: GOOG) scheduled for 1:30 p.m. PDT today, after market close, has rumor-mongers wondering whether the two will be announcing a big deal. Yahoo! has been on the block for so long that even the slightest breeze of news has everyone guessing; this morning, Doug McIntyre wrote that short interest was increasing as pessimists pooh-poohed Carl Icahn’s plans.

Michael Arrington at TechCrunch says his sources are insisting it’s only a search partnership, a deal that would probably have far less impact on the fate of Yahoo! — it may signal more things to come, but let’s recall that a “global advertising partnership” deal between Google and Time Warner, Inc. (NYSE: TWX)’s AOL in December 2005, in which Google purchased 5% of the internet company, never (yet) materialized into the acquisition many expected.

No major news outlet has the story yet, and there is no announcement on Yahoo!’s investor relations page. After falling 80 cents today, the stock was rebounding quickly on the rumors, at $25.97 at 2:10 p.m.

Update 6:21 p.m.:
Microsoft has pulled its $33 per share offer for Yahoo!, and Yahoo! has announced a search advertising partnership with Google. Yahoo!’s stock ended the day down $3.34, or 12.77%, at $22.81.

I was having a conversation with someone last week regarding his home equity line being shut down. He was rather distraught and frustrated by the sudden move of the lender to close off his line due to market conditions here in California. “How can they do that? They have no right to […]
Related Posts:
Superstars of Housing Love: The Sheriff Deputy Evicting People who Default.
Real Buyers of Genius: Another $20,000 a year person takes on a $600,000 mortgage.
$640 Billion in Sub-prime Loans Originated. $386 Billion in Alt-A Loans Originated. $1.026 Trillion in Loans at Risk? Priceless.
Housing Bloggers Unite: The Housing Blogger Network (HBN) has Started.
About

I was having a conversation with someone last week regarding his home equity line being shut down. He was rather distraught and frustrated by the sudden move of the lender to close off his line due to market conditions here in California. “How can they do that? They have no right to take away my hard earned money!” Aside from restraining myself from smacking him upside his head I did ask him how he earned that money that was now gone. “My home equity was my money. The bank has no right in closing access to my money.” Welcome to the new mentality of wealth in our nation.

This simple conversation is the tip of the iceberg of the challenge that is now confronting our nation. In the past few decades, Americans have arrived to the current distorted point in reality where alternate universes collide and somehow debt is now the equivalent to wealth. I should actually clarify that last statement in light of the above conversation about home equity lines being shut down:

“Wealth in the last decade isn’t how much you save or your net worth. Wealth is determined by your ability to have access to large amounts of easy debt via credit lines and maximum leverage.”

That is a very important point and once you grasp this knowledge, you can understand why we are in the predicament we are in. Today, retail sales numbers perked up and the market initially came out of the gate with guns-a-blazing. That is until folks stopped for two seconds and did the current economic math:

A: If all recent data is showing us that consumers are tapped out.

B: Home prices are still declining and foreclosures are rising.

C: Consumer inflation is hitting on every front.

D: Then how can Americans still be spending?

Let me show you how:

“American credit card debt is growing at the fastest rate in years, a fact that may signal coming trouble for the banks that issue them.

The Federal Reserve reported this week that the amount outstanding of revolving consumer credit hit $937.5 billion in November, on a seasonally adjusted basis, up 7.4 percent from a year earlier.

The annual growth rate has now been above 7 percent for three months running, the first such stretch since 2001, when a recession was driving up borrowing by hard-pressed consumers.

The surge in credit card borrowing comes as credit card default rates are gradually rising, albeit from low levels, and may reflect the fact that it has gotten harder for consumers to borrow against the value of their homes, both because home values have fallen in many markets and because mortgage lending standards have tightened.”

Now the above article was posted in January but now we are close to $1 trillion in revolving consumer debt out there. And the more ominous problem is that defaults are rising in this area. So what has occurred in the above equation is due to the lack of wage growth, people were using leverage via mortgages and consumer debt to bridge the Joneses gap. Take a look at the massive explosion in mortgage and consumer debt over the past 20 years:

consumer debt

Source: Fed Flow of Funds Report, June 2008

It is rather shocking that American households have approximately $13.84 trillion in debt obligations. In 1993, this number was at $4.2 trillion so we’ve nearly triple our national household debt in the matter of 15 years. That $13.84 trillion is a very large number and to put that into context, the estimate GDP for the entire United States for 2007 was $13.84 trillion:

GDP

Source: Wikipedia

We spend every last penny!  Is it any wonder why Americans have a negative personal savings rate? You really have to wonder how people can spend more than they earn but that is essentially the way we as a nation have been living for the past decade. This housing bubble fueled by the debt bubble was only a logical extension of the cultural financial neurosis. The great majority of the public started associating the ability to access credit with true financial prosperity. Well as we all now know, anyone with a pulse and one tooth was able to get a large mortgage in California by simply making things up. Need we remind you about the farmer making $14,000 a year with access to a $720,000 loan? Or what about the hundreds of credit card offers Americans receive each year in the mail? When debt is no longer seen as a necessary evil and a sign of wealth, new definitions take hold of mass psychology.

Take a look at this ad during the heyday of the housing bubble:

ad2.jpg

“Chances are, you’ll sell your home before we sell your mortgage.” Is this some sort of race? The underlying implication of course is you’ll make so much equity in a few short years that you’ll be selling your current McMansion for a double whopper McMansion so why worry yourself with whether they sell your mortgage off to some foreign investor. These ads only spoke to the distorted psychology of consumers who thought access to a $500,000 mortgage meant that they had access to a $500,000 net worth.

In a way, it allowed consumers to put on the bourgeois costume for a few years and feel like a million bucks even though they were drowning internally by suffocating debt. Think this isn’t the case? Take a look at the below chart:

saving.gif

savings2.png

That is why at the height of pseudo prosperity and the pinnacle of the housing bubble, Americans had for the first time crossed the negative savings barrier. This is the perfect example of watering down the definition of wealth in our country; collectively as a society people started having an aversion to saving money and a liking to debt. This of course is a major problem and no country can survive in the long run with crushing amounts of debt. I don’t care what kind of math political parties want to sell you but there is no way a country can be prosperous in the long run by running larger and larger deficits.

This implosion of the credit (debt) markets is simply a decade long debt ponzi scheme that can go on no longer. Consumer psychology still can’t understand why fuel is rising or why everything from education to groceries are costing much more. The perfect scheme was to con people into believing that going into debt, meaning you were spending tomorrow’s dollars today, was somehow a prudent way toward wealth. And the entire idea of savings lost its allure. In fact, society punished savers implicitly. For much of the past, if you bought a home folks knew that you had the diligence and restraint to hunker down for 2 or 3 years and put off conspicuous consumption for a larger goal such as a home. That entire romanticism of saving went out the window when anyone and everyone was getting BMWs and McMansions with zero down.

In fact, if you were renting and saving and trying to be frugal, you were seen as an outcast and a bum because you just missed out in a home that just went up $50,000 in one years simply because everyone was smoking the housing peyote. I wonder how many people had a kitchen conversation like this circa 2003:

Spouse A: “We should buy a home. The Perma Bulls down the street bought a home last year and they now have $50,000 in equity.”
Spouse B: “But it doesn’t make sense. How can a home be worth $50,000 more if they didn’t do anything?”
Spouse A: “Well here we are saving and all we’ve been able to save in our 2% savings account is $15,000. What if homes go up $50,000 again next year?”
Spouse B: “That can’t be because that makes no economic sense. Prices go up and correspond to some fundamental reason.”
Spouse A: “I heard that they got a home equity line and took a trip to Europe. Isn’t that great and fantastic? We actually make a bit more than they do but why do we live and feel poorer?”

Spouse B: “I don’t know. It just doesn’t make sense. I feel uncomfortable going into that large of debt. Why is that?”
Spouse A: “Because you’re stupid?”

Spouse B: “No. You are stupid you moron and don’t understand the difference between net worth and being in debt.”
Spouse A: “Isn’t wealth about what you can buy? We don’t take fancy trips or even have our own home! You are the true idiot you financial midget with no home.”
Spouse B: “I hate you.”
Spouse A: “I’m leaving you.”
Spouse B: “Go ahead and take the dog while you’re at it. I always hated how he looked at me anyways.”

lawnsign.jpg

What a lovely and heart warming story don’t you think? As you can see from the above sign, many people did have a conversation like this except in our story above, the couple split ways because of diverging financial goals and with that lawn sign, we can see that some folks unfortunately realized that selling a home in a busted bubble is no easy task.

This is the real deal here folks. We are shifting back whether we want to or not. The real psychological shift that is unfolding is the ability to break down wants and needs. A big gas guzzling car is a want and many folks are painfully realizing this. A large crushing mortgage for a McMansion is a want. Food and education are needs. Time to get these equations recalibrated before the market recalibrates them for you.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information

Related Posts:
Superstars of Housing Love: The Sheriff Deputy Evicting People who Default.
Real Buyers of Genius: Another $20,000 a year person takes on a $600,000 mortgage.
$640 Billion in Sub-prime Loans Originated. $386 Billion in Alt-A Loans Originated. $1.026 Trillion in Loans at Risk? Priceless.
Housing Bloggers Unite: The Housing Blogger Network (HBN) has Started.
About

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Filed under: Yahoo! (YHOO), Apple Inc (AAPL), Pfizer (PFE), Starbucks (SBUX), Ford Motor (F), Motorola (MOT), Johnson and Johnson (JNJ), Sprint Nextel Corp (S), Advanced Micro Dev (AMD), Money and Finance Today, Boston Scientific (BSX), Circuit City Stores (CC), CIT Group (CIT), Kellogg Co (K), Sears Holdings (SHLD), FedEx Corp (FDX), Morgan Stanley (MS), Amer Intl Group (AIG), Sun Microsystems (JAVA), Liz Claiborne (LIZ)

In the News:

Stock Picks for Under $10
There are a lot of once-highflying stocks that have fallen below $10 and look like bargains ripe for the picking. See if CIT Group, Ford, Motorola, Tenet Healthcare, Dynegy and Interpublic.
Stock Picks for Under $10 - CNBC

10 Worst Managed Companies in America

With the trading year almost half over and results from the first quarter out, 24/7 Wall St. presents its latest installment of its Ten Worst Managed Companies In America list. They include Sun Microsystems, Sears, Boston Scientific, Starbucks, Sprint, Circuit City, Motorola, AMD, AIG and Pfizer.
24/7 Wall St.: The 24/7 Wall St. Ten Worst Managed Companies In America

Continue reading Stock picks under $10, 10 worst managed companies & historic site foreclosures

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Signs of stagflation are abounding in our economy, as many predicted would be the likely outcome tied to the Fed’s frantic attempt to save the financial markets by slashing interest rates.  With a continually weakening economy and inflation taking hold in commodities across the board it looks like our friend stagflation is here for the time being.

From Bloomberg on the phenomenon:

Builders broke ground on 975,000 homes at an annual pace in May, the least in 17 years, and construction permits fell, the Commerce Department reported in Washington. Meanwhile, the Labor Department said producer prices jumped 1.4 percent, more than economists forecast. A further report from the Federal Reserve showed industrial production unexpectedly dropped 0.2 percent.

“The latest round of commodity-price pressure is adding to both inflation and weak growth,” said Ethan Harris, chief U.S. economist at Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. in New York. “It’s a pretty negative cocktail for the economy and financial markets.”

“Industrial production is down, that’s the stag part, and prices are up, that’s the inflation part,” said Neal Soss, chief economist at Credit Suisse Holdings Inc. in New York. Compared with the 1970s, though, “it’s not likely that inflation will get as out of control when wages do not respond.”

The producer-price index jump exceeded the 1 percent forecast among economists surveyed by Bloomberg News. It was the biggest increase since November. The Labor Department’s figures also showed that prices rose 0.2 percent excluding food and energy, a measure that matched economists’ predictions. Production was expected to increase 0.1 percent.

Source [blownmortgage]

Signs of stagflation are abounding in our economy, as many predicted would be the likely outcome tied to the Fed’s frantic attempt to save the financial markets by slashing interest rates.  With a continually weakening economy and inflation taking hold in commodities across the board it looks like our friend stagflation is here for the time being.

From Bloomberg on the phenomenon:

Builders broke ground on 975,000 homes at an annual pace in May, the least in 17 years, and construction permits fell, the Commerce Department reported in Washington. Meanwhile, the Labor Department said producer prices jumped 1.4 percent, more than economists forecast. A further report from the Federal Reserve showed industrial production unexpectedly dropped 0.2 percent.

“The latest round of commodity-price pressure is adding to both inflation and weak growth,” said Ethan Harris, chief U.S. economist at Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. in New York. “It’s a pretty negative cocktail for the economy and financial markets.”

“Industrial production is down, that’s the stag part, and prices are up, that’s the inflation part,” said Neal Soss, chief economist at Credit Suisse Holdings Inc. in New York. Compared with the 1970s, though, “it’s not likely that inflation will get as out of control when wages do not respond.”

The producer-price index jump exceeded the 1 percent forecast among economists surveyed by Bloomberg News. It was the biggest increase since November. The Labor Department’s figures also showed that prices rose 0.2 percent excluding food and energy, a measure that matched economists’ predictions. Production was expected to increase 0.1 percent.

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Deals, Staples Inc (SPLS), Options, Technical Analysis, Politics

SPLSStaples (NASDAQ: SPLS) shares are falling today after the European Commission approved SPLS’s $2.7 billion acquisition of Dutch office supply company Corporate Express NV. The transaction has already received regulatory approval in the U.S. and Canada. If you think this stock won’t be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on SPLS.

After hitting a one-year low of $19.69 in November, the stock hit a one-year high of $25.85 on Monday. This morning, SPLS opened at $24.76. So far today the stock has hit a low of $24.44 and a high of $24.98. As of 11:00, SPLS is trading at $24.54, down $0.57 (-2.3%). The chart for SPLS looks bullish and steady, while S&P gives the stock a positive 4 STARS (out of 5) buy rating.

For a bearish hedged play on this stock, I would consider a September bear-call credit spread above the $27.50 range. A bear-call credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of call options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn’t do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make a 16.3% return in three months as long as SPLS is below $27.50 at September expiration. Staples would have to rise by more than 11% before we would start to lose money. Learn more about this type of trade here.

Continue reading Staples (SPLS) buyout of Corporate Express approved by EU

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Google (GOOG), News Corp’B’ (NWS), Media World, Technology

I read an interesting article over at CNBC about News Corp.’s (NYSE: NWS) MySpace asset. It seems that the social-networking site wants to do something about the fact that it won’t succeed in booking $1 billion in net sales before the conclusion of the conglomerate’s fiscal year. MySpace will undergo an aesthetic overhaul to make the site more appealing. As it is now, many users might find the site too busy and not so friendly in terms of navigation. The changes will take place over time, beginning this week and concluding in the fall.

The question on my mind now is, did News Corp. really need MySpace? Sure, the site has a heck of a lot of registered users, well over 100 million worldwide, but now people are wondering how effectively these users can be exploited in terms of generating economic value. The article mentioned the disappointing results so far from an advertising deal made with Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) back in 2006, one which had a $900 million figure attached to it.

The problem here for News Corp. is that users are fickle and may eventually find another MySpace in the future (obviously, Facebook is an example of how social networking continues to evolve and how any big brand in this arena can be challenged at any time). That wouldn’t be good for long-term growth. Another problem cited is the fact that active MySpace users just want to socialize with their friends and/or network; they don’t care about the ads. There’s a lot of truth to this claim, and it’s a huge issue going forward.

I think one thing MySpace should concentrate on as best it can is trailers for entertainment product. Those are the kind of ads that I tend to click on most often. And I think that focusing on movies, TV shows, and video games is in line with what the cool kids on MySpace search for most. I do believe in the idea of a fresh look for the site. Change is always good and it will spark interest in people to check out what’s new. It also offers an opportunity to bring back inactive users.

Still, I think MySpace needs to be looked at from different angles, and News Corp. is likely to have a tough time keeping it from being a dragging element in its operations. It’s an excellent property to synergize with, since News Corp. runs an entertainment portfolio, but turning the users into compulsive ad-viewing eyeballs will be a difficult task.

Disclosure: I don’t own any company mentioned; positions can change at any time.

Filed under: Analyst reports, Analyst initiations

MOST NOTEWORTHY: Pioneer Southwest, Art Technology and Real Goods Solar were today’s noteworthy initiations:

  • Friedman Billings initiated Pioneer Southwest (NYSE: PSE) with an Outperform rating and $25 target. The firm believes the current valuation does not reflect potential upside from the upstream drop-downs, which would result in higher distributions.
  • ThinkPanmure believes Art Technology (NASDAQ: ARTG) is well-positioned to benefit from a strong replatforming cycle. Shares were initiated with a Buy rating and $4.50 target.
  • Broadpoint said Real Goods Solar (NASDAQ: RSOL) has a disciplined operational model leading to profitable growth, and started shares with a Buy rating and $10 target. ThinkPanmure also initiated Real Goods Solar with a Buy rating and $10 target and said the company is well-positioned given strong underlying trends that include higher retail electricity costs, legislative renewable energy standards and incentives, declining solar photovoltaic systems costs, and “green momentum.”

OTHER INITIATIONS:

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Products and services, Competitive strategy, Best Buy (BBY)

The Wall Street Journal reports that Best Buy (NASDAQ: BBY) is test piloting the sale of used video games at its Canadian stores, with an eye toward expanding the program into the United States. While the company says it’s too early to say whether the plan will take off, Best Buy’s head of international relations said on a conference call that “We’re very, very, very hopeful that this will be another avenue of increasing our relationship with the consumer generally.”

What a nice way of saying “making more money.” The used game business carries substantially better margins than retailing new games, and the frequency of trade-ins reduces inventory costs. Right now the leader in used games is GameStop (NYSE: GME), but you have to think a big push from Best Buy could take some market share in this profitable category. Alternative GameStop’s small size and more knowledgeable staff could make it more appealing to consumers than Best Buy — the two stores have locations in many of the same malls.

Even after its recent price decline, GameStop investors should be taking a hard look at the durability of the company’s competitive advantage. The company has so far done exceptionally well competing with big box retailers, a testament to tremendous management and a strong concept. But it’s a battle that’s likely to continue and, looking further into the future, you have to wonder whether higher-quality digital delivery of games could hurt the company.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Close
E-mail It