Archive for June 22nd, 2008

Filed under: Forecasts, Deals, Competitive strategy, Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), Yahoo! (YHOO)

Overnight, Yahoo! (NASDAQ: YHOO) signed several cell carrier deals in Asia that will put its mobile search onto a large number of new phones. According to the company, it now reaches 600 million handset customers worldwide.

Maybe mobile search will be a big market, but maybe it won’t. Reuters writes that “the mobile advertising market is expected to rise to $16.2 billion in 2011 up from $1.5 billion in 2006.”

Yahoo! may want to avoid counting its chickens too early. Despite the firm’s upbeat tone, Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) and Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) are having success getting into the same market. In China, where there are well over 300 million handsets in use, Baidu (NASDAQ: BIDU), the county’s largest search company, does not want to give up market share to US-based companies.

If Yahoo! gets 20% of the market in 2011, it would pick up $3 billion in additional revenue. Is that a nice chunk of change? Yes, but that is a long time for Yahoo! shareholders to wait.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.

Filed under: Rumors, Consumer experience

This one really caught me off-guard: Steve & Barry’s, the college-town apparel retailer known for selling decent-quality, reasonably fashionable apparel, all at prices under $10, is said to be on the brink of bankruptcy, searching desperately for $30 million to keep the company going through 2008.

It’s surprising because, in the past month alone, the discounter has opened nine new stores, bringing the total up to 270. According to The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), the company had been booking a large chunk of its profits from one-time, up-front payments made by mall operators seeking to fill vacant big-box spaces. After those payments, many of the stores are only marginally profitable.

Steve & Barry’s had established a niche with ultra low-priced goods, many of which bear the endorsements of celebrities including Sarah Jessica Parker and Amanda Bynes, and athletes like Bubba Watson, Venus Williams, and Stephon Marbury.

Its cash crisis aside, I’ll be shocked — and disappointed — if Steve & Barry’s disappears anytime soon. It would seem to be a strong strategic acquisition target for a number of companies, especially anyone looking to reach out to cash-strapped consumers struggling with high gas prices. $8.88 NBA-player endorsed basketball shoes would seem to be pretty recession-proof. Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT) could probably do great things with the company. Raising cash through an initial public offering also can’t be ruled out.

Steve & Barry’s appears to be (yet another) victim of overly aggressive expansion and hubris, but the concept remains strong, and I think it will be around for a long time.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Private equity, Blackstone Group L.P (BX)

In theory, private equity is a simple business. Basically, it’s about buying a company at a cheap price and then eventually selling it for a premium. Oh, and because of the large amount of debt, you can essentially leverage the returns.

Of course, the folks at the Blackstone Group LP (NYSE: BX) know this game very well. In fact, they have been doing it since the late 1980s.

However, this raises an interesting question: If Blackstone wants to buy from you or sell an asset to you, should you be concerned? Does the firm know something that you don’t?

It’s a good question to ask. After all, about a year ago, Blackstone went public with much fanfare. Interestingly enough, it marked the peak of the private equity market. Yet, Blackstone was able to snag a cool $4.1 in the offering. Even the Chinese government invested $3 billion in the firm.

Well, Bloomberg.com has a good piece on the topic.

First of all, Blackstone’s stock is down more than 40% since its IPO, and things aren’t looking so good (at least in the short-run).

Continue reading A look at Blackstone’s IPO anniversary

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Deals

Usana Health Sciences (NASDAQ: USNA) announced yesterday (subscription required) that the Special Committee of its Board of Directors had unanimously determined that founder, chairman, and CEO Myron Wentz’s offer to take the company private at $26 per share undervalued the company, and recommended that shareholders reject it. Mr. Wentz declined to sweeten the offer, and so the deal appears to be dead in the water.

Here’s where it gets kind of interesting: back in 2002, Wentz made an offer to take Usana private but then rescinded it, saying that “To allow our shareholders to benefit from any increased value, I have decided to terminate my current effort to acquire Usana’s operating assets on the terms previously announced.”

A cynic could suggest that Wentz made this latest buyout offer anticipating that it would be rejected as inadequate, given that it was for just over half the stock’s 52-week high. Some analysts predicted when the offer was made that it was likely to be rejected. So what did Usana get out of the offer? Since ex-con turned short-selling gumshoe Barry Minkow began accusing the company of fraud last year, the company’s stock has fallen precipitously and short interest has soared to more than 50% of the float. The announcement of Wentz’s offer ran the stock up by about 20%, probably shaking out a good number of short sellers — the offer may have helped precipitate a short squeeze, even if that wasn’t the intent.

Earlier this week, Usana raised earnings guidance, giving the stock another jolt.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Google (GOOG), Options

Google (NYSE: GOOG) closed at $562.38 Wednesday.

GOOG is expected to report Q2 EPS in early July.

Smith Barney reiterated its Buy rating and $630 price target on GOOG today.

GOOG July option implied volatility is at 40 is below its 26-week average of 36 according to Track Data, suggesting larger price fluctuations.

Option Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com

Home builders continue to dial back the production of new homes, with new housing starts reaching a 17-year low in May.  Further, the data points to future declines in starts as the market continues to correct.

From Calculated Risk:

Building permits decreased:

Privately-owned housing units authorized by building permits in May were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 969,000.
This is 1.3 percent below the revised April rate of 982,000 and is 36.3 percent below the revised May 2007 estimate
of 1,522,000.

Single-family authorizations in May were at a rate of 623,000; this is 4.0 percent below the April figure of 649,000.

The declines in permits suggest further declines in starts next month.

On housing starts:

Privately-owned housing starts in May were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 975,000. This is 3.3 percent below the
revised April estimate of 1,008,000 and is 32.1 percent below the revised May 2007 rate of 1,436,000.

Single-family housing starts in May were at a rate of 674,000; this is 1.0 percent (±9.9%)* below the April figure of 681,000.

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Wal-Mart (WMT), Ford Motor (F), General Motors (GM), Comfort Zone Investing

Ted Allrich is the founder of The Online Investor and author of the just released book: Comfort Zone Investing: Build Wealth And Sleep Well At Night. In this weekly column, he’ll offer advice to investors who are just getting started.

Last week I wrote about what might happen if gas continues its seemingly inevitable march upward, maybe reaching $10 a gallon. There will be changes in our lifestyles, major changes. Some companies will benefit greatly, others will simply go away, unable to evolve with the new reality. Here are more industries that will be affected.

The airlines, at least the ones left, will fly smaller planes, more fuel efficient. They’ll be full, every one, every time. They may not take off unless they are. Some cancelled if they’re not booked up 12 hours in advance. Expect more hassles at the airport, more charges and fees for whatever airlines can imagine. (How about charging by the pound? Passengers get on a scale, then pay at the counter based on their weight.) Seat space will get even smaller.

Continue reading Comfort Zone Investing: Higher gas means more changes

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Predicting future prices is a dangerous game. Trying to predict peak prices during a mania is like predicting the future behavior of an insane person. By definition their nature is not predictable and thus trying to determine what they’ll do tomorrow may be a fruitless exercise. Yet now that we are slowly […]
Related Posts:
How Many People Overpaid for Their Home in Los Angeles County? Trying to get a Raw Number of Households Underwater.
Housing Contradiction: Home Prices Down = Sales Up. Any Questions?
There will be Housing: How we’ve Returned to Selective Market Ignorance.
The Abyss is Deep: The Housing Abyss is Deep: 4 Major Reasons Why Housing in Southern California is Nowhere Near a Bottom.
The Quest for Accurate Housing Prices: Three Counties and Multiple Prices.

Predicting future prices is a dangerous game. Trying to predict peak prices during a mania is like predicting the future behavior of an insane person. By definition their nature is not predictable and thus trying to determine what they’ll do tomorrow may be a fruitless exercise. Yet now that we are slowly moving to historical rubrics to give credit out, we are quickly realizing how insane this bubble got. The straitjacket has been put back on the market and it turns out that someone left the door open on the credit asylum for too long. Time to gather the lunatics back in.

This week the weather has been perfect in Southern California. Across many areas we are in the 90s and all the beautiful people are out on the streets. Many are out walking simply because they cannot afford to fill up their gas tank but hey, that is the silver lining. In the end, many folks need to get out there and walk so they can lose some weight. And if you notice that people are not looking as beautiful as they once did in Southern California you can blame it on the credit crunch. Elective cosmetic surgery is down so expect to see more natural looking folks running around minus the fixed nose and other synthetic implants. In a way, we are metaphorically returning to a natural state of things. The time for artificial products will need to be put on the shelf for sometime.

California was the epitome of this housing bubble. We had the largest excess and now we are seeing the biggest bust. I would call it spending like a drunken sailor but I really haven’t met too many drunken sailors in my lifetime. How about we try coining a new term with a California twist. Whenever you see someone spending like a maniac blowing cash beyond their means, we can label it “Spending like Laura Richardson” or SLLR. So if you have a friend with a leased Lexus and Hummer and a mortgage that will make Ed McMahon look frugal, you can tell them, “hey Bob. You are spending too much. Why don’t you stop spending like Laura Richardson?” This of course would be a massive insult with a California twist that only a foreclosure specialist can produce. You can watch as they begin to cry with your below the belt insult. After all, if people are willing to elect such a financially irresponsible person, we might as well get something for our tax dollars. A phrase is all we can afford at the moment.

Before you feel bad for six-figure politicians, this article is going to attempt to look at the future of Southern California housing. The reason that we can start making educated guesses now is that the party has come to a screeching halt. We now have a static peak that we can work off from and apply some financial logic to what will happen over the next few years. I wrote an article aptly titled Nostradamus in the House. Looking at 4 Potential Scenarios for Southern California Housing on August 4th, 2007. Of course this was a few days before the massive credit crisis that was supposedly over many months ago. In the article I also have a swipe at WaMu which at the time was trading at $37 a share (today it closed at $6.38). Essentially, we are now at the worst case scenario from that chart. So we will now revise it for the next year.

1 - Looking at the Case-Shiller Index Past Los Angeles Bubble

The Case-Shiller Index uses the MSA (metropolitan statistical area) to track housing prices. The Los Angeles component of the index combines Los Angeles and Orange County. Given that these two counties have more than 13 million people, it is a good representation of the housing insanity that is going on in Southern California.

Some people may not know that Southern California had a previous bubble in the late 80s to early 90s. At this time our national economy was in a recession and the economy was once again a main focus for politicians. On this constructed chart, I used the previous peak (June 1990) and bottom (March 1996) and superimposed the new peak (September 2006) to give a better idea of how much more further we have to go to reach a bottom:

case-shiller-big.png

*Click to enlarge for a clearer image

The data in the most recent iteration of the Case-Shiller index goes until March of 2008. The startling thing you will notice is it took over 6 years from peak to trough in the last downturn with an overall decline of 27 percent. Now, we are only 1 year and 6 months from our peak and the market is already down 24 percent! And we have yet to see $500 billion in pay option ARMs to recast with 60 percent here in the state. California it would appear was Spending Like Laura Richardson (SLLR).

As the market is being slapped around like a mortgage piñata, people are scrambling to gather the little bit of real money that was locked inside. The reality has become that people equate credit with money. To a certain extent it is. But now many that have had their credit lines shut down and lost all their equity are realizing that credit is not as good as cold hard cash. There is a reason people say cash is king.

Now back to the chart it would be hard to conjure up any reason why we are nearing a bottom. The California economy is in such shambles, that we are getting cockamamie ideas that only serve as a good laugh. For example, some proposals include letting out inmates early onto the streets where there is very little employment. Guess what will ensue if that happens? Also, the Governor is throwing around a lottery idea which is the absolute stupidest thing one can propose. Yes, we are broke therefore let us exploit the most primal part of our humanity and take money away from those that do not understand basic statistics. Good job amigo! The fiscal year starts in July and it looks like we are going to have a bunch of arse grapping and posturing before we get any budget through. Ironically the budget is following the trajectory of our old governor Gray Davis.

Can prices go down for 6 years like the previous burst? Absolutely. The economy is in much worse shape and the types of mortgages floating out there would make Enron seem like a walk in the park.

2 - Income is Stagnant and Credit is Closing Shop

I can tell you as someone who has gotten mortgages at the peak, things are radically different now. All my investment properties are financed the old school way with 30-year fixed mortgage even though many brokers and lenders tried to convince me otherwise. Many of those folks are no longer working. Trying to get a loan in 2008 is a world away from a getting a loan in 2003, 2004, or even 2005. The market has dried up. Getting a loan in today’s market requires good credit, solid DTI ratios, and basically if you want a good rate it will have to be a primary residence. So now, income apparently matters. And as it turns out, we have a crew of people that were living in an economy were income didn’t matter. Welcome to a quick reality check.

Here are some basic statistics for the Los Angeles and Orange County markets:

Los Angeles County:
Median Household income (2004 census): $43,518

Orange County:

Median Household income (2004 census): $58,605

Now I know many of you are going to cherry pick tiny enclaves in Newport Beach and Beverly Hills but you need to remember that the Case-Shiller data looks at the entire metro area. As much as you would like to siphon off 80 percent of the population and only examine 20 percent of the prime areas, this is not how the data is compiled. The above figures show us how out of whack prices have gotten here in Southern California. Let us look at the current median price in both areas:

May 2008 Data

Los Angeles County Median Home Price: $422,000
Orange County Median Home Price: $485,000

Compare that to the previous peaks of $550,000 for Los Angeles and $645,000 for Orange County. Given the current income we have the following ratios:

Home to Yearly Income ratio

Los Angeles: 9.69

Orange: 8.27

Let us compare this to data from 2000 to highlight how much of a correction we will need to come back in line with historical ratios:

Los Angeles County Household income 1999: $46,452

Orange County Household income 1999: $57,706

June 2000

Los Angeles County Median Price: $203,000

Orange County Median Price: $273,000

Home to Yearly Income ratio:

Los Angeles: 4.3

Orange: 4.7

So given the ratios starting in 2000, we would need a few things to happen. Either incomes double in the next few years or prices go down by half. Given the state of our economy and stagnant wages, you can rest assured that we are going to reach more reasonable rates by prices continuing to fall.

3 - Inventory on the Market

Given the vast amount of inventory floating out in the market, we can say with authority that simply looking at demand and supply prices will continue to fall. Let us look at inventory:

Current Data June 2008:

Los Angeles County: 52,956

Orange County: 16,250

Sales for May 2008:

Los Angeles County: 5,445

Orange County: 2,266

Months of inventory:

Los Angeles County: 9.7 months

Orange County: 7.1 months
Now you also have to remember this is based on MLS inventory. We all know that lenders are being owned by REO inventory and with record amounts of NODs, this number is artificially low. So we can add 2 or 3 months of inventory for each county. Bottom line is until we get closer to 5 or 6 months of inventory you can rule out any stabilization talk. My estimate is we are going to see shadow inventory “surprise” people in the next few months.

So when will things bottom? To be blunt, not in a very long time. Just look at the above data. Do you really see prices jumping up anytime soon? I will safely say that when all this is said and done, Los Angeles and Orange counties will be off by 40 to 50 percent from their peak. And this is being conservative knowing what we know now. If someone has some reasonable argument to the contrary I’m completely open to hearing it but all I’ve heard is a bunch of hot air and fluff that sidesteps the hard facts.

Enjoy the great California weather and if your significant other is pressuring you to buy a home tell her you are not going to be Spending Like Laura Richardson. They’ll understand.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information

Related Posts:
How Many People Overpaid for Their Home in Los Angeles County? Trying to get a Raw Number of Households Underwater.
Housing Contradiction: Home Prices Down = Sales Up. Any Questions?
There will be Housing: How we’ve Returned to Selective Market Ignorance.
The Abyss is Deep: The Housing Abyss is Deep: 4 Major Reasons Why Housing in Southern California is Nowhere Near a Bottom.
The Quest for Accurate Housing Prices: Three Counties and Multiple Prices.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

UCLA’s Anderson school of business reported that they see the first ‘dim flicker’ of light at the end of the housing collapse in California, citing year-over-year transaction increases in areas like Riverside (one of the hardest hit by the bubble).  To me this just smacks of analysts wanting to be the first to call bottom without consideration to the underlying fundamentals of the California market.

The two most important of which are the fact that a majority of the loans in the more expensive markets were made with a combination of stated (a/k/a fake) income and exotic loan products like option arms and interest only loans that have yet to recast or adjust.  How can anyone call for a bottom and say that foreclosures will ease in 2009 with a clear wave of resets looming on the horizon for 2009-2012 that are actually more severe in nature than ARM resets?  That’s irresponsible.

An option ARM reset can increase the monthly payment requirement of a borrower 4-5 fold.  With no equity to refinance these homes are going to go cascading in to foreclosure further hurting the market.  Any one that does not take this eventuality as a serious threat to the market is just plain ignorant.  It’s going to be messy.

See the graph and you tell me if we’re out of the woods yet.


Courtesy of Calculated Risk.

From Bloomberg:

“The combination of steep price declines, lower interest rates, and an easing of the credit crunch may now be bringing bargain hunting buyers back into the market,” for California homes, Ryan Ratcliff, an Anderson Forecast economist, wrote in the report. Riverside County posted a year-on-year increase in the number of homes sold, he wrote.

Foreclosures likely will continue to hurt California’s housing market for the rest of this year and then start to moderate in 2009, the Anderson Forecast said. While a “normal” housing market “is still a long way off,” according to the report, the increase in home sales in some parts of the state is a positive sign.

`Dim Flicker’

“This is the very dim flicker of the light at the end of the tunnel,” Ratcliff said in an interview. “I can’t say that I see an unambiguous sign of a turnaround, because by the time it’s unambiguous, it’s already been happening three or four months.”

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Deals, Google (GOOG), Yahoo! (YHOO), XM Satellite Radio (XMSR), Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI), Market matters, CBS Corp ‘B’ (CBS), Clear Channel Commun (CCU), Stocks to Buy, Cramer on BloggingStocks

Too many parties have too much to lose to let this one go through without a fight, TheStreet.com’s Jim Cramer says.

No, it is not over. If there is one thing we have learned about Sirius (NASDAQ: SIRI) (Cramer’s Take)-XM (NASDAQ: XMSR) (Cramer’s Take), it is that at every step of the way, people have to try to block it or at least hold it up to the point that someone goes out of business. This is a deal, now much longer in passing than Exxon and Mobil, that still has congressional meddling even right now, still has rearguard activists who might fight the merger on the commission itself even though the FCC’s staff has said yes.

Lots of people are confusing the issue of the merger benefits with the merger itself. The benefits will be helpful down the road on both the revenue and the costs, and the caps won’t mean that much. What matters, plain and simple, is refinancing. Both companies are always in danger of running out of money.

However, if you know that three years hence — after the frozen period during which service fees cannot be increased — the two companies can begin to offer extreme cable pricing, you can go hat in hand to the Street with a good bond deal that people will no longer feel could default.

That’s why the stocks combined are good. They may turn out not to be good for all of the people playing the various games, because there is no quick way to monetize the two companies. But you will most certainly create a dominant company that will pretty much destroy terrestrial radio, which may be the biggest reason radio stocks continue to trade down and CBS (NYSE: CBS) (Cramer’s Take) continues to be brought down by CBS Radio.

There’s been so much that I have hated about this government’s stalling of this as opposed to the serious antitrust issues that have developed in the last 20 years of laissez-faire antitrust. Everything stinks out loud, including the stalling of the deal until after Clear Channel (NYSE: CCU) (Cramer’s Take), the principal target of the merger, went through. The people propounding Clear Channel, just like the people propounding newspapers, do not and have not worked in the industry. They just know cash flows and vectors, not the reality of the endless newspaper-like decline to this medium.

In short, putting XM together with Sirius would be like creating a new Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) (Cramer’s Take) with Yahoo! (NASDAQ: YHOO) (Cramer’s Take) when it comes to terrestrial radio.

And there’s a simple reason: commercials. Everyone hates them.

And you are done with them the moment this deal gets approved, even though it is not a foregone conclusion.

—————————————————————————
RELATED LINKS:
Cramer: Sirius, XM Need a Fast Wedding
AIG’s Sullivan Is Latest Credit Casualty
—————————————————————————

Jim Cramer is a director and co-founder of TheStreet.com. He contributes daily market commentary for TheStreet.com’s sites and serves as an adviser to the company’s CEO. At the time of publication, Cramer had no positions in the stocks mentioned.

Close
E-mail It