Archive for June 27th, 2008

I was watching CNBC on Wednesday morning and they were on a Fed watch with a countdown and all other bells and whistles. As the day went along, these talking heads were talking about good earnings here, the resilient American consumer, and all this other pointless Chihuahua yammering to keep people from asking the […]
Related Posts:
Two 400+ Point Days in Two-Weeks: Why this is Horrible News for Housing. Volcker and Protecting your Mac.
There will be Housing: How we’ve Returned to Selective Market Ignorance.
10 Percent Unemployment in California: Which Counties are Hurting the Most and What it Means for Housing.
Bipolar Housing: Lessons from the Great Depression: Part XI. Understanding the Impact of Asset Deflation and Consumer Inflation.
The Sham of our Current Unemployment Rate Numbers: Lessons from the Great Depression: Part X. Data Mining.

I was watching CNBC on Wednesday morning and they were on a Fed watch with a countdown and all other bells and whistles. As the day went along, these talking heads were talking about good earnings here, the resilient American consumer, and all this other pointless Chihuahua yammering to keep people from asking the hard questions and letting folks realize that those spewing “investment advice” are nothing more than glorified sales people. Well it came as no shock to anyone that the Federal Reserve stood pat and did not move rates. In fact, according to the Fed inflation is only slightly out of whack:

“(Bloomberg) Higher headline rates of inflation have shown only a few tentative signs of embedding themselves in core inflation or in longer-term inflation expectations,” Fed Vice Chairman Donald Kohn said in a speech to a conference today in Frankfurt.”

So with this news which came in the afternoon, the market shot up nearly 100 points as delusional buyers jumped back into the shark tank. But as the day was winding down, the market gave back essentially all the gains to end the day with a push. So much for the Federal Reserve’s power. On Thursday, the gates were opened up and the raging bears came flying out. It was an odd day for the market. The housing sales numbers were better than forecasted and initial jobless claims came right at market expectations. Yet that inflation that is “tentative” came out when oil hit $140 a barrel and sent the market careening to the floor. Do you realize that the DOW is down 9.4% for the month? In fact, the DOW is having the worst month since the Great Depression:

dow-june.jpg

If that isn’t bad enough the DOW is down nearly 20% from last October:

dow-2590.jpg

Does anyone really still believe we are not in a recession? Come on now. And if you arrive at the conclusion that we are in a recession then you need to admit to yourself that the numbers being put out by the government simply do not coincide with reality. The problem that we now face is that we are in need of a paradigm shift. Those that are viewed at least by the overwhelming public as “experts”, the brokers, analysts, paid economists, agents, mortgage lenders, and pundits are to a large degree charlatans. The fact that we now stand with oil at $140 a barrel, the U.S. Dollar tanking, the housing market collapsing, is proof that their belief system is a farce.

It would now seem that we are using parallels from the Great Depression over and over:

“NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — U.S. stocks fell sharply Thursday with the blue-chip index enduring its worst June so far since 1930, and plunging to its lowest finish since Sept. 11, 2006, after getting slammed hard as crude soared to new highs and Goldman Sachs disparaged U.S. brokers and advised selling General Motors Corp.”

“(The Economist) Housing Dropping Like a Brick: House prices are falling even faster than during the Great Depression”

“(Washington Post) The measure marks Washington’s most ambitious response to a housing slump more severe than any since the Great Depression. More than 1.2 million homes have fallen into foreclosure, and home prices are plummeting. Yesterday, the Standard & Poor’s/Case-Shiller Home Price Index of 20 cities reported that home prices fell 15.3 percent in April versus a year ago, the steepest decline since the index was created eight years ago.”

Apparently this Great Depression talk is no longer just part of a historical series on this blog.  I think given what is happening to the markets this month, it is important to remember a bit of history. Today we’ll look at the ever popular Frederick Lewis Allen and contrast how eerily similar market conditions are today. This is part XII in our Great Depression series:

1. Personal Story by a Lawyer from a Previous Asset Bubble. Can we Learn from the Past and How will the Housing Decline Impact You?

2. Lessons From the Great Depression: A Letter from a former Banking President Discussing the Bubble.

3. Florida Housing 1920s Redux: History repeating in Florida and Lessons from the Roaring 20s.

4. The Menace of Mortgage Debts: Lessons from the Great Depression Series: Part IV: Where do we go After the Housing Crash?

5. Business Devours its Young: Lessons from the Great Depression: Part V: Destroying the Working Class.

6. Crash! The Housing Market Free Fall and Client #10 Contagion.

7. Winston Smith and the Bailouts in Oceania: Lessons from the Great Depression Part VII.

8. Sheep Back to the Slaughter: Lessons from the Great Depression Part VIII: All the Change and Bear

Market Rallies.

9. A Bubble That Broke the World

10. The Sham of our Current Unemployment Numbers

11. Understanding the Impact of Asset Deflation and Consumer Inflation.

At a certain point can we drop the façade and accept that things are really bad? Then and only then, can we start confronting the brutal reality that we have a lot of cleaning up to do. Yet it would seem that the mistakes from the past are being repeated once again. Take a look at some of the things going on before the Crash of 1929:

“In view of what was about to happen, it is enlightening to recall how things looked at this juncture to the financial prophets, those gentlemen whose wizardly reputations were based upon their supposed ability to examine a set of graphs brought to them by a statistician and discover, from the relation of curve to curve and index to index, whether things were going to get better or worse.

Their opinions differed, of course; there never has been a moment when the best financial opinion was unanimous. In examining these opinions, and the outgivings of eminent bankers, it must furthermore be acknowledged that a bullish statement cannot always be taken at its face value: few men like to assume the responsibility of spreading alarm by making dire predictions, nor is a banker with unsold securities on his hands likely to say anything which will make it more difficult to dispose of them, unquiet as his private mind may be. Finally, one must admit that prophecy is at best the most hazardous of occupations. Nevertheless, the general state of financial opinion in October, 1929, makes an instructive contrast with that in February and March, 1928, when, as we have seen, the skies had not appeared any too bright.”

I realize that there were many sitting on the sidelines wondering, “this is absolutely insane and is completely wrong” yet kept their mouth shut because they didn’t want to be seen as a doom and gloomer or maybe their business simply did not allow open dissent. But ironically our most prestigious and old institution, Harvard was wrong again this week and was wrong during the Great Depression:

“But if ever such medals were actually awarded, a goodly number of leather ones would have to be distributed at same time. Not necessarily to the Harvard Economic Society although on October 19th, after having explained that business was “facing another period of readjustment,” it predicted that “if recession should threaten serious consequences for business (as is not indicated at present) there is little doubt that Reserve System would take steps to ease the money market so check the movement.” The Harvard soothsayers proved themselves quite fallible: as late as October 26th, after the wide-open crack in the stock market, they delivered cheerful judgment that “despite its severity, we believe that slump in stock prices will prove an intermediate movement not the precursor of a business depression such as would entail prolonged further liquidation.” This judgment turned out, course, to be ludicrously wrong; but on the other hand the Harvard Economic Society was far from being really bullish.

Nor would Colonel Leonard P. Ayres of the Cleveland Trust Company get one of the leather medals. He almost qualified when, on October l5th, he delivered himself of the judgment that “there does not seem to be as yet much real evidence that the decline in stock prices is likely to forecast a serious recession in general business. Despite the slowing down in iron and steel production, in automobile output, and in building, the conditions which result in serious business depressions are not present.” But the skies, as Colonel Ayres saw them, were at least partly cloudy. “It seems probable,” he said, “that stocks have been passing not so much from the strong to the weak as from the smart to the dumb.”

Now let us contrast that with what the Joint Center for Housing Studies put out via the center director in September of 2006:

“The headline hints of catastrophe: a dot-com repeat, a bubble bursting, an economic apocalypse. Cassandra, though, can stop wailing: the expected price corrections mark a slowing in the rate of increase - not a precipitous decline. This will not spark a chain reaction that will devastate home owners, builders, and communities. Contradicting another gloomy seer, Chicken Little, the sky is not falling.”

Now you would think that this is enough but this week Harvard put out another study being overly optimistic on the state of housing. Looks like someone is being set up for another colossal forecast failure.

You know it is important to highlight that during the Great Crash of 1929, even in that horrific month of October there were burst of optimism in the market. It took 3 years before hitting the absolute bottom:

“The New York Times averages for fifty leading stocks had been almost cut in half, failing from a high of 311.90 in September to a low of 164.43 on November 13th; and the Times averages for twenty-five leading industrials had fared still worse, diving from 469.49 to 220.95.

The Big Bull Market was dead. Billions of dollars’ worth of profits-and paper profits-had disappeared. The grocer, the window-cleaner, and the seamstress had lost their capital. In every town there were families which had suddenly dropped ‘from showy affluence into debt. Investors who had dreamed of retiring to live on their fortunes now found themselves back once more at the very beginning of the long road to riches. Day by day the newspapers printed the grim reports of suicides.

Coolidge-Hoover Prosperity was not yet dead, but it was dying. Under the impact of the shock of panic, a multitude of ills which hitherto had passed unnoticed or had been offset by stock-market optimism began to beset the body economic, as poisons seep through the human system when a vital organ has ceased to function normally.

Although the liquidation of nearly three billion dollars of brokers’ loans contracted credit, and the Reserve Banks lowered the rediscount rate, and the way in which the larger banks and corporations of the country had survived the emergency without a single failure of large proportions offered real encouragement, nevertheless the poisons were there; overproduction of capital; overambitious (expansion of business concerns; overproduction of commodities under the stimulus of installment buying and buying with stock-market profits; the maintenance of an artificial price level for many commodities, the depressed condition of European trade.

No matter how many soothsayers of high finance proclaimed that all was well, no matter how earnestly the President set to work to repair the damage with soft words and White House conferences, a major depression was inevitably under way.

Nor was that all. Prosperity is more than an economic condition; it is a state of mind. The Big Bull Market had been more than the climax of a business cycle; it had been the climax of a cycle in American mass thinking and mass emotion. There was hardly a man or woman in the country whose attitude toward life had not been affected by it in some degree and was not now affected by the sudden and brutal shattering of hope. .With the Big Bull Market zone and prosperity going, Americans were soon to find themselves living in an altered world which called for new adjustments. new ideas, new habits of thought, and a new order of values. The psychological climate was changing; the ever-shifting currents of American life were turning into new channels.

The Post-war Decade had come to its close. An era had ended.”

Even though the DOW is down nearly 20% from its peak reached last year, there is still this general sentiment that things are winding down and all will be well. Do people realize that companies have written off about $391 billion in bad loans with some expectations looking at $1 trillion before things are done? What about those pesky option ARMs that are starring us directly in the face? We are quickly approaching the psychological end game. The farce will be up soon because there is simply too much debt floating out in the market. It was never sustainable. The cracks are already being seen in the credit default swap market and derivatives are swimming in a market of multiple trillions, which is so absurd, that once people realize that no one has the Midas touch, the market will start to evaporate.

Cover your assets folks and make sure you are invested wisely for 2008. This is the year when the rubber meets the road. This will happen no matter what the financial engineers have in their Pollyanna models.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information

Related Posts:
Two 400+ Point Days in Two-Weeks: Why this is Horrible News for Housing. Volcker and Protecting your Mac.
There will be Housing: How we’ve Returned to Selective Market Ignorance.
10 Percent Unemployment in California: Which Counties are Hurting the Most and What it Means for Housing.
Bipolar Housing: Lessons from the Great Depression: Part XI. Understanding the Impact of Asset Deflation and Consumer Inflation.
The Sham of our Current Unemployment Rate Numbers: Lessons from the Great Depression: Part X. Data Mining.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

AMBAC, MBIA and FGIC are trying to unwind $125 billion in contracts written to insure subprime mortgage debt with banks across the country as the mortgage insurers try to recover from the beating they’ve taken during the housing bust.  Since the big bond insurers ratings have been cut on capital concerns they are working quickly to try to mitigate exposure to future losses by taking some upfront cost to get out of the details.

From Market Watch:

Bond insurers, including Ambac Financial Group, MBIA Inc. and Financial Guaranty Insurance Co., reportedly are trying to unwind $125 billion of guarantees they sold on risky debt securities.

MBIA, Ambac and FGIC are talking with banks about “commuting” these insurance contracts, which were sold in the form of credit-default swaps, a type of derivative that pays out in the event of default, the Financial Times reported on Monday.
The contracts guaranteed payments on collateralized debt obligations — complex debt securities often backed by mortgages that have plunged in value amid a recent wave of foreclosures.
MBIA lost their AAA ratings from Moody’s Investors Service last week, while FGIC was cut to junk status by the agency. Without top ratings, bond insurers can’t sell new guarantees, while policy-holders such as banks and big brokerage firms see the value of the contracts they previously bought drop in value.
That has added a renewed sense of urgency to the talks on commuting the contracts, the newspaper reported.

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), Nokia Corp. (NOK)

Of course, Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) demonstrated the huge value of owning a pervasive operating system.

But what about the OS for mobile? Microsoft has been building its own alternative. Moreover, Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) has Android.

However, the winner may actually be the handset maker, Nokia (NYSE: NOK). This week, the company announced it is purchasing Symbian, which has about 60% of the global market for the mobile OS. The offer comes to about $409.8 million (to grab the 52% that Nokia doesn’t already own).

But, unlike Microsoft, Nokia isn’t taking a proprietary approach. Instead, Symbian is going to be open source.

True, this is likely to take some time (say several years), but in the meantime, Nokia can leverage its massive global platform by using Symbian’s 1,200 programmers. The upshot should be improved innovation and faster product launches (oh, and there will be no need to pay licensing fees to Symbian).

OK, so what about rival handset makers that rely on Symbian, such as Motorola (NYSE: MOT), Sony Ericsson Mobile and Samsung? Might they be worried?

Perhaps, but then again, they realize the importance of having standardization. And by being open source, the handset makers have the leeway to add their own capabilities.

Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including The Complete M&A Handbook and The Edgar Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements. He also operates MergerBook.com.

Filed under: Deals

According to a number of studies, Wall Street’s initial reaction to a proposed buyout is a good indication of whether a deal will pan out or not. So when Pier 1 Imports (NYSE: PIR) recently made an $88 million bid for Cost Plus World Markets (NASDAQ: CPWM), and the response from investors was immediately negative (the stock price fell 20%), it was probably telling.

I guess Pier 1 was listening. On Wednesday, the company said it was revoking its bid.

Funny enough, the CEO of Pier 1, Alex W. Smith, originally called the deal “compelling” and that it “would create significant value for the stakeholders of both companies.”

Oops.

But now, according to Smith, it looks like the deal will be too expensive. After all, it appears that Cost Plus is going to fight.

Yet, why not try to fight back? Pier 1 does have some leverage. Plus, there are certainly cost synergies (basically, the industry really needs consolidation).

Then again, when it comes to Wall Street, sometimes it is easier to just give in.

Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including The Complete M&A Handbook and The Edgar Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements. He also operates MergerBook.com.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Competitive strategy, Best Buy (BBY)

Best Buy Inc.’s (NYSE: BBY) Chief Operating Officer made a pretty strong pledge this week. Brian Dunn suggested that the largest consumer electronics retailer in the U.S. would double its sales to $80 billion within five years. This has an eerie air about it, as it sounds much like Dell, Inc. (NASDAQ: DELL) then-CEO Kevin Rollins many years ago. While Dell’s ambitious goal didn’t really pan out nearly as nice, Best Buy has a much better proposition to get to its goal.

Dunn’s announcement at the retailer’s annual shareholder’s meeting this week was backed up by the fact that Best Buy has already doubled in size from 2003 to 2008. Its sales went from $20 billion to $40 billion in that five-year period. Keep in mind that one of Best Buy’s chief competitors, Circuit City Stores, Inc. (NYSE: CC), is basically on the ropes hanging on for dear life. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE: WMT) is Best Buy’s largest competitor, but it doesn’t carry near the breadth of actual consumer electronic products that Best Buy does. This positioning still leaves Best Buy free to navigate to $80 billion by 2013. But, doubling every five years is no easy task, and especially in the consumer spending environment we’re in now.

What is fascinating is that Best Buy apparently controls only about 20% of the consumer electronics market, and about 30% of retail PC sales in the U.S. Combine those low numbers with Best Buy’s very aggressive international expansion and partnerships and it’s easy to see that $80 billion in annual sales is already being attacked. Will it get there? We’ll be checking — all the way to 2013.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Earnings reports, NIKE, Inc’B’ (NKE)

According to Trey Thoelcke’s coverage on earnings reports, Nike (NYSE: NKE), a competitor of Adidas (OTC: ADDDY), beat Wall Street expectations for its Q4 results. Analysts thought that Nike might be good for earnings of $0.96 per share, but the footwear entity booked $0.98 per share, beating estimates by two cents (thankfully, it wasn’t the proverbial penny, which definitely gets boring after awhile). Investors didn’t seem to be too keen on the results, as the stock sold off in after-hours trading on Wednesday, dropping almost 5%.

Let’s take a closer look at the results. For the fourth quarter, the top line increased by 16% - not a bad revenue jump. And that $0.98 earnings per-share figure represented an increase of 14%. The fiscal year actually looked pretty good, too. Revenues increased 14%, and net income expanded by 28% to $3.74 per share. Gross margin expanded, and worldwide futures orders were up 11%. I like all these double-digit numbers, and I like the fact that the company paid out more in dividends this year than last, and I can see that Nike is taking advantage of the weak dollar through its international exposure.

Nike’s stock has performed well, over the last five years, but lately it’s not been as strong. Investors would certainly be justified in having a cautious stance with a company like Nike considering the current economic climate. Sneakers obviously might not be worth a lot of discretionary income in a time of high energy costs and slow growth. But with numbers like these, I have to say that Nike knows how to leverage its brand equity to full effect. This was a great yearly report, and if the stock pulled back a little further, I would definitely consider it.

Disclosure: I don’t own any company mentioned here; positions can change at any time.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Management, Options, Technical Analysis, Eaton Corp (ETN)

ETN logoEaton (NYSE: ETN) shares are falling today after the company announced this morning that it has named Joseph P. Palchak its new Automotive Group Chief Executive Officer. ETN shares are trading lower today with most other auto component companies as a weak first-quarter GDP reading has investors worried about the fragile state of the economy. If you think this stock won’t be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on ETN.

After hitting a one-year high of $104.12 in July, the stock hit a one-year low of $66.27 in January. This morning, ETN opened at $87.94. So far today the stock has hit a low of $84.78 and a high of $87.94. As of 11:40, ETN is trading at $84.88, down $3.67 (-4.2%). The chart for ETN looks bullish but deteriorating, while S&P gives the stock a positive 4 STARS (out of 5) buy rating.

For a bearish hedged play on this stock, I would consider an August bear-call credit spread above the $100 range. A bear-call credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of call options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn’t do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make a 6.4% return in seven weeks as long as ETN is below $100 at August expiration. Eaton would have to rise by more than 17% before we would start to lose money. Learn more about this type of trade here.

Continue reading Eaton (ETN) names new Automotive CEO

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan plans to file suit against Countrywide and their orange-tinted CEO Angelo Mozilo tomorrow for risky and deceptive mortgage lending practices in the state.  Ms. Madigan claims that the state has ample evidence to charge Countrywide for lending practices that have put borrowers in loans that can’t be repaid, and using sales and marketing tactics that encouraged borrowers and rewarded employees to take and make risky loans.

Illinois, like other parts of the country is dealing with a massive uptick in home foreclosures.

I can’t say I’m surprised.  Mozilo has flaunted his company’s success, blamed others for its losses, and there are more than a few stories from inside Countrywide about the ridiculous compensation and underwriting guidelines that encouraged charging high fees, putting borrowers in loans that made more money for the company and underwriting standards that probably don’t provide any more diligence than the application check used to rent movies at your local Blockbuster.

From the Wall Street Journal:

In a draft of the complaint, Illinois alleges that the company engaged in “unfair and deceptive practices” in the sale of mortgage loans. The 78-page document says the company loosened its underwriting standards, structured loans with “risky features” and engaged in “marketing and sales techniques” that incentivized employees and mortgage brokers to push loans whether or not homeowners had the ability to repay them.

In an interview, Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan said Countrywide “broke the law and we plan to hold them accountable for that.” She added that Countrywide’s actions have led to widespread foreclosures in her state and have wrecked havoc around the world. “The impact on individual homeowners and communities and the country and the global economy is unbelievable.”

Ms. Madigan says she is asking that all Countrywide loans originated using “unfair and deceptive” practices be rescinded or modified in some way, even if Countrywide has to repurchase the loans. She is also asking that her office be given 90 days to review any loans that are currently in foreclosure or that are moving toward foreclosure. As part of its investigation, the Illinois attorney general’s office interviewed about 30 former Countrywide employees and mortgage brokers and reviewed more than 100,000 pages of documents, Ms. Madigan said.

Mr. Mozilo was included as a defendant because he “participates in, manages, controls, and has knowledge of the day-to-day activities” of Countrywide, the lawsuit says.

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Newspapers, Magazines, Google (GOOG), Merrill Lynch (MER), Goldman Sachs Group (GS), Morgan Stanley (MS), Amer Intl Group (AIG)

MAJOR PAPERS:

  • The Wall Street Journal’s “The Game” column speculates that one of the results of the Bear Stearns crash could be the push of investment banks and commercial ones closer together, which could result in better handling of volatility with more stability. Some observers think Merrill Lynch & Co (NYSE: MER), Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) or The Goldman Sachs Group Inc (NYSE: GS) could go that route by buying a commercial bank. Any move would force them to adhere to better reserve ratios, affect short term bank funding, and shrink balance sheets.
  • The Wall Street Journal reported that Google Inc (NASDAQ: GOOG) will soon make available a new service that measure hits on the Internet with the intent of helping advertisers decide where to buy ads online and would directly compete with comScore Inc (NASDAQ: SCOR) and Nielsen Online. Ad executives said Google’s method could make targeting markets more efficient.
  • A Manhattan judge dismissed four claims made by American International Group Inc (NYSE: AIG) in its fight to regain control of a block of its shares held by Starr International, a company that once founded a lucrative compensation plan for AIG executives. AIG believes the shares held by Starr should continue to be used to fund employee compensation, the Financial Times reported.

WEB SITES:

  • According to Scorpio Partnership, Bloomberg reported that UBS AG (NYSE: UBS) and Merrill Lynch had slower growth in assets under management last year due to losses connected to the U.S. subprime crisis.

Close
E-mail It