Archive for July 1st, 2008

Filed under: Deals, Internet, Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), Yahoo! (YHOO), Technology, NASDAQ

Yahoo’s (NASDAQ: YHOO) embattled management and board have one month left to prove to shareholders that they made the right call in rejecting Microsoft’s (NASDAQ:MSFT) bid. With shares trading at about $20, they are going to have to do some fancy footwork to show why rejecting a $31to $33 per share offer was actually good for shareholders.

Yahoo is trying to convince investors that a proposed ’search’ deal with Google (NASDAQ:GOOG) will provide the growth needed to restore Yahoo to previous glory. According to an AP report: ” By relying on Google’s superior technology to show some of the ads alongside its search results, Yahoo believes it can increase its annual revenue by about $800 million and generate another $250 million to $450 million in annual cash flow.”

Keep in mind that since the Microsoft deal fell apart, Yahoo has lost more than $16 billion in market cap. It is going to have to generate a lot more in revenues to show that they made the right choice.

My other problem is that I have many friends who over the last week have told me they can’t access their Yahoo mail or open up their saved stock portfolio’s on Yahoo Finance. I, personally, have been locked out for two days.

I have tried to follow the steps on their website, but all to no avail. Of course, I emailed customer service and still have yet to receive an answer as to why I am unable to log in. And, as I said, the same thing has happened to some of my friends. Has it happened to you?

If Yahoo is having trouble providing basic services to longtime users, how does it plan on generating another $16 billion in market cap for long-term investors?

Aaron Katsman is the lead Portfolio Manager and Managing Director of America Israel Investment Associates, LLC and Senior Editor of IsraelNewsletter.com. DISCLOSURE: Writer’s fund has no position in any stock mentioned, as of 7/01/08.

Filed under: Forecasts, Deals, Apple Inc (AAPL), XM Satellite Radio (XMSR), Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI)

Sirius Satellite Radio, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIRI) laid out what it thought its financials would look like next year after a merger with XM Satellite Radio Holdings (NASDAQ: XMSR). The market wasn’t impressed.

Sirius had an odd way of expressing how it would save money next year. According to the company, “Total synergies, net of the costs to achieve such synergies, for the combined company are expected to be approximately $400 million in 2009.” The firm also said it expected positive free cash flow.

All of that good news sent Sirius down almost 9% to $1.91. Volume was heavy at over 35 million shares, so the selling turned into a stampede.

Sirius forgot to mention the one number that Wall St. really wants to see which is what it thinks the revenue for the merger company will hit for 2009. Without that, it is impossible to determine whether any of the cash flow numbers are believable.

Continue reading Sirius forecasts merger savings, investors flee

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Analyst upgrades and downgrades, Good news, Technical Analysis, Stocks to Buy

PAREXEL International Corporation (NASDAQ: PRXL) provides contract research, medical marketing and consulting services to the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device industries. Its Clinical Research Services segment offers clinical trial and data management, clinical pharmacology and related medical advisory services. The Consulting and Medical Communications Services unit offers technical advice on new product development, marketing and regulatory affairs. Subsidiary Perceptive Informatics sells IT system, medical imaging, and related services that help manage clinical trials.

The company pleased investors last week, when it guided fiscal Q4 EPS to 25-26 cents and revenues to $258-$265 million. Analysts had been looking for 26 cents and $259.31 million. Management also guided FY09 EPS to $1.10-$1.20 ($1.08 consensus) and FY09 revenues to $1.11-$1.14 billion ($1.14B consensus). Raymond James subsequently upgraded the stock to “outperform”, noting that the firm “will exhibit a strong growth profile due to a strong biopharmaceutical outsourcing market, a large geographic footprint and a diversified service offering.”

Continue reading PAREXEL International (PRXL): Price consolidating in bullish ‘pennant’ pattern

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Wachovia announced today that they are no longer offering the pick-a-pay, negative amortization mortgage loan. Additionally, they’ve announced that the bank will assist current pick-a-pay loan holders by waiving all pre-payment penalty fees for those looking to refinance out of the loan.

Here’s the details:

Effectively immediately, Wachovia is waiving all prepayment fees associated with its Pick-A-Pay mortgage to allow customers complete flexibility in their home financing decisions.
. . .
Additionally, for all new loan originations, Wachovia is discontinuing offering products that include payment options resulting in negative amortization.

While this has been covered extensively elsewhere with various regard I think we’ve reached a very important part in the mortgage market correction.  The return of sensible underwriting is finally getting back to basics.  The elimination of exotic mortgages like the pick-a-pay is exactly what the housing and mortgage markets need to return to normalcy and sustainable, responsible growth.

The elimination of financial engineering from the mortgage market is one of the key pieces to the recovery puzzle.  I am happy to see this loan go as it has been responsible for a major portion of the housing bubble and explosion of mortgage market greed which fueled fraud, borrower deception and risky lending practices.

An Important Milestone on the return to mortgage sanity

This is an important milestone for the market as it will force home prices back in to traditional multiples of income ranges rather than the inflated multiples that were common in the worst bubble areas including California, Vegas and Florida.  This change will insure that housing prices don’t explode in to the stratosphere again.

Additionally it will precipitate the continued fall of housing prices as voodoo financing options disappear.  The combination of sound underwriting and reduced housing prices are exactly what is needed to bring stability to the mortgage market.

More pain to come in housing market

Of course this means that more pain is sure to come in the housing markets.  Option ARM holders that were banking on refinancing in to another pick-a-pay mortgage to maintain their homes are suddenly looking at no feasible affordable mortgage and will lose their homes without some sort of bail out or debt forgiveness program from the government and lenders that made these loans.

The wave of upcoming pick-a-pay loans now truly have no place to go (as if disappearing equity wasn’t enough, the markets that have been somewhat stable are now going to feel more of the pick-a-pay foreclosure blight).  This harsh reality will push more foreclosures on to the market over the next 3 years.

Wachovia tries to limit liability

Of course, this has nothing to do with anything other than Wachovia looking to limit its already massive liability to these pick-a-pay loans.  They know that they are just ticking time bombs, and they want to refinance as many people out of those loans as possible to save their company from the sure to be eye-popping losses.

No matter the arguments about “conservative collateral valuations” by World Savings (the bank that Wachovia bought) - it is clear that the option arms made by World are a dangerous liability to the bank.  So much so that the bank is willing to waive all pre-payment fees in a last-ditch effort to get the loans off the books.  But as we all know the home price declines have probably made this option a pipe dream to many of those it’s supposed to help.

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Next big thing, Abercrombie and Fitch (ANF)

Last week, I had a chance to talk to Rémy de Tonnac, who is the CEO of INSIDE Contactless. He was certainly upbeat. After all, his firm recently snagged an investment from Samsung Ventures America. In fact, some of the other investors include biggies like Nokia Growth Partners and Motorola Ventures.

Although, it’s been a long journey. That is, INSIDE has been building its platform - which allows for contactless microprocessors - over the past ten years. But yes, things are starting to pay off.

INSIDE is focused on the so-called near field communications (NFC), which is a standard for mobile systems. Essentially, the technology helps facilitate mobile payments - which is likely to be a huge market.

However, for this to happen, Rémy believes that NFC must leverage innovation on the handset. For example, suppose you use your phone to pay for subway rides. So, wouldn’t it be cool to receive an SMS message if your pass was about to expire?

Or, suppose you get an alert about a favorite band that will be in town next week. Perhaps you can get a video preview and, of course, buy some tickets?

“NFC can do things in a better way,” said Rémy. “More importantly, it can also allow for new things - creating real value for consumers.”

Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including The Complete M&A Handbook and The Edgar Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements. He also operates MergerBook.com.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Unless you’ve been living under a rock and given how bad the housing market is, this may be a reality, the big news making the rounds this week is the housing bailout plan otherwise know as the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008. We can talk about the B-list theatrics with Mozilo shedding […]
Related Posts:
Real Homes of Genius: Two For One in Compton. Southern California Housing Bubble Hangover.
Two 400+ Point Days in Two-Weeks: Why this is Horrible News for Housing. Volcker and Protecting your Mac.
Real Homes of Genius: 675 square foot home in Lynwood California at $425,000?!
Housing Contradiction: Home Prices Down = Sales Up. Any Questions?
Ross Perot Charts: How I Learned to be a Housing Blogger from Ross Perot.

Unless you’ve been living under a rock and given how bad the housing market is, this may be a reality, the big news making the rounds this week is the housing bailout plan otherwise know as the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008. We can talk about the B-list theatrics with Mozilo shedding a tear in the otherwise pathetic attempt to send off ugly daughter Countrywide in style via a shotgun wedding to Bank of America but you have to hand it to Mozilo, he knew how to play the political game well and realized Americans would eat up anything served up to them with a ribbon and perfume.  He also ensured a few high profile politicians had their fingerprints on Countrywide.  Collateral damage.

But make no mistake about the bigger issue. This bailout should it go through would be the biggest bailout in the history of the human world. That is how big this thing is. Given that Bank of America had its hand on writing or at least influencing part of the legislation, I’m sure we all know where this is heading. And what a coincidence that they are buying Countrywide trying to close before the 4th of July while this legislation is being crammed down before the summer recess. What are the odds!!! Yet Americans are more worried about offshore drilling and saving 20 cents five years from now as opposed to seeing rampant inflation tax the hell out of the middle class family budget.

These issues are maddening and thankfully today I was able to land an interview with the uber-Senator Mr. Government Genius. These things can get complicated so we’ll ask him about this new government bailout.

Interview Conducted June 26, 2008:

windows-zealot-icon.jpg Dr. HB: Hi Senator Government Genius. Thank you for agreeing to this interview.

no-dissent-icon.jpgGG: You’re welcome. Glad to be here in sunny California representing my sunny constituents! Woo Woo!

windows-zealot-icon.jpgDr. HB: Umm, ok. Let us get started and talk about this much-discussed housing bailout bill.

no-dissent-icon.jpgGG: I wouldn’t call it a “bailout.”
windows-zealot-icon.jpg Dr. HB: What would you call it?

no-dissent-icon.jpgGG: I’d like to call it the “Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008″

windows-zealot-icon.jpgDr. HB: Isn’t housing what got us in this mess in the first place?

no-dissent-icon.jpg GG: Yes. But we didn’t build right the first time around. Now, we’ll build but instead of using other people’s money (OPM) we’re going to use the American tax payers’ money. Americans like it when we use the tax payers’ money.

windows-zealot-icon.jpgDr. HB: But won’t they realize that they are the ones who will ultimately pay for the financial irresponsibility and stupidity of others?

no-dissent-icon.jpgGG: Not necessarily. We’ll make it seem like we are really punishing lenders like forcing them to write-down 10 percent of their loan. Once they agree to this, we’ll move people from unfriendly evil mortgages into happy smiling government loans.
windows-zealot-icon.jpg Dr. HB: Aren’t you effectively putting a bottom for, oh, I don’t know, lenders? Places like California have seen prices drop 30 percent in one year. Given current trends, it is very likely prices will fall another 20 to 30 percent. Doesn’t this essentially ensure that the government will purchase loans with embedded declines?

no-dissent-icon.jpg GG: Hard questions! Not really. See, money grows on trees or as I like to call it, in the nursery of the Federal Reserve. We have these really nifty printing machines and incredibly, the world allows us to print more money without producing anything to back it up. Imagine using your Epson printer at home and going into Adobe Photoshop and printing hundred dollar bills all night. Don’t do that because if you do that, it is illegal. When we do it, it is called stimulating the economy. See the difference? So if homes do decline after we buy them, we can just print more money and all will be fine.

windows-zealot-icon.jpg Dr. HB: Wouldn’t that cause rampant inflation?

no-dissent-icon.jpg GG: Only on fuel, groceries, education, healthcare, and travel. You know, things Americans don’t need. But prices on homes will stabilize and go up and this is good since more people will be able to tap their God given right of home equity and go forth and consume again.

windows-zealot-icon.jpgDr. HB: Interesting. Do you believe in capitalism?

no-dissent-icon.jpgGG: Abso-freaking-lutely. I bleed Adam Smith. See, take a look…I’ve got Wealth of Nations tattooed on my back.

windows-zealot-icon.jpgDr. HB: Yeah, I really don’t need to see that. So you believe in capitalism. Now wouldn’t the government intervening and putting a bottom to home prices correcting go against the idea of a free market environment?

no-dissent-icon.jpg GG: Ummmm…I’m not sure I follow.

windows-zealot-icon.jpgDr. HB: Well it would seem somewhat situational to come in now that prices are falling using tax payers’ money to protect those that took risks during the housing bubble. Why didn’t the government step in and put a ceiling on how much prices could go up during the boom? Wouldn’t the same hold true on this as well?

no-dissent-icon.jpgGG: Capitalism is about always ensuring profits. I think Adam Smith said that in chapter 5.

windows-zealot-icon.jpgDr. HB: He didn’t say that. So basically what is occurring is a form of corporate welfare where lenders and Wall Street firms that took excessive risk now face a bottom which will be created with money from tax payers…many who did not gamble irresponsibly with their money. If it weren’t for this artificial bottom wouldn’t these firms simply collapse on their house of cards?

no-dissent-icon.jpgGG: Yes. And a world with no Bear Stearns is a very sad one indeed. Can you imagine waking up and having a world with no Countrywide, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, or Hummers? What a sad world that would be. I’m getting misty eyed just thinking about it. I think that is why Mozilo got a little choked up this week.

windows-zealot-icon.jpgDr. HB: We may have a world with no Hummers if gas prices stay this high. So you are telling me right now that essentially the government is ensuring selectively hand picked firms that would collapse without public intervention, is that correct? Now I know many of your constituents are thinking, “why not let a business that is poorly managed and is leveraged to the hilt collapse. In fact, the reason we are talking about this bill is because of these companies and lenders.” What would you have to tell them?

no-dissent-icon.jpgGG: Hello, we’re from the Government and we’re here to help. And this isn’t public support. This is support from the Federal Reserve. They have a big savings account, imagine your WaMu account on steroids. And this account, they can exchange one thing for another. Sort of like Columbus trading with folks back in the heyday in South America. It is a fair trade. You give us explosive evil mortgages and we float you some U.S. Treasuries.

windows-zealot-icon.jpgDr. HB: I’m not sure the public views that as a fair trade. Now, in this bill you also have an $8,000 tax credit for first-time home buyers. Economics would teach us, that giving tax credits to a sector will increase demand for it. It also teaches us that by giving a tax credit (aka less tax revenue) we will be increasing our massive deficits. How would you explain the logic of the tax credit?

no-dissent-icon.jpgGG: Well you see, we really want people to buy homes. I’m not sure why people aren’t buying more homes. I just bought 2 homes last month and it is fantastic! So with this tax credit we are basically saying to anyone sitting on the fence, “hey, come jump in the pool! The water is just dandy! And if things go boom we’ll just give you a government loan and all will be fine.” This will help us get more potential home buyers. And about that deficit, we’ll just figure out where to get that money later. Maybe we’ll exchange some old furniture in the White House over at the Federal Reserve.

windows-zealot-icon.jpg Dr. HB: I wouldn’t be surprised if they accepted that. Another major contention in the bill is the raising of FHA loan limits. It looks like you guys are trying to raise the limits by 150 percent to $625,000. Now the median priced home in the United States is currently around $200,000. Why is there a need to raise the limit so high?

no-dissent-icon.jpgGG: This is where it gets complicated folks so listen up! Are you listening? Ok. Basically, people in high priced areas like California screwed up three times as much as folks that screwed up in states like Georgia, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and all those other states. For example, someone that bought a home in Ohio for $110,000 with a funky loan now finds their home only worth $100,000. If the lender wanted to move this loan into a FHA product, they’ll eat $20,000 and we’ll rework the loan given the new guidelines. But say you are a sunny Californian! You decided to buy a Real Home of Genius for let us say, $1,000,000. Now, your place is worth only $700,000. The lender wants to unload this turd, uh, I mean deflated happy asset into a FHA loan. The borrower now has a loan at roughly $625,000 and everyone is happy! That is why the cap is being raised.

windows-zealot-icon.jpgDr. HB: But isn’t that selectively helping a handful of states?

no-dissent-icon.jpgGG: Yes. But we all need to take one for the team! Come on nation! Let us take one for California!

windows-zealot-icon.jpgDr. HB: For the past few months, California, Arizona, Florida, and Nevada have accounted for 50 percent of all distressed properties. I doubt the other 40 states with moderately priced homes would like this.

no-dissent-icon.jpgGG: We’ll just tell them that if they don’t, their pensions are at stake and scare the crap out of them. That way, we sink together.

windows-zealot-icon.jpgDr. HB: Given that this bill is being touted at $300 billion, how are we going to finance this bill?

no-dissent-icon.jpgGG: Like I said, if we need to print money we will. Look at it this way. The United States consumes about 20 million barrels of oil a day. At $137 a barrel, that is $2,740,000,000. So with that said, you can pretend that this housing rescue plan is the equivalent of 109 days of oil or a couple of weeks before the general election.

windows-zealot-icon.jpgDr. HB: Nice perspective. Well I think that’s all the questions I have for you Senator. Enjoy your summer recess. I think most folks will be working trying to maintain a middle class lifestyle.

no-dissent-icon.jpg GG: No problemo. Hey folks, make sure you go out there and do your country a favor by buying a Real Home of Genius. It’s the American thing to do.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information

Related Posts:
Real Homes of Genius: Two For One in Compton. Southern California Housing Bubble Hangover.
Two 400+ Point Days in Two-Weeks: Why this is Horrible News for Housing. Volcker and Protecting your Mac.
Real Homes of Genius: 675 square foot home in Lynwood California at $425,000?!
Housing Contradiction: Home Prices Down = Sales Up. Any Questions?
Ross Perot Charts: How I Learned to be a Housing Blogger from Ross Perot.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

The bail out plan that Congress is hard at work trying to pass may not do much in terms of actually helping anyone.  Government estimates show that only 400,000 people could benefit from the new FHA-driven refinance/loan modifications while more than 3,000,000 folks are actually 60 days down (or late) on their mortgage.

This refrain is all-to-common in trying to solve the mortgage mess.  FHA Secure, remember that one?  How many folks are being helped there?  Not many.  Loan modifications?  You don’t see those coming through in huge numbers either.  The tough reality is that with so much money at stake, so much declining equity, so much debt, so little additional borrowing capacity there is very little room to actually do something that works.

Or maybe the answer is doing little is the best answer.

A great article from the New York Times on the plight of lawmakers whose ham-handed attempts at help continue to fall short of main-street needs.

Those stark numbers not only illustrate the challenges for the lawmakers trying to provide some relief to their constituents but also hint at what the next administration will be facing after the election. While the proposed program would help some homeowners, analysts say it would touch only a small fraction of those in trouble — the Congressional Budget Office estimates it would be used by 400,000 borrowers — and would do little to bolster the housing market.

“It’s not enough, even in the best of circumstances,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody’s Economy.com. The number of people who will be helped “is going to be overwhelmed by the three million that are headed toward default.”

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Products and services, Launches, Google (GOOG), Marketing and advertising

Google, Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) continues to make transparency about all people and businesses its top priority. In releasing Trends for Websites this week, the world’s largest search information company made it impossible for websites to hide their numbers from all eyes, including consumers and advertisers. Are you a media buyer who wants to know the reach of a prospective website before you even contact them to negotiate? Visit Google’s Trend for Websites site and find out instantly.

Google then one-upped itself by announcing the Ad Planner product for advertisers. This new product will allow media buyers and advertisers to get an immense amount of help on the best web properties in which to spend ad money. In other words, Google is making life easier for its advertisers to find the largest-impact website in which to advertise — without trial and error. Of course, the new Ad Planner service is free.

Google’s unabated quest to become the world’s largest advertising company continues to move forward. Although these two products may not get much attention from the media after this week, these are huge impacts in terms of the business model that keeps Google’s entire money chest afloat: advertising revenue. When Google said that “we want to help you figure out where your target audience is” in announcing Ad Manager, it wasn’t kidding. The more it makes its ad customers successful, the more business it will bring in. Everyone’s happy, and Google remains solidly on top of the new media advertising world.

Close
E-mail It