Archive for July 2nd, 2008

You may have noticed that my most recent Real Homes of Genius examples have shifted from inner city $500,000 homes to struggling high priced “prime” areas like Beverly Hills and Culver City. The reason is that this housing correction is impacting properties in every corner of California. In 2005 and 2006, it was […]
Related Posts:
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Brea. A Home that Shows Each Phase of the California Housing Bubble.
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Pacoima. Zillow says $457,000 but Listed at $225,000?
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Stanton.
Real Homes of Genius: $438,000 for 816 square feet in Pico Rivera! Another Example of Manic SoCal Housing!
Real Homes of Genius: South Gate home at $397,000 – Reduced from $475,000.

You may have noticed that my most recent Real Homes of Genius examples have shifted from inner city $500,000 homes to struggling high priced “prime” areas like Beverly Hills and Culver City. The reason is that this housing correction is impacting properties in every corner of California. In 2005 and 2006, it was not uncommon to put a hand over your eyes, plunk your index finger on one of the 88 cities in Los Angeles County, and you could rest assured that area had 20+% year over year gains. It didn’t matter. It reminded me of the investment firm ad pre-tech bust where a chimp is throwing darts at a stock page and outperforms the market. Yes, it was literally that easy to make money in this speculative fervor.
The evolution of the housing decline is now engulfing the entire region. The California Association of Realtors came out with their monthly report stating that California is now down a whopping 35% on a year over year basis:

Single-family Detached Home

May 2007: $594,530

May 2008: $384,840

Nominal Decline: $209,690

How is this not a crash? Even if there is debate that the nation as a whole may or may not be in a recession California is definitely in one. With an unemployment rate of 6.8% and a heavy dependence on housing to boost our economy, we are going to face a serious challenge these upcoming years. That is without even looking at the $300 billion in Option ARM mortgages just itching to recast during the 2nd half of the year. There are reports highlighting the increase in sales for California which is true for two reasons:

First - A large number of current sales are distressed properties that are priced at a heavy discount.

Second - We are seeing the typical spring and summer selling season trends which aren’t as strong as other years.

So those are important caveats. And it is also hard to assume how many homes that are REOs are making it fully into the MLS data. Clearly there is a discrepancy when MLS data shows a decline in inventory while the amount of REOs is sky rocketing. Let us look at the current data and see if we can put our finger on the pulse of the market:

Total Southern California Inventory: 140,842 (MLS data)

Total Sales for SoCal in May of 2008: 16,917

Total months of inventory: 8.3 months

California Distress Information for May 2008

Notice of Defaults: 41,965

REOs: 20,237

NTS: 9,728

So here’s the raw data. The overall inventory numbers have been steadily falling since September of 2007 yet the sales numbers haven’t increased fast enough to compensate for the increase in distress market action. In fact, given that the foreclosure process takes months and the notice of default is only one of many stages, you can expect a flood of REOs and foreclosures hitting the market in the next few months just in synergy with the onslaught of option ARM mortgage.

You may say that the NOD number is over stated and people will bring this current. Thik again:

“(DQ News) Of the homeowners in default, an estimated 32 percent emerge from the foreclosure process by bringing their payments current, refinancing, or selling the home and paying off what they owe. A year ago it was about 52 percent. The increased portion of homes lost to foreclosure reflects the slow real estate market, as well as the number of homes bought during the height of the market with multiple-loan financing, which makes ‘work-outs’ difficult.”

That means 68 percent (at least from the last report in April) will not become current and go through the entire foreclosure process. The market conditions have only worsened since April and I can assure you that people in option ARMs will default at these levels or even higher just given the toxicity of the mortgages. Let us take a look at the chart once again:

Pay Option ARM

Not a pretty picture for California. Now let us look at a home in Brea that documents the history of the great California housing bubble. Today we Salute you Brea with our Real Homes of Genius award.

Housing Archeologist - Digging Up the Past

brea

Brea is a city in Orange County California that is also extremely close to Los Angeles County. Once started as a crude oil hub ironically, the city has become a nice place for families to search for starter homes. Young professionals usually find this city a good place to start. Many in Southern California have been to the Brea Mall. The cities population of 39,560 makes it one of the more moderate sized cities in Southern California.
Given the nature of the current housing explosion, Brea is not immune to the damage of the housing market. Let us look at the current data on this area:

May 2008

Brea 92821 Median Price: $447,500 (down 22.8% from $579,663 last year)

Brea 92823 Median Price: $517,000 (down 29.4% from $732,295 last year)

Now for people outside of the area these price drops must be stunning. After all, the price drop for 92823 is a stunning $215,295 in one year; a price in itself that is higher than the median priced home in the United States! But given California as a whole is down 35%, this is actually very common. Areas once thought prime are no longer in that category. In fact, many of these areas are the main culprits of the option ARM bonanza.

Many of the inner city loans have already imploded and these were largely due to the sub-prime loans. After all, how is someone making $14,000 going to get a $720,000 without fudging the math. But these so-called prime areas have people with decent to good credit with okay incomes but no way in the world could they afford a $732,295 starter home. That price correction above folks is the market correcting a massive bubble. That sub-prime talk is hogwash and a Trojan horse to cover the real mess of nationwide speculation.

For the large part as much as people want to believe Californians all make $250,000 a year, this is absolutely wrong. I remember in 2006 I kept getting these commentators on a monthly basis say “see, prices went up because they are simply reflecting higher wages and demand.” Which I would quickly say, “no, prices are going up because of speculation and rampant crappy loans. Incomes are not going up.” This massive correction is simply a reflection of that reality and those commentators have gone the way of the zero down mortgages. Even a cursory look at national income statistics would tell you this:

income.jpg

*Source: Wikipedia, Census Bureau

Only 5% of all U.S. households take in more than $166,200 a year. For that $732,295 price tag buyers in that area would need to making $250,000+ to afford a comfortable mortgage. So what are the stats for the Brea area?

Brea Average Household Income: $80,480

A tad bit short from $250,000 don’t you think? So this above place documents the entire mania that went on in California. This home is a 3 bedroom 1 bath short sale at 1,100+ square feet. The current sale price is $420,000 and is located in the 92821. What is the sale history on this place?

12/02/2005: $575,000

04/04/2002: $300,000

08/31/2000: $242,000

Now take a look at the peak for the 92821 area code above? Now look at the current median price. Notice something? Banks and lenders are basically trying to follow a declining market and lowering prices with median ranges. Of course, this is as idiotic as paying an inflated price on a home simply because 3 local comps justified a higher price. All that meant is 3 people drank the Kool-Aid and jumped in the market. Now we are seeing the reverse occurring. Let us do a quick market analysis. First, a similar home in this area with 3 bedrooms would rent for $2,100 a month.

Rent: $2,100

PITI: $2,958 (with 5% down and a 6.5% fixed mortgage)

Given you’ll be able to write-off much of the interest, this deal is getting closer to a more logical price range. In reality, the actual solid range would be $275,000 to $350,000 given the current market conditions. At that point, it really is up to you whether you should jump into the market given your life circumstances. Yet to run into the market right now is simply cashing in your chips to early. Look at how the price doubled in 5 years. This makes no sense. Let us be generous and say that the $242,000 price in 2000 was a good starting point. At the rate of inflation after 8 years the price should be $357,000, well within our range.

However you slice things, right now is not the time to buy. We’re getting there but jumping in right now would not be the most practical thing to do.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information

Related Posts:
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Brea. A Home that Shows Each Phase of the California Housing Bubble.
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Pacoima. Zillow says $457,000 but Listed at $225,000?
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Stanton.
Real Homes of Genius: $438,000 for 816 square feet in Pico Rivera! Another Example of Manic SoCal Housing!
Real Homes of Genius: South Gate home at $397,000 – Reduced from $475,000.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Filed under: Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), Apple Inc (AAPL), Wal-Mart (WMT), Money and Finance Today

In the News:

And I can’t rationalize it, quite.  Bank of America completed its controversial purchase of failed mortgage lender Countrywide.  The final purchase price came in at about $2.5 billion, down from the estimated $4 billion at the time of the announcement.  Questions about pending lawsuits, worthless home equity lines and exploding option ARMs all seemed to be answered to the satisfaction of BofA’s leadership to complete the purchase.

From the New York Times:

It’s official: Bank of America has acquired Countrywide Financial, marking the completion of an audacious rescue of one of the most troubled lenders in the United States. The deal will expand Bank of America’s reach in the mortgage business — but, in the current environment of rising defaults and delinquencies among American homeowners, the expansion obviously comes with serious risks.

Countrywide was among the largest lenders in California and Florida, two states hit especially hard by the housing downturn. Both states have sued Countrywide alleging it engaged in unfair and deceptive lending practices. What’s more, Countrywide has a big portfolio of home equity lines of credit, which some fear will be hit with a rash of defaults as borrowers run short of cash.

Some analysts had urged Bank of America to abandon the deal. And judging from the swings in Countrywide’s stock in the six months since the deal was announced, the markets have been questioning Bank of America’s commitment to buying it.

And yet Kenneth Lewis, Bank of America’s chief executive, pictured above, has been resolute that the purchase would go through.

Why didn’t Bank of America learn anything from Wachovia?

Why would Bank of America want all of those worthless Option ARMs?  Wachovia’s recent precedent-setting announcement that it’s waiving pre-pay fees on all Option ARMs implicitly confirms that those loans are a massive liability to the future of the bank.  And while Golden West/World Savings was a major originator of the exploding loans, there was none bigger than Countrywide.

Can Bank of America afford the loan loss reserves that will be needed to insure the risk of this acquired portfolio?  Will risk become too expensive moving forward?  Will it threaten the solvency of BofA?  Will they need to dilute shares, raise equity and cut dividends in the short-term to make it through the continued deterioration of the Countrywide-originated loans?

Bank of America is assuming that losses from Option ARMs, lawsuits and worthless HELOC’s will be far less than the long-term profiability of the combined unit.  That’s a big assumption and a tough one to make in a terrible economy.

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Analyst reports, Analyst upgrades and downgrades, General Motors (GM), UAL Corp (UAUA)

MOST NOTEWORTHY: Concur Tech, Groupe Danone and General Motors were today’s noteworthy downgrades:

  • Piper downgraded shares of Concur Tech (NASDAQ: CNQR) to Neutral from Buy after transferring analyst coverage, as they believe potential upside to estimates is priced into shares while competitive concerns from American Express (NYSE: AXP) are not.
  • Morgan Stanley downgraded shares of Groupe Danone (OTC: GDNNY) to Equal Weight from Overweight to reflect reduced visibility in the company’s core business.
  • Merrill downgraded General Motors (NYSE: GM) to Underperform from Buy citing the company’s deteriorating US auto sales, resulting in a higher cash burn, which could result in a larger than expected capital raise. The firm believes GM capital raise could be in the range of $15 billion and notes that bankruptcy is “not impossible.”

OTHER DOWNGRADES:

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

American Express announced intra-quarter guidance today saying that the company would be impacted by worse-than-expected credit conditions.  They expect their business to be impacted as economic activity slows and consumer late-pays and credit defaults on AMEX cards continue to mount.

From the Market Watch story:

“Business conditions continue to weaken in the U.S. and so far this month we have seen credit indicators deteriorate beyond our expectations,” Chief Executive Kenneth Chenault said in a statement.

“Today’s release indicated that the company would likely hold off on potential business building initiatives until business conditions improve,” the analyst wrote.
American Express has been hit by rising losses on its credit cards as the housing slump and slowing economic growth limit customers’ ability to repay debts.
Provisions for losses on American Express’s credit cards have risen over the past year to $1.15 billion from $783 million as the consumer credit market has weakened, Egan-Jones Ratings, a rating agency that’s paid by investors rather than issuers, noted.

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), Apple Inc (AAPL), Wal-Mart (WMT), Money and Finance Today

In the News:

Filed under: Good news, Technical Analysis, Andersons Inc (ANDE), Stocks to Buy

The Andersons (NASDAQ: ANDE) is a diversified firm, with interests in the U.S. agriculture, transportation and retail markets. Its Grain & Ethanol Group purchases and merchandises grain; operates grain elevator facilities; manages ethanol production facilities; and engages in grain and ethanol trading. The Rail Group buys, sells, leases, rebuilds, and repairs various types of used railcars and rail equipment. The Retail Group offers hardware, plumbing, electrical, and building supplies, as well as specialty foods and wines. The Plant Nutrient and Turf & Specialty Groups formulate fertilizers. The company has operations in ten states and Puerto Rico, plus rail leasing interests in Canada and Mexico.

The firm pleased investors last week, when it boosted its FY08 EPS guidance from $3.65-$4.00 to $4.40-$4.80. Analysts had been looking for $3.79. Management attributed the favorable outlook to the improved performance of the Plant Nutrient Group.

Continue reading The Andersons (ANDE): Price defines bullish ‘flag’ consolidation pattern

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Microsoft (MSFT), Yahoo! (YHOO), General Motors (GM), Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A), Walt Disney (DIS), Citigroup Inc. (C), Johnson and Johnson (JNJ), Chubb Corp (CB), Merrill Lynch (MER), Goldman Sachs Group (GS), Morgan Stanley (MS), Huaneng Power Intl ADS (HNP), Teva Pharm Indus ADR (TEVA), Lehman Br Holdings (LEH), Bear Stearns Cos (BSC), Intuitive Surgical Inc (ISRG)

Six months of 2008 are now behind us and the stock market has not been a friendly place to most investors. Stability that was once found in household names that were industry giants is gone, and they have now been brought to their knees.

Many of them were the stocks we might have looked to in the past for stability, so you can be sure I put forward my five candidates with a little trepidation, but forward I go anyway. First a little review is in order.

Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C) dropped from around $53 per share last year to around $30 in January and we can buy it today for around $17. Even at that price Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) has downgraded it to a sell and thinks there is more bad news to come. Citigroup was the largest bank in the world. Not any more.

General Motors (NYSE: GM) was the largest car maker in the world. That was before the stock tumbled from $43 to its current $11 range. A crushing blow to long time investors hoping that someone in the company could stop the ship from sinking.

Continue reading Serious Money: Five stable stocks for troubled times

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Russia

Traditionally, sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) have focused on highly liquid investments, such as equities and bonds. But as these funds get bigger and bigger, the focus has been changing. In fact, some SWFs are moving into alternative investments and even buying up whole companies.

Take Dubai World, which is the emirate’s SWF. This week, the firm teamed up with OAO Roskommunenergo (a Russian energy player) to bid $5.34 billion for OGK-1, which is a major electricity provider in Russia.

It’s a savvy move. After all, Russia is in the process of deregulating the electricity market, which should come into effect by 2011. So there should be some pricing opportunities (keep in mind that prices have been held artificially low for decades).

Even so, OGK-1 has its challenges. Essentially, the company needs some serious capital infusions. But hey, that’s something Dubai World can deal with handily, right?

Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including The Complete M&A Handbook and The Edgar Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements. He also operates MergerBook.com.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), Yahoo! (YHOO)

I read an article over the weekend about Yahoo! Inc. (NASDAQ: YHOO) and its reorganization attempts. Make no mistake about it, this company needs to alter its DNA if it intends to survive in a world without a Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ: MSFT) taking it over.

In a nutshell, it looks like Yahoo! wants to retool its divisions so that it can more efficiently react to changes in the online marketplace. Yahoo! apparently feels that its current organizational structure inhibits growth and is looking to create new teams dedicated to developing products that will capture eyeballs and advertising opportunities as quickly as possible. The company also wants to focus on cloud computing, a technology that is important to the business sector.

Well, from the point of view of an investor looking at Yahoo!, I don’t see anything here that persuades me to buy the stock. Synthesizing a new plan of corporate attack is pretty much par for the course for any company that is doing terribly and is looking to get back on the good side of Wall Street. But is there anything really exciting in the plan? No. It’s just Yahoo! doing something. There’s nothing too revolutionary going on. Centralizing this and that might add value. It also might not. It’s all in the execution, and I’m not sure I want to trust a company that rebuffed Microsoft’s reasonable buyout offer to execute anything at this point.

If Yahoo! wants to remain on its own, I have no doubt that it will survive and will be here a decade from now. But will it be a good investment for the long term? That’s uncertain at this point. It has incredible brand equity to web surfers, it’s a popular portal that will always be of value to advertisers, but Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) has proven that Yahoo! cannot thrive simply on its name and image.

Carl Icahn will tell you that Microsoft is the only solution to Yahoo!’s problems. Unless Yahoo! comes up with a good plan for the future (and I’m not sure the current one will suffice), Icahn may be proven right. There was a time when I was very bullish on the company and stock. For now, that feeling is a memory.

Disclosure: I don’t own any company mentioned; positions can change at any time.

Close
E-mail It