Archive for July 4th, 2008

Filed under: Industry, Ford Motor (F), General Motors (GM), Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)

I was actually in Detroit on Monday. I’m not going to write about the urban decay and the deterioration of the city. Many have researched and documented this far better than I ever could. But even in my short three-hour visit, the evidence was all too clear. Personally, I think Detroit has more character than many other richer and far more maintained and manicured cities. Even abandoned and in shambles, many of the buildings are architectural gems. Perhaps because one can still see the glorious past through the ruins, that it is so affecting. Or, as the website names them, they are The Fabulous Ruins of Detroit.

It is for this reason that the recent talk of bankruptcy for one of the Big Three has been so disturbing.

This week has been very busy for automakers, starting with June car and truck sales reported on Tuesday. General Motors Corporation (NYSE: GM) reported an 18.2% drop in sales, which was actually better than expected, and Ford Motor Company (NYSE: F) a drop of 27.9%. Meanwhile, Japan’s Toyota Motor Corporation (NYSE: TM) posted a 21.4% sales decline. GM shares actually got a boost from the sales figures, but that didn’t last long.

Continue reading Bankruptcy for one of the Big Three?

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

You may have noticed that my most recent Real Homes of Genius examples have shifted from inner city $500,000 homes to struggling high priced “prime” areas like Beverly Hills and Culver City. The reason is that this housing correction is impacting properties in every corner of California. In 2005 and 2006, it was […]
Related Posts:
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Brea. A Home that Shows Each Phase of the California Housing Bubble.
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Pacoima. Zillow says $457,000 but Listed at $225,000?
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Stanton.
Real Homes of Genius: $438,000 for 816 square feet in Pico Rivera! Another Example of Manic SoCal Housing!
Real Homes of Genius: South Gate home at $397,000 – Reduced from $475,000.

You may have noticed that my most recent Real Homes of Genius examples have shifted from inner city $500,000 homes to struggling high priced “prime” areas like Beverly Hills and Culver City. The reason is that this housing correction is impacting properties in every corner of California. In 2005 and 2006, it was not uncommon to put a hand over your eyes, plunk your index finger on one of the 88 cities in Los Angeles County, and you could rest assured that area had 20+% year over year gains. It didn’t matter. It reminded me of the investment firm ad pre-tech bust where a chimp is throwing darts at a stock page and outperforms the market. Yes, it was literally that easy to make money in this speculative fervor.

The evolution of the housing decline is now engulfing the entire region. The California Association of Realtors came out with their monthly report stating that California is now down a whopping 35% on a year over year basis:

Single-family Detached Home

May 2007: $594,530

May 2008: $384,840

Nominal Decline: $209,690

How is this not a crash? Even if there is debate that the nation as a whole may or may not be in a recession California is definitely in one. With an unemployment rate of 6.8% and a heavy dependence on housing to boost our economy, we are going to face a serious challenge these upcoming years. That is without even looking at the $300 billion in Option ARM mortgages just itching to recast during the 2nd half of the year. There are reports highlighting the increase in sales for California which is true for two reasons:

First - A large number of current sales are distressed properties that are priced at a heavy discount.

Second - We are seeing the typical spring and summer selling season trends which aren’t as strong as other years.

So those are important caveats. And it is also hard to assume how many homes that are REOs are making it fully into the MLS data. Clearly there is a discrepancy when MLS data shows a decline in inventory while the amount of REOs is sky rocketing. Let us look at the current data and see if we can put our finger on the pulse of the market:

Total Southern California Inventory: 140,842 (MLS data)

Total Sales for SoCal in May of 2008: 16,917

Total months of inventory: 8.3 months

California Distress Information for May 2008

Notice of Defaults: 41,965

REOs: 20,237

NTS: 9,728

So here’s the raw data. The overall inventory numbers have been steadily falling since September of 2007 yet the sales numbers haven’t increased fast enough to compensate for the increase in distress market action. In fact, given that the foreclosure process takes months and the notice of default is only one of many stages, you can expect a flood of REOs and foreclosures hitting the market in the next few months just in synergy with the onslaught of option ARM mortgage.

You may say that the NOD number is over stated and people will bring this current. Think again:

“(DQ News) Of the homeowners in default, an estimated 32 percent emerge from the foreclosure process by bringing their payments current, refinancing, or selling the home and paying off what they owe. A year ago it was about 52 percent. The increased portion of homes lost to foreclosure reflects the slow real estate market, as well as the number of homes bought during the height of the market with multiple-loan financing, which makes ‘work-outs’ difficult.”

That means 68 percent (at least from the last report in April) will not become current and go through the entire foreclosure process. The market conditions have only worsened since April and I can assure you that people in option ARMs will default at these levels or even higher just given the toxicity of the mortgages. Let us take a look at the chart once again:

Pay Option ARM

Not a pretty picture for California. Now let us look at a home in Brea that documents the history of the great California housing bubble. Today we Salute you Brea with our Real Homes of Genius award.

Housing Archeologist - Digging Up the Past

brea

Brea is a city in Orange County California that is also extremely close to Los Angeles County. Once started as a crude oil hub ironically, the city has become a nice place for families to search for starter homes. Young professionals usually find this city a good place to start. Many in Southern California have been to the Brea Mall. The cities population of 39,560 makes it one of the more moderate sized cities in Southern California.

Given the nature of the current housing explosion, Brea is not immune to the damage of the housing market. Let us look at the current data on this area:

May 2008

Brea 92821 Median Price: $447,500 (down 22.8% from $579,663 last year)

Brea 92823 Median Price: $517,000 (down 29.4% from $732,295 last year)

Now for people outside of the area these price drops must be stunning. After all, the price drop for 92823 is a stunning $215,295 in one year; a price in itself that is higher than the median priced home in the United States! But given California as a whole is down 35%, this is actually very common. Areas once thought prime are no longer in that category. In fact, many of these areas are the main culprits of the option ARM bonanza.

Many of the inner city loans have already imploded and these were largely due to the sub-prime loans. After all, how is someone making $14,000 going to get a $720,000 mortgage without fudging the math. But these so-called prime areas have people with decent to good credit with okay incomes but no way in the world could they afford a $732,295 starter home. That price correction above folks is the market correcting a massive bubble. That sub-prime talk is hogwash and a Trojan horse to cover the real mess of nationwide speculation from rich to poor.  Main Street and Wall Street both participated in this bonanza.

For the large part as much as people want to believe Californians all make $250,000 a year, this is absolutely wrong. I remember in 2006 I kept getting these commentators on a monthly basis say “see, prices went up because they are simply reflecting higher wages and demand.” Which I would quickly say, “no, prices are going up because of speculation and rampant crappy loans. Incomes are not going up.” This massive correction is simply a reflection of that reality and those commentators have gone the way of the zero down mortgages. Even a cursory look at national income statistics would tell you this:

income.jpg

*Source: Wikipedia, Census Bureau

Only 5% of all U.S. households take in more than $166,200 a year. For that $732,295 price tag buyers in that area would need to be making $250,000+ to afford a comfortable fixed mortgage. So what are the stats for the Brea area?

Brea Average Household Income: $80,480

A tad bit short from $250,000 don’t you think? So this above place documents the entire mania that went on in California. This home is a 3 bedroom 1 bath short sale at 1,100+ square feet. The current sale price is $420,000 and is located in the 92821. What is the sale history on this place?

12/02/2005: $575,000

04/04/2002: $300,000

08/31/2000: $242,000

Now take a look at the peak for the 92821 area code above. Now look at the current median price. Notice something? Banks and lenders are basically trying to follow a declining market and lowering prices with median ranges. Of course, this is as idiotic as paying an inflated price on a home simply because 3 local comps justified a higher price. All that meant is 3 people drank the Kool-Aid and jumped in the market. Now we are seeing the reverse occurring. Let us do a quick market analysis. First, a similar home in this area with 3 bedrooms would rent for $2,100 a month.

Rent: $2,100

PITI: $2,958 (with 5% down and a 6.5% fixed mortgage)

Given you’ll be able to write-off much of the interest, this deal is getting closer to a more logical price range. In reality, the actual solid range would be $275,000 to $350,000 given the current market conditions. At that point, it really is up to you whether you should jump into the market given your life circumstances. Yet to run into the market right now is simply cashing in your chips too early. Look at how the price doubled in 5 years. This makes no sense. Let us be generous and say that the $242,000 price in 2000 was a good starting point. At the rate of inflation after 8 years the price should be $357,000, well within our range.

However you slice things, right now is not the time to buy. We’re getting there but jumping in right now would not be the most practical thing to do.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information

Related Posts:
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Brea. A Home that Shows Each Phase of the California Housing Bubble.
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Pacoima. Zillow says $457,000 but Listed at $225,000?
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Stanton.
Real Homes of Genius: $438,000 for 816 square feet in Pico Rivera! Another Example of Manic SoCal Housing!
Real Homes of Genius: South Gate home at $397,000 – Reduced from $475,000.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Filed under: Forecasts, Management, Starbucks (SBUX)

In a brilliant article in The New York Times, the paper points out that of all the mistakes that Starbucks (NASDAQ: SBUX) made in its expansion, picking real estate locations may have been the worst. Much of the analysis for the piece came from talking to real estate brokers. The paper writes, “In some cases, brokers say, Starbucks misjudged the risks of putting stores close to each other, leading to the decline in same-store sales.”

It is astonishing that Starbucks would make such basic errors and speaks to what happened to management during the period when founder Howard Schultz was absent from the CEO job. The team that replaced him said it believed the company would eventually have 40,000 store worldwide. It clearly cut corners in terms of planning to get there.

The real trouble with the real estate location decisions is that it may take a very long time to fix. Closing stores may be easy, but finding better spots, negotiated for the space, and building out new stores will be time consuming and, perhaps, expensive.

Schultz and his minions are paying for rampant growth, and the poor souls who worked for him are paying more. Almost 12,000 will lose their jobs.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Newspapers, Magazines, Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), Yahoo! (YHOO), Time Warner (TWX), JPMorgan Chase (JPM), News Corp’B’ (NWS), BHP Billiton Ltd ADR (BHP), Rio Tinto plc ADS (RTP)

MAJOR PAPERS:

OTHER PAPERS:

  • Sources familiar with the inquiry said that the Justice Department has opened a formal antitrust investigation into a deal that would allow Google Inc (NASDAQ: GOOG) to provide some search advertising for Yahoo!. The Washington Post reported that investigators will demand documents from Google and Yahoo!, as well as other large companies in the media and Internet industries.

WEB SITES:

  • Reuters reported that regulators in the European Union are looking at the long-term effects of BHP Billiton Limited’s (NYSE: BHP) $170B bid for Rio Tinto Group (NYSE: RTP). Sources familiar with the EU questionnaire said regulators have asked competitors and customers about effects of the deal on their businesses through 2015.

Filed under: Good news, Rumors, Sprint Nextel Corp (S)

Much has been written about Sprint Nextel Corp.’s (NYSE: S) follies in recent quarters. The third-largest wireless carrier in the U.S. has lost millions of customers to larger and more successful competitors like Verizon Wireless and AT&T, Inc. (NYSE: T). But, with the launch of an extremely successful iPhone competitor (among other things), the company is showing signs of stemming its huge customer defections from past quarters.

The word of support initially came from Verizon Wireless President Denny Strigl , who told investors that Sprint’s performance had picked up in the last months — although Verizon still didn’t consider Sprint to be a threat to Verizon Wireless’ current results. Still, any improvement for Sprint is a good thing. Sprint CEO Dan Hesse, a wireless industry veteran with a largely successful track record, is the right person to be leading Sprint as well. So, are all the cards lined up for Sprint to become a resurgent force in the U.S. wireless industry?

It’s stock has rebounded in a decent way, closing up from mid-March’s $6/share to $8.91 recently (it closed yesterday at $8.94/share). Although Sprint lost over a million customers in the first quarter of 2008, the numbers should not be that bad in the second quarter. Sprint also won’t be sold any time soon. Verizon Wireless, which just bought Alltel from its private owners, is the only company that could have made a merger work in buying Sprint Nextel. It would be disastrous to have another company come in and try to emulate what Sprint attempted with Nextel back in 2005, which has turned out to be a complete disaster and has led to tens of billions in write-offs (do you hear me now, Deutsche Telekom?).

Sprint has the chops to turn itself around in 2009 with some solid management and good decisions, but it still won’t be easy. Spinning off the Nextel network (oops, I mean selling the spectrum off) and migrating all those customers to Sprint’s network — along with heavy retention incentives — may be Hesse’s biggest bet yet. That is, if he has the cahones to do it.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Google (GOOG), Options

Google (NYSE: GOOG) closed at $534.74 Tuesday.

GOOG is scheduled to report Q2 EPS on July 17.

Jefferies says: “Reiterating Buy and $600 target on healthy domestic search growth.

GOOG July option implied volatility of 46 is above its 26-week average of 37 according to Track Data, suggesting large price movement.

Option Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com

Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan plans to file suit against Countrywide and their orange-tinted CEO Angelo Mozilo tomorrow for risky and deceptive mortgage lending practices in the state.  Ms. Madigan claims that the state has ample evidence to charge Countrywide for lending practices that have put borrowers in loans that can’t be repaid, and using sales and marketing tactics that encouraged borrowers and rewarded employees to take and make risky loans.

Illinois, like other parts of the country is dealing with a massive uptick in home foreclosures.

I can’t say I’m surprised.  Mozilo has flaunted his company’s success, blamed others for its losses, and there are more than a few stories from inside Countrywide about the ridiculous compensation and underwriting guidelines that encouraged charging high fees, putting borrowers in loans that made more money for the company and underwriting standards that probably don’t provide any more diligence than the application check used to rent movies at your local Blockbuster.

From the Wall Street Journal:

In a draft of the complaint, Illinois alleges that the company engaged in “unfair and deceptive practices” in the sale of mortgage loans. The 78-page document says the company loosened its underwriting standards, structured loans with “risky features” and engaged in “marketing and sales techniques” that incentivized employees and mortgage brokers to push loans whether or not homeowners had the ability to repay them.

In an interview, Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan said Countrywide “broke the law and we plan to hold them accountable for that.” She added that Countrywide’s actions have led to widespread foreclosures in her state and have wrecked havoc around the world. “The impact on individual homeowners and communities and the country and the global economy is unbelievable.”

Ms. Madigan says she is asking that all Countrywide loans originated using “unfair and deceptive” practices be rescinded or modified in some way, even if Countrywide has to repurchase the loans. She is also asking that her office be given 90 days to review any loans that are currently in foreclosure or that are moving toward foreclosure. As part of its investigation, the Illinois attorney general’s office interviewed about 30 former Countrywide employees and mortgage brokers and reviewed more than 100,000 pages of documents, Ms. Madigan said.

Mr. Mozilo was included as a defendant because he “participates in, manages, controls, and has knowledge of the day-to-day activities” of Countrywide, the lawsuit says.

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Forecasts, Consumer experience, Competitive strategy, NIKE, Inc’B’ (NKE), Economic data

If you love Adidas’ clothing and footwear then I have some good news for you. Adidas is eying to open about 2,300 new stores in China by 2010, lifting its total number to 6,300. The company’s decision came as a result of strong demand from China even in times when we might expect to see some downturns.

Frederic Seiller, a vice president in charge of retail operations for Greater China, stated that the the global economic slowdown had no impact on Adidas’s sales in China. In addition, the company is optimistic about its further gains, and forecast a nice demand from the local sportswear market. From this point of view, total sales in China are expected to come to 1 billion euros by 2010.

As well as getting growth in revenue, by opening its biggest store in the world in central Beijing Adidas aims to beat rival Nike Inc. (NYSE: NKE). Back in 2007, China became Nike’s second-largest market, and its Chinese sales reached $1 billion in 2008.

Continue reading Adidas plans to open new stores in China

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Wachovia announced today that they are no longer offering the pick-a-pay, negative amortization mortgage loan. Additionally, they’ve announced that the bank will assist current pick-a-pay loan holders by waiving all pre-payment penalty fees for those looking to refinance out of the loan.

Here’s the details:

Effectively immediately, Wachovia is waiving all prepayment fees associated with its Pick-A-Pay mortgage to allow customers complete flexibility in their home financing decisions.
. . .
Additionally, for all new loan originations, Wachovia is discontinuing offering products that include payment options resulting in negative amortization.

While this has been covered extensively elsewhere with various regard I think we’ve reached a very important part in the mortgage market correction.  The return of sensible underwriting is finally getting back to basics.  The elimination of exotic mortgages like the pick-a-pay is exactly what the housing and mortgage markets need to return to normalcy and sustainable, responsible growth.

The elimination of financial engineering from the mortgage market is one of the key pieces to the recovery puzzle.  I am happy to see this loan go as it has been responsible for a major portion of the housing bubble and explosion of mortgage market greed which fueled fraud, borrower deception and risky lending practices.

An Important Milestone on the return to mortgage sanity

This is an important milestone for the market as it will force home prices back in to traditional multiples of income ranges rather than the inflated multiples that were common in the worst bubble areas including California, Vegas and Florida.  This change will insure that housing prices don’t explode in to the stratosphere again.

Additionally it will precipitate the continued fall of housing prices as voodoo financing options disappear.  The combination of sound underwriting and reduced housing prices are exactly what is needed to bring stability to the mortgage market.

More pain to come in housing market

Of course this means that more pain is sure to come in the housing markets.  Option ARM holders that were banking on refinancing in to another pick-a-pay mortgage to maintain their homes are suddenly looking at no feasible affordable mortgage and will lose their homes without some sort of bail out or debt forgiveness program from the government and lenders that made these loans.

The wave of upcoming pick-a-pay loans now truly have no place to go (as if disappearing equity wasn’t enough, the markets that have been somewhat stable are now going to feel more of the pick-a-pay foreclosure blight).  This harsh reality will push more foreclosures on to the market over the next 3 years.

Wachovia tries to limit liability

Of course, this has nothing to do with anything other than Wachovia looking to limit its already massive liability to these pick-a-pay loans.  They know that they are just ticking time bombs, and they want to refinance as many people out of those loans as possible to save their company from the sure to be eye-popping losses.

No matter the arguments about “conservative collateral valuations” by World Savings (the bank that Wachovia bought) - it is clear that the option arms made by World are a dangerous liability to the bank.  So much so that the bank is willing to waive all pre-payment fees in a last-ditch effort to get the loans off the books.  But as we all know the home price declines have probably made this option a pipe dream to many of those it’s supposed to help.

Source [blownmortgage]

Close
E-mail It