Archive for July 6th, 2008

California Attorney General Jerry Brown echoed the sentiments of his Illinois counter-part, citing lending practices that encouraged risky borrowing behavior as the key reason for filing a civil suit against Countrywide today in California court. The lawsuit also names Angelo Mozilo and President Dave Sambol in the suit.

I imagine that this will go down very much like Ameriquest did at the beginning of the subprime boom.  The states will have a hard time proving wrongdoing, but they’ll amass enough questionable evidence to suggest to Bank of America that they quickly resolve the matter to protect them from further investigations and law suits in their respective states.

Bank of America will settle with the states for the Countrywide misgivings by announcing some record-breaking dollar amount - the states will claim victory and various heads of Countrywide will be alternatively hung or pardoned on a case-by-case basis.

It will all look good in the papers and on mainstream TV and the pundits will eat it up; but in the end will anything really be fixed?

From the New York Times:

The civil lawsuits, which also name Countrywide’s chief executive, Angelo R. Mozilo, as a defendant, accuse the lender of engaging in unfair trade practices that encouraged homeowners to take out risky loans, regardless of whether they could repay them.

The lender, based in Calabasas, Calif., became the company most closely associated with the American housing boom, in which mortgages with low teaser rates were seemingly handed out to anyone who asked, as well as the real estate market’s subsequent collapse when mortgage rates rose and shaky borrowers lost their homes to foreclosure.

“Countrywide exploited the American dream of homeownership and then sold its mortgages for huge profits on the secondary market,” California’s attorney general, Jerry Brown, said in a statement.

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Forecasts, Management, Starbucks (SBUX)

In a brilliant article in The New York Times, the paper points out that of all the mistakes that Starbucks Corp. (NASDAQ: SBUX) made in its expansion, picking real estate locations may have been the worst. Much of the analysis for the piece came from talking to real estate brokers. The paper writes, “In some cases, brokers say, Starbucks misjudged the risks of putting stores close to each other, leading to the decline in same-store sales.”

It is astonishing that Starbucks would make such basic errors and speaks to what happened to management during the period when founder Howard Schultz was absent from the CEO job. The team that replaced him said it believed the company would eventually have 40,000 store worldwide. It clearly cut corners in terms of planning to get there.

The real trouble with the real estate location decisions is that it may take a very long time to fix. Closing stores may be easy, but finding better spots, negotiated for the space, and building out new stores will be time consuming and, perhaps, expensive.

Schultz and his minions are paying for rampant growth, and the poor souls who worked for him are paying more. Almost 12,000 will lose their jobs.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

I’m off in Huntington Beach with my family for the long weekend.  I hope you all get to take a breather from the seemingly endless beat of dour news to enjoy this great country we live in and celebrate our friends and loved ones.  See you Monday.

4th

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Google (GOOG), Marketing and advertising

About two years ago, Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) paid $1.65 billion for YouTube. The purchase is now starting to look like a poor decision.

According to The New York Post, “YouTube’s numbers for 2008 don’t look pretty: while 3 billion videos are viewed every month, revenues could total an anemic sub-$200 million this year.”

Some analysts believe that the trouble with YouTube is that the videos are too short, or that it is difficult for marketers to figure out in advance which content will pull well with users. Those views are wrong.

The basic trouble with YouTube is that that video quality of 99% of the content is terribly poor. Source material for many clips comes from home video cameras or cellphones. None of that is of “production value.” Putting ads that cost millions of dollars to create next to low-resolution content is a hard sell.

YouTube has a very basic problem. Most of its videos don’t look good and a lot of them are barely watchable.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

You may have noticed that my most recent Real Homes of Genius examples have shifted from inner city $500,000 homes to struggling high priced “prime” areas like Beverly Hills and Culver City. The reason is that this housing correction is impacting properties in every corner of California. In 2005 and 2006, it was […]
Related Posts:
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Brea. A Home that Shows Each Phase of the California Housing Bubble.
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Pacoima. Zillow says $457,000 but Listed at $225,000?
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Stanton.
Real Homes of Genius: $438,000 for 816 square feet in Pico Rivera! Another Example of Manic SoCal Housing!
Real Homes of Genius: South Gate home at $397,000 – Reduced from $475,000.

You may have noticed that my most recent Real Homes of Genius examples have shifted from inner city $500,000 homes to struggling high priced “prime” areas like Beverly Hills and Culver City. The reason is that this housing correction is impacting properties in every corner of California. In 2005 and 2006, it was not uncommon to put a hand over your eyes, plunk your index finger on one of the 88 cities in Los Angeles County, and you could rest assured that area had 20+% year over year gains. It didn’t matter. It reminded me of the investment firm ad pre-tech bust where a chimp is throwing darts at a stock page and outperforms the market. Yes, it was literally that easy to make money in this speculative fervor.
The evolution of the housing decline is now engulfing the entire region. The California Association of Realtors came out with their monthly report stating that California is now down a whopping 35% on a year over year basis:

Single-family Detached Home

May 2007: $594,530

May 2008: $384,840

Nominal Decline: $209,690

How is this not a crash? Even if there is debate that the nation as a whole may or may not be in a recession California is definitely in one. With an unemployment rate of 6.8% and a heavy dependence on housing to boost our economy, we are going to face a serious challenge these upcoming years. That is without even looking at the $300 billion in Option ARM mortgages just itching to recast during the 2nd half of the year. There are reports highlighting the increase in sales for California which is true for two reasons:

First - A large number of current sales are distressed properties that are priced at a heavy discount.

Second - We are seeing the typical spring and summer selling season trends which aren’t as strong as other years.

So those are important caveats. And it is also hard to assume how many homes that are REOs are making it fully into the MLS data. Clearly there is a discrepancy when MLS data shows a decline in inventory while the amount of REOs is sky rocketing. Let us look at the current data and see if we can put our finger on the pulse of the market:

Total Southern California Inventory: 140,842 (MLS data)

Total Sales for SoCal in May of 2008: 16,917

Total months of inventory: 8.3 months

California Distress Information for May 2008

Notice of Defaults: 41,965

REOs: 20,237

NTS: 9,728

So here’s the raw data. The overall inventory numbers have been steadily falling since September of 2007 yet the sales numbers haven’t increased fast enough to compensate for the increase in distress market action. In fact, given that the foreclosure process takes months and the notice of default is only one of many stages, you can expect a flood of REOs and foreclosures hitting the market in the next few months just in synergy with the onslaught of option ARM mortgage.

You may say that the NOD number is over stated and people will bring this current. Thik again:

“(DQ News) Of the homeowners in default, an estimated 32 percent emerge from the foreclosure process by bringing their payments current, refinancing, or selling the home and paying off what they owe. A year ago it was about 52 percent. The increased portion of homes lost to foreclosure reflects the slow real estate market, as well as the number of homes bought during the height of the market with multiple-loan financing, which makes ‘work-outs’ difficult.”

That means 68 percent (at least from the last report in April) will not become current and go through the entire foreclosure process. The market conditions have only worsened since April and I can assure you that people in option ARMs will default at these levels or even higher just given the toxicity of the mortgages. Let us take a look at the chart once again:

Pay Option ARM

Not a pretty picture for California. Now let us look at a home in Brea that documents the history of the great California housing bubble. Today we Salute you Brea with our Real Homes of Genius award.

Housing Archeologist - Digging Up the Past

brea

Brea is a city in Orange County California that is also extremely close to Los Angeles County. Once started as a crude oil hub ironically, the city has become a nice place for families to search for starter homes. Young professionals usually find this city a good place to start. Many in Southern California have been to the Brea Mall. The cities population of 39,560 makes it one of the more moderate sized cities in Southern California.
Given the nature of the current housing explosion, Brea is not immune to the damage of the housing market. Let us look at the current data on this area:

May 2008

Brea 92821 Median Price: $447,500 (down 22.8% from $579,663 last year)

Brea 92823 Median Price: $517,000 (down 29.4% from $732,295 last year)

Now for people outside of the area these price drops must be stunning. After all, the price drop for 92823 is a stunning $215,295 in one year; a price in itself that is higher than the median priced home in the United States! But given California as a whole is down 35%, this is actually very common. Areas once thought prime are no longer in that category. In fact, many of these areas are the main culprits of the option ARM bonanza.

Many of the inner city loans have already imploded and these were largely due to the sub-prime loans. After all, how is someone making $14,000 going to get a $720,000 without fudging the math. But these so-called prime areas have people with decent to good credit with okay incomes but no way in the world could they afford a $732,295 starter home. That price correction above folks is the market correcting a massive bubble. That sub-prime talk is hogwash and a Trojan horse to cover the real mess of nationwide speculation.

For the large part as much as people want to believe Californians all make $250,000 a year, this is absolutely wrong. I remember in 2006 I kept getting these commentators on a monthly basis say “see, prices went up because they are simply reflecting higher wages and demand.” Which I would quickly say, “no, prices are going up because of speculation and rampant crappy loans. Incomes are not going up.” This massive correction is simply a reflection of that reality and those commentators have gone the way of the zero down mortgages. Even a cursory look at national income statistics would tell you this:

income.jpg

*Source: Wikipedia, Census Bureau

Only 5% of all U.S. households take in more than $166,200 a year. For that $732,295 price tag buyers in that area would need to making $250,000+ to afford a comfortable mortgage. So what are the stats for the Brea area?

Brea Average Household Income: $80,480

A tad bit short from $250,000 don’t you think? So this above place documents the entire mania that went on in California. This home is a 3 bedroom 1 bath short sale at 1,100+ square feet. The current sale price is $420,000 and is located in the 92821. What is the sale history on this place?

12/02/2005: $575,000

04/04/2002: $300,000

08/31/2000: $242,000

Now take a look at the peak for the 92821 area code above? Now look at the current median price. Notice something? Banks and lenders are basically trying to follow a declining market and lowering prices with median ranges. Of course, this is as idiotic as paying an inflated price on a home simply because 3 local comps justified a higher price. All that meant is 3 people drank the Kool-Aid and jumped in the market. Now we are seeing the reverse occurring. Let us do a quick market analysis. First, a similar home in this area with 3 bedrooms would rent for $2,100 a month.

Rent: $2,100

PITI: $2,958 (with 5% down and a 6.5% fixed mortgage)

Given you’ll be able to write-off much of the interest, this deal is getting closer to a more logical price range. In reality, the actual solid range would be $275,000 to $350,000 given the current market conditions. At that point, it really is up to you whether you should jump into the market given your life circumstances. Yet to run into the market right now is simply cashing in your chips to early. Look at how the price doubled in 5 years. This makes no sense. Let us be generous and say that the $242,000 price in 2000 was a good starting point. At the rate of inflation after 8 years the price should be $357,000, well within our range.

However you slice things, right now is not the time to buy. We’re getting there but jumping in right now would not be the most practical thing to do.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information

Related Posts:
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Brea. A Home that Shows Each Phase of the California Housing Bubble.
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Pacoima. Zillow says $457,000 but Listed at $225,000?
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Stanton.
Real Homes of Genius: $438,000 for 816 square feet in Pico Rivera! Another Example of Manic SoCal Housing!
Real Homes of Genius: South Gate home at $397,000 – Reduced from $475,000.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Filed under: Before the bell, Google (GOOG), Apple Inc (AAPL), Viacom (VIA), AMR Corp (AMR)

Before the bell: Futures mixed ahead of ECB, Jobs data; oil nears $146; NVDA plunges

AMR Corp. (NYSE: AMR), the parent of American Airlines, expects to record a non-cash charge of nearly $1.3 billion in the second quarter, the company said in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The company also indicated it may cut nearly 7,000 jobs, or 8% of its workforce.

A federal judge in New York ruled Tuesday that Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) doesn’t have to turn over source code for the search function in its YouTube video service as part of an ongoing $1 billion copyright-infringement lawsuit filed by Viacom Inc. (NYSE: VIA), but it does have to turn over records of every video watched by YouTube users, including their login names and IP addresses, be turned over to the entertainment giant. If this doesn’t seem like a consumer privacy violation, I’m not sure what is.

Meanwhile, Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL) is also encountering some law suits. This time CEO “Steve Jobs and other managers were accused in an investor lawsuit against the company of backdating stock-option awards to maximize their personal profit.” According to Bloomberg, Shareholder Martin Vogel and co-plaintiff Kenneth Mahoney said in the new complaint that Apple executives hid the cost of the backdated options from shareholders, leading the company to file false financial statements.

Filed under: Major movement, Analyst upgrades and downgrades, Bad news, Industry, Aetna Inc (AET), Options, Technical Analysis

AET logoAetna (NYSE: AET) shares are falling today after an analyst at Goldman Sachs downgraded the stock to “Sell” from “Neutral,” saying the company will face lower profit margins over the next few years. Other companies in the health-care industry also got downgrades today. If you think this stock won’t be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on AET.

After hitting a one-year high of $60.00 in December, the stock has hit a new one-year low today. This morning, AET opened at $36.98. So far today the stock has hit a low of $36.01 and a high of $37.99. As of 11:55, AET is trading at $37.29, down 2.50 (-6.3%). The chart for AET looks bearish and steady, while S&P gives the stock a positive 4 STARS (out of 5) buy rating.

For a bearish hedged play on this stock, I would consider an August bear-call credit spread above the $45 range. A bear-call credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of call options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn’t do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make a 4.2% return in six weeks as long as AET is below $45 at August expiration. AET would have to rise by more than 20% before we would start to lose money.

Continue reading Trade idea for recent Aetna downgrade

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Private equity

While there were challenges, it looked like Texas Pacific Group would snag a 23% equity stake in Bradford & Bingley PLC, a UK mortgage company. True, the deal was highly dilutive, but at the same time, B&B has been suffering from the credit crunch.

Now, TPG has walked away and instead, a syndicate of investors has rounded up $793 million to bolster B&B. Apparently, the company will need to raise even more capital.

Why? Basically, Moody’s Investors Service downgraded the debt of B&B because of rising mortgage delinquencies and continued balance sheet problems. As a result, the economics of the deal changed significantly. In fact, TPG had negotiated an “out” clause for such a scenario.

Actually, the deal implosion points to the fact that the credit crunch is global. It even appears that things may be getting worse, especially in Europe, where there may be a need for many more capital infusions for the financial services sector.

Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including The Complete M&A Handbook and The Edgar Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements. He also operates MergerBook.com.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Deals, Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), Yahoo! (YHOO), Time Warner (TWX)

Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) may try to buy Yahoo! (NASDAQ: YHOO) again, but it does not want the whole company. It finds the search business useful as part of its battle with Google (NASDAQ: GOOG). The content portal business does not have much attraction, and Redmond wants a company like Time Warner (NYSE: TWX) to pick up that piece. According to The Wall Street Journal, Microsoft “approached other media companies in recent days about joining it in a deal that would effectively lead to Yahoo’s breakup.”

The new deal just might work. Yahoo! dropped below $20 yesterday, putting its stock back where it traded before the first buy-out offer. The No. 2 search company’s shares reached as high as $33. Investors, especially Carl Icahn, are steamed that Yahoo! did not grab all of that extra money.

Even if Microsoft cannot find a partner to take the Yahoo! content business, it may move ahead. It only has 10% of the US search business. Yahoo! has about 20% and Google around 60%.

Microsoft still needs Yahoo!, and with its stock down by a third, Yahoo! needs a buyer.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.

Close
E-mail It