Archive for July 9th, 2008

Filed under: International markets, China, Economic data, Politics, Recession

The United States, the most powerful nation the world has ever seen, will be getting a run for its money from China in the decades to come. According to a report by Albert Keidel of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, China’s economy will surpass the U.S. by 2035 and will be twice its size by the middle of the century.

The thought of the U.S. not being number one is mind blowing, but not surprising. China’s growth rate during this decade has averaged more than 10% and is still going strong even amid a global economic slowdown. Meanwhile, Chinese exports to the U.S. exceeded imports by about $75 billion between January and April. Chinese exports probably were not slowed much by the recent devastating earthquake that killed more than 69,000 probably did little to slow China’s economy.

Not surprisingly, talk of protectionism seems to be on the rise in the U.S. One foolish member of Congress has proposed slapping new tariffs on Chinese goods to punish the country for currency manipulation. Such a law would probably be struck down by the World Trade Organization. Barack Obama, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, pledges to fight for a “a trade policy that opens up foreign markets to support good American jobs.” He also wants to “amend” the North American Free Trade Agreement. Republican John McCain takes the opposite approach, vowing during his recent overseas trips to continue President Bush’s free trade agenda.

Continue reading Will China’s economy eclipse the U.S.?

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Products and services, Launches, Google (GOOG)

When Google, Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) purchased wireless software development company Android years ago, its founder asked Google’s co-founder Larry Page, “Is this interesting to Google?” It sure turned out to be, although the mobile phone operating system environment was announced almost a year ago and nothing concrete has shipped in a customer device yet. My bet is that Google isn’t delaying development to fine-tune its software — it’s had years to do that and the money to boot.

The problem is the wireless environment in the U.S., for starters. The competitive landscape is so tightly controlled that Google’s mantra of “open access” just won’t sit well with wireless carriers used to telling customers what they can and cannot do with their phones. If you think U.S. consumers have control over their wireless lifestyles, a quick trip to Europe will dispel that notion pretty fast.

If Google really wants to make Android the ubiquitous, free and open mobile operating system it wants it to be, what are the alternatives to having partnerships with mobile carriers who will, of course, be afraid of Google? Google has bid on wireless airwaves before (only to have the goal of allowing open devices accessible to closed networks), but this time, I see it going down the mobile virtual network operator route, plain and simple. Although the MVNO model has largely failed in the U.S., Google doesn’t have a national wireless network to operate. But with its large pockets, it sure can buy wholesale from the existing carriers and place its Android customers with service — and then, give them anything they want. Like, mobile search results with ads next to them.

Filed under: Analyst reports, Analyst upgrades and downgrades

MOST NOTEWORTHY: Nova Chemical, Tomkins Plc and Office Max were today’s noteworthy downgrades:

  • Citigroup downgraded shares of Nova Chemical (NYSE: NCX) to Sell from Hold as they believe the ethylene cycle is trending downward due to economic uncertainty. Citigroup lowered their target to $21 and $25 and added the stock to the Top Picks Live List as a Sell.
  • Goldman cut Tomkins Plc (NYSE: TKS) to Sell from Neutral as they believe the slowing economy could impact sales.
  • Piper downgraded shares of OfficeMax (NYSE: OMX) to Neutral from Buy following the negative pre-announcement by competitor Office Depot (NYSE: ODP) on concerns of deteriorating industry fundamentals. Piper lowered their target on OfficeMax to $11 from $22.

OTHER DOWNGRADES:

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

You may have noticed that my most recent Real Homes of Genius examples have shifted from inner city $500,000 homes to struggling high priced “prime” areas like Beverly Hills and Culver City. The reason is that this housing correction is impacting properties in every corner of California. In 2005 and 2006, it was […]
Related Posts:
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Brea. A Home that Shows Each Phase of the California Housing Bubble.
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Pacoima. Zillow says $457,000 but Listed at $225,000?
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Stanton.
Real Homes of Genius: $438,000 for 816 square feet in Pico Rivera! Another Example of Manic SoCal Housing!
Real Homes of Genius: South Gate home at $397,000 – Reduced from $475,000.

You may have noticed that my most recent Real Homes of Genius examples have shifted from inner city $500,000 homes to struggling high priced “prime” areas like Beverly Hills and Culver City. The reason is that this housing correction is impacting properties in every corner of California. In 2005 and 2006, it was not uncommon to put a hand over your eyes, plunk your index finger on one of the 88 cities in Los Angeles County, and you could rest assured that area had 20+% year over year gains. It didn’t matter. It reminded me of the investment firm ad pre-tech bust where a chimp is throwing darts at a stock page and outperforms the market. Yes, it was literally that easy to make money in this speculative fervor.

The evolution of the housing decline is now engulfing the entire region. The California Association of Realtors came out with their monthly report stating that California is now down a whopping 35% on a year over year basis:

Single-family Detached Home

May 2007: $594,530

May 2008: $384,840

Nominal Decline: $209,690

How is this not a crash? Even if there is debate that the nation as a whole may or may not be in a recession California is definitely in one. With an unemployment rate of 6.8% and a heavy dependence on housing to boost our economy, we are going to face a serious challenge these upcoming years. That is without even looking at the $300 billion in Option ARM mortgages just itching to recast during the 2nd half of the year. There are reports highlighting the increase in sales for California which is true for two reasons:

First - A large number of current sales are distressed properties that are priced at a heavy discount.

Second - We are seeing the typical spring and summer selling season trends which aren’t as strong as other years.

So those are important caveats. And it is also hard to assume how many homes that are REOs are making it fully into the MLS data. Clearly there is a discrepancy when MLS data shows a decline in inventory while the amount of REOs is sky rocketing. Let us look at the current data and see if we can put our finger on the pulse of the market:

Total Southern California Inventory: 140,842 (MLS data)

Total Sales for SoCal in May of 2008: 16,917

Total months of inventory: 8.3 months

California Distress Information for May 2008

Notice of Defaults: 41,965

REOs: 20,237

NTS: 9,728

So here’s the raw data. The overall inventory numbers have been steadily falling since September of 2007 yet the sales numbers haven’t increased fast enough to compensate for the increase in distress market action. In fact, given that the foreclosure process takes months and the notice of default is only one of many stages, you can expect a flood of REOs and foreclosures hitting the market in the next few months just in synergy with the onslaught of option ARM mortgage.

You may say that the NOD number is over stated and people will bring this current. Think again:

“(DQ News) Of the homeowners in default, an estimated 32 percent emerge from the foreclosure process by bringing their payments current, refinancing, or selling the home and paying off what they owe. A year ago it was about 52 percent. The increased portion of homes lost to foreclosure reflects the slow real estate market, as well as the number of homes bought during the height of the market with multiple-loan financing, which makes ‘work-outs’ difficult.”

That means 68 percent (at least from the last report in April) will not become current and go through the entire foreclosure process. The market conditions have only worsened since April and I can assure you that people in option ARMs will default at these levels or even higher just given the toxicity of the mortgages. Let us take a look at the chart once again:

Pay Option ARM

Not a pretty picture for California. Now let us look at a home in Brea that documents the history of the great California housing bubble. Today we Salute you Brea with our Real Homes of Genius award.

Housing Archeologist - Digging Up the Past

brea

Brea is a city in Orange County California that is also extremely close to Los Angeles County. Once started as a crude oil hub ironically, the city has become a nice place for families to search for starter homes. Young professionals usually find this city a good place to start. Many in Southern California have been to the Brea Mall. The cities population of 39,560 makes it one of the more moderate sized cities in Southern California.

Given the nature of the current housing explosion, Brea is not immune to the damage of the housing market. Let us look at the current data on this area:

May 2008

Brea 92821 Median Price: $447,500 (down 22.8% from $579,663 last year)

Brea 92823 Median Price: $517,000 (down 29.4% from $732,295 last year)

Now for people outside of the area these price drops must be stunning. After all, the price drop for 92823 is a stunning $215,295 in one year; a price in itself that is higher than the median priced home in the United States! But given California as a whole is down 35%, this is actually very common. Areas once thought prime are no longer in that category. In fact, many of these areas are the main culprits of the option ARM bonanza.

Many of the inner city loans have already imploded and these were largely due to the sub-prime loans. After all, how is someone making $14,000 going to get a $720,000 mortgage without fudging the math. But these so-called prime areas have people with decent to good credit with okay incomes but no way in the world could they afford a $732,295 starter home. That price correction above folks is the market correcting a massive bubble. That sub-prime talk is hogwash and a Trojan horse to cover the real mess of nationwide speculation from rich to poor.  Main Street and Wall Street both participated in this bonanza.

For the large part as much as people want to believe Californians all make $250,000 a year, this is absolutely wrong. I remember in 2006 I kept getting these commentators on a monthly basis say “see, prices went up because they are simply reflecting higher wages and demand.” Which I would quickly say, “no, prices are going up because of speculation and rampant crappy loans. Incomes are not going up.” This massive correction is simply a reflection of that reality and those commentators have gone the way of the zero down mortgages. Even a cursory look at national income statistics would tell you this:

income.jpg

*Source: Wikipedia, Census Bureau

Only 5% of all U.S. households take in more than $166,200 a year. For that $732,295 price tag buyers in that area would need to be making $250,000+ to afford a comfortable fixed mortgage. So what are the stats for the Brea area?

Brea Average Household Income: $80,480

A tad bit short from $250,000 don’t you think? So this above place documents the entire mania that went on in California. This home is a 3 bedroom 1 bath short sale at 1,100+ square feet. The current sale price is $420,000 and is located in the 92821. What is the sale history on this place?

12/02/2005: $575,000

04/04/2002: $300,000

08/31/2000: $242,000

Now take a look at the peak for the 92821 area code above. Now look at the current median price. Notice something? Banks and lenders are basically trying to follow a declining market and lowering prices with median ranges. Of course, this is as idiotic as paying an inflated price on a home simply because 3 local comps justified a higher price. All that meant is 3 people drank the Kool-Aid and jumped in the market. Now we are seeing the reverse occurring. Let us do a quick market analysis. First, a similar home in this area with 3 bedrooms would rent for $2,100 a month.

Rent: $2,100

PITI: $2,958 (with 5% down and a 6.5% fixed mortgage)

Given you’ll be able to write-off much of the interest, this deal is getting closer to a more logical price range. In reality, the actual solid range would be $275,000 to $350,000 given the current market conditions. At that point, it really is up to you whether you should jump into the market given your life circumstances. Yet to run into the market right now is simply cashing in your chips too early. Look at how the price doubled in 5 years. This makes no sense. Let us be generous and say that the $242,000 price in 2000 was a good starting point. At the rate of inflation after 8 years the price should be $357,000, well within our range.

However you slice things, right now is not the time to buy. We’re getting there but jumping in right now would not be the most practical thing to do.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information

Related Posts:
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Brea. A Home that Shows Each Phase of the California Housing Bubble.
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Pacoima. Zillow says $457,000 but Listed at $225,000?
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Stanton.
Real Homes of Genius: $438,000 for 816 square feet in Pico Rivera! Another Example of Manic SoCal Housing!
Real Homes of Genius: South Gate home at $397,000 – Reduced from $475,000.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Filed under: Competitive strategy, Intel (INTC), Advanced Micro Dev (AMD)

It is not very many chips, but it means a great deal, especially from a PR standpoint. Intel (NASDAQ: INTC) has taken the processor franchise at Dreamworks from smaller rival AMD (NYSE: AMD). Dreamworks indicated that the Intel products worked much better, a public slap at the incumbent.

According to The Wall Street Journal, “DreamWorks Animation said the resulting increase in computing power would substantially shorten the time needed for many computing chores and aid the studio’s planned shift next year to 3-D animation.” Given how good the press is for Intel, it should be giving the chips to Dreamworks for free. Perhaps that is how it got the contract.

Intel’s new eight-core chips are extremely powerful and this should be of real benefit to Dreamworks.

The news is another demonstration of how bad things are at AMD. The company still has over $5 billion in debt and barely breaks even on an operating basis. Its shares are just above $5. In 2006, they were above $40.

AMD can ill afford having its name on the front page matched with another customer loss.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), Yahoo! (YHOO)

I read an article over the weekend about Yahoo! Inc. (NASDAQ: YHOO) and its reorganization attempts. Make no mistake about it, this company needs to alter its DNA if it intends to survive in a world without a Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ: MSFT) taking it over.

In a nutshell, it looks like Yahoo! wants to retool its divisions so that it can more efficiently react to changes in the online marketplace. Yahoo! apparently feels that its current organizational structure inhibits growth and is looking to create new teams dedicated to developing products that will capture eyeballs and advertising opportunities as quickly as possible. The company also wants to focus on cloud computing, a technology that is important to the business sector.

Well, from the point of view of an investor looking at Yahoo!, I don’t see anything here that persuades me to buy the stock. Synthesizing a new plan of corporate attack is pretty much par for the course for any company that is doing terribly and is looking to get back on the good side of Wall Street. But is there anything really exciting in the plan? No. It’s just Yahoo! doing something. There’s nothing too revolutionary going on. Centralizing this and that might add value. It also might not. It’s all in the execution, and I’m not sure I want to trust a company that rebuffed Microsoft’s reasonable buyout offer to execute anything at this point.

If Yahoo! wants to remain on its own, I have no doubt that it will survive and will be here a decade from now. But will it be a good investment for the long term? That’s uncertain at this point. It has incredible brand equity to web surfers, it’s a popular portal that will always be of value to advertisers, but Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) has proven that Yahoo! cannot thrive simply on its name and image.

Carl Icahn will tell you that Microsoft is the only solution to Yahoo!’s problems. Unless Yahoo! comes up with a good plan for the future (and I’m not sure the current one will suffice), Icahn may be proven right. There was a time when I was very bullish on the company and stock. For now, that feeling is a memory.

Disclosure: I don’t own any company mentioned; positions can change at any time.

An important lesson for everyone to remember during all of this bailout mania is that higher risk still costs more money - no matter who is managing it - the government or private companies. From our friend Chris at Loan Officer Survival Guide (whose book you should have in your library) comes a stunning email that confirms this reality.

Citi has made huge pricing changes to their government products which make these supposed “affordabilty” products much more expensive. No matter how much Congress wants to make FHA bail out America the simple truths of risk management will continue to confound them.

Check out these pricing modifiers based on credit risk:

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: International markets, Bad news, Federal Natl Mtge (FNM), Lehman Br Holdings (LEH), Housing

“It’s like that wave approaching the shoreline that you see in the distance and don’t think is big, and then it’s 100 feet in front of you and you realize it is.”

That’s how London-based economist Mark Chandler described Europe’s perspective on the potential ‘latest wave’ of the housing crisis — the research report by Lehman Brothers (NYSE: LEH) that Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM) and Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE) may have to raise up to $46 billion and $29 billion in additional capital, Bloomberg News reported.

Europe is concerned that the pair’s announcement “signals another round of write-downs here in England and Europe as well as in America” Chandler told BloggingStocks Tuesday, with negative consequences for the stock market, and, equally significant, for business and consumer confidence, he said.

Europe’s major stock markets decline

Indeed, Europe’s major stock markets did not react favorably Tuesday to the Lehman report. London’s FTSE fell 66.70 points to 5446.00, Germany’s DAX declined 104.49.35 to 6,291.71, and France’s CAC 40 fell 78.22 to 4,263.37 in Tuesday afternoon trading.

Continue reading In Europe, Fannie, Freddie status spark concern of recession

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Ben Bernanke reported to Congress that he expects turmoil in the housing and mortgage markets to continue through 2009 and has asked Congress for increased Federal Reserve powers to help address the market problems.

They’re still overly optimistic.  The plain fact is that Option ARM resets are going to start crashing on the shores of the housing market with grave effect.  Unless the government decides to offer wholesale debt forgiveness and cheap refinancing options to these note holders were going to be in for a lot of pain through 2012.

From the New York Times:

Ben S. Bernanke, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, publicly indicated on Tuesday that he believes the problems will persist into next year when he outlined a series of steps the Fed is considering in the coming months.

One such step would extend low-interest lending programs to Wall Street’s largest investment banks into next year. The programs, one of which was set to expire in September, can continue only if the Fed issues a finding that there are “unusual and exigent circumstances” that justify them.

Mr. Bernanke also recommended that Congress grant the Fed broader authority to monitor and supervise the financial markets to assure greater stability in the future. But with time running out on this session, lawmakers are unlikely to adopt such legislation before next year.

Source [blownmortgage]

Close
E-mail It