Archive for July 24th, 2008

Filed under: After the bell, Earnings reports, Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), Intel (INTC), Marketing and advertising

Intel Corp. (NASDAQ: INTC) today reported better-than-expected second quarter results, allaying fears that the economic slowdown would hurt the world’s largest chipmaker.

Net income rose 25% to $1.6 billion, or 28 cents and sales jumped 9.1% to $9.47 billion, beating analysts’ expectations of profit of 26 cents on revenue of $9.33 billion. The company even gave robust guidance of $10 billion to $10.6 billion. Analysts surveyed by Bloomberg expected sales of $10.01 billion. Shares of the Santa Clara, Calif.-based company rose in after-hours trading along with other tech bellwethers such as Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ: MSFT), Dell Inc. (NASDAQ: DELL) and Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG).

“Intel had another strong quarter with revenue at the high end of expectations and earnings up substantially year over year,” said Paul Otellini, Intel president and CEO, in the earnings release. “As we enter the second half, demand remains strong for our microprocessor and chipset products in all segments and all parts of the globe.”

Some skeptics, including me, wondered whether Intel would be hurt by the economic slowdown that’s hurting everyone else. After all, are people and companies willing to shell out big bucks for fancy notebook computers during these uncertain times? Well, judging from the company’s earnings, the answer appears to be “yes.”

Both the mobile and microprocessor units set records. Gross margins rose to 55.4% from 53.8% in the first quarter and 46.9% a year earlier “as growth in demand for lower-priced notebook PCs resulted in a lower-than-expected microprocessor average selling price. In April, the company predicted a gross margin of 56% plus or minus a couple of points,” the Wall Street Journal noted.

So it looks like reports of Intel’s decline were overblown.

“If the slowdown were that pervasive, then Intel would have already seen it,” Raymond James analyst Hans Mosesmann told Bloomberg News.

Good point.

Filed under: Electronic Arts (ERTS), Small business

The smart money continues to pour into social networking deals. The latest comes from a tier-one VC: Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers.

Today, the firm announced a $29 million round for Zynga Game Network. Essentially, the company combines two hot categories - social networking and casual games.

No doubt, this deal is a big validator. After all, Kleiner only cares about companies that have the potential of being game-changers.

So, what makes Zynga different? Well, for the most part, the company has devised innovative techniques to create highly addictive games (some say the process is scientific). Plus, there are opportunities to expand onto mobile platforms and to even create virtual worlds.

Keep in mind that Kleiner has invested in a variety of break-out gaming companies in the past, such as Electronic Arts Inc. (NASDAQ: ERTS). In fact, a Kleiner partner, William “Bing” Gordon - the former CEO of EA - will come on the board of Zynga.

Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including The Complete M&A Handbook and The Edgar Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements. He also operates MergerBook.com.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Dick Syron, Freddie Mac chairman and CEO took home nearly $20 million last year and can take home another $20 million this year reports the Associated Press.  This for the man that has guided Freddie Mac’s stock to it’s lowest point since 1991 and presided over a $3 billion net loss for the company in 2007.

This is obscene.  How do these people who are supposed to be leaders get rewarded for driving these companies straight in to conservatorship? If the government does take over Fannie and Freddie it must come with pay controls for executives of these companies.  The American taxpayer doesn’t deserve to pick up the tab of the mortgage mess, but if they are forced to they certainly shouldn’t pick up ridiculous salaries of non-performing executives.

From CNN:

Freddie Mac Chairman and Chief Executive Richard Syron pocketed nearly $19.8 million in compensation last year, according to a Securities and Exchange Commission filing Friday, even though the mortgage company’s stock lost half its value in 2007.

If Syron stays at the helm of Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500) through the end of next year, he will receive nearly $20 million in stock awards if the board says he has met certain goals. This year, he is guaranteed to get $8.8 million in stock grants regardless of performance.

For 2007, Syron received a $1.2 million salary, a $3.45 million bonus, including $1.25 million to remain at the company, and $771,585 in other compensation. He also received stock and options valued by the company at $14.3 million at the time they were awarded.

The company last year picked up the tab for Syron’s financial planning expenses, car and driver for commuting, home security system, business-related dining and travel costs for his wife and $100,000 in legal fees from negotiating his employment contract.

Source [blownmortgage]

I’m on the road training folks as part of my job, so unfortunately I wasn’t able to cover much of the news today - that primarily being Washington Mutual tanking and respected, former White House economist Nouriel Roubini estimating that it will take $1 trillion to get us out of the housing/mortgage mess.

Here’s the links to the stuff I wish I could have written about had time permitted - maybe your schedule is currently more flexible :)

WaMu’s $3.3 billion loss for the quarter (Bloomberg)

Washington Mutual Inc., the biggest U.S. savings and loan, reported a $3.3 billion second-quarter loss on uncollectible loans as a record number of borrowers were unable to keep up with mortgage payments.

The loss of $6.58 a share compared with net income of $830 million, or 92 cents a share, a year earlier, Seattle-based Washington Mutual said today in a statement. The company said mortgage-related losses through 2011 will be at the high end of its previous forecast of $12 billion to $19 billion.

George Bush says Wall Street got “drunk” (WSJ.com) — yes “W” they were the only ones…

“Wall Street got drunk — that’s one of the reasons I asked you to turn off the TV cameras — it got drunk and now it’s got a hangover,” Bush said Friday, according to a video obtained by Houston’s ABC affiliate KTRK. “The question is how long will it sober up and not try to do all these fancy financial instruments.”

Roubini’s $1 trillion call (C/R)

Mortgage rates reach year high (WSJ.com)

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Earnings reports, Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), International Business Machines (IBM), JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Merrill Lynch (MER), Wells Fargo (WFC)

Reuters reports that today is a big one for bank and technology earnings. It looks like Merrill Lynch (NYSE: MER) will lose big and will try to soften the blow with an announcement about selling its 20% of Bloomberg LP for $4.5 billion to its founder, New York mayor, Michael Bloomberg. JP Morgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) and a handful of big technology companies are expected to report profits. But will they be enough?

Meanwhile, how can we make sense of yesterday’s 276 point rally on Wall Street? Nobody knows what happened, but theories abound: the price of oil fell — possibly due to anticipation that the Fed would raise interest rates to deal with inflation that is roaring out of control. Higher interest rates would strengthen the dollar, which would drive down the price of oil since it’s traded in dollars. But I think yesterday’s market was a short-covering frenzy. With the SEC foolishly squeezing the shorts, they needed to cover their bets that financials would fall further. Of course good news from Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) didn’t hurt.

Today’s earnings — with estimates courtesy of a Reuters analyst survey — are likely to move the market. Here’s a roundup:

  • Merrill Lynch is expected to lose $1.94
  • JPMorgan was expected to make $0.44, down 63% from 2007. At a Price/Earnings to Growth (PEG) ratio of 0.4 and a P/E of 12 on earnings forecast to grow 31% to $3.34 in 2009, it looks cheap. CNNMoney reports it made 54 cents — well ahead of expectations and its shares are up 5% in premarket.
  • Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ: MSFT) will earn 47 cents a share, a 21% increase from last year. At a PEG ratio of 1.1 and a P/E of 15 on earnings forecast to grow 14.3% to $2.16 in 2009, it looks reasonably priced.
  • Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) is likely to earn $4.72, up 61% from last year. At a PEG ratio of 1.7 and a P/E of 36 on earnings forecast to grow 25% to $21.57 in 2009, it looks expensive.
  • International Business Machines (NYSE: IBM) is anticipated to earn $1.82, 21% higher than 2007. At a PEG ratio of 1.3 and a P/E of 16 on earnings forecast to grow 12% to $9.57 in 2009, it looks priced about right.

As always, I predict the market will boost the shares of companies that beat these expectations and raise their revenue and profit growth forecasts. For those that fail to beat and raise, investors could slash their shares. JPMorgan beat expectations this morning and the upside surprise is rewarding those who bet on it prior to the announcement.

Peter Cohan is President of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College and edits The Cohan Letter . He owns Wells Fargo shares and has no financial interest in the other securities mentioned.

Filed under: Television, General Electric (GE), Time Warner (TWX), CBS Corp ‘B’ (CBS), News Corp’B’ (NWS), Media World

As a Disney (NYSE: DIS) shareholder, the High School Musical juggernaut is important to me. It means money for the company. It means a point of distinction for Disney that adds value to its content and differentiates it from other media businesses such as News Corp. (NYSE: NWS) and Time Warner (NYSE: TWX). It means that tweens have something realistic to relate to that reflects their own days of breaking out in song while walking through school (okay, that was a joke).

But I was disappointed to hear that a reality show extension of the brand is having a tough time in the ratings. According to this blog post at The Hollywood Reporter, the show, called High School Musical: Get in the Picture, had the worst ratings on Monday night. It’s some sort of competition show with a prize related to being in some sort of video in the Musical franchise.

I’m not sure of the specifics, but my main concern is that it couldn’t offer any competition to CBS (NYSE: CBS) or General Electric’s (NYSE: GE) NBC. Remember, Disney’s big model is to take its content and spread it around to enhance the value of the company’s other platforms. It’s all about the synergy. Unfortunately, it didn’t work this time. I honestly thought that ABC would have seen huge numbers from the kids on this one. It makes me wonder if Musical might be getting long in the tooth.

Continue reading Is Disney’s ‘High School Musical’ fad fading?

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Wachovia Corp (WB), Options

Wachovia Corp. (NYSE: WB) is recently up $1.33 to $14.45. Wachnovia reported Q2 EPS loss of ($1.27) ex items verses consensus estimates of ($0.78). WB lowered its quarterly dividend to $.05. WB will take a $6.1 billion goodwill charge for Golden West. WB August option implied volatility of 94 is below a level of 141 from July 21 and above its 26-week average of 59 according to Track Data, suggesting larger price movement.

Financial Select Sector SPDR (ETF) (AMEX: XLF) is recently up $.30 to $21.05. XLF August option implied volatility of 50 is above its 26-week average of 37 according to Track Data.

Option Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

I’m going to tell you something that you probably already know. Americans are horrible savers. In fact, this trait has provided the perfect breeding ground for credit products that provide the illusion of real wealth. I’ve been hammering away in article after article going after the big players on Wall Street and […]
Related Posts:
Are you a Debt Slave?
Cultural Spending Neurosis: How a Nation Went From Prudence to Financial Decadence.
Stop Saving Now and Spend Those Rebates! The Home Refinancing Well Has Run Dry.
You Can Kiss $2.84 Trillion in Housing Equity Goodbye: The Continued Decline in Real Estate.
The Plague of Housing: Why we Will Feel and Be Poorer Because of the Housing Bust.

I’m going to tell you something that you probably already know. Americans are horrible savers. In fact, this trait has provided the perfect breeding ground for credit products that provide the illusion of real wealth. I’ve been hammering away in article after article going after the big players on Wall Street and also going after unscrupulous lenders that have been the pushers of the credit products for this past decade that have led us to this current economic cliff. Yet there is sufficient blame to go around and one is the psychology of the American consumer.

As of 2008, the average household debt is $117,951 and this includes credit cards, installment loans, home equity loans, and mortgages. The New York Times has an excellent series regarding the “Debt Trap” and below is a graph that I will be talking about in great detail. If you are interested, click on the image to go to the New York Times interactive chart:

New York Times

All in all Americans have over $2.5 trillion in consumer debt. This number is staggering. That is why during the first signs of any economic problems the first thing that came to mind to our financial politician wizards was an economic stimulus package. Of course the majority didn’t ask where the money came from but you can now thank higher consumer inflation for the byproduct of this action.

Yet this mentality is still guiding much of our economic and political policies. People have become addicted to credit as if it were some form of drug. Recently, many lenders especially those with high concentration loan portfolios in California have started closing off many consumers’ home equity line of credits. The reaction is very telling since it gives us an insight into how people view credit.

Many believe that this home equity line was similar to you having access to your regular savings account. That is, whenever you needed the money it would be there for you. This was one of the inventions that started in the 1990s and has exploded recently. As you can see in the interactive chart above, home equity loans really had no place in the market prior to the 1990s. The concept was that the equity was your ultimate safety net, not some modified credit card that would put your biggest asset at risk. Recently with the run-up in the housing bubble, American consumers with their lack of savings decided to tap into this resource to continue spending. So when many people realized that their home equity lines have been shut down, they felt as if they had their savings stripped away. This idea that access to debt is equivalent to access to wealth demonstrates the profound lack of financial knowledge from many in our country.

Why would people be so willing to spend money that they don’t have? This is where the discussion veers off from economics and begins to look at consumer behavior and psychology. People want to be loved and accepted. Just watch MTV or VH-1 for a few hours and you’ll see this for yourself through their advertising. What you’ll see are ads about looking a certain way or buying a certain fragrance and with this simple act, you will be loved or accepted (normally by a very attractive member of the opposite sex). Of course you’ll have to spend money on a certain product which is probably over priced.

You also see this in many of the local clubs and night spots here in Southern California. Pick anytime, if you go out on a single night, you’ll typically see a guy trying to impress his friends with a round of the most expensive spirits not because of the taste, but because of the price of the drink. The group like a Pavlovian experiment responds as, “wow, you are the [best, greatest, coolest, hottest, funniest] person alive!” So the condition is imprinted on the mind. That is, if you spend on an expensive item you will get recognition from the group. The fact that many of these clubs accept credit cards is a perfect place to watch this social experiment unfold. Watch how many people use cash.

Now carry this psychology over to home purchases and automobile purchases which are the two largest consumer debt items around. Buying that home was about being secure and having a place for your family. After all, who doesn’t want this? It’s not like someone is going to respond, “no, I actually don’t want my family to be secure and rather live under the San Gabriel River.” So many either feel the pressure directly from family and friends or indirectly from media campaigns and those in the industry. The idea of owning a home is deeply imbedded in the American psyche. It is a cultural archetype that even as a kid, many start drawing a home with a picket white fence and a dog as a reference to what home is.

Those in advertising produced excellent (meaning they got people to do a desired action) marketing campaigns that exploited this insecurity which many carry deeply. Some of you may have seen this Century 21 ad where a couple is debating over real estate:

untitled.png

*Click to watch full ad on YouTube (warning, you may become financially ill)

Think about what this ad is telling us. What does your gut tell you when you watch this? Try finding an ad that has a more financially prudent debate where the couple is sitting down with their accountant and going over the ratios on a conventional 30 year fixed mortgage. We didn’t see any of this because the entire industry would have halted! Hello! $397 average savings per year and people were going zero down on $500,000 starter homes? No wonder why our economy has placed a multi-year debt albatross that is slowly drowning us.

Amazingly, six in 10 Americans oppose Wall Street Bailouts but the majority do support the government keeping people in their homes:

Gallup

*Source: Gallup

So why did the Bear Stearns bailout go through so quickly without going to the public? The answer is, many people simply do not care enough to cause an uproar about what occurred. They rather focus on saving 10 cents a gallon on oil while their mortgage payment just went up $500, $1,000, or even $2,000. The talking heads told us that if Bear Stearns wasn’t bailed out, the dark clouds of financial ruin would sweep over the nation and cover us in fire and brimstone. Guess what? We still ended up flying into a bear market and people are still losing their homes. We are getting this same rhetoric with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. A quick solution is nationalize the entities, split them up, and let the shareholders eat their risk. Enough with this implicit guarantee when we all know the taxpayer is on the hook.

The problem with Wall Street and bailing certain institutions out and this uttering of a second stimulus from politicians is they still believe that we are living in a world where people are willing to sacrifice their lives to go deeper into debt. They miscalculated on how people view housing. When the archetype dream of a picket white fence home came with a $4,000 a month mortgage payment, the sudden reality hit and many realized that the dream wasn’t worth the actual price tag. That is why the zero down craze was so utterly incompetent. Buyers had no skin in the game.

In places like California, buyers were effectively given a put option. The mortgage itself is non-recourse, meaning if there is a foreclosure the home goes back to the lender or bank and the buyer walks away with a foreclosure on their record. Many are electing to go down this route. Some by choice and many because they cannot afford the recasting payment or have seen a decrease in their income. Amazingly, the person that rents with a zero net worth now has a stronger financial position than the person that bought at peak levels and actually has a negative net worth of $100,000 or even $200,000.

The obsession with credit and the ultimate sign of debt the McMansion is now crumbling on its weak edifice. Our economy has been so dependent on debt and real estate for the past decade that we have fallen behind in many crucial areas like biotechnology and engineering because much of our capital and resources were diverted to non-productive sectors like building bigger and bigger homes accompanied by cars that are bigger and less fuel efficient. Slowly this is changing at least with the auto industry.

Many rational Americans looked around their neighborhood and saw what was a once in a lifetime spending binge. A boat, Hummer, and McMansion for all. The only problem is, it was on a temporary lease. The problem with this is that 70 percent of Americans were living like the top 1%:

American Average Household Wealth

*Source: Wikipedia

Many had to deal with cognitive dissonance of knowing incomes didn’t justify the spending they were seeing in the real world. The majority however decided to capitulate and get into unbelievable amounts of debt. It was a façade. The government is simply feeding into this cultural delusion that all the consumption items of debt reflected the actual income of our country but it did not as you can clearly see. No politician has the courage to say what needs to be said, “my fellow Americans, we have spent way beyond our means and need to change the way we live our lives.” Not during an election year. They will keep feeding into this myth that you can save nothing and sacrifice little and enjoy everything today even if you don’t actually have the savings to pay for it. Until we see some CEOs doing the perp walk instead of going to them for advice on saving the housing market (much of the problems created by them), then we will know that times are changing at the top. People need to demand this from their government or at the minimum, not buy into this financial myth.

We have $500 billion in Pay Option ARMs that are set to recast in the next few months. These are the absolute most toxic mortgages out there. I would put them on the same level as subprime loans and we are going to quickly realize that they too will be defaulting in high rates. Banks and lenders are artificially counting that these loans will still remain current once they do recast. If you look at their bottom line, they are actually counting much of the deferred interest as income. Many are current but not for long. They are betting that owners will exercise their put option but many will simply allow it to expire worthless.

I notice that parts of our cultural consumer psychology are changing. There was one commercial this weekend on a show that was targeted to the teen crowd that had a girl fixing up her dorm room. The room looked trendy and had all the knacks that someone could possibly need for college. She looks at the camera and tells us, “I got this all for a discount. After all, I am a math major.” It will now be cool to save if not for any other reason then there is no other option. There was also a segment on a show poking fun at those who waited in lines for the new iPhone. One of the actors was showing a new feature of, “using the phone to navigate for places for cheaper rent since I can’t afford my current place with this phone.” Time for the wake up call folks. Things are not going back to how they were.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information

Post from: Dr. Housing Bubble Blog

American Savings: Americans Save an Average of $392 Per Year. Total Consumer Debt is over $2.5 Trillion. The Dark Knight of Debt.

Related Posts:
Are you a Debt Slave?
Cultural Spending Neurosis: How a Nation Went From Prudence to Financial Decadence.
Stop Saving Now and Spend Those Rebates! The Home Refinancing Well Has Run Dry.
You Can Kiss $2.84 Trillion in Housing Equity Goodbye: The Continued Decline in Real Estate.
The Plague of Housing: Why we Will Feel and Be Poorer Because of the Housing Bust.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Filed under: Earnings reports, Forecasts, PepsiCo (PEP)

PepsiCo Inc. (NYSE: PEP) today reported strong second quarter results as the maker of soft drinks and salty snacks such as Cheetos weathered rising commodity prices and continued to benefit from the weak dollar.

Net income rose more than 9% to $1.7 billion, or $1.05 per share, as revenue soared 14% to $10.9 billion, the Purchase, NY-based company said in a statement. The results surpassed the $1.01 profit forecast and $10.6 billion sale forecast of analysts surveyed by Bloomberg.

“PepsiCo continued to drive growth across its worldwide snacks and beverage businesses primarily through strong product innovation, well-executed pricing actions and focus on expense control and productivity.” said Chief Executive Indra Nooyi, “We are proud of our first-half performance and confident that we are well-positioned to deliver on our outlook amidst a challenging macroeconomic environment.”

In the quarter, PepsiCo International showed over 20% revenue growth and over 30% profit growth from prior year. A weak spot was PepsiCo Americas Beverages. The economic slowdown has hurt the business, pushing down volumes by 1%. Mountain Dew and Sierra Mist both grew in the single-digits while Pepsi fell in the mid single digits. Energy drinks were a bright spot lead by a triple-digit volume growth in AMP Energy and a 50% gain in SoBe Life Water. Gatorade also showed gains in the quarter.

Investors reacted cautiously to the earnings report because the company said it could not provide “guidance on the 2008 projected EPS growth including the impact of the mark-to-market gains or losses on commodity hedges due to the unpredictability of future changes in commodity prices.” The shares are up only fractionally in mid-morning trading.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Earnings reports, Google (GOOG), Apple Inc (AAPL)

Apple, Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL) reported stellar, above-expectations quarterly results yesterday after market close. One would have thought that this company, in the midst of U.S. economic uncertainty, would have reported a mediocre quarter at best, but that wasn’t the case. Apple outpaced expectations by $0.11 per share, shipped more Mac computers than during any quarter in its history, and saw a 38% revenue jump from the year-ago quarter.

As a nice reward for such a stellar quarter, the market took Apple out behind the woodshed and gave it a sound whipping. The reason? Apple’s murky guidance for the fourth quarter. This from a company that almost always shoots low with guidance only to blow the numbers away. Add that to ongoing concern over the health of CEO Steve Jobs and you have a 10% drop in AAPL shares before the market opened this morning.

Is Apple the victim of outsized expectations? You bet. Just like Google, Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) the other day — which also reported a fantastic quarter but saw its shares pummeled right after results were announced — Apple may be losing the ability to impress. In reality, both companies are doing excellent business in the face of gas and energy price spikes in addition to a six-month string of job losses in the U.S. Yet, the market slapped huge losses on both stocks based on what could be considered shaky speculation for future growth prospects.

On the other hand, Citigroup, Inc. (NYSE: C) saw stock gains after reporting a better-than-expected $2.5 billion dollar quarterly loss last week. Talk about twisted.

Close
E-mail It