Archive for July 25th, 2008

Filed under: Consumer experience, Competitive strategy, McDonald’s (MCD)

Despite high commodity prices and challenging market conditions that put pressure on consumer spending, McDonald’s Corp. (NYSE: MCD) was able to surprise Wall Street by reporting a stronger-than-expected second quarter profit. However, investors’ positive reaction didn’t last too long as the company announced it anticipates further high beef costs, which could lead to an increase in prices on its popular dollar menu.

Back in May, McDonald’s executives announced they had no plans to make changes to its “everyday affordability” concept, but the company’s chief operating officer, Ralph Alvarez, recently noticed that the dollar menu is coming under pressure from rising ingredient costs. “The cost implications of having that value menu have changed when you see what’s going on in beef and chicken,” Alvarez stated to the Chicago Tribune.

Alvarez didn’t offer too many details on how the dollar menu might change. However, the news is not great for all you lovers of the famous double cheeseburger. A spokesman for the hamburger giant said one of the company’s strategies that is already tested in some markets was to lift prices for this best-selling U.S. sandwich.

Looking ahead, McDonald’s said it expects cheese cost to jump by 21% this year in the U.S., while the price it pays for chicken may see a growth in a range between 5% and 6%. For 2008 U.S. beef costs, the company also anticipates an increase between 8% and 9%.

Rising commodity prices was one of the main reasons why the research firm Deutsche Bank to lower its rating on the company to a hold earlier this morning.

Eliza Popescu is a financial writer for the online investment advisory service Investor’s Observer.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

The explicitly guaranteed GSE, Freddie Mac, is mulling a possible $10 billion equity round to raise capital to try to avoid from kicking in the taxpayer-financed bailout that Hank Paulson is hot and heavy on.

I don’t know how you raise that much cash at such a terrible stock price without completely diluting the hell out of the rest of the shareholders; but onward I say.  Better the stockholders than the taxpayers.  I say raise away until the stock is worth nothing (better get moving).

From Market Watch:

Freddie Mac is considering raising capital by selling as much as $10 billion in new shares to investors, the Wall Street Journal reported Friday, citing unnamed people familiar with the matter. The move, which comes as emergency regulatory actions have triggered a two-day rebound in its stock, would have the potential to avoid a full-blown government rescue for Freddie…

Source [blownmortgage]

The New York Times reports that Andrew Cuomo, New York’s attorney general, has sued UBS AG (NYSE: UBS). He charges UBS of deceptive sales practices. Massachusetts beat him to that punch when it sued UBS for deception after revealing e-mails indicating that UBS decided it would be better to foist the toxic waste on its naive wealth management customers rather than taking the hit of writing down the holdings on their books.

I began following the Auction Rate Securities (ARS) market — those bond-like securities whose rates used to reset in weekly auctions — back in February when those auctions failed. Since then 5,341 comments have appeared from people whose hard-earned cash is frozen in what was marketed to them as safe, money-market-like securities with slightly higher yields.

I credit Cuomo with adding a useful detail to the brief against UBS. He points out that UBS senior executives were selling $21 million worth of ARSs as its brokers were desperately pushing the toxic waste onto their individual customers. This reminds me of the same kind of deception we saw during the dot-com era when an analyst, Henry Blodget, wrote bullish reports about companies that he trashed in e-mails to his colleagues.

Continue reading Cuomo sues UBS for Auction Rate Securities deception

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Google (GOOG), Options

Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) closed at $535.60 Wednesday.

GOOG is scheduled to report Q2 EPS on July 17. Cowen says: “We continue to expect GOOG to gain search share and monetize newer initiatives, such as YouTube and GOOG Apps, over time. We are maintaining our Outperform rating.”

GOOG July 530 straddle is priced at $39. GOOG August 530 straddle is priced at $58. GOOG August option implied volatility of 47 is above its 6-month average of 38 according to Track Data, suggesting large price movement.

Option Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com

Citigroup chairman Win Bishcoff said that housing prices in the US and Britain could fall for another two years before leveling off.  It sounds nice, but it’s wrong.  House prices are going to continue falling for long than two years - especially in highly-speculative areas like California, Florida and Nevada.  The reason?  Option ARM and Alt-A loan resets that start to kick-in in earnest around 2010.  See below graph.

So while various pundits and “people in the know” will continue to throw out numbers that sound far enough off to not sound foolish, they will continue to be wrong until they address the second wave of resets that must wash through the system.

From Reuters:

Citigroup chairman Win Bischoff has warned that house prices in Britain and the United States are likely to keep falling for another two years.

The chairman of one of the world’s most powerful banks told the BBC in an interview that he expects it will take two years for the markets to stabilise.

He also said he expected the credit crunch could continue through until 2009.

And the graph that makes me highly skeptical of any talk of a recovery prior to the second wave.

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Forecasts, Indices, Commodities, Oil, S and P 500, DJIA, Recession

There was very interesting post yesterday by Professor Mark Perry of the University of Michigan’s School of Management. While we’ve all been coping with rising prices at the pump and at the supermarket, he’s got another way to look at the numbers.

In truth, in spite of all the noise and fear, we’ve actually seen prices go down dramatically in a number of products. While we focus on food and energy prices, we’ve seen the following:

  • Computers have seen prices go down by 90% over the past 10 years.
  • TVs have experience a 76% drop over the same period of time.
  • Even autos have dropped by 3.4%

What to make of all this? Professor Perry looks at these drops in light of the fact that average hourly earnings have increased by 40% over the last 10 years. Or, in other words, Perry posits “…there are many, many products that are significantly cheaper today than ten years ago, especially after adjusting for increases in earnings.”

So, why don’t we pay attention to these dips that make it massively more affordable for me to set up my 73″ Flat Panel TV screen?

While Prof. Perry credits the gradual nature of these price drops, I think it’s human psychology. Behavioral finance has shown that in investing, we focus a lot more on losses than on gains. So too at the pump — we’re thinking about how much more a gallon of gas costs us than how much less a MacBookPro costs from a couple of years ago.

Zack Miller is the managing editor of IsraelNewsletter.com and a former equity analyst for a leading multinational hedge fund

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Before the bell, Major movement, Earnings reports, Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), Market matters, International Business Machines (IBM), Citigroup Inc. (C), JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Merrill Lynch (MER), Oil

U.S. stock futures turned higher Friday morning after earnings from Citigroup that beat expectations offset disappointment from Merrill, Google and Microsoft. There was also some pressure from oil as prices rebounded to above $131 a barrel, following Nigeria cutting output.

Many on Thursday started wondering if we have seen the bottom. Stocks rallied for a second straight session as oil continued its price drop. Better -than-expected earnings for JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) again lifted banks. The Dow Jones Industrial Average gained 207.38 points, or 1.9%, the S&P 500 index rose 15.7 points, or 1.2%, and the Nasdaq Composite Index gained 27.45 points, or 1.2%.

Without any economic releases today, the market will continue to focus on earnings, and investors have a lot to mull, especially after Thursday’s wave of financial results releases after the close, and with financials and techs being in the center of attention.

After JPMorgan Chase brought on some optimism with its results Thursday morning, Merrill Lynch (NYSE: MER) reported after the close a wider-than-expected loss of $4.65 billion, or $4.9 a share, on $9.7 billion of credit-market writedowns. The loss per share was larger than any analyst had expected according to Bloomberg survey. MER shares are declining over 4.8% in premarket trading.

But then, Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C) reported this morning a smaller-than-expected loss. The largest U.S. bankposted a $2.5 billion second-quarter loss, or 54 cents per share on about $7.2 billion of credit-market writedowns. Analysts estimated the loss would be $3.67 billion, according to a Bloomberg survey. Citi shares are up over 4% this morning in premarket trading.

Also, three tech giants reported after the close Thursday: Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ: MSFT), Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) and IBM (NYSE: IBM). Google missed expectations despite posting a 35% growth in profit and its stock is over 7.2% lower in premarket trading. Similarly, Microsoft also missed Wall Street’s expectations despite posting a 13% profit growth and MSFT shares are down over 5.5% in premarket trading. IBM, however, topped estimates with its 22% profit growth.

Many more earnings were reported Thursday and this morning. Will the ones that beat expectations offset the disappointments? This is how today’s session will likely play out.

Even though the market is once again enjoying a delusion sandwich covered in toxic mortgage mustard, the reality on the ground continues to become grimmer. Wachovia, one of the nation’s largest banks announced an $8.9 billion quarterly loss and that they’ll be slashing over 6,000 from their workforce. Oh, and the dividend is […]
Related Posts:
Foreclosed: Predicting Foreclosures in California. How Many Homes will Be Foreclosed in 2008?
Foreclosures jump statewide by 40% in California in just one quarter! Welcome to California’s Gold!
Foreclosures? Housing Bubble? In Southern California? Impossible!
How Many People Overpaid for Their Home in Los Angeles County? Trying to get a Raw Number of Households Underwater.
Foreclosure Nation: More Like Foreclosure States. 4 States Made up 50 Percent of all Foreclosures and Distressed Property Action.

Even though the market is once again enjoying a delusion sandwich covered in toxic mortgage mustard, the reality on the ground continues to become grimmer. Wachovia, one of the nation’s largest banks announced an $8.9 billion quarterly loss and that they’ll be slashing over 6,000 from their workforce. Oh, and the dividend is getting slashed as well. So what happens? The market of course pushes the stock up by 27%! American Express, the uber credit card company also announced problems but the market is believing that the Federal Reserve and the U.S. Treasury have some mythical powers to create money out of thin air. They do only if you own an investment bank.

Yet back in the trenches of reality, Americans are feeling the massive pinch of the world’s biggest housing bubble being pricked by the sharpest needle of all, imploding debt. That is no hyperbole. In no time in our civilized history have we seen such speculation on a global scale stemming from real estate. California is the poster boy of this housing bubble. You would think that the market would be punishing lenders even harder who have created and own such financially destructive loans yet many see this as a time to jump in. Just look at the markets. Tread these waters at your own peril.

Today, the California foreclosure numbers for the second quarter were released and they are not a pretty site. First, let us take a look at the first sign of future wealth destruction, the notice of default:

Notice of Defaults

As you can see from the chart, notice of defaults have gone sky high in that past few quarters. We went from a relatively mild 2006, to a quickly deteriorating 2007, to the current record breaking problems in 2008. The reason notice of defaults are so important for future predictions is that these are homes that have yet to be taken back by lenders. These are early signs of trouble. What this means is lenders in the upcoming months better gear up for a tsunami of REOs.

We already know that the short-sale option has been a marginal joke in California. Many are so deeply in negative territory that no lender would go for a short-sale and rather would take a foreclosure. They have too many problems trying to stay solvent and avoiding their own foreclosure ala IndyMac Bank. The vast divide between lenders and how loan modifications are being handled is an utter joke. There is no standard. Some lenders are willing to work with you while others are doing absolutely nothing in the area of loan modifications. They are all holding their breath and preparing their turd bucket of mortgages ready for release into the belly of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Bank of America who recently acquired toxic mortgage producer Countrywide recently alluded to the fact that they may not be backing up Countrywide debt:

“(Global Trend Analysis) Bank of America Corp., the second- biggest U.S. bank, said it may not guarantee $38.1 billion of Countrywide Financial Corp.’s debt after taking over the mortgage lender, increasing the likelihood of a default.

“There is no assurance that any such debt would be redeemed, assumed or guaranteed,” the bank said in an April 30 regulatory filing, adding that no decision has been reached. Investors had grown more optimistic the bank would back Countrywide debt. Ratings firm Standard & Poor’s cut the mortgage-lender’s debt to junk today after saying it would raise the grade earlier this week.”

They basically are doing a “it wasn’t me” on the market. After all, would you back up Countrywide’s toxic debt?

Last quarter, there was an all time record of 121,341 notice of defaults filed in California. This is incredible. Only 3 years ago, the number was 12,408 for the second quarter of 2005. That is a ten-fold jump in 3 years! Yet the more distressing analysis is when we look at the notice of defaults and also combine the actual foreclosures that occurred in the second quarter:

Foreclosures

We are now in uncharted waters. The notice of default numbers may look like they are plateauing but this is like arguing whether you are going to jump out of a 100 story or 102 story building. The number of foreclosures in the second quarter hit a stunning 63,031. If you look closely at the chart, even in 2006 many of the notice of defaults where resolved without a foreclosure actually taking place. Well of course this occurred because the massive speculation allowed those who over paid to sell to someone who over paid even more.

“(DQNews) Of the homeowners in default, an estimated 22 percent emerge from the foreclosure process by bringing their payments current, refinancing, or selling the home and paying off what they owe. A year ago it was about 52 percent. The increased portion of homes lost to foreclosure reflects the slow real estate market, as well as the number of homes bought during the height of the market with multiple-loan financing, which makes ‘work- outs’ difficult.”

This is not good and only reinforces the obvious which the overall market is ignoring at the moment. What this tells us is 78 percent of these notice of defaults will end up in foreclosure. Now the precipitous decline in prices is ensuring that many of those 121,341 notice of defaults will further add REO inventory for the remainder of the year and cause future losses to these banks and lenders. Now how is this going to be healthy for the market? If anything, it assures us that prices will be falling for the remainder of the year and will put a vast amount of inventory on the market during the worst selling times which are the fall and winter. This combined with the $300 billion in option ARM loans will be a destructive combination. We have yet to see the massive recasts in the pay Option ARM market. You can do the math and any lenders with large exposure in California are going to get hammered.

Paulson saying we are months away from a bottom is absurd. Senator Jim Bunning was right when he called him out and stated that Paulson will be out in a few months, but the rest of us will be here to deal with any of the consequences of hasty actions. The bottom is in…but for Paulson’s career.

We have just cut the umbilical cord of reality from Wall Street. Look at the action with WaMu announcing a $3.3 billion loss:

SEATTLE—Washington Mutual says it swung to a loss in the second quarter as it increased to more than $8 billion its reserve to cover sour loans.For the April-to-June period, the Seattle-based bank says it lost $3.33 billion, or $6.58 per share, which compares with a profit of $830 million, or 92 cents per share in the year-ago period. Results include a previously disclosed, one-time reduction of $3.24 per share related to the company’s capital raising in April.

Thomson Financial says analysts, on average, were expecting a loss of $1.05 per share.

The bank says it increased its loan loss reserves by $3.74 billion to $8.46 billion during the quarter, as it continues to face mounting losses stemming from bad mortgages.”

Shares of WaMu went up and down in after hours trading as if there really is any doubt about the data. Not only did WaMu miss their target, they missed it by multiple times! Bwahahaha! And the freaking stock barely moves. Do you know where most of WaMu’s loans are? In California. Just let the above charts sink in with their vivid colors and try to take a guess what is going to happen. They’re going to need all those loss reserves for the army of Real Homes of Genius they have in their portfolio. Companies should just announce a $1 trillion dollar loss and you’ll see their stock rally by 50%. Apparently bad news is now good. Hello George Orwell!

What we are seeing on main street is not being reflected by what is occurring in the stock market, which should at least reflect what is going on in the real world (aka, look at the above charts). Yet what do we expect from a government that tells us we are not in a recession, unemployment is not bad, and inflation is contained? Their panacea of course is drilling for oil we won’t see for at least 5 years! I didn’t realize subprime mortgages ran on 89-octane. All you need to do to verify this reality is take a trip to your local grocery store, fill up your tank of gas, send your kid to college, look at your mortgage, and try booking a trip out of the country and you’ll quickly realize that something is rotten in Denmark.

Let us take a look at another data point that shows us how far we are from a bottom here in California:

Subprime

The above is a look at subprime loans in the state. As you can see, there are still plenty out there to cause damage but take a look at the Alt-A products which most pay Option ARMs fall under:

Alt-A

And this should make you feel warm and fuzzy all around. The Congressional Budget Office came out saying that the rescue of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would cost approximately $25 billion but no one really knows how much. Heck, WaMu and Wachovia combined dished out losses of $12.2 billion in one quarter and they are peanuts to the issues confronting Fannie and Freddie. Yet they are also seeking in the legislation to increase the public debt limit by a stunning $800 billion from $9.8 trillion to $10.6 trillion:

“(WSJ) The $25 billion cost estimate from the CBO for the rescue plan was downplayed by Democratic and Republican lawmakers. “Everyone knows it’s just a wild guess,” said Sen. Jim DeMint, (R., S.C.). He called the plan a “huge gamble,” but added that, “it’s kind of: Guarantee a little now or pay a whole lot later.”

Lawmakers plan to raise the public-debt limit as part of the legislation to $10.6 trillion from $9.8 trillion. Congress must vote to increase the limit to account for additional borrowing, something it is loath to do, although it would have had to take that step this year even without the rescue plan for Fannie and Freddie, Democratic aides said.”

This is flat out absurd! What a disgrace. You need to get in contact with your Congressperson or Senator and say you will not stand for this absurdity:

Find your respresentative

Find your Senator

Give Senator Jim Bunning some support to filibuster this piece of toxic legislation

Can you see what is happening? You’ll also see in the legislation that they are trying to raise caps to $625,000 which of course will make it convenient to off load this crappy Alt-A California mortgage junk onto the public debt. If you needed any more evidence that Washington is trying to offload this entire mess on the U.S. taxpayer, you need not look any further than this piece of legislation. What a shame.

There are more Alt-A loans in California and these actually have a higher concentration of no-doc loans! Can you take a wild guess how these are going to do now that the state has a median price of $328,000, down 31.5% from the peak price of $479,000? If you look to Washington or Wall Street for your answer, don’t expect one that reflects the reality on the ground. We are living in two separate universes here. If you would have bought a median priced home in California last year at the peak, you would now be down $151,000. Is this really a reason for a rally especially in lenders that fed into that speculation that is now clearly bursting with an onslaught of foreclosures?

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information

Post from: Dr. Housing Bubble Blog

Foreclosures in California: 121,000 Notice of Defaults and 63,000 Foreclosures. Home Values Plummeting on Record Breaking Quarter.

Related Posts:
Foreclosed: Predicting Foreclosures in California. How Many Homes will Be Foreclosed in 2008?
Foreclosures jump statewide by 40% in California in just one quarter! Welcome to California’s Gold!
Foreclosures? Housing Bubble? In Southern California? Impossible!
How Many People Overpaid for Their Home in Los Angeles County? Trying to get a Raw Number of Households Underwater.
Foreclosure Nation: More Like Foreclosure States. 4 States Made up 50 Percent of all Foreclosures and Distressed Property Action.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Filed under: Earnings reports, Colgate-Palmolive (CL), Procter and Gamble (PG), Kimberly-Clark (KMB)

It wasn’t a super quarter for Kimberly-Clark (NYSE: KMB). The consumer-products company only met expectations set for it by Wall Street. But, sometimes, that’s pretty good, given the conditions the business is working in. As a matter of fact, I see that Brent Archer penned a recent post discussing how inflation is hurting Kimberly-Clark (and just about every other entity, as well). At that time, the company projected a $900 million increase in terms of inflationary pressures, double management’s previous estimate. So, looking through this current earnings release, I can’t help but feel that things could have been worse.

For the second quarter, net sales rose 11% to $5 billion. Earnings on an adjusted basis dropped a penny compared to the year-ago period, coming in at $1.03 per share. Like I said, that matched expectations, according to Briefing.com. Guidance for the future also appears to be in-line. Kimberly-Clark seems, to me at least, to be holding its own during a difficult time. And here’s a couple cash-flow data points that should appeal to many investors. Operating cash flow for the quarter was up 16% to $753 million. Prudent management of the company’s working capital benefited this metric. And on a six-month basis, cash from operations also increased, albeit not by much. That sum rose a little under 2% to almost $1.2 billion. I like to see good cash-flow numbers like that, especially for dividend-paying concerns.

And speaking of dividends, Kimberly-Clark’s stock is trading at a great yield, over 4%. Of course, that means that investors buying today will need a lot of patience. You’ll be paid to wait, but if you’re into fast capital-appreciation rates, you probably won’t get it here, not in this trading environment. Inflation will continue to be a concern for it, as well as consumer-product colleagues such as Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG), Colgate-Palmolive (NYSE: CL), and Energizer (NYSE: ENR).

(See more of today’s earnings news here.)

Disclosure: I don’t own any company mentioned; positions can change at any time.

Read | Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Close
E-mail It