Archive for October 23rd, 2008

Guest post from: Constantine von Hoffman, a veteran business journalist who writes the blog CollateralDamage.biz, a humorous look at marketing, business and his dog.

Once upon a time the US actually had a law in place that would have at least hindered the current mess. Not surprisingly, that legislation – the Glass-Steagall Act – came out of the Great Depression. Just as unsurprisingly it was repealed in 1999 at a time when lawmakers and business no longer thought that “what goes up must come down” still applied to the economy.

Simply put, Glass-Steagall prevented the mingling of investment and commercial bank activities. If you did one, you couldn’t do the other. This happened because way back then it was thought that commercial banks were way too speculative – both with where they were investing their assets and also because they were buying stocks for resale to the public.

Thus, banks became greedy, taking on huge risks in the hope of even bigger rewards. Banking itself became sloppy and objectives became blurred. Unsound loans were issued to companies in which the bank had invested, and clients would be encouraged to invest in those same stocks.

Sound familiar?

(more…)

Filed under: Products and services, Google (GOOG)

Even Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) is feeling the economic pinch. Actually, what started as a pinch has turned into a train wreck, and now even the world’s largest web search provider will be slowing hiring and turning down the heat on possible acquisitions. Google CEO Eric Schmidt told Bloomberg Television that advertising budgets are “under stress.” I’d say that’s an understatement.

In all likelihood, this will be Google’s toughest test in its 10-year history. Its entire business revolves around advertising income. Although the company does it better than anyone — and new media advertising is finally becoming mainstream — the company’s exposure to an ongoing slowdown could be cause for concern. Although the company may “do no evil,” it will certainly have some profit evil creeping up on its results in some form soon.

Schmidt added that, “All of us are vulnerable . . . it’s a race between a contraction in advertising, which would affect everybody, and a very positive shift from offline to online.” The question is this: can Google take more of the dollars that are shifting to online advertising faster than the overall contraction in advertising spending over the next year or so (or longer)? Given Google’s history, it will almost certainly continue to be successful, but it’s hard to see the company taking such huge chunks of market share that the advertising slowdown won’t chip away at its results.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Newsletters, Commodities, Agriculture, Stocks to Buy

“Agriculture-related stocks have been hammered; as a result, we are now buyers of Monsanto (NYSE: MON),” says Glenn Rogers in Gordon Pape’s The Internet Wealth Builder.

“Monsanto just recently released solid earnings and raised guidance for the year. They are now looking for earnings of $3.58 to $3.60 a share, up from $3.37 previously.

“The company said the change reflected higher-than-expected sales and gross profit in its seeds and traits business and its Roundup and other glyphosate-based herbicide business.

“The stock is down almost 20% from its all-time high of $145.80 reached in mid-June, but has lately been showing signs of renewed strength. Farmers may defer the purchase of a tractor but seed is likely to be the last place they will scrimp.

“There aren’t many stocks that I am actively buying in the current market conditions but Monsanto is an exception. We rate the stock a buy.”

Steven Halpern’s TheStockAdvisors.com offers a daily look at the latest market commentary and favorite stock picks and investment ideas from the nation’s leading financial newsletter advisors.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

The spin is out in full force folks. The Southern California housing numbers are now out and once again they show a dismal and pathetic market. Yet even in the face of falling prices ala the Wal-Mart commercials, you can rest assured that some are going to spin the data for all it […]
Related Posts:
Foreclosures? Housing Bubble? In Southern California? Impossible!
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Compton. Once, Twice, Three times a Short Sale.
Emerging Economic Trends: Housing Swaps, Frugality, and Selling Homes in Lower Priced Areas.
C.A.R. says 2007 will see a -2% Drop in California. Does This Feel like a 2% Yearly Drop?
Doing The Housing Bubble Math Dance for California.

The spin is out in full force folks. The Southern California housing numbers are now out and once again they show a dismal and pathetic market. Yet even in the face of falling prices ala the Wal-Mart commercials, you can rest assured that some are going to spin the data for all it is worth. You also need to remember that the recent data on Southern California is for the month of July, a historically strong month simply because of seasonal factors. In addition, the month of August should look similar to this month but expect the report for September due out in October to show the actual pay option ARM smack down.

But even with seasonality the spinsters are going to use the current minor bump in home sales as a major positive:

“(DQNews) La Jolla, CA—The number of Southern California homes sold last month edged up to its highest level in more than a year as bargain hunters swept up foreclosure properties in affordable neighborhoods, a real estate information service reported.

A total of 20,329 new and resale houses and condos sold in Los Angeles, Riverside, San Diego, Ventura, San Bernardino and Orange counties last month. That was up 16.7 percent from 17,424 the previous month and up 13.8 percent from 17,867 for July a year ago, according to San Diego-based MDA DataQuick.

Last month’s sales count was the highest since 21,856 homes were sold in March 2007, though it still fell 23 percent short of the average July sales total since 1988, when MDA DataQuick’s statistics begin. From last September through June, sales for each month were at an all-time low for that particular calendar month, with the exception of April which was the next lowest. Last month’s sales total was the first since September 2005 to rise above the year-ago level.”

Bargain hunters? Foreclosures in affordable neighborhoods? Isn’t that an oxymoron? If the neighborhood was affordable in the first place you wouldn’t be seeing large number of foreclosures but that is an entirely different subject. Even though this report is trying to spin the 21,856 sales as a significant jump it is nowhere close to the sales that occurred during the bubble frenzy. Take a look at this data:

July 2004: 32,988

July 2005: 31,069

July 2006: 25,628

July 2007: 17,867

July 2008: 20,329

It helps to put things in perspective doesn’t it? Of course they aren’t going to say that sales for Southern California are off by 38% from their peak July month only a few years ago. And when they say that the jump was bolstered by “affordable neighborhoods” what they mean is that the majority of the sales were fueled by the Inland Empire were homes are being sold for whatever the market will take. Let us look at the details of the report:

Southern california housing

I first direct your attention to the stunning jump in sales for Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. These two counties make up the Inland Empire. But what the report doesn’t highlight is the actual median price of both these counties. They are now down 34 and 35 percent on a year over year basis and carry a median price of $260,000 and $230,000. Do you realize that Riverside County for example hit a high median price of $432,000 in December of 2006? So if we take that peak price to the current median price we get:

$430,000 - $260,000 = $170,000 (A 39% Discount)

Los Angeles County hit a peak of $550,000 and is now at $400,000. Nice $150,000 discount. Orange County? Orange County had a median price of $645,000 in June of 2007. That is a drop of $184,000 in one year. Would you wait a year for $184,000? I think most would.

Across the board prices are getting hammered. The reason sales jumped last month was in large part to the big jump in the Inland Empire. And of course homes are now selling for 50 to 60 percent off peak sales prices. To think this won’t happen in Los Angeles County and Orange County is simply unrealistic. It will happen. Just wait until the pay option ARM loans in these areas hit their anniversary dates.

You’ll love some of the reasons given for the fall off in prices:

“What we’re looking at is a fire sale of properties in newer affordable neighborhoods that were bought or refinanced near the price peak with lousy mortgages. What we’re still not seeing is this level of distress spreading to more expensive or established neighborhoods,” said John Walsh, MDA DataQuick president.

The median price paid for a Southland home was $348,000 last month, down 2.0 percent from $355,000 in June and down 31.1 percent from $505,000 for July 2007. That peak of $505,000 was reached in March, April, May and July of last year.

The median has fallen because of depreciation, especially in inland markets, and because of the steep drop off in home financing in the so-called jumbo category, which until recently was defined as loans above $417,000.

Before the credit crunch hit in August 2007, nearly 40 percent of Southland sales were financed with jumbo loans. Jumbos last month accounted for 15.8 percent of Southland sales.”

First, what qualifies as a more established neighborhood? Are we talking about Malibu or Newport Coast? Sure, those areas are positive but only a fraction of the entire 20,000,000+ people that live in Southern California live there. That reminds me of something said during the Crash of 1929. Mr. Rockefeller during the crash of the Great Depression announced that he was buying stocks while everyone was selling. To paraphrase a market observer, “of course he is buying. He’s the only one left with money.” Well of course these areas are doing fine! They always do well irrespective of the economy. Yet I draw your attention to the chart above again. Every single county is down from 26.9% to 35.2%. That is a major correction in one year and we are yet to see the truly “lousy” mortgages hit the actual market.

Another interesting part of the report is the implication that jumbo loans are somehow hurting the market. Did you look at the overall Southern California median price? It’s at $348,000! You don’t need a stinking jumbo loan anymore. What you need is good credit and a solid income to buy a home and not some banana republic mortgage from the bubble days. Given that our unemployment rate is at 7.3% who really wants to buy a home when their income is at risk? You think those 200,000 state workers are hungry to buy a home given that Arnold is trying to cut them down to the minimum wage? What about all the jobs in housing that are now no longer bringing in good paychecks? If you connect the dots prices are going down because the entire state was turned into a housing casino and mortgages were used as chips.

I recall clearly a few months ago hearing on the radio here in Southern California, these permabull brokers talking about how great the Hope Now program would be for buyers. When this failed, it was going to be the fantastic Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bailout. Well of course all these idiotic programs failed because they missed one simple yet obvious fact. The economy is in distress! This is like offering lobster to a person with no taste buds. Or offering someone that lives in Palm Springs an Eskimo jacket. They don’t need gimmicks. What we need is for the state to get its budget in order and not offer tax breaks for subprime lenders. We need an infrastructure that is sustainable and not one built around finance, insurance, and real estate. Did people really think that we were going to trade homes to one another ad infinitum? Sure makes that $729,500 loan limit seem like an absolute boneheaded move.

I was going through some of the historical “help” that was going to save the market and have compiled a list here for your mental historical note keeping:

Bailout matrix

Of course these programs are all failing because they fail to address the structural problems of the system. That is, this was a bubble of epic proportions and the only way to sustain it is to bring back the toxic credit that fueled the market. I was digging through some images I have saved and found this screenshot of Hank Paulson on CNN from December of 2007:

cnn-subprime-helpontheway-december.png

Subprime help is indeed on the way. On the way out the door that is.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information

Post from: Dr. Housing Bubble Blog

Southern California Housing Report: New Housing Motto: Foreclosure Data is so Bad, it has to be Good! Median Price Down 31% to $348,000.

Related Posts:
Foreclosures? Housing Bubble? In Southern California? Impossible!
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Compton. Once, Twice, Three times a Short Sale.
Emerging Economic Trends: Housing Swaps, Frugality, and Selling Homes in Lower Priced Areas.
C.A.R. says 2007 will see a -2% Drop in California. Does This Feel like a 2% Yearly Drop?
Doing The Housing Bubble Math Dance for California.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Another guest post from MG who went from Wharton to Wall St. to real estate to Blown Mortgage.

Not all that much seems to have come from the G7+ meeting this past weekend. We somehow expected more than: “The Federal Reserve led an unprecedented push by central banks to flood the financial system with dollars, backing up government efforts to restore confidence and helping to drive down money-market rates.

In its statement the Fed said:

“In order to provide broad access to liquidity and funding to financial institutions, the Bank of England, the European Central Bank, the Federal Reserve, the Bank of Japan, and the Swiss National Bank are jointly announcing further measures to improve liquidity in short-term U.S. dollar funding markets.

To assist in the expansion of these operations, the Federal Open Market Committee has authorized increases in the sizes of its temporary swap facilities with the BoE, the ECB, and the SNB, so that these central banks can provide U.S. dollar funding in quantities sufficient to meet demand.”

And just in the nick of time, we observe, this being options expiration week.

(more…)

Filed under: Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)

Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX) released its third quarter results yesterday, and things looked pretty good: net income up 30%, revenue up 16%, subscriber-acquisition costs down 15%, and the rate of subscriber cancellations remained flat.

But the company cut its revenue forecast, and net subscriber additions are down 30% so far for October compared to last year. CEO Reed Hasting said (subscription required) that “Since July, conditions have deteriorated markedly. It now appears that there will be continued growth for Netflix, but not as fast as last year.” He added that “The state of the economy could explain this modest headwind.”

I’m not so sure. Given that watching DVDs at home is a lot less expensive than many other forms of entertainment, it should be somewhat immune to economic woes. In an economy as weak as this one, any struggling company will be quick to blame its woes on the economy. Sometimes that’s the case but, often, there are more serious issues that won’t be solved by a macroeconomic upturn.

In the long run, it’s hard to see what gets investors so excited about Netflix. The growth appears to be slowing, even with a price/earnings ratio of 20 — which is pretty high in this market.

Continue reading Slowdown at Netflix goes beyond the economy

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Newsletters, Commodities, Agriculture, Stocks to Buy

“Agriculture-related stocks have been hammered; as a result, we are now buyers of Monsanto (NYSE: MON),” says Glenn Rogers in Gordon Pape’s The Internet Wealth Builder.

“Monsanto just recently released solid earnings and raised guidance for the year. They are now looking for earnings of $3.58 to $3.60 a share, up from $3.37 previously.

“The company said the change reflected higher-than-expected sales and gross profit in its seeds and traits business and its Roundup and other glyphosate-based herbicide business.

“The stock is down almost 20% from its all-time high of $145.80 reached in mid-June, but has lately been showing signs of renewed strength. Farmers may defer the purchase of a tractor but seed is likely to be the last place they will scrimp.

“There aren’t many stocks that I am actively buying in the current market conditions but Monsanto is an exception. We rate the stock a buy.”

Steven Halpern’s TheStockAdvisors.com offers a daily look at the latest market commentary and favorite stock picks and investment ideas from the nation’s leading financial newsletter advisors.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Close
E-mail It