Archive for November 3rd, 2008

Another guest post from MG who went from Wharton to Wall St. to real estate to Blown Mortgage.

Today’s reverse crash resulted in the Dow up $889.35 to close at $9,065.12. From peak to recent trough, the Dow has moved from its all-time high of $14,164 on October 9, 2007 to a low of $8,176 on October 27, 2008. That’s a decline of $5,988 or 42%. It earned back about 10% of that today.

So, let’s try to figure out what caused all this exuberance and determine if it’ll hold.

Over the weekend it was reported that emerging markets’ debt, currencies, and stocks are crashing, a series of events that the US will be relatively unscathed by, for a change. **not much bearing on the Dow unless there’s more to this story, but go on**

(more…)

Filed under: Politics, Financial Crisis

Investors may not support Barack Obama, but they do expect him to be the next president of the United States. The smart ones do anyway.

If the polls are to be believed, Obama should easily defeat John McCain. Even the ultra-conservative talking heads on CNBC seem to have accepted this reality. Carl Quintinilla recently asked Pennyslvania Senator Bob Casey whether Obama will be “pulled to the left” if the Democrats win in a landslide. Why not ask Casey, who is pretty conservative as Democrats go, about Obama’s five-year plan? I guess it’s no surprise that the business network has Steve Forbes as a guest host on “Squawk Box.” The Arizona senator needs all of the help he can get.

The market already — wrongly in my view — views Obama as a tax-and-spend liberal ready to suck away their capital gains and wrap America in bubble wrap to protect it from the ravages of world trade. The truth is more complex than these stereotypes. Obama plans to cut taxes for most Americans and favors fair trade policies. Markets, however, anticipate the future and people are scared. That explains why the Dow Jones industrial average is down more than 29%.

Continue reading The market already expects Barack Obama to win

The market already expects Barack Obama to win originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Mon, 03 Nov 2008 12:29:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Newsletters, Technical Analysis, S and P 500, DJIA

Options and trading specialist David Nassar discusses an intriguing short-term trade based on seasonal patterms at the end of October. Here’s a look from his Marketwatch Options Trader.

“The global markets are still crashing, and a highly defensive approach remains warranted until very clear signs of stabilization take shape.

“Even if the broad market were to somehow stage a strong rally, we would expect a full retest of the lows, a few weeks out. Typically, October lows are retested in December (1974, 1987, 2002, et al).

“Despite this bearish outlook, we are recommending a ‘October seasonal trade.’ The seasonally most bullish period of the year is the end of October and the beginning of November.

“As a result, we usually try to trade this period for a rally. Given the above bearish market comments, you might think this strange, but understand that this is just a trade.

Continue reading Marketwatch expert highlights the ‘October seasonal’ trade

BloggingStocksMarketwatch expert highlights the ‘October seasonal’ trade originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:40:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

The selling pressure on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac has been heavy this week after a Barron’s article published on the weekend made the case that both government sponsored entities would require a full fledged bailout.  This was made clear even prior to the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 being signed into law.  […]
Related Posts:
Real Homes of Genius: Two For One in Compton. Southern California Housing Bubble Hangover.
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Paramount. 768 Square Feet for $324,900. Buy, Withdraw, Sell, Foreclose. The Cycle of Life.
World Premier! Real Homes of Genius Video.
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Compton. $90,000 in Los Angeles County?
How Many People Overpaid for Their Home in Los Angeles County? Trying to get a Raw Number of Households Underwater.

The selling pressure on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac has been heavy this week after a Barron’s article published on the weekend made the case that both government sponsored entities would require a full fledged bailout.  This was made clear even prior to the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 being signed into law.  The challenge now becomes if they do go out and sell more stock that current shares will be diluted to a point where the shares become worthless.  Both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are testing multi-decade lows.

Sometimes people forget what these two companies stand for.  Part of their mission is of creating liquidity on the secondary mortgage market.  Yet with a struggling housing market these large institutions have to contend with a faltering portfolio that is seeing more and more losses.  Now it is very likely that current shareholders would be wiped out in the event of a bailout.  The question becomes why would foreign investors purchase bonds or preferred shares in the company if the likelihood of failure is around the corner.  Certainly they will be made whole but not at premium rates.  The well is drying up quickly.

There are a few emerging trends in the housing market.  It is rather clear that housing still remains in a precarious situation.  We are nearing the end of the summer selling season and the boost that was expected unfortunately did not materialize.  Record inventory is still on the market and questionable mortgages such as pay option ARMs still loom on the balance sheets of many lenders.  One of the trends that is emerging is people engaging in housing swaps.  That is, people exchanging homes normally without a broker or agent.  In many cases, it is a barter trade.  Another trend is towards frugality.  Now some would argue that this isn’t a trend more than the economic situation forcing the hand of many to face the grim reality.  Yet there should be little doubt that prudence is making a comeback.  Also, we will examine the hidden housing numbers embedded in the Southern California housing market.  Are we really approaching some sort of market bottom?

Housing Swaps

I happened to stumble upon housing swaps on Craigslist.  For those two of you who haven’t heard of Craigslist, this is one of the most visited sites on the internet with some 20,000,000 visits per month in the United States alone.  You can consider this a dynamic classified section where you can find pets, look for employment, trade cars, get rid of unwanted furniture, and now swap your home with someone else.  Now I’ve used housing swaps when traveling for a temporary living arrangement.  For example, you need a place to stay and you find someone in your desired location who is looking to travel as well, and you come to an agreed upon trade.  Now this I used during college and was amazed at how many people are out there and the ability of technology to shrink the world.

That isn’t the new trend.  But what I am noticing is postings from people looking to permanently swap their place with others.  That is something that is new.  There were the unique postings in the past but now everyday you can find a person looking to trade their home with your home.  Here is an example:

Craigslist

The person above is looking to exchange their Chicago home with a home out here in Burbank either temporarily or permanently.  Now why would someone do a housing swap as opposed to selling their home?  There are actually many good reasons.  First, you may be an area with depressed sales and can’t sell your home.  For many corporate careers, if you are in a junior position you may need to go where the company sends you.  This may translate into you relocating but if you own your home and cannot sell, then you are stuck.  What if you absolutely love your career?  Then most would do anything they can to find a way to move to their new location.

Another reason people would do a housing swap instead of selling is they may be in a negative equity position.  Say you bought a home for $350,000 and the home is now “worth” $250,000.  A large number of people do not (or don’t want to) come to the table with $100,000 simply to sell their home.  There is a large portion of the population that can manage the housing payment but is simply stuck in this position of limbo.  They would like to sell their home but cannot.  There only other option is to ruthlessly default and some are going down this path as well.

Finally, this may workout for people who are on the margins.  If you have say a 4 or 5 percent equity position in your home, it may cost you $10,000 or $30,000 simply to sell your place.  Why not contact someone and save yourself that amount?  You can hire a real estate attorney for a few hours, get the paperwork drawn up and finish the deal.  This may work for cases like the person that needs to relocate and doesn’t really care if they get a profit on their home.  They are simply looking to sell the home.

It’ll be interesting to see if more and more of these cases pop up on Craigslist.

Frugality

There is a definitive emerging trend in frugality.  There is a fountain of wealth with Google.  You can use Google Maps and have access to technology that only a few years ago was accessible by the highest level government officials.  You also have the luxury of searching for information from a variety of sources.  One of the features I enjoy from Google is their Google Trends search feature.  In this, you can see the amount of search queries for any phrase or word.  Since Google dominates the search world, this is an excellent view of what people are searching for at any given time.  Take a look at this search phrase:

Google Trends

As you can see from the above chart, not many people are searching for “real estate investing” anymore which shouldn’t come as a surprise.  Ironically, in times where people should be more financially educated they tend to steer away from this.  They ramp up their investments at the worst time, near a peak, and face rapid problems.  Is it any wonder that California has now seen a drop of 38 percent in one-year for a median priced home?

This trend can also be seen perfectly by comparing two stocks for the year.  That of Family Dollar Stores and Best Buy:

Family Dollar Store

For the year Family Dollar Stores are up 24 percent while Best Buy is down 15 percent.  So what does this mean?  What it means is that people are focusing on things they “need” and avoiding things they “want.”  It is interesting to note that consumer and producer inflation is running at decade highs.  Now why is this?  Clearly housing prices collapsing and credit tightening is wealth destruction so you would think that we would be seeing possibly deflation.  The problem however is items that people need such as food, fuel, and healthcare are not growing exponentially.  These remain fixed while the U.S. Dollar declines and purchases less and less of these items.  In addition, many Wal-Mart goods are produced in China which is facing its own inflation.  The workforce is slowly getting more educated and is demanding slightly higher wages which find their way into the price of the goods that people consume.

With budgets getting tight “want” stores like Best Buy are facing the brunt of the economic contraction.  We saw this with Mervyn’s filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in July.  Another clear example is looking at a low cost food source such as McDonald’s and comparing it to P.F. Chang’s China Bistro:

McDonalds

Over the past year McDonald’s is up 29 percent while P.F. Chang’s is down 27 percent.  Frugality is becoming a way of life because money is tight and this is being reflected in the spending behavior of Americans.

Census Selling

Much to the chagrin of many the housing market won’t see a bottom at least in California until 2011.  There is some positive aspects to this including more affordable housing for many.  It will also lighten the debt load for households in the future.  It may also give people the incentive to purchase homes in areas they plan on staying in and investing their time in creating a better community.

Foreclosures are still at historical highs.  Given the recent housing report for Southern California and the modest jump in sales, I think it is important to look at the actual sales and how they played out in various regions.  Let us first get a population count for the 6 major counties:

Population Count For County:

Los Angeles:               9,948,081

Orange:                       3,002,048

Riverside:                    2,026,803

San Bernardino:          1,999,332

Ventura:                      799,720

San Diego:                  2,941,454

Total Southern California:   20,717,438

So that gives us the entire population count for Southern California.  The total population of California is 36,457,549 so Southern California makes up 56 percent of this amount.  Now let us look at last months sales data:

Southern california housing

Now I made the case in a previous article that the minor bump in sales was in large part by the fire sale of homes in the Inland Empire.  Let us now break down the numbers to get an actual proportion:

Riverside + San Bernardino Total July Sales =  6,637 / (20,329 total SoCal Sold)

So these two counties made up 32.6 percent of all sales for Southern California.  Now we should look at what percent these counties make up for the Southern California population:

Riverside + San Bernardino Population = 4,026,135 / (SoCal total 20,717,438)

Total population percentage for these two counties is 19.4 percent.  So essentially these two counties are selling at twice the percent of their population representation.  I was listening on the radio to someone explain the median price drop and cautioning that sales are getting skewed because “expensive” homes aren’t selling and only foreclosures and lower priced homes are selling.  This in fact is true.  The only thing I would caution these folks about is that distress sales are now the bulk of the market even though miraculously in some of the data, foreclosures don’t pop up in multiple listing services.

These new trends are simply a way people are coping with the economic conditions.  It is very unlikely we will be seeing a second half recovery especially for housing.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information

Post from: Dr. Housing Bubble Blog

Emerging Economic Trends: Housing Swaps, Frugality, and Selling Homes in Lower Priced Areas.

Related Posts:
Real Homes of Genius: Two For One in Compton. Southern California Housing Bubble Hangover.
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Paramount. 768 Square Feet for $324,900. Buy, Withdraw, Sell, Foreclose. The Cycle of Life.
World Premier! Real Homes of Genius Video.
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Compton. $90,000 in Los Angeles County?
How Many People Overpaid for Their Home in Los Angeles County? Trying to get a Raw Number of Households Underwater.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

A guest post from Frank Shump. Frank is a veteran from the financial services industry, and currently authors a blog called Thefinancecastle.com, which documents his thoughts on money matters and his adventures in self employment.

By and large the average American consumer is usually a resilient creature. Even through minor recessions and increasing prices in the past, we’ve managed to just keep on trucking and buy things we need (and of course some things we don’t). In most times when our economy was heading into a recession, the general public’s view was to downplay the amount of fear we’re feeling and keep on doing what we’re doing until the cycle trended back upward. This time, however, things appear to be different. An increasing number of consumers are scared, jittery, and angry about the current economic condition, and they have every right to be.

A recent poll put out by CNN/Opinion Research Corp. showed that seventy-five percent of those surveyed believe that things are going badly in the United States. After years of easy credit and rampant consumerism, it appears that as a nation we may finally be coming to the realization that the party, is in fact, over.

(more…)

Filed under: Goldman Sachs Group (GS), Morgan Stanley (MS), Financial Crisis

Analysts are speculating that Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) may post its first quarterly loss as a public company. According to Reuters, “The potential for a quarterly loss, combined with the generally weaker environment for financial institutions, has some investors wondering if Goldman Sachs really deserves to trade at a higher valuation than Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS).” Based on that point of view, a bad quarter could cause the premier investment bank’s shares to fall sharply.

The factors that may cause the red ink are write-downs in the value of public and private assets and the firm’s real estate portfolio.

Leaving Goldman aside, the analysis is an indication that the worst may not be behind many other large U.S. banks and brokerages. If the best-run company in the industry faces substantial losses, what about the rest of the group?

Most investment bank shares are off 60% or more this year. A month or two ago, some were off closer to 80%. More bad news from any firm in the sector could push these stocks to new bottoms. Shares in Morgan, which has recovered to $17, could be driven back down to $7, its 52-week low.

Financial stocks could be heading for another big sell-off.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.

Goldman’s first loss? originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Sat, 01 Nov 2008 11:40:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Close
E-mail It