Archive for November 10th, 2008

Filed under: Earnings reports, Bad news, Starbucks (SBUX)

As I sit in my neighborhood Starbucks (NASDAQ: SBUX) outlet, the song playing through the coffeeshop speakers is Everybody Hurts by REM. How appropriate. This fiscal year, especially these past two quarters, hurt Starbucks. Fiscal fourth quarter 2008 profits were $5.4 million, or a penny per share, after restructuring costs associated with store closings; but only 10 cents a share before charges, three cents less than analysts expected and a very painful 11 cents a share less than the year-ago period.

Ouch.

On a somewhat healthier note, net revenues were up a bit, to $2.5 billion, a 3% increase from a year earlier. Not a growth story exactly, but at least not negative! There’s something! And CEO Howard Schultz had all kinds of positive spin, touting Starbucks as “more resilient than many other premium brands” (see how he snuck that “premium” in there? Talk about setting a subconscious benchmark!) and pointing out that he is “encouraged by our ability to drive increased traffic at a relatively low cost, as we did on Election Day” with the free tall coffee promotion.

Continue reading Starbucks 4Q 2008 earnings: Everybody Hurts … when there are store closings

Starbucks 4Q 2008 earnings: Everybody Hurts … when there are store closings originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:46:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Another guest post from MG Dungan who went from Wharton to Wall St. to real estate to Blown Mortgage.

Economies worldwide are in recession and it’s getting worse. The momentum on the downside is too strong and the losses too pervasive to expect bailouts or interest-rate cuts to have more than a temporary effect. At best, government can slow down the rate of decline or perhaps delay a crash, but at a great future cost.

In the US, what started out as a housing problem in a few states has now become a full-fledged recession, with a majority of states (30) now in or dangerously close (19) to recession. The single exception is Alaska, according to Moody’s Economy.com.

(more…)

Filed under: General Electric (GE), Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A), Goldman Sachs Group (GS)

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE: BRK.A) stock has fallen 26% this year to a low not seen since February 2007. That does not sound great, but compared to the S&P’s 42% drop so far in 2008, Buffett looks relatively good.

Buffett has been in the news quite a bit lately. His biography tops the business book best seller list and he’s been flogger-in-chief for the administration’s $810 billion bailout plan — since it was signed into law, the NYSE index has lost $3.8 trillion of its market capitalization. He’s also been trying the cheer-lead America into buying stocks.

But I am wondering whether all this cheer-leading was part of the deal that allowed him to get 10% interest payments and warrants to buy The Goldman Sachs Group (NYSE: GS) and General Electric Company (NYSE: GE) a few weeks ago — their stocks are well below the $115 and $22.25 a share exercise prices on those warrants. Along with his painful loss of wealth, Buffett’s reputation has taken somewhat of a tumble as a result of his getting out in front of what now looks like a bad bailout approach.

Continue reading Warren Buffett is not perfect

BloggingStocksWarren Buffett is not perfect originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:56:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: General Electric (GE), Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A), Goldman Sachs Group (GS)

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE: BRK.A) stock has fallen 26% this year to a low not seen since February 2007. That does not sound great, but compared to the S&P’s 42% drop so far in 2008, Buffett looks relatively good.

Buffett has been in the news quite a bit lately. His biography tops the business book best seller list and he’s been flogger-in-chief for the administration’s $810 billion bailout plan — since it was signed into law, the NYSE index has lost $3.8 trillion of its market capitalization. He’s also been trying the cheer-lead America into buying stocks.

But I am wondering whether all this cheer-leading was part of the deal that allowed him to get 10% interest payments and warrants to buy The Goldman Sachs Group (NYSE: GS) and General Electric Company (NYSE: GE) a few weeks ago — their stocks are well below the $115 and $22.25 a share exercise prices on those warrants. Along with his painful loss of wealth, Buffett’s reputation has taken somewhat of a tumble as a result of his getting out in front of what now looks like a bad bailout approach.

Continue reading Warren Buffett is not perfect

BloggingStocksWarren Buffett is not perfect originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:56:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

A guest post by Jay C. Hammond, freelance journalist and researcher.

There are plenty of candidates for blame in the current mortgage meltdown. Yet the ability of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to investigate mortgage fraud and other financial crimes is increasingly being called into question. The FBI and the Department of Justice are the agencies primarily responsible for pursuing criminal charges against lenders and financial firms.

Mortgage fraud is blamed for annual losses of between $4 and $6 billion, according to statistics published on the FBI website at www.fbi.gov/hq/mortgage_fraud.htm, By September, the FBI had already received more than 62,000 reports of suspicious activity representing losses of $1.4 billion in 2008. There were 1,569 active investigations underway as of August 2008. Compare that to only 462 in 2007 and 295 in 2003.

(more…)

Leave it to California to first, stall a budget for a record 85 days only to pass a budget that amounts to kicking the economic shiny can down the pothole-filled road.  We may want to save those cans for their redemption value since things are getting progressively worse.  Only 6 weeks after being signed, the […]
Related Posts:
California Examined: The Deep Budget Impact of the Mortgage Crises.
You Can Kiss $2.84 Trillion in Housing Equity Goodbye: The Continued Decline in Real Estate.
Foreclosure and Short Sale Report: 33.79% of All Southern California Inventory for Sale is Distressed Homes.
Housing in Graphics and California $16 Billion in the Hole: The Genesis of the California Housing Market.
California Budget Woes: Balance the Budget by Gambling and Letting Inmates Out!

Leave it to California to first, stall a budget for a record 85 days only to pass a budget that amounts to kicking the economic shiny can down the pothole-filled road.  We may want to save those cans for their redemption value since things are getting progressively worse.  Only 6 weeks after being signed, the budget is now facing a stunning $11.2 billion deficit.  It took longer to pass the first budget than it took us to once again drive off an economic cliff.  What exactly happened here?

Well first, the initial budget passed in September for the 2008-09 fiscal year amounted to a buffet of gimmicks, illusions, and putting your hand in one pocket, taking $20 out and shifting it over to your other pocket deluding yourself that you are now richer.  So how did they pass that budget?

*$3.3 billion in sale of authorized Economic Recovery Bonds

*$1.9 billion in changes to accrual accounting

*$5.1 billion of lottery proceeds

*$1.4 billion in other initiatives

*$8 billion in spending cuts

This is what it took to pass a $143 billion budget on September 23.  More debt and accounting smoke and mirrors.  Nothing really addressed the structural problems facing the state.  Barely enough time to catch our breath but here is what awaits California.  This comes from the Special Session 2008-09 report:

“Economic conditions have deteriorated dramatically since the Governor signed the 2008 Budget Act of September 23.  This deterioration was reflected in General Fund revenue collections for the month of September that came in $923 million below forecast.  As a result, California faces a revenue shortfall of $11.2 billion this year.  Specifically, the Department of Finance estimates that General Fund revenues will be approximately $567 million lower in 2007-08, $10.7 billion lower in 2008-09, and $13 billion lower in 2009-10 than earlier projections.”

This coming from our government so you know things are actually worse.  So where was this supposed and deceptive money going to come from?  Let us look at the revenue sources for the state:

California State Revenues

54% of the state revenue comes from the personal income tax.  Another 26% is pulled from sales taxes.  Corporate tax pulls in about 12%.  So by and large, most of the state revenue comes from people paying taxes on earnings.  Which leads us to our first obvious reason why this budget shortfall is not a surprise.

Let us now look at 5 reasons why 2009 will make 2008 look like a picnic for the state.

Condition #1 - Employment

Hard to tax someone when they are unemployed.  The unemployment rate in the state is exploding:

California Unemployment Rate
California’s unemployment rate stands at 7.7%.  The last time the rate was this high was in 1996 and puts us at the 4th highest rate of unemployment in the country.  Now, what we are seeing is a vicious cycle that feeds on itself where people get fired, they don’t spend, don’t pay taxes, and it feeds and reinforces itself.  Remember these are state estimates which are always in the Pollyanna camp and are tantamount to asking a real estate agent if buying today is a good decision.  It is highly doubtful that the state has even crunched the numbers for October since they lag.  You thought September was bad?  Just wait until the October numbers are processed.

There is no economic fundamental sign as to why employment will suddenly explode once again next year.  California was much too reliant on finance, insurance, and real estate for its health.  We have tied our anchor to the biggest bubble in history and the industries that pumped the air into this bubble.  And unemployment is getting longer and more painful.  Let us first look at the duration of unemployment in the state:

California Unemployement duration

Currently, over 350,000 people have been unemployed 5 to 14 weeks.  This a jump from September of 2006 when the number was 250,000.  In addition, those unemployed 27 weeks or more has shot up in the last year alone.  Currently there are over 200,000 people that fall in this category when only in September of 2007 there were 150,000.  What does this tell us?  It is much harder to find a job and more and more are losing their jobs unfortunately.  Let us now look at how people lose their jobs:

Job loss reason

This is probably a more revealing chart.  Those considered by the state as “job losers” has jumped up exponentially.  In September of 2006 400,000 people were categorized as job losers and now the number is well over 600,000.  Why is this category important?  These are people that lost their job and not by their own choice.  They were fired, a company went bankrupt, or the company money just ran out.  Overall, there are currently 1,425,000 people unemployed in the state:

California employment conditions

Going back to the budget, with personal income tax being the highest revenue source and job losses only growing, you can expect less money to come into the state next year.  Let us take a look at the actual data and look at certain industries:

Job Sectors

It should not come as a surprise that the biggest job losses are in fields related to the housing industry.

Condition #2 Housing

According to DataQuick the median price of a home sold in California for October was $280,000.  The peak using DataQuick as our source was $484,000 for the state in May of 2007.  What this now means is statewide the California median home price is now down a jaw dropping 42% in slightly over a year.  I have very little doubt that we won’t see a housing bottom until 2011 and with this budget I am only more convinced that this will be the case.

Last month 51.1 percent of all sales were foreclosure resales.  Given that 40,317 homes sold, 20,602 of these homes were foreclosures.  That is a stunning number.  You may think that the sales are starting to pick up pace.  Do not kid yourself.  This number is simply keeping pace with the amount of distress inventory hitting the market.  Let us look at the numbers for the most recent dataset:

September 2008 Distress Indicators

Notice of Defaults:    21,665

Trustee Sales:            20,510

REOs:                         27,373

It is highly likely that most of the 21,665 Notice of Defaults will go into foreclosure.  For the 3rd quarter, only 20 percent were able to save their home once in this stage.  Meaning, 8 out of 10 will lose their home.  What that also means is there are more distress properties hitting the market each month than actual sales.  Even with the new SB 1137 legislation the drop in NODs and foreclosures will be extremely short lived.  Why?  It only addresses one facet of this complex equation.  It basically seeks to do for distress data the same it did with the budget.  Sweep the problem under the rug for another day.  Look at condition #1 regarding jobs and you’ll see why these measures fail to address the true problem.  Employment never justified these prices in the first place.

We are also entering the fall and winter selling season which historically is always slower.  When tax payments start rolling in the state is going to realize that the 2009-10 budget is simply unsupportable.

Condition #3 - State Budget Kicking Can Down

It is worth noting that the recent budget pass in September was the equivalent of putting a band-aid on a broken bone.  Sure, it feels good because you are doing something but it failed to address the true magnitude of the problem.  There is major revenue short falls.  Something needs to be done.  And that is where the hard choice is.  Do you cut additional jobs thus fueling the perpetual cycle and adding more people to the unemployment lines or do you raise taxes and risk hurting some businesses in the state?  At this point, it seems like a combination is necessary.  A dogmatic approach to this will not take us anywhere.

The last budget split on this ideological perspective and look where it got us.  6 weeks and we are back to the drawing board.  I have no idea how we still have an A+ rating but hey, some of those collateralized debt obligations had A+ ratings right before they imploded so take that for what it is worth.  Take a look at the above revenue and you see where we are heading.

Also, just wait until folks do their taxes for next year.  Big money comes from capital gains and you can rest assured that many people are a lot less wealthy today.  The state better adjust quickly and gear up because we have less than 2 months before we enter 2009.  After that, many will be claiming losses on their tax returns so that revenue is out the window.  If unemployment keeps going up that is fewer that pay into the tax base.

Sales have fallen drastically as well.  You need only look at the recent example of Circuit City, many here in California, which decided to close down 155 stores.  We are reaching the endgame here.  That is, we are now at the moment where we realize the full extent of this Ponzi financial system.  The only thing that kept things going up was simply the momentum itself.  It detached from any economic or market fundamentals.  It was by all definitions a bubble.  Sadly, the state budget assumed a decade of bubble growth was somehow normal.  Now, we need to quickly adjust to the actual reality.  That bubble is long gone and big profits with it.  Have we forgotten about the years of Real Homes of Genius plaguing the market?

Condition #4 - Global Crisis

I never understood why some folks believed so strongly in decoupling:

icon078.gif:  “California will never go down.  Because guess what?  Even if people aren’t buying here the world is doing fine and they’ll buy real estate here.”

These folks fall under the decoupling camp and they are largely silent and absent today.  All you needed to do was travel and realized everyone drank the debt elixir.  Some have modified their stance.  It is unequivocally clear that foreign buyers are not snapping up real estate.  In the few cases that they are, they are buying in Beverly Hills or Santa Monica and not the Inland Empire or other L.A. locations where the bulk of people live.

The fact that this is a global crisis leaves us largely to our own devices.  Even by current measures, prices in California are still too high.  People across the country view our prices still as bubbly.  They certainly aren’t going to rush in and buy up these homes.  Who are they going to rent them to?  The unemployed?  Makes absolutely no sense.  It is much too big of a risk.  Plus, most lenders now require solid credit and anywhere from 20 to 30 percent down for any investment property.  You tell me how Americans have $56,000 or $84,000 sitting around for an investment property?  Not many and those that do are buying out in other states where prices make more sense.

This global credit crisis is gigantic.  It is estimated that current declines have wiped out over $10 trillion globally.  This isn’t chump change.  That is the size of our national debt.

Condition #5 - Consumer Behavior

Finally, people are more cautious.  People are now psychologically scarred and realize that more pain may be coming down the pipeline.  Why would someone want to buy a home if they are not certain about their job situation?  Maybe they are getting their hours cut back.  Maybe they’ve just watched their 401k lose 40% of its value and they are wondering how they will survive in retirement.  Many have seen their home equity disappear.  Everyone knows someone or is personally hit by this economic crisis.

This goes beyond simply a credit crisis.  This is not just a subprime mess.  This is hitting on so many fronts and simply shows how complex our global system is.  Let us look at what we are battling with:

*Growing unemployment

*Deflation in housing prices

*Credit crisis

*Automobile sector on the verge of collapse

*Big ticket consumer stores going under

*Commodities bubble popping

*Commercial real estate collapsing

*Banks going under

Obviously, the above does a number on the psyche of the public.  I would assume many are even holding off on buying say a new car, TV, or computer and making do with what they have.  Many of the economic consumerist models relied on folks spending over and over and always replacing slightly old items with newer flashier models.  We’ll be seeing more older cars on the road.  This new paradigm of consumer awakening is hitting at the worst time, the holiday shopping season.

With that said, California is now forced to make hard choices.  There is no other way.  We are in what I call Stagpression.  That is a situation where we are holding off depression with mountains of debt.  Not exactly a method or recipe for recovery.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information.

Post from: Dr. Housing Bubble Blog

California Financial Stagpression: Budget Deficit Hits $11.2 Billion Deficit 6 Weeks after Signing Budget. 5 Reasons Why California will see a Deteriorating Economy in 2009.

Related Posts:
California Examined: The Deep Budget Impact of the Mortgage Crises.
You Can Kiss $2.84 Trillion in Housing Equity Goodbye: The Continued Decline in Real Estate.
Foreclosure and Short Sale Report: 33.79% of All Southern California Inventory for Sale is Distressed Homes.
Housing in Graphics and California $16 Billion in the Hole: The Genesis of the California Housing Market.
California Budget Woes: Balance the Budget by Gambling and Letting Inmates Out!

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Filed under: Deals, Housing, Financial Crisis

The real estate market is as bad as it gets, so lenders are getting cold feet about big projects. Even Donald Trump, who can usually work magic filling his buildings with tenants, is running into problems. (It should be noted he has never been good at the casino business and spends too much time doing TV junk like The Apprentice).

Trump may not have much of an argument. He wants an extension to the loan for his residential tower in Chicago, which means a portion of its has lapsed. Why the banks involved, including Germany’s largest bank, Deutsche Bank (NYSE: DB), would do that is unclear.

According to The Wall Street Journal, “The suit demands — among other things — that an extension provision in the original loan agreement be triggered because of the unprecedented financial crisis in the credit markets now prevailing, in part due to acts Deutsche Bank itself participated in.” In other words, the financial crisis almost rises to the level of being an “act of God.” Not quite, but getting close.

Trump’s real problem is not the banks. Since everyone in the U.S. is poor, no one wants to buy his expensive Chicago condominiums. A lawsuit won’t solve that.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 24/7 Wall St.

Trump sues lenders originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Sat, 08 Nov 2008 12:40:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Pfizer (PFE), Amer Intl Group (AIG), QUALCOMM Inc (QCOM), Wells Fargo (WFC)

Today’s weak and horrible jobs numbers did not wreck the markets because they were actually a tad less horrible than yesterday’s whisper numbers. It is amazing when 6.5% unemployment and -240,000 jobs to make 1.2 million jobs lost this year is GOOD NEWS.

Here are unofficial closing bell levels:

Dow 8,943.89 +248.10 (2.85%)
S&P 500 930.75 +25.87 (2.86%)
Nasdaq 1,647.40 +38.70 (2.41%)
52-Week Lows

American International Group (NYSE: AIG) rose on multiple reports that federal officials are looking at ways to ease financial pressure on the insurance giant. Shares were up over 11% at $2.08 right before the close.

NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ: NVDA) rose after its earnings came in well above plan considering that it had set the bar so low. Despite a revenue warning, value buyers had this graphics card giant trading up 13% at $8.61 right before the close.

QUALCOMM (NASDAQ: QCOM) was a surprise gainer today after trading down this morning. The CDMA cellular chip and wireless standard giant missed earnings and guided estimates down on weakening cell phone sales trends. Shares were up almost 8% at $35.57 right at the close.

Pfizer Inc. (NYSE: PFE) was under more pressure this morning, but rose throughout the trading day. Goldman Sachs downgraded this stock today down to a SELL rating, yet shares were uo almost 3% at $16.84 right before the close of the day.

Wells Fargo & Co. (NYSE: WFC) was actually flirting with positive territory at 3:59. Considering it sold $11 billion in stock at $27.00, it is amazing that it was only down 0.1% at $28.72 in the seconds before that unofficial closing level.

Closing Bell: Major markets up, and 3-Card Monte surprises with AIG, NVDA, QCOM, PFE, and WFC originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:20:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Close
E-mail It