Archive for December 8th, 2008

Filed under: Microsoft (MSFT), Yahoo! (YHOO), JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Las Vegas Sands (LVS)

This post is part of AOL Money & Finance’s Best & Worst in Money 2008 feature.

In 2008, many big names took big face plants. Since this is a blog about money, I ranked them based on how much they lost and how far they fell. As you can see, the method is not exactly scientific. Here are the five biggest falls from grace:

  1. Richard Fuld, Lehman Brothers. The $639 billion bankruptcy is history’s largest so far by a factor of at least six. And Fuld personally lost about $1 billion in his personal holdings of Lehman stock. And the repercussions of letting Lehman fail stretched from money market funds to Iceland. Ouch!
  2. Jimmy Cayne, Bear Stearns CEO. Cayne lost plenty of his personal wealth when Bear Stearns stock stumbled. But at least shareholders were able to get out with something when JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) bought it.
  3. Eliot Spitzer, New York governor. Spitzer destroyed his once promising political career by spending time with at least one woman other than his wife. He was trying to use his prosecution of Wall Street to boost his political career as Rudy Giuliani did. But his self-destructive urges got the better of him.
  4. Sheldon Adelson, CEO, Las Vegas Sands (NYSE: LVS). Adelson, a colorful character who was a consulting client of mine, has lost $30 billion on paper thanks to his excessive debt load and a decline in gambling.
  5. Jerry Yang, CEO, Yahoo! (NASDAQ: YHOO). Poor Jerry Yang suffered from delusions about his ability to revive his creation. He lost a chance to boost shareholder returns by selling to Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ: MSFT) for $31 a share. With the stock at $11.51, he left big bucks on the table, and the board kicked him out of the big chair.

Let us know which one you would chose as the biggest fall of 2008.

Peter Cohan is president of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College and edits The Cohan Letter. He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned.

Share the reasons for your Biggest Fall from Grace pick in the comments, or let us know about any contenders we overlooked. Also be sure to see the rest of the Best & Worst in Money 2008.

Best & Worst in Money 2008: Biggest fall from grace originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:40:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Bad news, Apple Inc (AAPL), Wal-Mart (WMT), General Motors (GM), Newsletters, Target Corp. (TGT), Sears Holdings (SHLD), Nordstrom, Inc (JWN), Calif Pizza Kitchen (CPKI), Stocks to Sell, Recession

The chain that once dubbed itself “where America shops” is increasingly a place shoppers avoid. Despite its much-publicized recovery efforts, investors should consider steering clear, too. Sears Holdings Corporation (NYSE: SHLD) has been in the news a great deal lately, announcing awful sales results and planning yet another stock buyback to prop up its flailing price.

The recent store changes have not worked, and neither will the financial engineering. This company is on its way down, and a visit to a local store showed me why.

Sears used to be the General Motors Corporation (NYSE: GM) of retailers — an apt analogy when both were all-American giants, and just as apt today as both struggle. Sears had completely lost its way when vulture investor, Eddie Lampert, bought the company in late 2004 and combined it with Kmart. Wall Street analysts went nuts, pushing the stock price to $192 a share.

Today, Wall Street has lowered that price to near $40.

Continue reading Sears: the GM of retailers

Sears: the GM of retailers originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Mon, 08 Dec 2008 15:50:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

The spin is out in full force folks. The Southern California housing numbers are now out and once again they show a dismal and pathetic market. Yet even in the face of falling prices ala the Wal-Mart commercials, you can rest assured that some are going to spin the data for all it […]
Related Posts:
Foreclosures? Housing Bubble? In Southern California? Impossible!
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Compton. Once, Twice, Three times a Short Sale.
Emerging Economic Trends: Housing Swaps, Frugality, and Selling Homes in Lower Priced Areas.
C.A.R. says 2007 will see a -2% Drop in California. Does This Feel like a 2% Yearly Drop?
Doing The Housing Bubble Math Dance for California.

The spin is out in full force folks. The Southern California housing numbers are now out and once again they show a dismal and pathetic market. Yet even in the face of falling prices ala the Wal-Mart commercials, you can rest assured that some are going to spin the data for all it is worth. You also need to remember that the recent data on Southern California is for the month of July, a historically strong month simply because of seasonal factors. In addition, the month of August should look similar to this month but expect the report for September due out in October to show the actual pay option ARM smack down.

But even with seasonality the spinsters are going to use the current minor bump in home sales as a major positive:

“(DQNews) La Jolla, CA—The number of Southern California homes sold last month edged up to its highest level in more than a year as bargain hunters swept up foreclosure properties in affordable neighborhoods, a real estate information service reported.

A total of 20,329 new and resale houses and condos sold in Los Angeles, Riverside, San Diego, Ventura, San Bernardino and Orange counties last month. That was up 16.7 percent from 17,424 the previous month and up 13.8 percent from 17,867 for July a year ago, according to San Diego-based MDA DataQuick.

Last month’s sales count was the highest since 21,856 homes were sold in March 2007, though it still fell 23 percent short of the average July sales total since 1988, when MDA DataQuick’s statistics begin. From last September through June, sales for each month were at an all-time low for that particular calendar month, with the exception of April which was the next lowest. Last month’s sales total was the first since September 2005 to rise above the year-ago level.”

Bargain hunters? Foreclosures in affordable neighborhoods? Isn’t that an oxymoron? If the neighborhood was affordable in the first place you wouldn’t be seeing large number of foreclosures but that is an entirely different subject. Even though this report is trying to spin the 21,856 sales as a significant jump it is nowhere close to the sales that occurred during the bubble frenzy. Take a look at this data:

July 2004: 32,988

July 2005: 31,069

July 2006: 25,628

July 2007: 17,867

July 2008: 20,329

It helps to put things in perspective doesn’t it? Of course they aren’t going to say that sales for Southern California are off by 38% from their peak July month only a few years ago. And when they say that the jump was bolstered by “affordable neighborhoods” what they mean is that the majority of the sales were fueled by the Inland Empire were homes are being sold for whatever the market will take. Let us look at the details of the report:

Southern california housing

I first direct your attention to the stunning jump in sales for Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. These two counties make up the Inland Empire. But what the report doesn’t highlight is the actual median price of both these counties. They are now down 34 and 35 percent on a year over year basis and carry a median price of $260,000 and $230,000. Do you realize that Riverside County for example hit a high median price of $432,000 in December of 2006? So if we take that peak price to the current median price we get:

$430,000 - $260,000 = $170,000 (A 39% Discount)

Los Angeles County hit a peak of $550,000 and is now at $400,000. Nice $150,000 discount. Orange County? Orange County had a median price of $645,000 in June of 2007. That is a drop of $184,000 in one year. Would you wait a year for $184,000? I think most would.

Across the board prices are getting hammered. The reason sales jumped last month was in large part to the big jump in the Inland Empire. And of course homes are now selling for 50 to 60 percent off peak sales prices. To think this won’t happen in Los Angeles County and Orange County is simply unrealistic. It will happen. Just wait until the pay option ARM loans in these areas hit their anniversary dates.

You’ll love some of the reasons given for the fall off in prices:

“What we’re looking at is a fire sale of properties in newer affordable neighborhoods that were bought or refinanced near the price peak with lousy mortgages. What we’re still not seeing is this level of distress spreading to more expensive or established neighborhoods,” said John Walsh, MDA DataQuick president.

The median price paid for a Southland home was $348,000 last month, down 2.0 percent from $355,000 in June and down 31.1 percent from $505,000 for July 2007. That peak of $505,000 was reached in March, April, May and July of last year.

The median has fallen because of depreciation, especially in inland markets, and because of the steep drop off in home financing in the so-called jumbo category, which until recently was defined as loans above $417,000.

Before the credit crunch hit in August 2007, nearly 40 percent of Southland sales were financed with jumbo loans. Jumbos last month accounted for 15.8 percent of Southland sales.”

First, what qualifies as a more established neighborhood? Are we talking about Malibu or Newport Coast? Sure, those areas are positive but only a fraction of the entire 20,000,000+ people that live in Southern California live there. That reminds me of something said during the Crash of 1929. Mr. Rockefeller during the crash of the Great Depression announced that he was buying stocks while everyone was selling. To paraphrase a market observer, “of course he is buying. He’s the only one left with money.” Well of course these areas are doing fine! They always do well irrespective of the economy. Yet I draw your attention to the chart above again. Every single county is down from 26.9% to 35.2%. That is a major correction in one year and we are yet to see the truly “lousy” mortgages hit the actual market.

Another interesting part of the report is the implication that jumbo loans are somehow hurting the market. Did you look at the overall Southern California median price? It’s at $348,000! You don’t need a stinking jumbo loan anymore. What you need is good credit and a solid income to buy a home and not some banana republic mortgage from the bubble days. Given that our unemployment rate is at 7.3% who really wants to buy a home when their income is at risk? You think those 200,000 state workers are hungry to buy a home given that Arnold is trying to cut them down to the minimum wage? What about all the jobs in housing that are now no longer bringing in good paychecks? If you connect the dots prices are going down because the entire state was turned into a housing casino and mortgages were used as chips.

I recall clearly a few months ago hearing on the radio here in Southern California, these permabull brokers talking about how great the Hope Now program would be for buyers. When this failed, it was going to be the fantastic Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bailout. Well of course all these idiotic programs failed because they missed one simple yet obvious fact. The economy is in distress! This is like offering lobster to a person with no taste buds. Or offering someone that lives in Palm Springs an Eskimo jacket. They don’t need gimmicks. What we need is for the state to get its budget in order and not offer tax breaks for subprime lenders. We need an infrastructure that is sustainable and not one built around finance, insurance, and real estate. Did people really think that we were going to trade homes to one another ad infinitum? Sure makes that $729,500 loan limit seem like an absolute boneheaded move.

I was going through some of the historical “help” that was going to save the market and have compiled a list here for your mental historical note keeping:

Bailout matrix

Of course these programs are all failing because they fail to address the structural problems of the system. That is, this was a bubble of epic proportions and the only way to sustain it is to bring back the toxic credit that fueled the market. I was digging through some images I have saved and found this screenshot of Hank Paulson on CNN from December of 2007:

cnn-subprime-helpontheway-december.png

Subprime help is indeed on the way. On the way out the door that is.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information

Post from: Dr. Housing Bubble Blog

Southern California Housing Report: New Housing Motto: Foreclosure Data is so Bad, it has to be Good! Median Price Down 31% to $348,000.

Related Posts:
Foreclosures? Housing Bubble? In Southern California? Impossible!
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Compton. Once, Twice, Three times a Short Sale.
Emerging Economic Trends: Housing Swaps, Frugality, and Selling Homes in Lower Priced Areas.
C.A.R. says 2007 will see a -2% Drop in California. Does This Feel like a 2% Yearly Drop?
Doing The Housing Bubble Math Dance for California.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Filed under: Analyst reports, MasterCard Inc’A’ (MA), Morgan Stanley (MS)

Credit-card concerns Visa, Inc. (NYSE: V) and MasterCard, Inc. (NYSE: MA) will be shelling out up to $2.75 billion to settle an antitrust suit with Discover Financial Services (NYSE: DFS). Specifically, MasterCard will pay Discover $862.5 million in the fourth quarter, while Visa will fork over $1.89 billion over the course of 2009. Following the release of the settlement’s details, an analyst at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods is weighing in favorably on all three firms.

Sanjay Sakhrani called the news “a big win for Discover, as it provides an additional cushion to contend with the implications of a weaker U.S. economy.” He expects the payments will add about $1.75 to Discover’s earnings per share. However, he also cited the report as an upside catalyst for MasterCard and Visa, as it eliminates an overhang on shares of both companies — an assertion supported by analyst Julio C. Quinteros, Jr., of Goldman Sachs.

Unfortunately, though, it’s not all sunshine and rainbows in the credit-card group today. Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) has filed its own suit against Discover in New York State Supreme Court, alleging that it’s entitled to a chunk of the $2.75-billion settlement. DFS was spun off from Morgan Stanley last year, and the latter company claims that it should receive a portion of the award under the terms of a special dividend agreement.

Not so fast, says Discover, which alleges that its parent company is in violation of their spinoff agreement, and “the amount of Morgan Stanley’s special dividend is a matter of dispute.” Morgan fired back that “there is absolutely no basis for Discover’s claim that the agreement was breached.” Stay tuned to see how this credit-card drama plays out — in early trading, shares of all three credit card companies were higher.

Elizabeth Harrow is an analyst and financial writer in the research department at Schaeffer’s Investment Research. She is featured in the video series Schaeffer’s Daily Q&A on SchaeffersResearch.com.

BloggingStocksVisa, MasterCard settle with Discover, but what about Morgan Stanley? originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:11:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Major movement, Exxon Mobil (XOM), Citigroup Inc. (C), Bank of America (BAC), MasterCard Inc’A’ (MA), Goldman Sachs Group (GS), Morgan Stanley (MS), Wells Fargo (WFC)

Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) shares had plunged by about 25% about an hour ago, while Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) shares had dropped about 11%. By now, the declines have moderated with MS down “only” 15% and GS down about 8%.

Other financials, such as Bank of America (NYSE: BAC), Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) and Citigroup (NYSE: C) aren’t displaying such declines. BAC is down less than 2%, WFC up 0.75% and C is up half a percent.

With no news on either company, it isn’t clear why the two investment banks, recently turned commercial banks, are plunging.

CNBC’s David Faber said one of the reasons Goldman could be down today is a “rumor the firm was involved with the ‘Short Volkswagen’ trade, which has blown up on a massive short squeeze.” Volkswagen (OTC: VLKAY) briefly took over the lead from Exxon Mobil (NYSE: XOM) as the largest market cap firm in the world after the recent spike in share price.

While this may explain Goldman’s stock price decline, it doesn’t Morgan’s, which has been in the news regarding the settlement of Visa (NYSE: V) and MasterCard (NYSE: MA) with Discover (NYSE: DFS). Morgan claims it deserves a piece of the settlement.

Still, this news can’t have caused the stock to plunge. Something else might be in the works.

Update 12:45 pm: Seems the speculation regarding being on the wrong side of a Volkswagen trade applies to Morgan Stanley too. While Morgan’s spokesperson denied any exposure to VW, Goldman declined to comment. Societe Generale, the French bank, saw its shares also hit on a similar speculation regarding a bad bet on VW shares.

BloggingStocksMorgan Stanley plunges 25%, Goldman 10%; other financials stable originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:26:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

A guest post from Constantine von Hoffman, veteran business journalist and author of the blog CollateralDamage.biz, a humorous look at marketing and business.

News reports about yesterday’s 679 point drop in the Dow all blamed a study stating what was self-evident: We are in a recession and have been in one for the past year.

“The stock market suffered one of its worst days since the start of the financial crisis Monday as investors responded to a string of bad economy news by fleeing to the sidelines. Among the day’s events: confirmation that the U.S. has been in a recession since December 2007. ”

The problem with that explanation is that it doesn’t seem to make any sense.

Aren’t markets supposed to factor in widely available information and thus be “rational”?  To believe that explanation means accepting the idea that investors (and thus markets) are totally clueless about the actual state of the economy. Did anyone really think we were not in a recession?

When looking at the reason given for the market slide let us for a moment put aside the always plausible argument that many reporters are idiots and publish the first explanation they can understand. (Please note that I say this as one of the guilty.)

Actually, what has happened is that the idea of a rational market has become warped by general usage*. The idea of rational or “self-correcting” markets has suffered from bumper-sticker syndrome. Somehow this became: The markets know best. While journalists are certainly complicit in the spread of this interpretation, it is rooted in conservative ideology and has been used to further the argument that government economic regulation is bad.

For economists, the word rational is only applied to markets when joined with the word expectations. It was coined by economist John F. Muth to describe the many economic situations in which the outcome depends partly on what people expect to happen.

In the case of yesterday’s market plunge,  the markets were rational in that they lived up to everyone’s expectations. For some reason people briefly saw the announcement of a new Treasury Secretary as a reason for hope and thus the dead cat went up. This idea didn’t sit right with a lot of people – myself included – so investors used this report as a reason to move the markets back in line with their expectations. (Wait, did I just say the press may have gotten one right? Sort of. You know what they say about broken clocks, though.)

In case you haven’t had enough bad news ponder what people’s current expectations mean to the housing market.

*Sort of like evolution. The bumper-sticker version of evolution is: Survival of the fittest. In many people’s minds this has come to mean, “those who survive are the best.” In this usage, “best” has a moral connotation and implies that other species are inferior. In fact, evolution actually means: Species survive who can best fit into a particular ecological niche that allows them to prosper. (But try getting that on a bumper sticker.) Actually, the “fittest” animal on the planet today is ithe cockroach. There are at least 4,000 species of roach, fitting into more niches than you spray a can of Raid at. Feel free to declare them the best if you’d like.

Source [blownmortgage]

I wrote a year ago about the site, Mortgage Lender Implode-O-Meter, being sued by a mortgage company for damages allegedly tied to the company’s listing on the site’s imploded lender list.  The claims were fanciful, with the lender claiming that their bank accounts had been drained by institutional warehouse lenders and other sorts of malarky that made the suit look exactly as it was: an attempt to simply shut-up the good folks at Implode by a brute force legal battle where they figured to have the upper-hand in capital to silence the critics.

The good news for all of us?  The community around Implode donated to the tune of $20,000 (subsidizing about half the legal costs incurred) and the site and it’s owners had good legal representation that settled the case out of court.  The critics lost - they could not silence the new newsmakers and their reportage simply because it made them look bad.

But the battle was far from over, as more bloggers have been sued for critical remarks and coverage of the seedy underbelly that was the mortgage industry.  Companies have been sending threatening letters, making menacing phone calls, and dragging these individuals to court at an alarming rate to silence them and protect their company name.

The folks at Implode have soldiered on and in the meantime have become the de facto number 1 news source about the mortgage industry.  And because of this they remain under attack.

In October Implode was sued again for an expose that uncovered a  scheme that used FHA downpayment assistance, affiliation with Indian Reservations and some creative financing to provide a seller-funded downpayment grant program that seemed to run outside the law - at least according to Forbes and other sources.  I’m not an expert on the matter but the article itself seemed well-researched and documented to me and you can judge for yourself at: What the SFDPA Administrators Don’t Want You To Know: Part 1, The Penobscot Indian Tribe Down Payment Grant Program

Once again the owners of the company under the spotlight reacted with threats and eventual legal action against Implode.  You can read about the full suit here.

This is sending us all who write and comment on the industry down the dangerous path of simply being bludgeoned to silence by those that would rather bury the bodies and move on, without dealing with the consequences of the greed and malfeasance that permeated the industry over the last decade.  It cannot be tolerated or appeased and all of those who responsibly seek to uncover the truths of the past must be protected and supported against those who wish to silence them.

While the site isn’t actively fundraising for this battle, I urge you to support Implode and the people there who have become the preeminent information source on the industry meltdown in their goal to uncover and bright to light the ridiculous systems and schemes that were set up to generate millions of dollars during the boom from unsuspecting (or suspecting) participants.  Please give whatever you can.  Free speech is our most basic right, and ensuring that the industry is reformed is the only way to keep another housing-fueled meltdown from bringing this country to its knees again.

Source [blownmortgage]

Close
E-mail It