Archive for December 9th, 2008

Filed under: Housing

Throughout 2006 and 2007, economist Peter Schiff went on every show that would have him on to warn the world about the real estate bubble, lax lending standards and artificially low interest rates.

And everyone argued with him: Ben Stein, Art Laffer and others called the subprime problem a “tiny problem” and said that it was a tremendous opportunity in the financials. Watch a “Peter Schiff’s Greatest Hits” compilation below.

They laughed at Peter Schiff … but he was right! originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 09 Dec 2008 13:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Analyst upgrades and downgrades, DaimlerChrysler (DAI), Nokia Corp. (NOK), United Parcel’B’ (UPS), Analyst initiations

Analyst upgrades:

  • Goldman upgraded Nokia (NYSE: NOK) to Neutral from Sell on valuation and believes the company’s guidance is realistic.
  • SMH Capital upgraded GMX Resources (NASDAQ: GMXR) to Accumulate from Neutral and is positive on the company’s capex reduction.
  • Wachovia raised Nationwide Health Services (NYSE: NHP) to Outperform from Market Perform to reflect the company’s diversified portfolio and “solid” capital position.
  • Portugal Telecom (NYSE: PT) was upgraded to Equal Weight from Underweight at Morgan Stanley.
  • Omnicare (NYSE: OCR) was upgraded to Buy from Hold at Soleil.
  • SKF AB (OTC: SKFRY) was upgraded at JP Morgan to Neutral from Underweight.

Analyst downgrades:

Continue reading Analyst calls: NOK, NHP, PCR, RIO, DT, UPS, BLK, ADSK, DAI, UNT …

Analyst calls: NOK, NHP, PCR, RIO, DT, UPS, BLK, ADSK, DAI, UNT … originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 09 Dec 2008 11:55:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Analyst reports, Analyst upgrades and downgrades, Google (GOOG), Yahoo! (YHOO), New York Times’A’ (NYT), AMR Corp (AMR), UAL Corp (UAUA), Intuit Inc (INTU), Analyst initiations, Delta Air Lines (DAL), Andersons Inc (ANDE)

Analyst upgrades:

  • Calyon upgraded major network carriers based on falling oil prices and capacity cuts. The analyst is positive over the next 12 months but cautious short-term given the uncertain economy, and volatile markets and oil prices. AMR Corp (NYSE: AMR) and Delta Air (NYSE: DAL) were upgraded to Add from Neutral and UAL Corp (NASDAQ: UAUA) was raised to Neutral from Reduce.
  • Ryanair (NASDAQ: RYAAY) was upgraded at Citigroup to Buy from Hold.
  • Boardwalk Pipeline (NYSE: BWP) was raised to Buy from Hold at Deutsche Bank.
  • Cowen lifted Biogen Idec (NASDAQ: BIIB) to Outperform from Neutral.
  • JP Morgan upgraded Choice Hotels (NYSE: CHH) to Neutral from Underweight following the better-than-expected Q3 report.
  • Oppenheimer upgraded shares of Integra LifeSciences (NASDAQ: IART) to Outperform from Perform on valuation, the company’s minimal exposure to economic conditions, and expectations for margin improvement and a rebound in organic growth.

Analyst downgrades:

Continue reading Analyst calls: AMR, DAL, UAUA, RYAAY, BIIB, SHW, EQ, INTU, NYT, GOOG, YHOO …

BloggingStocksAnalyst calls: AMR, DAL, UAUA, RYAAY, BIIB, SHW, EQ, INTU, NYT, GOOG, YHOO … originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:25:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Another guest post from MG Dungan who went from Wharton to Wall St. to real estate to Blown Mortgage.

Now here’s a lagging indicator for you: at least a year after the fact, the recession is now known to have began in December 2007. A depression comes next, but since there has been only one in the US, there isn’t a generally-accepted definition. So, get out your calculators and old economic textbooks and get ready for a few years of debate.

Employment as a Metric

During the Depression, unemployment was officially 25% and wages (for those who still had jobs) fell 42%.

“In studying the Great Depression, some scholars “mis-measure” employment levels by disregarding jobs the government created by the mid-1930s to spark a recovery. This suggests that for them, a ‘depression’ is a period when the private sector contracts and is unresponsive to fiscal stimulus, irrespective of how activist and effective the public sector may be,” according to James Galbraith, an economist at UT’s LBJ School of Public Affairs. That seems to be where we are right now. Something else not taken into account is the quality of those surviving jobs. Hours, then days were cut to the point where a job could be one day a week per employee, with no benefits, of course.

“Given how deeply poisoned the financial wells are, it’s distinctly possible that even a large fiscal stimulus will not reignite a credit-driven expansion, so that the public sector will have to take the economic lead for three to five years or longer,” Galbraith said. I think that’s a given at this point; Obama seems to think so too.

Employment 2008

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the unemployment rate is 6.7% if you count some of the people. It’s 12.5% if you count more of them. If you were able to count all the unemployed, it would undoubtedly be a lot, a real lot, more than 12.5%.

Measures of Economic Activity

GDP

Another frequently used benchmark to determine economic health or the lack of it is gross domestic product (GDP), the most common measure of a country’s overall economic output. At the depth of the depression, total US economic output fell to $55 billion from $103 billion and world trade plummeted 65% measured in US$. Now, a GDP decline of 10% is sometimes cited as the key marker of a depression, albeit a lagging indicator.

Global Output

The Baltic Dry Index (BDI) is one of the best leading indicators of future economic activity since it measures global raw material and infrastructure demand; it’s a fav of ours too. December’s result (shown below) is also a reflection of the lack of availability of financing for international trade, usually Letters of Credit between banks. When you hear that credit has dried up, at serious issue is a lot more than credit cards and HELOCs.

Get a load of the cliff dive the BDI has taken over the last few months and the lack of a dead-cat bounce since November. Raw materials are not being delivered and finished goods are not being produced.

Source [blownmortgage]

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is getting tough on credit rating agencies. A series of measures announced on Wednesday, December 3, would impose additional requirements on the credit reporting agencies in an effort to increase transparency and accountability. Consumers, investors and lenders may even end up getting more meaningful ratings.

These comprehensive rules touch every aspect of the credit rating process - from conflicts of interest, to publication of ratings methodologies to disclosure of ratings track records,” explains SEC Chariman Christopher Cox.

The proposed rules are the result of an extensive examination of the three major credit ratings agencies recently concluded by the SEC. The examination, which lasted 10 months, revealed significant weaknesses in ratings practices.

“One of the significant weaknesses in the credit rating process has been that while the credit rating agencies often relied on other to verify the quality of assets underlying structured products - and thus their ratings were vulnerable to reliance on incorrect information - there was frequently inadequate explanation of the limitations of the ratings of these products,” Chairman Cox said. “Just as significantly, conflicts of interest ingrained into the business models of credit rating agencies were amplified as structured products were specifically designed to achieve high ratings for certain tranches and as credit rating agencies sought to gain business and market share by assisting in this process.”

This is the second set of reforms proposed by the SEC since June 2007 when Congress granted the Commision the authority to Register and oversee credit rating agencies. The Credit Rating Reform Act ended nearly a century of self-policing by the credit rating agencies who act as financial gatekeepers determining who can borrow funds and at what cost (interest rate). Some would also say that credit ratings have become a means of assessing a person’s or an organization’s trustworthiness and moral character.

Credit scoring cannot help but provide a moral context for making credit decisions. To be creditworthy is to be trusworthy,” says credit evaluation and financial identity researcher Josh Lauer, assistant professor of communication at the University of New Hampshire. “At a fundamental level, credit evaluation is an effort to determine whether a given person can be trusted.”

According to Chairman Cox, ten credit rating agencies have registered with the SEC since the Act passed in 2007. This represents an increase of 43 percent in the number of nationally recognized statistical rating organizations. Despite the increase in competition, three firms - Fitch Ratings, Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s - continue to dominate the 45 billion-a-year credit rating industry, according to the Associated Press (AP).

The public has 45 days from the date the proposed amendments are published in the Federal Register to submit comments to the SEC. The AP reports that some critics are already sayign the proposed rules do not go far enough while spokespersons for the three major credit rating agencies have already expressed their support for the measures.

A Fact Sheet containing additional details on the proposed rules can be found on the SEC website at www.sec.gov.

Source [blownmortgage]

The selling pressure on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac has been heavy this week after a Barron’s article published on the weekend made the case that both government sponsored entities would require a full fledged bailout.  This was made clear even prior to the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 being signed into law.  […]
Related Posts:
Real Homes of Genius: Two For One in Compton. Southern California Housing Bubble Hangover.
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Paramount. 768 Square Feet for $324,900. Buy, Withdraw, Sell, Foreclose. The Cycle of Life.
World Premier! Real Homes of Genius Video.
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Compton. $90,000 in Los Angeles County?
How Many People Overpaid for Their Home in Los Angeles County? Trying to get a Raw Number of Households Underwater.

The selling pressure on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac has been heavy this week after a Barron’s article published on the weekend made the case that both government sponsored entities would require a full fledged bailout.  This was made clear even prior to the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 being signed into law.  The challenge now becomes if they do go out and sell more stock that current shares will be diluted to a point where the shares become worthless.  Both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are testing multi-decade lows.

Sometimes people forget what these two companies stand for.  Part of their mission is of creating liquidity on the secondary mortgage market.  Yet with a struggling housing market these large institutions have to contend with a faltering portfolio that is seeing more and more losses.  Now it is very likely that current shareholders would be wiped out in the event of a bailout.  The question becomes why would foreign investors purchase bonds or preferred shares in the company if the likelihood of failure is around the corner.  Certainly they will be made whole but not at premium rates.  The well is drying up quickly.

There are a few emerging trends in the housing market.  It is rather clear that housing still remains in a precarious situation.  We are nearing the end of the summer selling season and the boost that was expected unfortunately did not materialize.  Record inventory is still on the market and questionable mortgages such as pay option ARMs still loom on the balance sheets of many lenders.  One of the trends that is emerging is people engaging in housing swaps.  That is, people exchanging homes normally without a broker or agent.  In many cases, it is a barter trade.  Another trend is towards frugality.  Now some would argue that this isn’t a trend more than the economic situation forcing the hand of many to face the grim reality.  Yet there should be little doubt that prudence is making a comeback.  Also, we will examine the hidden housing numbers embedded in the Southern California housing market.  Are we really approaching some sort of market bottom?

Housing Swaps

I happened to stumble upon housing swaps on Craigslist.  For those two of you who haven’t heard of Craigslist, this is one of the most visited sites on the internet with some 20,000,000 visits per month in the United States alone.  You can consider this a dynamic classified section where you can find pets, look for employment, trade cars, get rid of unwanted furniture, and now swap your home with someone else.  Now I’ve used housing swaps when traveling for a temporary living arrangement.  For example, you need a place to stay and you find someone in your desired location who is looking to travel as well, and you come to an agreed upon trade.  Now this I used during college and was amazed at how many people are out there and the ability of technology to shrink the world.

That isn’t the new trend.  But what I am noticing is postings from people looking to permanently swap their place with others.  That is something that is new.  There were the unique postings in the past but now everyday you can find a person looking to trade their home with your home.  Here is an example:

Craigslist

The person above is looking to exchange their Chicago home with a home out here in Burbank either temporarily or permanently.  Now why would someone do a housing swap as opposed to selling their home?  There are actually many good reasons.  First, you may be an area with depressed sales and can’t sell your home.  For many corporate careers, if you are in a junior position you may need to go where the company sends you.  This may translate into you relocating but if you own your home and cannot sell, then you are stuck.  What if you absolutely love your career?  Then most would do anything they can to find a way to move to their new location.

Another reason people would do a housing swap instead of selling is they may be in a negative equity position.  Say you bought a home for $350,000 and the home is now “worth” $250,000.  A large number of people do not (or don’t want to) come to the table with $100,000 simply to sell their home.  There is a large portion of the population that can manage the housing payment but is simply stuck in this position of limbo.  They would like to sell their home but cannot.  There only other option is to ruthlessly default and some are going down this path as well.

Finally, this may workout for people who are on the margins.  If you have say a 4 or 5 percent equity position in your home, it may cost you $10,000 or $30,000 simply to sell your place.  Why not contact someone and save yourself that amount?  You can hire a real estate attorney for a few hours, get the paperwork drawn up and finish the deal.  This may work for cases like the person that needs to relocate and doesn’t really care if they get a profit on their home.  They are simply looking to sell the home.

It’ll be interesting to see if more and more of these cases pop up on Craigslist.

Frugality

There is a definitive emerging trend in frugality.  There is a fountain of wealth with Google.  You can use Google Maps and have access to technology that only a few years ago was accessible by the highest level government officials.  You also have the luxury of searching for information from a variety of sources.  One of the features I enjoy from Google is their Google Trends search feature.  In this, you can see the amount of search queries for any phrase or word.  Since Google dominates the search world, this is an excellent view of what people are searching for at any given time.  Take a look at this search phrase:

Google Trends

As you can see from the above chart, not many people are searching for “real estate investing” anymore which shouldn’t come as a surprise.  Ironically, in times where people should be more financially educated they tend to steer away from this.  They ramp up their investments at the worst time, near a peak, and face rapid problems.  Is it any wonder that California has now seen a drop of 38 percent in one-year for a median priced home?

This trend can also be seen perfectly by comparing two stocks for the year.  That of Family Dollar Stores and Best Buy:

Family Dollar Store

For the year Family Dollar Stores are up 24 percent while Best Buy is down 15 percent.  So what does this mean?  What it means is that people are focusing on things they “need” and avoiding things they “want.”  It is interesting to note that consumer and producer inflation is running at decade highs.  Now why is this?  Clearly housing prices collapsing and credit tightening is wealth destruction so you would think that we would be seeing possibly deflation.  The problem however is items that people need such as food, fuel, and healthcare are not growing exponentially.  These remain fixed while the U.S. Dollar declines and purchases less and less of these items.  In addition, many Wal-Mart goods are produced in China which is facing its own inflation.  The workforce is slowly getting more educated and is demanding slightly higher wages which find their way into the price of the goods that people consume.

With budgets getting tight “want” stores like Best Buy are facing the brunt of the economic contraction.  We saw this with Mervyn’s filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in July.  Another clear example is looking at a low cost food source such as McDonald’s and comparing it to P.F. Chang’s China Bistro:

McDonalds

Over the past year McDonald’s is up 29 percent while P.F. Chang’s is down 27 percent.  Frugality is becoming a way of life because money is tight and this is being reflected in the spending behavior of Americans.

Census Selling

Much to the chagrin of many the housing market won’t see a bottom at least in California until 2011.  There is some positive aspects to this including more affordable housing for many.  It will also lighten the debt load for households in the future.  It may also give people the incentive to purchase homes in areas they plan on staying in and investing their time in creating a better community.

Foreclosures are still at historical highs.  Given the recent housing report for Southern California and the modest jump in sales, I think it is important to look at the actual sales and how they played out in various regions.  Let us first get a population count for the 6 major counties:

Population Count For County:

Los Angeles:               9,948,081

Orange:                       3,002,048

Riverside:                    2,026,803

San Bernardino:          1,999,332

Ventura:                      799,720

San Diego:                  2,941,454

Total Southern California:   20,717,438

So that gives us the entire population count for Southern California.  The total population of California is 36,457,549 so Southern California makes up 56 percent of this amount.  Now let us look at last months sales data:

Southern california housing

Now I made the case in a previous article that the minor bump in sales was in large part by the fire sale of homes in the Inland Empire.  Let us now break down the numbers to get an actual proportion:

Riverside + San Bernardino Total July Sales =  6,637 / (20,329 total SoCal Sold)

So these two counties made up 32.6 percent of all sales for Southern California.  Now we should look at what percent these counties make up for the Southern California population:

Riverside + San Bernardino Population = 4,026,135 / (SoCal total 20,717,438)

Total population percentage for these two counties is 19.4 percent.  So essentially these two counties are selling at twice the percent of their population representation.  I was listening on the radio to someone explain the median price drop and cautioning that sales are getting skewed because “expensive” homes aren’t selling and only foreclosures and lower priced homes are selling.  This in fact is true.  The only thing I would caution these folks about is that distress sales are now the bulk of the market even though miraculously in some of the data, foreclosures don’t pop up in multiple listing services.

These new trends are simply a way people are coping with the economic conditions.  It is very unlikely we will be seeing a second half recovery especially for housing.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information

Post from: Dr. Housing Bubble Blog

Emerging Economic Trends: Housing Swaps, Frugality, and Selling Homes in Lower Priced Areas.

Related Posts:
Real Homes of Genius: Two For One in Compton. Southern California Housing Bubble Hangover.
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Paramount. 768 Square Feet for $324,900. Buy, Withdraw, Sell, Foreclose. The Cycle of Life.
World Premier! Real Homes of Genius Video.
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Compton. $90,000 in Los Angeles County?
How Many People Overpaid for Their Home in Los Angeles County? Trying to get a Raw Number of Households Underwater.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Filed under: Microsoft (MSFT), Yahoo! (YHOO), News Corp’B’ (NWS)

Does any legitimate candidate want the job of running Yahoo! (NASDAQ:YHOO)? It seems not. According to The Wall Street Journal one of the top candidates is the former CEO of cellular carrier Vodafone (NYSE:VOD) Arun Sarin.

While the search engines and portal companies are trying to move their products to wireless platforms. Sarin has no significant experience in the technology behind search, the content issues of building a portal like Yahoo!, or getting marketers to put more advertising on the company’s sites.

If Sarin is the final choice it will be an indication that no important media or internet executive was willing to take the job. There are already rumors that the COO of News Corp. (NYSE:NWS) Peter Chernin, turned down the chance to interview for the position.

One of the problems with getting a new chief is that no one know what will happen to Yahoo!’s search business. Will it be bought by Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT)? There is also the open issue of whether Yahoo! will merge with AOL and who will ultimately run that company.

In other words, no sane person wants the job.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 24/7 Wall St.

Yahoo! (YHOO) CEO search gets out of hand originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 09 Dec 2008 03:47:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Close
E-mail It