Archive for December 10th, 2008

A great graph by EconomPicData shows just how much of the cash dolled out by Hank Paulson will actually remain in the system.  The bottom line?  From the $125 billion handed out to-date to the largest 9 banking institutions a mere $17 billion will go towards recapitalizing the system.  The rest?  Yup - bonuses and compensation.

My head just exploded.

From EconomPicData via Alternet:

It turns out that the nine banks about to be getting a total equity capital injection of $125 billion, courtesy of Phase I of The Bailout Plan, had reserved $108 billion during the first nine months of 2008 in order to pay for compensation and bonuses.

Source [blownmortgage]

Another guest post from MG Dungan who went from Wharton to Wall St. to real estate to Blown Mortgage.

Now here’s a lagging indicator for you: at least a year after the fact, the recession is now known to have began in December 2007. A depression comes next, but since there has been only one in the US, there isn’t a generally-accepted definition. So, get out your calculators and old economic textbooks and get ready for a few years of debate.

Employment as a Metric

During the Depression, unemployment was officially 25% and wages (for those who still had jobs) fell 42%.

“In studying the Great Depression, some scholars “mis-measure” employment levels by disregarding jobs the government created by the mid-1930s to spark a recovery. This suggests that for them, a ‘depression’ is a period when the private sector contracts and is unresponsive to fiscal stimulus, irrespective of how activist and effective the public sector may be,” according to James Galbraith, an economist at UT’s LBJ School of Public Affairs. That seems to be where we are right now. Something else not taken into account is the quality of those surviving jobs. Hours, then days were cut to the point where a job could be one day a week per employee, with no benefits, of course.

“Given how deeply poisoned the financial wells are, it’s distinctly possible that even a large fiscal stimulus will not reignite a credit-driven expansion, so that the public sector will have to take the economic lead for three to five years or longer,” Galbraith said. I think that’s a given at this point; Obama seems to think so too.

Employment 2008

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the unemployment rate is 6.7% if you count some of the people. It’s 12.5% if you count more of them. If you were able to count all the unemployed, it would undoubtedly be a lot, a real lot, more than 12.5%.

Measures of Economic Activity

GDP

Another frequently used benchmark to determine economic health or the lack of it is gross domestic product (GDP), the most common measure of a country’s overall economic output. At the depth of the depression, total US economic output fell to $55 billion from $103 billion and world trade plummeted 65% measured in US$. Now, a GDP decline of 10% is sometimes cited as the key marker of a depression, albeit a lagging indicator.

Global Output

The Baltic Dry Index (BDI) is one of the best leading indicators of future economic activity since it measures global raw material and infrastructure demand; it’s a fav of ours too. December’s result (shown below) is also a reflection of the lack of availability of financing for international trade, usually Letters of Credit between banks. When you hear that credit has dried up, at serious issue is a lot more than credit cards and HELOCs.

Get a load of the cliff dive the BDI has taken over the last few months and the lack of a dead-cat bounce since November. Raw materials are not being delivered and finished goods are not being produced.

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Major movement, Earnings reports, Bad news, Industry, Options, Technical Analysis

TXRH logoTexas Roadhouse (NASDAQ: TXRH - option chain) shares are dropping today after the company reported a third-quarter profit of $8.6 million, or 12 cents per share, missing analysts’ estimates of 13 cents per share. TXRH also warned that earnings for 2008 will be flat with last year’s numbers.

It has been common wisdom that worried consumers won’t be spending their cash on casual dining until they feel more confident about the economy, and the flat full-year forecast from TXRH seems to add weight to that thesis. If you think this stock won’t be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on TXRH.

This morning, TXRH opened at $6.91. So far today the stock has hit a low of $6.23 and a high of $6.96. As of 12:20, TXRH is trading at $6.21, down $0.93 (-13.0%). The chart for TXRH looks bearish and S&P gives TXRH its lowest 1 STARS (out of 5) strong sell ranking.

For a bearish hedged play on this stock, I would consider a December bear-call credit spread above the $7.50 range.

Continue reading Texas Roadhouse (TXRH) Q3 earnings show consumers staying away

BloggingStocksTexas Roadhouse (TXRH) Q3 earnings show consumers staying away originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:52:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Management, Industry, Consumer experience, Rants and raves, Apple Inc (AAPL), Ford Motor (F), General Motors (GM), Marketing and advertising, NIKE, Inc’B’ (NKE), Recession

The case of the American car manufacturers being brought to their knees by the housing bubble, sub-prime lending and derivatives developed on Wall Street has been in the press for most of the year. If you believe that these issues are the primary cause of this almost imminent collapse of the industry you must be running one of them.

The truth is that General Motors (NYSE: GM), Ford (NYSE: F) and privately held Chrysler are led by bloated egos, with cars being built by bloated unions that are now begging to be saved by a bloated government. Except for the fact that the federal government can print money at will, it would have declared bankruptcy a long time ago itself.

Another difference between the bloated companies and their unions in comparison to the government is that the companies and unions could only lie and fool themselves for so long — the government has proven that it can do it forever; and it is in this that it displays its greatest creativity.

It looks like a bailout is on its way from Congress but this may only be putting a terminal patient on life support. I have great concerns that the U.S car industry will go bankrupt next year or soon after the government stops propping it up with a cash infusion. Or perhaps, as some have suggested, it may morph into a single entity, through bankruptcy or otherwise.

Continue reading Auto industry bailout: A bloated government to lead a bloated industry

Auto industry bailout: A bloated government to lead a bloated industry originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 09 Dec 2008 12:28:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Mighty kings rise and fall like the sun.  Southern California decided to take an ancient recipe from the books of history and followed in this time honored path.  Except our king came riding in on a pair of 24 inch spinning rims in a Cadillac Escalade.  The only problem is all of it was mortgaged […]
Related Posts:
Foreclosures? Housing Bubble? In Southern California? Impossible!
Short Sale Report Volume 3: Another Week and Another Record. SoCal Short Sales up over 12,000.
Think Housing Can’t Go Down Significantly in Southern California?
Southern California Housing Report: New Housing Motto: Foreclosure Data is so Bad, it has to be Good! Median Price Down 31% to $348,000.
Foreclosures jump statewide by 40% in California in just one quarter! Welcome to California’s Gold!

Mighty kings rise and fall like the sun.  Southern California decided to take an ancient recipe from the books of history and followed in this time honored path.  Except our king came riding in on a pair of 24 inch spinning rims in a Cadillac Escalade.  The only problem is all of it was mortgaged on a kingdom of sand that is now quickly eroding.  For anyone in Southern California the minor consolation we can take is that this will go down in the history books of financial exuberance like those who lived through the Dutch tulip mania in 1637.  Tulip contracts were selling at 20 times the annual income of a skilled craftsman.  Remember the story about a farm worker who made $14,000 a year and was able to buy a $720,000 home back in May of 2007?  Why stop at a 20 ratio when we can go over 50 times?

Now this is the story of glamour and glitz.  The rise and fall of a housing market in a few short years.  In today’s article I am going to use graphs and data to try to examine the Southern California housing market.  I have been covering the housing market since 2006 in the heat of the insanity and the psychology now is incredibly different.  Prices declining by 40 percent in one year will do that to you.

Southern California according to DataQuick reached a peak median price of $505,000 in July of 2007.  Since that time, the median price has fallen to $300,000.  Keep in mind the median household income for Southern California is under $50,000.  So at the peak, it would take the median household income 10 times their annual earnings to purchase a home in the region.  20 times for a tulip contract, 10 times for a glorious shack.  We will now have our place in the history of magnificent bubbles right their next to the tulip bulb mania from 371 years ago.

So let us get to work since we have a lot to cover.  First, I have compiled a chart showing the median prices for each county in Southern California since the start of the decade.  I have yet to see a chart break out the counties individually like this so the chart should provide a fresh perspective of the data:

SoCal median home prices

(Click for a sharper image)

As you can see from the chart, the pace of growth for the entire region was uniform up until the summer of 2007.  Like a plateau, we hit a steady pricing trend from 2006 to 2007 before falling off the cliff.  The dotted yellow line is the aggregate of all counties in Southern California.  Many counties are now back to 2003 price levels without adjusting for inflation.  Given the last few months of data, we are looking at least in the short term to heavy and strong deflation in practically every investment vehicle on the market.  What this means is price drops are even worse than they look.

What else can we learn from the chart?  Without prejudice every region rose at nearly the same pace.  This is the stunning thing to notice when you break the data out.  Every upward county trend in the chart above shows a similar movement upward.  It didn’t matter whether it was Orange County or San Bernardino, the bubble took hold of each county.  The actual nominal price peaks for Orange County and Ventura are simply stunning.

The next chart should sum up nearly an entire decade of housing mania for the region.  I’ve put together a chart showing the median price for Southern California and the monthly sales for the region:

SoCal sales vs median home price

A couple of things I want to highlight first.  You will notice that for sales, there is always a seasonal drop in the winter and peak in the summer.  That is typical.  It goes up and goes down based on common real estate sales patterns.  Why?  Many people move during the summer season and most people buy homes during their “family forming” years so pulling a kid out of school isn’t the smartest move.  In addition, many people buy homes who are planning on having a family so in general it causes an upsurge during this time.

What you’ll notice that since 2000, the troughs were higher during the winter and the peaks were stronger in the summer all the way until 2006.  That is the first time the summer bounce wasn’t as strong as it once was in the heat of the bubble.  It is also the time when you see the median price plateau.  Once this happened, it took about one year for the entire market to collapse and as you can see above, both prices and sales fell off a cliff.

So why are sales now moving up?  Simple.  Prices have gotten cheaper.  Drastically cheaper.  Even with the amazing upsurge in sales, you can see that we are still very far behind the curve from the bubble days.  Keep in mind we are now entering the typical slow season of winter so it will be interesting to see what happens here.  I maintain that housing prices for Southern California will not bottom out until 2011.  Now sure, we may hit a bottom in price in 2009 or 2010 but that price will probably be the same in 2011.  The problem with finding the bottom is you won’t know until maybe one year has passed.  But when bubbles burst, especially one this size that has caused so much financial trauma, we will be swimming in scuba gear near the bottom for a few years.

Most kings have a sense when they are facing trouble.  In most cases, a king won’t look out his castle’s window and see thousands of angry peasants with pitchforks and say, “wow, I didn’t see that coming!”  We have many early warning signs.  One thing that is simply laughable from the mainstream media is when they say, “no one can possibly have seen this coming.”  Well many economists, bloggers, and some politicians saw this coming so there goes that “no” one argument.  In many cases, that is why many media outlets are slashing and burning staff because how can they claim to be credible when many independent sources have done the research they didn’t and have issued many siren calls in the past?  Many readers are smart enough to see who is credible and who is simply playing catch up.  Why pay a writer a high six figure salary when a blogger knowledgeable in the subject is already writing about it?

What was one thing that was missed that approached like an angry mob screaming and chanting?  Notice of defaults and foreclosures:

socal notice of defaults and foreclosures

Take a look at the chart above very carefully.  You notice that tiny red sliver of foreclosures in Q2 of 2006?  That was the wake up call.  These foreclosures were probably the most egregious fraud cases because look at the peak prices above.  Practically anyone could sell a home at peak price with little work.  After this point in 2006, a trend was noticeably appearing.  No one saw this coming?  Maybe they didn’t but many who actually understand these trends tried to echo a warning but bubbles are hard to burst.  It is like the party with no parent and the punchbowl needs to be taken away because people are way too drunk.  Who will be the one to end the fun?  You would hope that regulators such as the Fed or our government would have something to say but instead, we have Alan Greenspan saying how fantastic adjustable rate mortgages are!  So that has already passed.  Yet the problem is they are still doing the same mistake!  How so?  For example, during these last few upsurges in sale they made it appear that it was somehow a gigantic jump.  No, if you pulled data back from 2000 where the bubble started, you would quickly see the “upsurge” was simply a trend back to normalcy.

You’ll notice with the above chart that as time went on, many of the notice of defaults (NODs) started going into foreclosures.  This is significant.  If you look at say Q1 of 2005 we have nearly 17,025 (NODs) but practically no foreclosures.  Why?  Anyone in trouble can just sell their home.  Simple.  Not the case anymore.  You may be wondering why NODs suddenly fell off in Q3.  This as I have stated is because of SB 1137 which is simply a dull legislation requiring lenders to kick the can down the road a few more months.  It basically tells lenders, “hey you.  Contact the borrower and tell them what’s up.  Now go forth and collect.”  Yet how are you going to squeeze cash out of a cash strapped California homeowner?  That is why each subsequent bailout gets dumber and dumber on an exponential scale because consumers simply are financially strapped.

Another key chart to look at is the median price versus the California unemployment rate:

California unemployment rate

What you’ll notice almost perfectly is the unemployment rate dropping sharply right at the peak of the bubble.  Right when the bubble burst, you see unemployment rising sharply.  So what came first, high unemployment or the peak price?  No need for a chicken or egg debate but let us point out the obvious.  First, you’ll notice that once the plateau of peak prices was reached it stayed high into 2007.  Unemployment started creeping up in 2006.  Why?  Well many builders were getting out of dodge while the going was good while many people were still pretending they lived in Wonderland hoping a borrower would jump into the rabbit hole and pay their outrageous price.

This above chart is crucial since the trend is almost perfect now.  That is, higher unemployment will lead to lower prices.  That is normally how housing markets play out during tough times.  This case is unique in that California built an industry around this bubble with construction, finance, home building, equity withdrawals, and industries that catered to the housing bubble.  Now that the bubble is gone there isn’t enough other jobs in the non-bubble economy to absorb these people back.  That is why I just don’t see how California gets out of this bubble until 2011.  Maybe nationwide we may see a price bottom in 2009 or 2010 but certainly not for us.

The above charts paint a rather clear picture of the longer term trend.  But how are things today?  Well let us look at the current market snapshot:

california distress properties

This next chart has data from September of 2007.  You’ll notice an upsurge in July of 2008 but you should ignore that because I added San Diego county distress sales at this point.  However, the trend is unmistakable.  Inventory is falling and distress sales are rising.  The only reason you have seen then taper off recently again is because of the legislation.  But even then, you can see how tiny this is even when it is simply pushing problems 1 or 2 quarters away.

This chart also shows that psychologically those that do not need to sell are pulling their homes off the market.  Why in world would you sell right now?  This is a horrid market.  Yet, waiting until a few months down the road you may actually lose even more.  Think of it this way.  The chart with price above shows massive gains since 2000.  That is across all counties.  A high percentage of people that own bought before this time so they would still make a profit today.  Now you have people willing to wait hoping next summer the bubble makes a triumphant return.  Or you can sell now.  This chart above tells you one major thing.  Many think they’ll be able to get higher prices tomorrow.  Yet distress properties keep hitting the market because these are forced sales.

I hope the above gives you a deep perspective of Southern California and hopefully provides you some insight in where we are heading.  We haven’t seen this kind of economic turmoil since the Great Depression so it is hard to say when we will bottom out.  Yet one thing is certain and that is we are going to go down in the history books for generations to come right next to those beautiful tulip bulbs.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information.

Post from: Dr. Housing Bubble Blog

The Rise and Fall of the Southern California Housing Empire: Foreclosures, Bad Investments, and Psychological Deception.

Related Posts:
Foreclosures? Housing Bubble? In Southern California? Impossible!
Short Sale Report Volume 3: Another Week and Another Record. SoCal Short Sales up over 12,000.
Think Housing Can’t Go Down Significantly in Southern California?
Southern California Housing Report: New Housing Motto: Foreclosure Data is so Bad, it has to be Good! Median Price Down 31% to $348,000.
Foreclosures jump statewide by 40% in California in just one quarter! Welcome to California’s Gold!

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Filed under: Industry, Oil

I have been posting so much bad news over the last couple of years that I thought it would be interesting to try something different for a change: look for something that’s truly good. If I can find it, I’ll tell you what the good news is, why it’s important, and what it means for the rest of the world.

The price of oil peaked at $147 a barrel in July but now it’s $43.46 — a 70% decline. This is good for the airline industry because jet fuel is one of its biggest costs. Now the International Air Transport Association (IATA) estimates that if in 2009 the price of oil averages $60 a barrel, the airline industry’s loss will be $2.5 billion for the year. That may sound like a lot, but in 2008, the IATA estimated the industry will lose $5 billion.

Unfortunately, the industry is suffering from a decline in passenger traffic due to the economic crunch. The IATA estimates a 3% decline in international traffic. Interestingly, the U.S. carriers have also benefited from an 18% strengthening in the dollar and they’ve cut back on flight capacity so they could raise prices. Passengers could benefit; however, if the airlines decide to try to fill up their planes by cutting prices to reflect their lower jet fuel costs.

That would be great news for the public and the higher revenues might also reduce airline losses.

Peter Cohan is President of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College and edits The Cohan Letter.

Good News Watch: Lower jet fuel prices to slash airline losses originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 09 Dec 2008 12:12:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Newsletters, New York Times’A’ (NYT), Stocks to Sell

I guess I’m a bit old school, but I like the idea of walking to my mailbox to get my newspaper. I even like the feel of the ink that bleeds onto my fingers, but I recognize that I’m a bit unique.

Too unique, actually, and that is a problem for the newspaper business.

Yesterday, we learned that the old Tribune Company, privately owned by billionaire Sam Zell, is filing for protection under bankruptcy law. The company is drowning in a sea of debt and trying frantically to sell assets in order to raise cash.

It is obvious to management that subscriptions and advertising revenue will not be enough to pay off debt. The company will need to work with creditors on delaying principle and interest payments while it raises cash.

With the advent of the Internet and explosion of cable news networks, little old print media is going the way of the buggy whip.

Across the newspaper business, circulations have been falling for many moons and advertising dollars are taking their business elsewhere. Losses have been piling up, making it difficult to pay down debt used to consolidate the industry.

It’s a complete mess.

Continue reading Tribune files for bankruptcy, could New York Times be next?

Tribune files for bankruptcy, could New York Times be next? originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 09 Dec 2008 17:50:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Close
E-mail It