Archive for December 12th, 2008

We are in a process of financial de-evolution.  I’m not sure what Darwin would call this but each subsequent day without missing a beat produces another more progressively disastrous “idea” to save the market.  I am cautious about calling what we are seeing as ideas since it is better to define it as flushing money […]
Related Posts:
The Rise and Fall of the Southern California Housing Empire: Foreclosures, Bad Investments, and Psychological Deception.
A Trip down the Housing Graveyard: The Casualties of the Housing Bear Market.
There will be Housing: How we’ve Returned to Selective Market Ignorance.
Economic Recipe for Financial Success in 3 Steps: Get too big to Fail, Lose as much Money as Humanly Possible, go on Government Corporate Welfare. 3 Big Economic Stories: Treasury not saying who borrowed $2 trillion, Circuit City files for Bankruptcy, and AIG getting bailed out again.
Are You a Bitter Bubblehead Renter? The Evolution of Housing Psychology.

We are in a process of financial de-evolution.  I’m not sure what Darwin would call this but each subsequent day without missing a beat produces another more progressively disastrous “idea” to save the market.  I am cautious about calling what we are seeing as ideas since it is better to define it as flushing money down the toilet which would be a better characterization of what the Fed and U.S. Treasury are doing to our country.

The genius crony capitalist now think it would be a magnificent idea to get mortgage rates to 4.5%.  Now why would the Treasury want to do this?  Well according to the Wall Street Journal:

“(WSJ)  Treasury views this plan as potentially halting the slide in home prices by enabling borrowers to afford bigger mortgages, thus increasing demand for homes and pushing up home values.”

Bwahahahaha!  The solution to the problem according to these bandits is to go back to the genesis of what caused this housing bubble.  That is, people taking on bigger mortgages and home prices getting too high was the freaking problem!  These are the people running our country.  In fact, dropping home prices are proving in certain areas to actually increase sales.  I’m going to show you a chart for Southern California that may boggle your mind.  See, as prices dropped sales actually increased:

Southern California Real Estate

I know this is a shock to the MENSA members running our country into the ground but prices being too high is [was] the problem.  So why would you want to institute a policy that would artificially keep prices high?  And since these guys don’t think two steps ahead, this problem is doomed to fail.  Why?  Well interest rates eventually will be set by market forces.  Mortgage rates are already at historical lows.  So let us take a look at a poor sap that buys a home with a 4.5% 30 year fixed rate.  In a few years when we have to face the repercussions of the squandering of our entire wealth in pathetic bailouts, rates will undoubtedly be higher since we are going to need to attract more capital to the U.S. since we are flat broke.  So in the future, let us say rates go back to 6.5% the price of the home will need to reflect that.  We are essentially screwing people once again and kicking the can down the road.  This is patently insane.  Let us examine a $300,000 home purchase at 4.5% with 20% down:

Down payment:                       $60,000

$240,000 mortgage at 4.5%:    PI  =  $1,216

four percent

Not bad.  But what if rates go back to 6.5% in a few years when this person wants to sell the home?  How much would a person be able to afford if they want a similar monthly payment?

$193,000 mortgage at 6.5%:    PI  = $1,219

six percent mortgage rate

You have lost an extraordinary amount of purchasing power here.  The purchase price would now have to be around $241,000 if we are trying to maintain a similar monthly payment.  Remember the original purchase price is $300,000.  Do we really need to go through this exercise again when we just went through the pay Option ARM and subprime debacle that clearly screwed people over with a teaser rate?  Do we really think housing is going to appreciate that much in the next few years?  I doubt it.  Look at Japan and you’ll get a glimpse into our future.  Trying to institute these low rates is simply unbelievable but like I said, the ideas get dumber as we go along so next year they may be giving free mortgages with your next GM car purchase.  Who really understands what the cronies are brewing in their ministry of bad ideas.

People are running to safety right now with 3 month treasuries coming in at 0.005%.  Bwahahaha!  We’ve become a big gigantic mattress for the world.  Banks are flat out sticking their money here and holding on to their pants for dear life.  Remember when the money was given to them for lending to the public?  Never happened.  Why don’t we go back and yank that capital out of their corrupt hands and use that to fund infrastructure projects and everything else we’ll be launching next year.  If they aren’t going to lend it, might as well use it for something that will benefit the country.  I have always been adamant against any bailouts but allowing these banks to maintain this capital was a big freaking joke.  We’ve just been ripped off by Wall Street and the bankers.  How long are we going to allow this to go on?

In fact, I know the big spectacle today was with the big 3 automakers.  Regular readers know I have as much sympathy for them as I did for Paris Hilton spending a few days in county jail.  Yet I can’t believe the rage some Americans have at auto workers when the true crime is being perpetrated by Wall Street banks and our own Fed and U.S. Treasury.  Think about the ridiculous $306 billion back stop that was given to Citigroup on a Sunday night only a few days ago.  Did we see the CEO being forced to ride in on a mule to explain to us how they would manage the money?  What about AIG and their extravagant parties?  How about all those capital injections from the TARP into the largest banks?  Last time I checked, I didn’t see anywhere in the bill that stated, “money should be parked in short term notes while country implodes.”  It is our money folks.  We have a right to have it back if we are not satisfied in how it is being managed.  Do you think any of these people are following the laws?  They are the people who write the law!  Thomas Jefferson is rolling over in his grave:

“If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation then by deflation, the banks and the corporations will grow up around them, will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.”

If this foreclosure crisis doesn’t make you feel like we are quickly losing our national home, I’m not sure what will wake you up.

Layoffs Get Worse    

The employment situation is getting worse.  We are finally starting to look at the employment side of the equation but I’m afraid it is too late.  Too much money has been squandered and unless we are going to go and retrieve it out of Wall Street’s hands, we are going to be limited to the amount we will be able to spend since so much has been committed by the ministry of bad ideas.  Today, these were some of the announcements:

Du Pont:  Looking to dismiss 6,500 employees

AT&T:  Cutting their work force by 12,000 jobs

State Street Corporation:   Cutting 1,700 jobs

This doesn’t even include the 50,000 jobs from Citigroup or the 19,000 from JP Morgan or even the job cuts that will come from the big 3 no matter what happens.  Bailout or bankruptcy a lot of jobs will be gone.  That is a certainty.

State budgets aren’t exactly swimming in the green either.  Earlier this week I went into great detail regarding the dire situation in California and the group of incompetent boobs running the state.  Many states are in a similar situation with their own set of circus clowns.  The jobs report set to be released tomorrow will once again show much more damage.

Until people realize that this is about the lower and middle class of America getting fleeced over by Wall Street and puppet politicians, we are going to continue to see poorly planned bailouts that reflect the interests of a very small number of our population.  Do you realize that in our country, only 10% of all households make more than $118,200 a year?  In places like California and New York that doesn’t go too far.  The most recent Census data tells us that there are about 110,000,000 households in the U.S.  So let us breakdown the raw numbers:

income

And this data is one or two years old from the Census Bureau so given the economic collapse, I would imagine that the numbers would still be accurate or even show lower numbers in many categories.  So when these banks talk about the people, they’re probably talking about 100,000 households in a nation with 110,000,000 households.

Frugality Revisited

The unfortunate aftermath of decades of massive consumerism is that now many people conditioned on believing they are what they buy will have to come to terms with not buying as much.  This is going to be a shock for most.  We are so conditioned that things always get better as time goes on especially when it comes to finance that it is hard to believe that the current players have just set us back a decade or two.

The notion that today’s car is better than one that came out last year because it has a $50 plastic iPod slot is absurd because it will cost you $5,000 more.  Doesn’t make sense.  But if the core of a society is simply consuming blindly then anyone that doesn’t consume is usually at the fringes.  Here in California, I know many of the readers from this state even though they had solid incomes and were prudent, probably felt like paupers in their groups because practically everyone around them were buying bigger homes and driving around in leased cars.  Yet it was never really wealth.  Yet the mind is hard to convince when you see everyone flocking together as a herd.

Frugality is coming whether we want it or not.  During the Great Depression, there were many people pining for the heyday of the Roaring 20s but it never came back.  It couldn’t.  It was one gigantic bubble just like the one we’ve lived through.  All these bailouts and the gimmick of lowering rates to 4.5% keep on grasping at this notion that we somehow aren’t a poorer nation.  We are.  We can try denying this but the sooner we come to terms the quicker we can get to being productive.  Yet so much of the money is being funneled into unproductive activities like propping up banks that should fail.  Fail as in right now.  Otherwise, we are going to have a lost decade like Japan where capital is diverted from productive activities to keeping pathetic banks on life support.

Think of wealth this way.  Why did gold cost $35 an ounce during the Great Depression and now is going for $765 an ounce?  Did it somehow become 21 times more valuable?  Well gold is actually tangible and has a fixed amount.  With a fiat currency our central bank can print as much as they like or create all these absurd facilities to channel the wealth to their own self serving interests.  Yet that is the problem.  Too much power is concentrated in a few hands.  This is the end effect.  There is nothing holding us back from printing or bailing out anything and everything.  Isn’t it funny that we haven’t heard someone say, “well you know what, we only have about $1 trillion more left for bailouts.”  They’ll never say that because theoretically they have nothing keeping them in check.  They can print but our U.S. Dollar is being under siege by the people who we put into power to protect it.  Don’t listen to their words.  Every action they are taking is to lower the dollar value to hopefully help us with our enormous debt.  Debt that is going to their crony Wall Street and central bank friends.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information.

Post from: Dr. Housing Bubble Blog

SIIV - Super Ignorant Investment Vehicle: The Evolution of Progressively Dumber and Dumber Bailouts. 3 Emerging Trends: Bailouts getting costlier and dumber, layoffs accelerating, and embracing frugality.

Related Posts:
The Rise and Fall of the Southern California Housing Empire: Foreclosures, Bad Investments, and Psychological Deception.
A Trip down the Housing Graveyard: The Casualties of the Housing Bear Market.
There will be Housing: How we’ve Returned to Selective Market Ignorance.
Economic Recipe for Financial Success in 3 Steps: Get too big to Fail, Lose as much Money as Humanly Possible, go on Government Corporate Welfare. 3 Big Economic Stories: Treasury not saying who borrowed $2 trillion, Circuit City files for Bankruptcy, and AIG getting bailed out again.
Are You a Bitter Bubblehead Renter? The Evolution of Housing Psychology.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Filed under: Rants and raves, General Electric (GE), Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A), Goldman Sachs Group (GS), Chasing Value, Best Stocks for 2008

It was only seven weeks ago that I posted Chasing Value: Considering Berkshire Hathaway… again. At the time, Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.B) was trading around $3,850 for the “B” shares.

Well, I think the time for consideration is over and this morning I placed a limit order for the stock. I think the time is right when stories like Berkshire Hathaway at Lowest Close Since Feb. 2007 and my colleague Peter Cohan’s Warren Buffett is not perfect are being trumpeted in the media.

For those who have followed “my pal Warren” Buffett for years, or even decades, these cautionary stories of him losing his edge are as silly as trying to predict where the DJIA will be on a given date. As for Peter suggesting that he was early buying into Goldman Sachs Group (NYSE: GS) or General Electric (NYSE: GE) three weeks ago, well my gosh, it has only been three weeks!

I understand that the prevailing wisdom seems to be running against the buy and hold approach. But three weeks is kind of short to be passing judgment, don’t you think? The DJIA is down 42% while Berkshire is only down 31% from its high of $5059.

Perhaps investors have punished the stock because GS and GE are down. Maybe it is because Berkshire has been buying up railroads and that strategy is less important with oil prices falling 55% since the summer high of $147 a barrel. It could also be because people have lost their minds — who knows?

Continue reading Chasing Value: Berkshire - you’re selling, I’m buying!

BloggingStocksChasing Value: Berkshire - you’re selling, I’m buying! originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:10:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Good news, Employees, Boeing Co (BA)

After a 52-day strike, Boeing Co. (NYSE: BA) has reached a tentative deal with its 27,000 member machinists union. Tentative details suggest that workers will get a 15% wage increase over three years, an $8,000 bonus over four years, and a freeze of medical costs at 2005 levels. Furthermore, the new contract limits the amount of work that can be outsourced and will last a year longer than the previous pact. But even though the contract has not been ratified, this is good news for Boeing and its workers.

Limiting outsourcing could be good for Boeing and the workers depending on how it’s accomplished. One of the reasons for the delay in delivering its very popular 787 aircraft was that Boeing outsourced the majority of the design and manufacture of the components and later discovered that it was not doing enough to manage those subcontractors. As a result, Boeing suffered unpleasant surprises in its delivery schedule.

If Boeing and its machinists agreed to give the union a chance to bid on work under consideration to be outsourced, then both parties might be better off. That’s because if the union offered a competitive price and excellent quality, Boeing would likely find it easier to manage its union workers than those of a subcontractor located half way around the world.

Continue reading Boeing reaches deal with machinists. Is its engineering union next?

BloggingStocksBoeing reaches deal with machinists. Is its engineering union next? originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:10:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

A guest post from Constantine von Hoffman, veteran business journalist and author of the blog CollateralDamage.biz, a satirical look at marketing and business.

John Dugan, head of the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, said yesterday that nearly 36 percent of borrowers who received restructured mortgages re-defaulted within three months. That rate jumped to nearly 53 percent after six months and 58 percent after eight months.

This report poses significant challenges for backers of the FDIC’s plan to renegotiate/modify some mortgages as a way to stem the foreclosure tsunami. To qualify for the FDIC plan, borrowers would need to make six consecutive payments. This is to avoid the problem of early-payment defaults (EPD occurs when borrowers loans miss a payment during the first few months of their origination). The FDIC payment requirement clearly requires borrowers to show some solvency. But the 58 percent re-default rate after eight months clearly needs to be addressed before theFDIC plan can be given much credence.

“Industry evidence indicates that in a majority of instances loan modifications simply delay the timeline from default to foreclosure but don’t prevent them from taking place,” Nathaniel Otis and William Clark, analysts at KBW, wrote in a note to investors on Tuesday.

It is also worth noting that while delinquencies continue to rise for subprime, alt-A and prime mortgages, Dugan said the greatest delinquencies were in prime mortgages.

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Books, Oil

Memo to T. Boone Pickens: before you write another book about the art of the comeback, make sure your comeback is complete and that your career is on stable ground.

On September 2, Pcikens’ book The First Billion Is the Hardest: Reflections on a Life of Comebacks and America’s Energy Future hit the stores. Now he’s in need of another comeback as a huge pullback in energy prices and investor withdrawals have sent the value of Pickens’ hedge fund assets down to less than $500 million. When his fund peaked in June, he was managing $2 billion.

With the market in the toilet and investors fleeing for the exits, Pickens has reportedly moved the fund almost entirely into cash — perhaps a sign that he has abandoned his long-term bullish outlook on oil prices.

However, Pickens’ contributions to America now go beyond wealth-building. While he initially made his name as a Carl Icahn-style corporate raider back in the 1980s, he’s moved on to finding solutions to our dependence on foreign oil. The Pickens Plan has garnered the support of the Sierra Club, former Clinton Chief of Staff John Podesta, and even Senator Barack Obama — an impressive feat given that Pickens is an ardent Republican.

And he’s not out money yet. Apparently he just gave $63 million to Oklahoma State to pay for a football stadium.

BloggingStocksT. Boone Pickens faces investor withdrawals originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:32:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Books, Oil

Memo to T. Boone Pickens: before you write another book about the art of the comeback, make sure your comeback is complete and that your career is on stable ground.

On September 2, Pcikens’ book The First Billion Is the Hardest: Reflections on a Life of Comebacks and America’s Energy Future hit the stores. Now he’s in need of another comeback as a huge pullback in energy prices and investor withdrawals have sent the value of Pickens’ hedge fund assets down to less than $500 million. When his fund peaked in June, he was managing $2 billion.

With the market in the toilet and investors fleeing for the exits, Pickens has reportedly moved the fund almost entirely into cash — perhaps a sign that he has abandoned his long-term bullish outlook on oil prices.

However, Pickens’ contributions to America now go beyond wealth-building. While he initially made his name as a Carl Icahn-style corporate raider back in the 1980s, he’s moved on to finding solutions to our dependence on foreign oil. The Pickens Plan has garnered the support of the Sierra Club, former Clinton Chief of Staff John Podesta, and even Senator Barack Obama — an impressive feat given that Pickens is an ardent Republican.

And he’s not out money yet. Apparently he just gave $63 million to Oklahoma State to pay for a football stadium.

BloggingStocksT. Boone Pickens faces investor withdrawals originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:32:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is getting tough on credit rating agencies. A series of measures announced on Wednesday, December 3, would impose additional requirements on the credit reporting agencies in an effort to increase transparency and accountability. Consumers, investors and lenders may even end up getting more meaningful ratings.

These comprehensive rules touch every aspect of the credit rating process - from conflicts of interest, to publication of ratings methodologies to disclosure of ratings track records,” explains SEC Chariman Christopher Cox.

The proposed rules are the result of an extensive examination of the three major credit ratings agencies recently concluded by the SEC. The examination, which lasted 10 months, revealed significant weaknesses in ratings practices.

“One of the significant weaknesses in the credit rating process has been that while the credit rating agencies often relied on other to verify the quality of assets underlying structured products - and thus their ratings were vulnerable to reliance on incorrect information - there was frequently inadequate explanation of the limitations of the ratings of these products,” Chairman Cox said. “Just as significantly, conflicts of interest ingrained into the business models of credit rating agencies were amplified as structured products were specifically designed to achieve high ratings for certain tranches and as credit rating agencies sought to gain business and market share by assisting in this process.”

This is the second set of reforms proposed by the SEC since June 2007 when Congress granted the Commision the authority to Register and oversee credit rating agencies. The Credit Rating Reform Act ended nearly a century of self-policing by the credit rating agencies who act as financial gatekeepers determining who can borrow funds and at what cost (interest rate). Some would also say that credit ratings have become a means of assessing a person’s or an organization’s trustworthiness and moral character.

Credit scoring cannot help but provide a moral context for making credit decisions. To be creditworthy is to be trusworthy,” says credit evaluation and financial identity researcher Josh Lauer, assistant professor of communication at the University of New Hampshire. “At a fundamental level, credit evaluation is an effort to determine whether a given person can be trusted.”

According to Chairman Cox, ten credit rating agencies have registered with the SEC since the Act passed in 2007. This represents an increase of 43 percent in the number of nationally recognized statistical rating organizations. Despite the increase in competition, three firms - Fitch Ratings, Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s - continue to dominate the 45 billion-a-year credit rating industry, according to the Associated Press (AP).

The public has 45 days from the date the proposed amendments are published in the Federal Register to submit comments to the SEC. The AP reports that some critics are already sayign the proposed rules do not go far enough while spokespersons for the three major credit rating agencies have already expressed their support for the measures.

A Fact Sheet containing additional details on the proposed rules can be found on the SEC website at www.sec.gov.

Source [blownmortgage]

Americans have a strong love affair with real estate.  The idea of private property is deeply ingrained in our investing psyche.  For a big part, the latest housing bubble would have never happened if people didn’t have a fertile mental ground in believing sometimes blindly to the myth of real estate.  We are now left […]
Related Posts:
Bank Failure: IndyMac Bank. Lessons from the Great Depression Part XIV. Bank Failures.
A Bubble That Broke the World: Lessons from the Great Depression Part IX. When Credit is Debt.
DOW down Nearly 20 Percent from Peak: Lessons from the Great Depression: Part XII. Is the DOW now Tracking with the California Housing Market?
The Day Housing Faced the Plague of Locusts: Lessons from The Great Depression Part XIII. Facing our Own Economic Pilgrimage.
The Psychology of Ben Bernanke: The Great Depression was caused by the Federal Reserve. Was he Talking About the current Great Depression that is Sprouting Under his Watch? Lessons From the Great Depression: Part XIII. The Federal Reserve.

Americans have a strong love affair with real estate.  The idea of private property is deeply ingrained in our investing psyche.  For a big part, the latest housing bubble would have never happened if people didn’t have a fertile mental ground in believing sometimes blindly to the myth of real estate.  We are now left with the aftermath of a bursting bubble.  Yet is this it?  What one year ago seemed to be an extreme scenario now seems to be a daily utterance.  That is, this is the worst economic collapse since the Great Depression and the historical data backs this idea.

The shocking unemployment report that came out on Friday cemented the notion that this calamity is only accelerating.  Market analyst were expecting job losses for November to come in at 350,000 but when the 533,000 number came out, the worst in 34 years the market was initially stunned.  Yet the market rallied and ended the day up.  Why?  The notion going forth is this is simply the effects of the worst which is clearly behind us.  I believe to a certain extent that the NBER announcing that the recession started in December of 2007 is a way to try to convince people that we are closer to the end than the beginning.  Of course, there are more valid reasons but take a look at the timing.  You mean they had to wait until a few days ago to tell us we have been in recession for a full year?  As I discussed in detail in a previous article, each subsequent bailout grows exponentially more troublesome and why would we believe that we are closer to the bottom?

Today we are going to examine real estate during the Great Depression and compare it to our current market.  This will be a challenging exercise since real estate during that time was very different from our current situation and data is sparse.  But we have pocket markets like the Florida boom of the 1920s that can serve as a template for high flying states like California, Nevada, Arizona, and yes even Florida again.  If we believe that we can learn something from history, then it is important to look at a time period in our nation’s history and hopefully we can learn lessons that will serve us well today and tomorrow.

This is part XXIII in our Great Depression series:

17. The All Hat and No Cattle Nation

18.  Charity for Financial Deviants.

19.  The Silent Economic Depression

20.  The Four Horsemen of the Economic Apocalypse

21.  The Big Change

22.  The Infection of Consumerism and Living Fake Lives.

The Boom and the Bust

It is important to note that home building during the Great Depression dropped by 80% between the years 1929 and 1932.  It is also the case that many families owned farms which clearly isn’t a factor in today’s market.  But we can use current measures and try to determine how deep our current decline is in relation to the past.  Keep in mind that when you read 1929 - 1932 you may get a psychological feeling that this was a short timeframe.  Remember that in late 1929 we saw the peak of the stock market and the bottom wasn’t reached until the middle of 1932 and it lingered near the lows for a very long time.  If we follow a similar timeline with our market peak in October of 2007, then we can expect a bottom in the summer of 2010.

Of course that is simply an observation.  The past doesn’t dictate the future.  Yet our current real estate bubble is more problematic since it is global.  First, let us examine the 80 percent drop during the Great Depression with current housing starts during this bubble:

housing starts us

The housing market, at least measured in housing starts hit a peak in early 2006.  We have fallen off a cliff since that time.  Keep in mind that housing starts react much quicker to the downside than say real estate values.  Why?  Well builders have their ears to the ground and are deep in analysis for future building projects.  This isn’t an exact science (obviously) yet any significant contraction in starts is a sign that market saturation is starting or profits are no longer to be found.  That is why back in 2006 when we saw this decline while prices were going up and the stock market was roaring, we knew we had a leading indicator telling us trouble was ahead.

The above chart is telling.  Since the peak in housing starts, they have now fallen by a stunning 70% in 2 years.  That is on par with the Great Depression figure of 80% from 1929 to 1932.  Keep in mind that there are no signs or even reasons for builders to build for the near future since the market is flooded with excess housing units.  I have gathered the homeowner vacancy rate for the past 48 years and this chart should be telling:

homeowner vacancy rate united states

*Click for sharper image

The current homeowner vacancy rate is the highest ever recorded.  It is at 2.8 and has fallen from the peak of 2.9 in the first quarter of 2008.  With nearly 5 decades of data, the average vacancy rate stands at 1.5.  The current rate is for all intents and purposes at a record high.  Now 2.8 percent may seem tiny but we are talking millions of homes here.  2.8 is nearly 80 percent higher than the average rate over the past half century!

It is very possible that we may see that 80 percent fall since builders really have no economically fundamental reason to be building in the current market.  On the contrary, next year is expected to have grimmer numbers with more foreclosures flooding the market which will only add more inventory.  That is why I have argued that California and other bubble states will not see bottoms well into 2011.

Bubble States

The Florida real estate market during the 1920s witnessed a massive speculation.  In terms of bubble states and historical data, we have much information on the bubble during this time.  In fact, there are 4 states that had near exact bubble speculation during this current bubble.  Those 4 states are California, Florida, Nevada, and Arizona.  They have been running up the foreclosure numbers higher for the entire nation.  How so?  Take a look at this data:

October 2008 foreclosure filings:

Nationwide:         279,561

California:           56,954*

Florida:                54,324

Nevada:                14,483

Arizona:               17,507

*Recent drop because of SB 1137

So what this means is for the latest data, the 4 states above made up 51% of all nationwide foreclosure filings!  Keep in mind that the California number is artificially low because of SB 1137 which is simply bottling up a blast of foreclosures that will hit us in Q1 or Q2 of 2009.  If we look at data that is pre-SB 1137 California is in utter free fall:

August of 2008 foreclosure filings:

California:                       101,724 

The bill was signed into law in July and of course this data was much to soon too reflect those changes.  So has California really seen a drop in foreclosures that amounts to nearly 50% in a few months?  Yes.  But the legislation and data is horrifically misleading.  All it does is requires lenders to take a few additional steps to contact and work with borrowers but there is nothing you can do when someone purchased a home for $550,000 (L.A. County median peak) and is now selling for $355,000.  All you are doing is wishing.  This will only make the numbers look low for the forth quarter of 2008.  2009 we will face the incredible tsunami of option ARM recasts that will flood the state.

So how far have California prices fallen?  Take a look at 2 measures for the entire state:

California peak real estate

Now I know many readers will see these drops and must think, “wow, a near 50% drop in slightly over one year!  Prices must be near a bottom.”  They are not and I have argued this succulently in 10 reasons why California will not face a bottom until May of 2011.

But we need a rubric.  How bad did prices fall in the 1920 Florida real estate bust?  Let us look at some records:

Bank clearings

Now it is hard to get an accurate figure of price falls.  Some places became worthless because they were built on swamplands and had no intrinsic value beyond the mania.  But the above bank clearings from Miami are stunning.  Bank clearings for Miami fell 86% over the above timeframe from 1925 at the peak to 1929.  We can use this measure as a good indicator of the fall of interest in a bursting bubble.  You will also make note that from 1929 to 1939 the country was in depression and this real estate bust occurred prior to that.  So there wasn’t a bottom and then a quick jump up.  What it does show is that people can go from one bubble (Florida real estate) to another (stocks in 1929).  This double bubble is as American as apple pie since we went from the technology bubble right into the real estate bubble.

What were some of the reasons during the mania given to people to buy Florida real estate? [from Only Yesterday]

“1. First of all, of course, the climate-Florida’s unanswerable argument.

2. The accessibility of the state to the populous cities of the Northeast-an advantage which Southern California could not well deny.

3. The automobile, which was rapidly making America into a nation of nomads; teaching all manner of men and women to explore their country, and enabling even the small farmer, the summer-boarding-house keeper, and the garage man to pack their families into flivvers and tour southward from auto-camp to auto-camp for a winter of sunny leisure.

4. The abounding confidence engendered by Coolidge Prosperity, which persuaded the four-thousand-dollar-a-year salesman that in some magical way he too might tomorrow be able to buy a fine house and all the good things of earth.

5. A paradoxical, widespread, but only half-acknowledged revolt against the very urbanization and industrialization of the country, the very concentration upon work, the very routine and smoke and congestion and twentieth- century standardization of living upon which Coolidge Prosperity was based. These things might bring the American businessman money, but to spend it he longed to escape from them-into the free sunshine of the remembered countryside, into the easy-going life and beauty of the European past, into some never-never land which combined American sport and comfort with Latin glamour-a Venice equipped with bathtubs and electric iceboxes, a Seville provided with three eighteen-hole golf courses.

6. The example of Southern California, which had advertised its climate at the top of its lungs and had prospered by so doing: why, argued the Floridians, couldn’t Florida do likewise?

7. And finally, another result of Coolidge Prosperity: not only did John Jones expect that presently he might be able to afford a house at Boca Raton and a vacation-time of tarpon-fishing or polo, but he also was fed on stories of bold business enterprise and sudden wealth until he was ready to believe that the craziest real-estate development might be the gold-mine which would work this miracle for him.

Crazy real-estate developments? But were they crazy? By 1925 few of them looked so any longer. The men whose fantastic projects had seemed in 1923 to be evidences of megalomania were now coining millions: by the pragmatic test they were not madmen but-as the advertisements put it- inspired dreamers. Coral Gables, Hollywood-by-the-Sea, Miami Beach, Davis Islands-there they stood: mere patterns on a blue-print no longer, but actual cities of brick and concrete and stucco; unfinished, to be sure, but growing with amazing speed, while prospects stood in line to buy and every square foot within their limits leaped in price.”

We have been here before.  This seems like a template of how things will play out in bubble states.  What occurred during this bubble is people forgot the lessons taught to us during the Great Depression and here we are repeating them.  I am struck by this notion being thrown around that we should put a bottom on housing prices.  Why would we want to legislate unaffordable housing to Americans?  That is what will happen.  In fact, people took on riskier and riskier loans because of higher prices.  Either way, the idea is absurd and is part of the dumb and dumber bailout model we are currently living through.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information.

Post from: Dr. Housing Bubble Blog

Home Sweet American Bubble Investing Pie: Lessons from the Great Depression Part XXIII: The Worst Housing Crash in American History.

Related Posts:
Bank Failure: IndyMac Bank. Lessons from the Great Depression Part XIV. Bank Failures.
A Bubble That Broke the World: Lessons from the Great Depression Part IX. When Credit is Debt.
DOW down Nearly 20 Percent from Peak: Lessons from the Great Depression: Part XII. Is the DOW now Tracking with the California Housing Market?
The Day Housing Faced the Plague of Locusts: Lessons from The Great Depression Part XIII. Facing our Own Economic Pilgrimage.
The Psychology of Ben Bernanke: The Great Depression was caused by the Federal Reserve. Was he Talking About the current Great Depression that is Sprouting Under his Watch? Lessons From the Great Depression: Part XIII. The Federal Reserve.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Close
E-mail It