Archive for December 16th, 2008

Filed under: International markets, Next big thing, Chasing Value, Stocks to Buy, Raytheon Company (RTN), Best Stocks for 2008

You can’t put one in your holster yet, but they have done it. The Raytheon Company (NYSE: RTN) has brought H. G. Wells’ science fiction invention of the ray gun to reality as an advanced missile defense system.

The first serious battlefield ray gun is now being deployed. And the next generation, now in the laboratory, is coming soon.

It was last July when I posted Chasing Value: Raytheon says ‘Game on’ highlighting the stock. It was one of this year’s picks, and while down, it has out performed the market. I liked it last year, I liked it mid-year and I still like it. The company is a leader in missile defense systems and civilian airport radar and monitoring systems.

Continue reading Chasing Value: Raytheon creates a real ‘ray-gun’

Chasing Value: Raytheon creates a real ‘ray-gun’ originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:58:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: International markets, Forecasts, India, China, Brazil, Russia, Japan, Recession

What’s one key to the global economy’s recovery, and by extension, the U.S. economy’s recovery?

Well, it’s not likely to be an engine of growth of the past, namely, the U.S. consumer. Several regional growth engines are needed.

To be sure, the U.S. consumer will play a role: a $14 trillion economy — still, the world’s largest — remains an influential contestant in the GDP arena, but if the global economy hopes to achieve a balanced, sustainable growth track, consumption by consumers in the world’s other major economies have to play a larger role, so says economist Peter Dawson.

Dawson’s analysis assumes that the U.S. consumer will return — not to home equity loan-driven, frenzied, unsustainable consumption of this decade, but to a moderate growth track, after real median incomes start to rise after the U.S. economy starts to recover. The above is mentioned as a backdrop because some economic models assume severely-challenged U.S. consumption for several years; Dawson’s model is not one.

Still, even a moderate-growth U.S. consumer spending model does not invalidate the need for structural changes in the global economy.

Continue reading Foreign consumers deemed critical to pulling world out of recession

Foreign consumers deemed critical to pulling world out of recession originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:15:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

A guest post from Frank Shump. Frank is a veteran from the financial services industry, and currently authors a blog called Thefinancecastle.com, which documents his thoughts on money matters and his adventures in self employment.

As we prepare for the Fed to lower rates to an all time low and more consumer hitting the daunting certainty of foreclosure and bankruptcy, it’s easy to forget about the even littler guy in the housing picture, the renter. As I mentioned in a previous post, renters have been feeling their share of pain in this market, too. Many landlords, either overwhelmed and taking what they can or simply abandoning their properties altogether, have left many renters out in the cold. Despite continuing to bleed, it appears that the government controlled mortgage giant, Fannie Mae, may have a soft spot for us consumers after all (well, now that they’re done loading up risk to their eyeballs and paying the price). They’ve officially launched efforts to help renters stay in their homes, even if the property they’re renting heads into foreclosure.

The move, according to Fannie, will allow tenants to sign new leases, and should affect about 4,000 renters that are staying in properties that have hit foreclosure. This is definitely a positive development, considering that the renters have been dutifully paying their rent but still would face eviction without help. The policy is expected to go into place on January 9, according to Brian Faith, a Fannie spokesperson. I’d expect Freddie Mac will follow suit on those efforts as well. Both of them have agreed to temporarily hold evictions.

Of course it wasn’t exactly compassion that moved Fannie to action. An advocacy group, the New Haven Legal Assistance Association recently accused the company of obeying Federal requirements to let renters stay in properties that have hit foreclosure. As part of the bailout, Both Fannie and Freddie are required to allow tenants to stay “where permissible” in their homes. I guess that was open to interpretation until now.

I suppose it’ll be somewhat comforting to renters to know no matter what happens they’ll have a chance to stay where they are. If the Fed rate cut goes through and credit remains tight..we’ll all be renting soon enough, anyway.

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Major movement, Exxon Mobil (XOM), Citigroup Inc. (C), Bank of America (BAC), MasterCard Inc’A’ (MA), Goldman Sachs Group (GS), Morgan Stanley (MS), Wells Fargo (WFC)

Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) shares had plunged by about 25% about an hour ago, while Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) shares had dropped about 11%. By now, the declines have moderated with MS down “only” 15% and GS down about 8%.

Other financials, such as Bank of America (NYSE: BAC), Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) and Citigroup (NYSE: C) aren’t displaying such declines. BAC is down less than 2%, WFC up 0.75% and C is up half a percent.

With no news on either company, it isn’t clear why the two investment banks, recently turned commercial banks, are plunging.

CNBC’s David Faber said one of the reasons Goldman could be down today is a “rumor the firm was involved with the ‘Short Volkswagen’ trade, which has blown up on a massive short squeeze.” Volkswagen (OTC: VLKAY) briefly took over the lead from Exxon Mobil (NYSE: XOM) as the largest market cap firm in the world after the recent spike in share price.

While this may explain Goldman’s stock price decline, it doesn’t Morgan’s, which has been in the news regarding the settlement of Visa (NYSE: V) and MasterCard (NYSE: MA) with Discover (NYSE: DFS). Morgan claims it deserves a piece of the settlement.

Still, this news can’t have caused the stock to plunge. Something else might be in the works.

Update 12:45 pm: Seems the speculation regarding being on the wrong side of a Volkswagen trade applies to Morgan Stanley too. While Morgan’s spokesperson denied any exposure to VW, Goldman declined to comment. Societe Generale, the French bank, saw its shares also hit on a similar speculation regarding a bad bet on VW shares.

BloggingStocksMorgan Stanley plunges 25%, Goldman 10%; other financials stable originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:26:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: General Electric (GE), Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A), Goldman Sachs Group (GS)

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE: BRK.A) stock has fallen 26% this year to a low not seen since February 2007. That does not sound great, but compared to the S&P’s 42% drop so far in 2008, Buffett looks relatively good.

Buffett has been in the news quite a bit lately. His biography tops the business book best seller list and he’s been flogger-in-chief for the administration’s $810 billion bailout plan — since it was signed into law, the NYSE index has lost $3.8 trillion of its market capitalization. He’s also been trying the cheer-lead America into buying stocks.

But I am wondering whether all this cheer-leading was part of the deal that allowed him to get 10% interest payments and warrants to buy The Goldman Sachs Group (NYSE: GS) and General Electric Company (NYSE: GE) a few weeks ago — their stocks are well below the $115 and $22.25 a share exercise prices on those warrants. Along with his painful loss of wealth, Buffett’s reputation has taken somewhat of a tumble as a result of his getting out in front of what now looks like a bad bailout approach.

Continue reading Warren Buffett is not perfect

BloggingStocksWarren Buffett is not perfect originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:56:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

The selling pressure on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac has been heavy this week after a Barron’s article published on the weekend made the case that both government sponsored entities would require a full fledged bailout.  This was made clear even prior to the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 being signed into law.  […]
Related Posts:
Real Homes of Genius: Two For One in Compton. Southern California Housing Bubble Hangover.
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Paramount. 768 Square Feet for $324,900. Buy, Withdraw, Sell, Foreclose. The Cycle of Life.
World Premier! Real Homes of Genius Video.
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Compton. $90,000 in Los Angeles County?
How Many People Overpaid for Their Home in Los Angeles County? Trying to get a Raw Number of Households Underwater.

The selling pressure on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac has been heavy this week after a Barron’s article published on the weekend made the case that both government sponsored entities would require a full fledged bailout.  This was made clear even prior to the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 being signed into law.  The challenge now becomes if they do go out and sell more stock that current shares will be diluted to a point where the shares become worthless.  Both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are testing multi-decade lows.

Sometimes people forget what these two companies stand for.  Part of their mission is of creating liquidity on the secondary mortgage market.  Yet with a struggling housing market these large institutions have to contend with a faltering portfolio that is seeing more and more losses.  Now it is very likely that current shareholders would be wiped out in the event of a bailout.  The question becomes why would foreign investors purchase bonds or preferred shares in the company if the likelihood of failure is around the corner.  Certainly they will be made whole but not at premium rates.  The well is drying up quickly.

There are a few emerging trends in the housing market.  It is rather clear that housing still remains in a precarious situation.  We are nearing the end of the summer selling season and the boost that was expected unfortunately did not materialize.  Record inventory is still on the market and questionable mortgages such as pay option ARMs still loom on the balance sheets of many lenders.  One of the trends that is emerging is people engaging in housing swaps.  That is, people exchanging homes normally without a broker or agent.  In many cases, it is a barter trade.  Another trend is towards frugality.  Now some would argue that this isn’t a trend more than the economic situation forcing the hand of many to face the grim reality.  Yet there should be little doubt that prudence is making a comeback.  Also, we will examine the hidden housing numbers embedded in the Southern California housing market.  Are we really approaching some sort of market bottom?

Housing Swaps

I happened to stumble upon housing swaps on Craigslist.  For those two of you who haven’t heard of Craigslist, this is one of the most visited sites on the internet with some 20,000,000 visits per month in the United States alone.  You can consider this a dynamic classified section where you can find pets, look for employment, trade cars, get rid of unwanted furniture, and now swap your home with someone else.  Now I’ve used housing swaps when traveling for a temporary living arrangement.  For example, you need a place to stay and you find someone in your desired location who is looking to travel as well, and you come to an agreed upon trade.  Now this I used during college and was amazed at how many people are out there and the ability of technology to shrink the world.

That isn’t the new trend.  But what I am noticing is postings from people looking to permanently swap their place with others.  That is something that is new.  There were the unique postings in the past but now everyday you can find a person looking to trade their home with your home.  Here is an example:

Craigslist

The person above is looking to exchange their Chicago home with a home out here in Burbank either temporarily or permanently.  Now why would someone do a housing swap as opposed to selling their home?  There are actually many good reasons.  First, you may be an area with depressed sales and can’t sell your home.  For many corporate careers, if you are in a junior position you may need to go where the company sends you.  This may translate into you relocating but if you own your home and cannot sell, then you are stuck.  What if you absolutely love your career?  Then most would do anything they can to find a way to move to their new location.

Another reason people would do a housing swap instead of selling is they may be in a negative equity position.  Say you bought a home for $350,000 and the home is now “worth” $250,000.  A large number of people do not (or don’t want to) come to the table with $100,000 simply to sell their home.  There is a large portion of the population that can manage the housing payment but is simply stuck in this position of limbo.  They would like to sell their home but cannot.  There only other option is to ruthlessly default and some are going down this path as well.

Finally, this may workout for people who are on the margins.  If you have say a 4 or 5 percent equity position in your home, it may cost you $10,000 or $30,000 simply to sell your place.  Why not contact someone and save yourself that amount?  You can hire a real estate attorney for a few hours, get the paperwork drawn up and finish the deal.  This may work for cases like the person that needs to relocate and doesn’t really care if they get a profit on their home.  They are simply looking to sell the home.

It’ll be interesting to see if more and more of these cases pop up on Craigslist.

Frugality

There is a definitive emerging trend in frugality.  There is a fountain of wealth with Google.  You can use Google Maps and have access to technology that only a few years ago was accessible by the highest level government officials.  You also have the luxury of searching for information from a variety of sources.  One of the features I enjoy from Google is their Google Trends search feature.  In this, you can see the amount of search queries for any phrase or word.  Since Google dominates the search world, this is an excellent view of what people are searching for at any given time.  Take a look at this search phrase:

Google Trends

As you can see from the above chart, not many people are searching for “real estate investing” anymore which shouldn’t come as a surprise.  Ironically, in times where people should be more financially educated they tend to steer away from this.  They ramp up their investments at the worst time, near a peak, and face rapid problems.  Is it any wonder that California has now seen a drop of 38 percent in one-year for a median priced home?

This trend can also be seen perfectly by comparing two stocks for the year.  That of Family Dollar Stores and Best Buy:

Family Dollar Store

For the year Family Dollar Stores are up 24 percent while Best Buy is down 15 percent.  So what does this mean?  What it means is that people are focusing on things they “need” and avoiding things they “want.”  It is interesting to note that consumer and producer inflation is running at decade highs.  Now why is this?  Clearly housing prices collapsing and credit tightening is wealth destruction so you would think that we would be seeing possibly deflation.  The problem however is items that people need such as food, fuel, and healthcare are not growing exponentially.  These remain fixed while the U.S. Dollar declines and purchases less and less of these items.  In addition, many Wal-Mart goods are produced in China which is facing its own inflation.  The workforce is slowly getting more educated and is demanding slightly higher wages which find their way into the price of the goods that people consume.

With budgets getting tight “want” stores like Best Buy are facing the brunt of the economic contraction.  We saw this with Mervyn’s filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in July.  Another clear example is looking at a low cost food source such as McDonald’s and comparing it to P.F. Chang’s China Bistro:

McDonalds

Over the past year McDonald’s is up 29 percent while P.F. Chang’s is down 27 percent.  Frugality is becoming a way of life because money is tight and this is being reflected in the spending behavior of Americans.

Census Selling

Much to the chagrin of many the housing market won’t see a bottom at least in California until 2011.  There is some positive aspects to this including more affordable housing for many.  It will also lighten the debt load for households in the future.  It may also give people the incentive to purchase homes in areas they plan on staying in and investing their time in creating a better community.

Foreclosures are still at historical highs.  Given the recent housing report for Southern California and the modest jump in sales, I think it is important to look at the actual sales and how they played out in various regions.  Let us first get a population count for the 6 major counties:

Population Count For County:

Los Angeles:               9,948,081

Orange:                       3,002,048

Riverside:                    2,026,803

San Bernardino:          1,999,332

Ventura:                      799,720

San Diego:                  2,941,454

Total Southern California:   20,717,438

So that gives us the entire population count for Southern California.  The total population of California is 36,457,549 so Southern California makes up 56 percent of this amount.  Now let us look at last months sales data:

Southern california housing

Now I made the case in a previous article that the minor bump in sales was in large part by the fire sale of homes in the Inland Empire.  Let us now break down the numbers to get an actual proportion:

Riverside + San Bernardino Total July Sales =  6,637 / (20,329 total SoCal Sold)

So these two counties made up 32.6 percent of all sales for Southern California.  Now we should look at what percent these counties make up for the Southern California population:

Riverside + San Bernardino Population = 4,026,135 / (SoCal total 20,717,438)

Total population percentage for these two counties is 19.4 percent.  So essentially these two counties are selling at twice the percent of their population representation.  I was listening on the radio to someone explain the median price drop and cautioning that sales are getting skewed because “expensive” homes aren’t selling and only foreclosures and lower priced homes are selling.  This in fact is true.  The only thing I would caution these folks about is that distress sales are now the bulk of the market even though miraculously in some of the data, foreclosures don’t pop up in multiple listing services.

These new trends are simply a way people are coping with the economic conditions.  It is very unlikely we will be seeing a second half recovery especially for housing.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information

Post from: Dr. Housing Bubble Blog

Emerging Economic Trends: Housing Swaps, Frugality, and Selling Homes in Lower Priced Areas.

Related Posts:
Real Homes of Genius: Two For One in Compton. Southern California Housing Bubble Hangover.
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Paramount. 768 Square Feet for $324,900. Buy, Withdraw, Sell, Foreclose. The Cycle of Life.
World Premier! Real Homes of Genius Video.
Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute you Compton. $90,000 in Los Angeles County?
How Many People Overpaid for Their Home in Los Angeles County? Trying to get a Raw Number of Households Underwater.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

California has quickly turned into a case study for the long-term effects of the housing market. The state, which ranks as the eighth largest economy in the world, found itself in a state of quiet desperation when the credit crunch took effect in October. California had already delayed its yearly budget over 80 days, finally settling on an agreement in September. In October, Arnold Schwarzenegger, the state’s governor (my state, I might add), announced he would be seeking billions of dollars from short-term loans and bond-sales to finance such basic costs as payroll expenditures.

Two months later, the state has announced that it is considering making payments to contractors, food-services companies and other state vendors in the form of warrants paying a 5% interest rate on the principal amount. That’s right. Whatever money that California has been able to raise over the past months has only been enough to pay its most immediate bills, forcing it to issue the equivalent of IOU’s to the state’s other service providers. The state has admitted that it may run out of necessary cash as early as March.

California is, of course, only 1 of 50 states in the United States. Yet it represents 13% of the housing market, and it is contributing 19% of foreclosures in the housing market to the United States economy. Couple that with a low property tax rate (among other things) that ranges between 3.6 and 6.5% and does not contribute any funding to the actual state budget (only local and county), and you are presented with a rather ugly picture. Schwarzenegger has made it clear that he would seek federal aid if the budget situation does not improve, painting a picture of a possible bailout for the state.

Adding to its woes, California also has the highest rate of unemployment of any state in the nation. That rate, at last count, is currently sitting at a 14-year high of 8.2%. The provides ample support for those calling for a further downturn in California’s economy, as disposable income for consumers rapidly evaporates, driving business activity downward, causing further reduced tax revenue for the state. It sounds ugly, and clearly it is.

I live in California, specifically in the inland area that has been hit hardest by the sub-prime crisis. California is chock-full of tremendously wealthy individuals and families, but the gap between income groups is growing more and more apparent as the financial crisis continues. Lower income families and individuals are driven to spend as though they earn as much as the wealthy, perhaps due to the ubiquitous presence of Hollywood. Even our governor, after all, is a movie star. Yet when your state finds itself bereft of funding, all the sheen and charisma in the world won’t help.

The trouble is, with the employment picture growing increasingly dire, it is entirely possible that California will not be the only state to find itself asking for handouts. Socialist programs may be extended beyond the corporate welfare policies our government has been experimenting with since the Bear Stearns bailout, and could finally include we-the-taxpayers. And yet it’s funny how that doesn’t exactly excite me.

Source [blownmortgage]

Close
E-mail It