Archive for December 23rd, 2008

The Southern California housing market still shows significant signs of distress.  It is rather obvious that the Federal Reserve is going to do everything it can to weaken the dollar and try to strong-arm interest rates until they scream uncle.  During this same historic week that we are now in zero interest rate policy Ben […]
Related Posts:
San Diego Down 4.5 percent YOY - or $42,000 from Peak.
Option ARMs for Dummies: Why 4.5 Percent Mortgages Rates will do Absolutely Nothing for these Toxic Assets.
65% of Southern Californians are Delusional. No wait, 65% Jump in Southern California Home Sales. No wait, 38% Record Median Price Drop. No wait, 50% of all sales are from foreclosures. Housing and Foreclosure Voodoo Headlines.
Riding in the Short Bus of Housing: Southern California Short Sale Numbers. 1 in 10 Homes is a Distress Sale.
C.A.R. says 2007 will see a -2% Drop in California. Does This Feel like a 2% Yearly Drop?

The Southern California housing market still shows significant signs of distress.  It is rather obvious that the Federal Reserve is going to do everything it can to weaken the dollar and try to strong-arm interest rates until they scream uncle.  During this same historic week that we are now in zero interest rate policy Ben Bernanke helicopter (ZIRP) world, another milestone occurred in Southern California.  The median price for an area with more than 20 million people has now breached the $300,000 mark.  This is significant because the peak of $505,000 was reached only last summer.

The market has deteriorated so quickly and with such devastation, it gives me pause to think what is going to happen when the $300 billion in pay option ARMS (POA) recast in 2009 through 2012.  For many long time readers you know that my “crash scenario” meant prices falling 40 percent from their peak.  The median price for the region is now off by 43.6 percent.  Keep in mind that last month 55 percent of buyers exercised their bargain shopping right to purchase repossessed homes.  You have to take that into context when looking at the median price.  However, let us go through our monthly analysis of one of the most expensive and diverse housing regions in the country:

Southern California Housing Chart

*Click for sharper image

This chart gives a very clear picture of what has occurred in Southern California.  You’ll notice that most counties reached their peak in the summer of 2007 only to fall precipitously over the next year.  Southern California is a micro view of what has occurred in many metro areas across the country.  You have your prime locations in Laguna Beach, Santa Monica, and La Jolla that will remain resistant simply because of their locations.  Yet you have areas like the Inland Empire that have seen unrelenting price drops similar to those in Florida or Arizona.  Aside from the Southern California median price dropping below $300,000 we have our first county dropping below $200,000 since 2003.  The median price for a home in San Bernardino is now $185,250.  San Bernardino hit a peak of $380,000 in November of 2006.  Guess what?  We’ve just had our first county drop by 50 percent from the peak.

Now there are many things pushing prices lower.  Market confidence is shattered and it doesn’t help the public to hear that a Ponzi scheme run by Bernard Madoff has been going on for probably a decade and has put at risk nearly $50 billion.  That isn’t the boost in the arm we need right now.  First, to simply think that the housing market collapsed out of nowhere is a mistake.  Let us look at the sales pattern in conjunction with median price for Southern California over this decade:

Southern California sales vs price

The first warning sign we had came with the major pattern dislocation in the summer of 2006.  The normally robust bounce in sales did not occur.  Yet prices kept going up for another year.  This is where the bubble stepped it up to another level.  This graph from a technical perspective gives you a better understanding why looking at price alone is not a good predictor of future trends.  What you’ll also notice is the steady sales increase from January of 2008.  Normally, winter is the weak selling season and you’ll notice the seasonal dips in the chart followed by the healthier summer selling seasons.  Keep in mind that our recent ascent upwards was fueled by these strong price drops.

The recent sales increases should be taken in context.  If you look at the decade, we are still well under even the weakest winter trough from 2000 to summer of 2007.  You’ll also notice that last months sales are now reflecting the typical fall and winter weakness.

Some argue that the median price is a poor indicator.  Yet this is what the average family on the street is most likely in tune to.  It is also the average family that will be buying homes so yes, it is important.  It is fascinating that during the boom, those in the real estate industry kept championing robust median price numbers and now that the numbers don’t suit their purpose, they choose to knock them down.  Okay, let us look at the Case-Shiller Index for the Los Angeles and Orange County area:

Case Shiller Index

The Case-Shiller Index measures repeat sales on the same home.  So this is arguably a more accurate reflection.  The index doesn’t give us a price per se but gives us an overall measure of price increase from a baseline point.  For example, the baseline year is 2000 and has a number of 100.  At the peak, the LA/OC measure jumped to 273.94.  That is nearly a tripling of price in less than a decade.  This measure is now converging with the median price.  How so?  Let us look at the median price of a home in L.A.

December 1999 median price:            $192,000

August 2007 median peak price:        $550,000

550,000 / 192,000 = 2.86 times

Nuts.  The median price of Los Angeles is now $340,000.  Let us run the numbers again:

December 1999 median price:            $192,000

November 2008 median price:            $340,000

340,000 / 192,000 = 1.77 times

What is the current Case-Shiller number?  184.54.  Keep in mind that the Case-Shiller Index looks at L.A. and Orange County.  The 184.54 number takes us back to where we were in February of 2004.  The median price in Los Angeles county in August of 2003 was $338,000.  The index and the median price are converging with a trend and are only separated by 6 months in Los Angeles.  Bottom line?  You can choose to look at the Case-Shiller Index or the median price and the story remains the same.

Yet California is facing challenges beyond just the housing market.  Some people forget that you actually need good employment to buy a home.  They have become so laser focused on interest rates or monetary policy that they forgot one thing.  A large number of Californians were employed in the real estate industry!  I talked in great detail about the rise and the fall of the Southern California housing empire in a previous article.  We benefited the most from the housing bubble and are paying the price during the bust.

Have you noticed that the bailouts have gone into the black hole of crony capitalistic banking wonderland?  Wasn’t the main purpose of the bailout to keep the market from collapsing as it currently is?  The truth of the matter is the bailout was never for you.  The bailout was to keep the world of the bankers and those on Wall Street from collapsing.  Even floor brokers now realize that they aren’t part of the private club as we have seen the many pictures of entry level workers walking out with their boxes from Lehman Brothers.  It is the Titanic and only a few lifeboats are available.  Who will get a piece of the bailout lifesaver?

California is also in a budgetary mess.  While our politicians get paid to literally do nothing, our employment base is getting shattered to pieces:

California Unemployment rate

It is stunning how little focus has gone into sustainable job growth.  Here we are, nearing the end of 2008 and having committed over $2.2 trillion and what can we say we have accomplished with all this?  My main question is how can we as a public simply not care where this $2.2 trillion went?  Think if we only dedicated half the time from the bread and circus theater of the auto industry to asking the Fed to open up their books.  $15 billion for the auto industry.  $2.2 trillion for the banking industry.  Hmmmm.  You know how many jobs that $2.2 trillion could have created?  I’m not for government meddling as long time readers know but I would rather have that $2.2 trillion go to rebuilding roads, schools, focusing on healthcare, and maybe getting our budget in order.  If it is a choice between banks, hedge funds, and our buddy Madoff I’d rather see the money go to the average American taxpayer who is already being taken to task while watching the Fed and U.S. Treasury destroy their currency.

I still stand by my prediction that the bottom for California housing will not be reached until 2011.  I know in our nano-second driven world, it is hard to imagine 2 or 3 more years of this.  But we only have 2 roads we will follow.  One road takes us down our current path.  Price destruction and massive market corrections to fix the misallocation of a bubble decade.  Otherwise known as deflation.  Or if the Fed and U.S. Treasury have their way hyper-inflation.  Their actions hope for a 1970s style inflation were they can prime things up and then get it under control.  Anyone that looks at data from that time realizes that bringing down high inflation is no easy task.

The Southern California housing market operates with all these multiple forces pulling at it.  Before you start looking at a bottom ask yourself the following questions:

(a)  Is the employment situation good for the state?

(b)  Are wages increasing?

(c)  Is there a lack of inventory on the market?

(d)  Are prices going back up?

I would answer no to all the above and if someone asked me whether Southern California has hit a bottom, my answer would be no.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information.

Post from: Dr. Housing Bubble Blog

Southern California is only $32,500 Away from Seeing Housing Prices Fall by 50 Percent from the Peak: The Precipitous fall from $505,000 to $285,000.

Related Posts:
San Diego Down 4.5 percent YOY - or $42,000 from Peak.
Option ARMs for Dummies: Why 4.5 Percent Mortgages Rates will do Absolutely Nothing for these Toxic Assets.
65% of Southern Californians are Delusional. No wait, 65% Jump in Southern California Home Sales. No wait, 38% Record Median Price Drop. No wait, 50% of all sales are from foreclosures. Housing and Foreclosure Voodoo Headlines.
Riding in the Short Bus of Housing: Southern California Short Sale Numbers. 1 in 10 Homes is a Distress Sale.
C.A.R. says 2007 will see a -2% Drop in California. Does This Feel like a 2% Yearly Drop?

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Filed under: Law, Scandals

New York retiree Phyllis Molchatsky lost nearly $2 million in Bernard Madoff’s alleged Ponzi scheme — and she’s as mad as hell and not going to take it anymore.

Realizing that suing Mr. Madoff won’t lead anywhere, she’s trying an innovative strategy: suing the Securities & Exchange Commission, alleging that the SEC was negligent in failing to detect and put a stop to the financial crime in progress. Ms. Molchatsky filed an administrative claim for relief, and if the SEC doesn’t respond or negotiate within six months, she will have the option of suing the Commission in federal court.

SEC Chairman Christopher Cox has already admitted that the SEC failed to respond to specific and credible allegations of wrongdoing by Mr. Madoff over the years and said that he was “gravely concerned by the apparent multiple failures over at least a decade to thoroughly investigate these allegations.”

Still, experts say it will be an uphill battle to win any damages from the SEC. As Law Professor Gregory Sisk said (subscription required) in The Wall Street Journal, “The government undoubtedly would argue that if liability is imposed here it creates a disincentive for the government to do any regulation in the future.”

Of course the SEC screwed up badly here, but that’s nothing new. If the SEC were held responsible for losses incurred as a result of its many failures to do its job, the damages would make the $700 billion bailout look like a breakfast buffet at Friendly’s.

Continue reading Investor sues the SEC over Madoff losses

Investor sues the SEC over Madoff losses originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 23 Dec 2008 11:10:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Bad news, Products and services, Consumer experience, Competitive strategy, eBay (EBAY), Wal-Mart (WMT), Amazon.com (AMZN), Sears Holdings (SHLD)

While this is a week when many of us are celebrating and enjoying some much needed time with friends and family, things are not looking so cheerful over at eBay (NASDAQ: EBAY) as slow sales and low traffic are hurting sales on the popular online auction site (subscription required).

This is the first holiday season for the company under its new CEO, John Donahoe, and things are definitely not looking too jolly. According to research firm comScore Inc., the site has been losing a lot of valuable traffic to its competitors, such as Amazon.com (NASDAQ: AMZN) that have more fixed-price products for consumers to purchase, an area where eBay is still lagging.

For the period of November 3 through December 14, a time when many of us were busy spending hours online researching those perfect presents to hand out this holiday, eBay was just not getting the hits that it usually does, and traffic was down by 16% from the same period last year. In contrast, Amazon was enjoying a modest increase in traffic of 6% during the same time frame.

Continue reading Not such a Merry Christmas at eBay (EBAY)

Not such a Merry Christmas at eBay (EBAY) originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:40:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Commodities, Oil, Recession

This post was written by Minyanville contributor Adam Warner:

Smarter minds than yours truly have noted that the oil ETF United States Oil Fund (AMEX: USO) is not the best bullish play on crude here. My understanding of the product is that USO owns futures, and must roll each cycle. And right now oil is in deep contango, which always sounds pornographic but actually just refers to the fact that there’s a particularly steep and upward sloped curve in the futures as you go out in time.

I’ll take their word for the contango part, but I’m not entirely sure why that necessarily will knock down USO. They’ll roll when they roll, and even if the spread is wide, won’t it then just depend on what happens in the next month AFTER the roll? I’m thinking out loud here, so if anyone has something enlightening to add on this topic, I am all ears.

I sold and am selling more Nov. puts anyway, so it should not matter a great deal from my standpoint. And I’m not sure I really have a great alternative if I want to do something bullish in oil options.

I don’t trade futures or futures options, and as far as pure oil there’s Super Double Ultra Octane Special (AMEX: DBO), which does not have liquid options.

There’s also Ultra Oil & Gas ProShares (AMEX: DIG) and UltraShort Oil & Gas ProShares (AMEX: DUG), but those track energy stocks.

BloggingStocksPlaying oil with the United States Oil Fund (USO) ETF originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:42:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Via [bloggingstocks]

Possession, they say, is nine-tenths of the law. Unfortunately, when the remaining tenth is a mortgage, both homeowners and renters can find themselves evicted as part of the foreclosure process.

Results of an email survey of community and state homeless coalitions conducted by the National Coalition for the Homeless indicate that nearly 61 percent of respondents were already seeing an increase in homelessness before April 2008 when the report was published. More than 37 percent of those responding stated people were able to rent which researchers believe was an indication that they were former homeowners who had lost their homes through foreclosure. The number of foreclosures has continued to increase since the survey was taken so the number of people who are homeless as a result of foreclosure is also probably grown.

Although the housing market has also slowed, not all of the homes vacated because of foreclosure are remaining empty. Across the country foreclosed and abandoned properties are being occupied by squatters. Most squatting is random and unorganized. People seek temporary shelter then move on. Recently, however, some organized attempts to move homeless people into vacant properties for extended residency are being made.

In California, SignOnSanDiego.com reports that individuals claiming to be part of a religious order called the Sovereign Solomon Brothers Archbishop Corporation Sole are filing false grant deeds on foreclosed properties. They aren’t stopping there, either. They a moving tenants into the properties. some of the tenants may have been made homeless by foreclosure themselves. It is unclear whether the tenants knew their occupation of the property is based on questionable legal grounds. Since the recorder’s office is not responsible for verifying the authenticity of the documents being filed, it is often not until a property is resold and a new owner tries to move in that the situation is recognized. By then, determining who the rightful owner of the property is and who has the right to occupy it can take weeks or longer. At least one person has been arrested and charges with filing false documents in connection with this scheme.

A group of homeless activists calling themselves Take Back the Land has helped six families move into foreclosed properties in Miami, FL, according to the Associated Press (AP). This group also helps the families with used furniture, cleaning supplies and even landscape maintenence. No charges have been filed against either the group or the squatters. The City says it is the responsibility of the prpoerty owner, in this case the mortgage lender, to remove squatters or to file complaints that would allow law enforcement to take action.

It is not only recently vacated property that is being occupied or the homeless who are moving in. An “old house that was not properly locked up” became the hiding place for a fugitive in Vermont, WCAX.com reports. This situation demonstrates the dangers of squatting, both for the squatters and the community. In addition, vacant properties can pose health and fire hazards, as well as attracting criminal elements.

There are no quick fixes for the mortgage crisis, vacant properties or homelessness. The National coalition for the Homeless recommends requiring lenders nationwide to file foreclosure deeds within 30 days of the foreclosure sale in order to help identify the reighful owners and tenants of foreclosed properties. They also advocate protecting any existing agreements with tenants or renters and allowing their leases to survive the foreclosure process rather than automatically evicting them when the ownership fo the property is transferred to the mortage company or bank. Of course, the best solution is to help homeowner avoid foreclosure and prevent homelessness, not just during the current crisis but over the long term.

Source [blownmortgage]

A great graph by EconomPicData shows just how much of the cash dolled out by Hank Paulson will actually remain in the system.  The bottom line?  From the $125 billion handed out to-date to the largest 9 banking institutions a mere $17 billion will go towards recapitalizing the system.  The rest?  Yup - bonuses and compensation.

My head just exploded.

From EconomPicData via Alternet:

It turns out that the nine banks about to be getting a total equity capital injection of $125 billion, courtesy of Phase I of The Bailout Plan, had reserved $108 billion during the first nine months of 2008 in order to pay for compensation and bonuses.

Source [blownmortgage]

The Southern California housing market still shows significant signs of distress.  It is rather obvious that the Federal Reserve is going to do everything it can to weaken the dollar and try to strong-arm interest rates until they scream uncle.  During this same historic week that we are now in zero interest rate policy Ben […]
Related Posts:
San Diego Down 4.5 percent YOY - or $42,000 from Peak.
Option ARMs for Dummies: Why 4.5 Percent Mortgages Rates will do Absolutely Nothing for these Toxic Assets.
65% of Southern Californians are Delusional. No wait, 65% Jump in Southern California Home Sales. No wait, 38% Record Median Price Drop. No wait, 50% of all sales are from foreclosures. Housing and Foreclosure Voodoo Headlines.
Riding in the Short Bus of Housing: Southern California Short Sale Numbers. 1 in 10 Homes is a Distress Sale.
C.A.R. says 2007 will see a -2% Drop in California. Does This Feel like a 2% Yearly Drop?

The Southern California housing market still shows significant signs of distress.  It is rather obvious that the Federal Reserve is going to do everything it can to weaken the dollar and try to strong-arm interest rates until they scream uncle.  During this same historic week that we are now in zero interest rate policy Ben Bernanke helicopter (ZIRP) world, another milestone occurred in Southern California.  The median price for an area with more than 20 million people has now breached the $300,000 mark.  This is significant because the peak of $505,000 was reached only last summer.

The market has deteriorated so quickly and with such devastation, it gives me pause to think what is going to happen when the $300 billion in pay option ARMS (POA) recast in 2009 through 2012.  For many long time readers you know that my “crash scenario” meant prices falling 40 percent from their peak.  The median price for the region is now off by 43.6 percent.  Keep in mind that last month 55 percent of buyers exercised their bargain shopping right to purchase repossessed homes.  You have to take that into context when looking at the median price.  However, let us go through our monthly analysis of one of the most expensive and diverse housing regions in the country:

Southern California Housing Chart

*Click for sharper image

This chart gives a very clear picture of what has occurred in Southern California.  You’ll notice that most counties reached their peak in the summer of 2007 only to fall precipitously over the next year.  Southern California is a micro view of what has occurred in many metro areas across the country.  You have your prime locations in Laguna Beach, Santa Monica, and La Jolla that will remain resistant simply because of their locations.  Yet you have areas like the Inland Empire that have seen unrelenting price drops similar to those in Florida or Arizona.  Aside from the Southern California median price dropping below $300,000 we have our first county dropping below $200,000 since 2003.  The median price for a home in San Bernardino is now $185,250.  San Bernardino hit a peak of $380,000 in November of 2006.  Guess what?  We’ve just had our first county drop by 50 percent from the peak.

Now there are many things pushing prices lower.  Market confidence is shattered and it doesn’t help the public to hear that a Ponzi scheme run by Bernard Madoff has been going on for probably a decade and has put at risk nearly $50 billion.  That isn’t the boost in the arm we need right now.  First, to simply think that the housing market collapsed out of nowhere is a mistake.  Let us look at the sales pattern in conjunction with median price for Southern California over this decade:

Southern California sales vs price

The first warning sign we had came with the major pattern dislocation in the summer of 2006.  The normally robust bounce in sales did not occur.  Yet prices kept going up for another year.  This is where the bubble stepped it up to another level.  This graph from a technical perspective gives you a better understanding why looking at price alone is not a good predictor of future trends.  What you’ll also notice is the steady sales increase from January of 2008.  Normally, winter is the weak selling season and you’ll notice the seasonal dips in the chart followed by the healthier summer selling seasons.  Keep in mind that our recent ascent upwards was fueled by these strong price drops.

The recent sales increases should be taken in context.  If you look at the decade, we are still well under even the weakest winter trough from 2000 to summer of 2007.  You’ll also notice that last months sales are now reflecting the typical fall and winter weakness.

Some argue that the median price is a poor indicator.  Yet this is what the average family on the street is most likely in tune to.  It is also the average family that will be buying homes so yes, it is important.  It is fascinating that during the boom, those in the real estate industry kept championing robust median price numbers and now that the numbers don’t suit their purpose, they choose to knock them down.  Okay, let us look at the Case-Shiller Index for the Los Angeles and Orange County area:

Case Shiller Index

The Case-Shiller Index measures repeat sales on the same home.  So this is arguably a more accurate reflection.  The index doesn’t give us a price per se but gives us an overall measure of price increase from a baseline point.  For example, the baseline year is 2000 and has a number of 100.  At the peak, the LA/OC measure jumped to 273.94.  That is nearly a tripling of price in less than a decade.  This measure is now converging with the median price.  How so?  Let us look at the median price of a home in L.A.

December 1999 median price:            $192,000

August 2007 median peak price:        $550,000

550,000 / 192,000 = 2.86 times

Nuts.  The median price of Los Angeles is now $340,000.  Let us run the numbers again:

December 1999 median price:            $192,000

November 2008 median price:            $340,000

340,000 / 192,000 = 1.77 times

What is the current Case-Shiller number?  184.54.  Keep in mind that the Case-Shiller Index looks at L.A. and Orange County.  The 184.54 number takes us back to where we were in February of 2004.  The median price in Los Angeles county in August of 2003 was $338,000.  The index and the median price are converging with a trend and are only separated by 6 months in Los Angeles.  Bottom line?  You can choose to look at the Case-Shiller Index or the median price and the story remains the same.

Yet California is facing challenges beyond just the housing market.  Some people forget that you actually need good employment to buy a home.  They have become so laser focused on interest rates or monetary policy that they forgot one thing.  A large number of Californians were employed in the real estate industry!  I talked in great detail about the rise and the fall of the Southern California housing empire in a previous article.  We benefited the most from the housing bubble and are paying the price during the bust.

Have you noticed that the bailouts have gone into the black hole of crony capitalistic banking wonderland?  Wasn’t the main purpose of the bailout to keep the market from collapsing as it currently is?  The truth of the matter is the bailout was never for you.  The bailout was to keep the world of the bankers and those on Wall Street from collapsing.  Even floor brokers now realize that they aren’t part of the private club as we have seen the many pictures of entry level workers walking out with their boxes from Lehman Brothers.  It is the Titanic and only a few lifeboats are available.  Who will get a piece of the bailout lifesaver?

California is also in a budgetary mess.  While our politicians get paid to literally do nothing, our employment base is getting shattered to pieces:

California Unemployment rate

It is stunning how little focus has gone into sustainable job growth.  Here we are, nearing the end of 2008 and having committed over $2.2 trillion and what can we say we have accomplished with all this?  My main question is how can we as a public simply not care where this $2.2 trillion went?  Think if we only dedicated half the time from the bread and circus theater of the auto industry to asking the Fed to open up their books.  $15 billion for the auto industry.  $2.2 trillion for the banking industry.  Hmmmm.  You know how many jobs that $2.2 trillion could have created?  I’m not for government meddling as long time readers know but I would rather have that $2.2 trillion go to rebuilding roads, schools, focusing on healthcare, and maybe getting our budget in order.  If it is a choice between banks, hedge funds, and our buddy Madoff I’d rather see the money go to the average American taxpayer who is already being taken to task while watching the Fed and U.S. Treasury destroy their currency.

I still stand by my prediction that the bottom for California housing will not be reached until 2011.  I know in our nano-second driven world, it is hard to imagine 2 or 3 more years of this.  But we only have 2 roads we will follow.  One road takes us down our current path.  Price destruction and massive market corrections to fix the misallocation of a bubble decade.  Otherwise known as deflation.  Or if the Fed and U.S. Treasury have their way hyper-inflation.  Their actions hope for a 1970s style inflation were they can prime things up and then get it under control.  Anyone that looks at data from that time realizes that bringing down high inflation is no easy task.

The Southern California housing market operates with all these multiple forces pulling at it.  Before you start looking at a bottom ask yourself the following questions:

(a)  Is the employment situation good for the state?

(b)  Are wages increasing?

(c)  Is there a lack of inventory on the market?

(d)  Are prices going back up?

I would answer no to all the above and if someone asked me whether Southern California has hit a bottom, my answer would be no.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information.

Post from: Dr. Housing Bubble Blog

Southern California is only $32,500 Away from Seeing Housing Prices Fall by 50 Percent from the Peak: The Precipitous fall from $505,000 to $285,000.

Related Posts:
San Diego Down 4.5 percent YOY - or $42,000 from Peak.
Option ARMs for Dummies: Why 4.5 Percent Mortgages Rates will do Absolutely Nothing for these Toxic Assets.
65% of Southern Californians are Delusional. No wait, 65% Jump in Southern California Home Sales. No wait, 38% Record Median Price Drop. No wait, 50% of all sales are from foreclosures. Housing and Foreclosure Voodoo Headlines.
Riding in the Short Bus of Housing: Southern California Short Sale Numbers. 1 in 10 Homes is a Distress Sale.
C.A.R. says 2007 will see a -2% Drop in California. Does This Feel like a 2% Yearly Drop?

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Close
E-mail It