Archive for March, 2009

Filed under: Google (GOOG), Cisco Systems (CSCO), Small business

Times are particularly tough for VC funds. The IPO market is a ghost-town. M&A is muted — with fairly low valuations. By all accounts, it looks like the returns for VC funds will be dismal.

But, interestingly enough, this is likely the best time to start a VC fund. After all, it takes several years for startup firms to get critical mass. Plus, it’s easier to structure juicy terms on deals.

Continue reading Google Ventures takes flight

Google Ventures takes flight originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:10:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati

Via [bloggingstocks]

Naked Capitalism - Auto Company Plans Rejected by Task Force
Infectious Greed - Stating the Auto Obvious
Naked Capitalism - Guest Post: The Banks Were Profitable In January And February Thanks To… AIG
Huffington Post - “Let Them Have Stained Carpets” - Obama’s Marie Antoinette Moment
MISH’S Global Economic Trend Analysis - G-20 Targets Hedge Funds, Ignoring Everything Worth Discussing
Financial Times - A new plan needed as the cycle grows vicious

Source [blownmortgage]

The market is on a major run.  You have to give credit where credit is due.  The S&P 500 is up an astonishing 17.4 percent from the low only reached on March 9th which is incredible.  Just to give you a perspective on how ferocious this jump is, the median annual return for the […]

The market is on a major run.  You have to give credit where credit is due.  The S&P 500 is up an astonishing 17.4 percent from the low only reached on March 9th which is incredible.  Just to give you a perspective on how ferocious this jump is, the median annual return for the S&P 500 since 1988 is 10.88 percent.  We’ve nearly doubled that in less than 2 weeks.  That is the extent of volatility in our market.  Yet make no mistake that this rally has been fueled because of the speed of the fall and a rush by those feeling that this was the bottom.  Even after this run up, the S&P 500 is still off by 50 percent from its peak.  The U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve are doing everything they can to siphon off money into the financial sector of this country including a push to redo mark to market accounting by ripping off the U.S. taxpayer.  It is now clearer why Bank of America and Citigroup mentioned that they would be turning a profit in the first quarter of 2009.

Some of the most vicious bear market rallies occurred during the Great Depression.  When you have fallen so fast even a slight glimmer of light looks like a beaming ray of sunshine.  Given how much money has been pumped into the system, it should be no surprise that we will see movements in the markets.  Trillions of dollars are floating in the system but where are they landing?  That is yet to be determined (aside from bonuses and capital to insolvent banks).
In bear market rallies any news that isn’t bad is seen as warranting a massive rally.  Take for example the unexpected jump in housing starts.  The media was playing this up like some gigantic move.  Keep in mind housing starts have fallen at rates last seen in the Great Depression so a move up is expected.  Let us see this massive move on a chart shall we?

housing starts

Did you catch that?  Let me go ahead and zoom in for you to show you this market moving data:

starts big

Some reporters like to spin data.  On a percentage basis, it was a nice bump but look at the above charts.  The jump was largely anchored in multiple unit housing starts.  That is, apartments and places for rent!  This is like having a panic attack of happiness because Citigroup moved up 40+ percent in one day even though it translated to a 40-cent move.  I wouldn’t read too much into this data.  Even if we see mild and sustain growth here, the market has been so viciously pounded that it will take years for it to get out.  How much lower can we go any how?  It wasn’t like we were expecting it to hit zero.  Single-family starts are still off by 80 percent from their peak levels.

The Southern California numbers were released earlier this week and prices are still moving lower:

so-cal-march_2009

The median Southern California home is now at $250,000 and for the first time since the bubble has burst, Los Angeles County has cracked into the $200,000 range coming in at $299,000.  This is significant since L.A. County is the most populated county in the region with 10,000,000 people living here.  If you look at the chart, you’ll notice that both San Diego and Orange County perked up a tiny bit.  I will say this again that there are many bottom callers rushing to buy right now thinking that this is the bottom.  It is not.  California will bottom out sometime in 2011 given all the regional and market factors affecting our market.  But like those rushing back into the stock market for another beating, they will realize within a few months that structural problems are still largely present.  Unemployment in the state is at 10.1 percent and rising.  Home prices are still out of sync with local family incomes.  Yet people still having the taste of those peak bubble prices look at a $400,000 home in a once $700,000 area and think “wow, $300,000 off!”  Just because an asset has fallen dramatically in value does not make it worth buying.

As I discussed in detail in a previous post, the state is now back only a few weeks after a major budget passed and is anticipating another $8 billion gap.  This is becoming a comedy of errors and is based yet again on Pollyanna projections.  Look, there will be a point when it will make sense to buy in California.  In fact, there are many states in the country where it does make sense to buy today.  So we are not anti-buying homes.  Yet as I have been saying for years, prices do not make sense based on the following reasons:

a.  Local family incomes

b.  Employment projections

c.  Neighborhood factors

d.  Quality of homes

e.  Schools and education

Normally, these are factors that all interplay in creating a price for a home.  It is astounding how simplistic the current system is in arriving at a home’s value.  In essence, they take 3 similar homes sold in the neighborhood and find an average square foot price and arrive at a price for the home for sale.  Normally, they will tweak a bit for additional amenities but that is the extent of the pricing model.  Well you can see the flaw with that model especially in a bubble.  If homes are selling at bubble prices then you taking 3 bubble priced homes will only give you a 4th bubble priced home.  There are more nuanced ways of home valuations and we will eventually get there.  Yet we are not there yet.  Right now we have a rush to buy from investors and bottom callers because prices have fallen so dramatically.  Prices falling by 50 percent will get your attention.  Yet they are still over priced based on historical and more conservative pricing assumptions.  If you buy right now the only reason to do so is because prices have fallen so quickly.  That is it.  Don’t try to justify that it is because they are now “cheap” and it is a good deal.  Prices will continue to fall.

Many are somehow thinking that we are once again in the glory days of the California housing mania.  Let us take a look at Southern California home sales and prices:

so-cal_price_and_sales_march_2009

As you can see, we have yet to broach the 25,000 sales per month reached in 2006 when it was the last leg of the Southern California housing bubble.  And once again, we are coming off massive lows so any movement up will look gigantic from the lows in 2008.  Yet keep in mind for last month, 56 percent of all homes sold were foreclosure resales.  So we are still seeing many bargain shoppers and investors picking up homes thinking this is the bottom.  Given that you need to come in with 10, 15, and sometimes 20 percent down to buy a home, it is a bad move because without a doubt, home prices will fall by at least another 10 percent in the region.  And the next leg down is the collapse of the middle to upper income areas.  If we look at San Bernardino and Riverside counties, we can already find homes for $100,000.  So those areas are getting close to their bottom.  Yet we have prime and semi-prime areas that are still resistant because there is a significant amount of money on the sidelines and many are simply deciding to jump in.  How much money is on the sidelines?

sidelinemoney

We have not seen this much money on the sidelines in a generation.  So there is money out there to buy especially since many people are freaked out by the casino nature of our stock markets.  In fact, real estate is now looking like a conservative investment compared to some stocks.  If you are buying right now in California you should plan on staying in your home for 7 to 10 years because there will be another push to lower prices once the Option ARM and Alt-A loans come to confession en masse.  It is nearly impossible for the government to bailout these loans with a straight face but given the suspension of mark to market coming online soon, we can bet that we are going to have our own lost generation just like Japan.  Keep in mind one of the large fundamental problems Japan had was that it did not come to terms with bad assets and did not put to rest insolvent institutions.  So the new novel approach is to get the bad assets off the books and onto the U.S. taxpayer.  How does that solve the problem?  The assets are still bad yet now the cost has shifted completely to the taxpayer.  With the push to suspend mark to market, we are virtually assuring ourselves a lost decade.  Are you going to trust the earnings of Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, and other financial institutions in the first quarter of 2009 now that we know that they can value long-term assets however they please?  Wouldn’t we all love that power!  Heck, I think all of us would like to think that our 5-year-old cars are worth the amount we paid for them off the dealer lot but if we tried to sell them on the market, good luck getting that price.

All I can offer you is caution in this bear market rally.  It would be one thing if we were rallying on awesome and fantastic earnings and the unemployment at 4 percent.  That is not the case.  Unemployment is rising and earnings for the first quarter will be dismal even with the alchemy of suspending mark to market.  It is a sham and I think most Americans have opened their eyes sufficiently to see the massive contradictions embedded in the system.  Just take a look at the money pulled out of the markets above.  Some are jumping back into the markets but be forewarned, there is much more to go before we hit the true bottom.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information.

Post from: Dr. Housing Bubble Blog

Southern California Housing Report and Bottom Callers out En Masse: 17.4 Percent Jump in S&P 500 in Less Than 2 Weeks. Housing Starts up Because of Rental Units. Sealing the Deal for a Lost Decade.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

The Big Picture - Rolling Stone: “The Big Takeover” — AIG Bailout as Political Revolution by Wall Street
Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis - Quantitative Easing Begins; “Operation Twist” Revisited
Mortgage Insider - One lending standard for all companies
The Big Picture - Buying Toxic Assets with Bailout Money
Huffington Post - Bank-Rescue Plan Could Spark Another Public Backlash
Rain City Guide - Naughty Mortgage Fraud Mom Gets Life Sentence Instead of a Time Out

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Viacom (VIA), News Corp’B’ (NWS), Film

DreamWorks Animation (NYSE: DWA) has done it again. The studio’s new computer cartoon, Monsters Vs. Aliens, which was distributed by Viacom (NYSE: VIA), debuted in the top slot over the weekend at domestic multiplexes. According to Boxofficemojo estimates at the time of this writing, the film earned around $58 million. I think we all expected the performance in terms of rank, but I have to say that I thought the film would have taken in north of $60 million.

If you look at this very useful reference, you’ll see that the opening for Monsters is relatively decent when compared to other DreamWorks Animation openings. But since both Kung Fu Panda and Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa had both hit the $60 million mark, I thought Monsters could do the same. An element to keep in mind is the timing. This is the first time that the studio opened one of its animated projects in March since The Road to El Dorado, and that one doesn’t really count since it wasn’t a CGI affair. So from that standpoint, perhaps this is a big victory.

Continue reading ‘Monsters Vs. Aliens’ is a dream for DreamWorks while ‘12 Rounds’ is a nightmare for WWE

‘Monsters Vs. Aliens’ is a dream for DreamWorks while ‘12 Rounds’ is a nightmare for WWE originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: General Motors (GM), Market matters, Bank of New York (BK), Cramer on BloggingStocks

TheStreet.com’s Jim Cramer says that fundamentally, we have the same decent setup here.

Where are the sellers? How did they vanish? Were they really reacting to the hazards of a CEO being fired by the government?

I have to laugh about that analysis; as yesterday’s outrage on flagship said, the government did us all a favor by getting rid of GM (NYSE: GM) (Cramer’s Take) head Rick Wagoner — perhaps the least competent CEO of a major American company — and given the choices out there, that’s a vicious benchmark.

Continue reading Cramer on BloggingStocks: Yesterday didn’t change anything

Cramer on BloggingStocks: Yesterday didn’t change anything originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:50:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati

Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Amazon.com (AMZN), Intel (INTC), General Motors (GM), Amer Intl Group (AIG), Sun Microsystems (JAVA)

Today saw more bank losses. Forced closure more likely at auto-makers. Political seizure over free market enterprise. And a market eager to find an excuse to sell off. That sums it up. The good news is that everything went on sale, all over again and even more. Here were today’s unofficial closing bell levels:

Dow 7,522.02 -254.16 (-3.27%)
S&P 500 787.53 -28.41 (-3.48%)
Nasdaq 1,501.80 -43.40 (-2.81%)

Top Analyst Upgrades
Top Analyst Downgrades

Continue reading Closing Bell: Government puts stocks on sale, redux (AMZN, AIG, DRYS, INTC, GM, JAVA UBS)

Closing Bell: Government puts stocks on sale, redux (AMZN, AIG, DRYS, INTC, GM, JAVA UBS) originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati

Via [bloggingstocks]

Infectious Greed - Your Moment of Obama/AIG Zen
WSJ Developments - Mortgage Bankers Association Feels the Pain
Huffington Post - On the Wrong Side of AIG, in Handcuffs
Calculated Risk - New Home Sales: Is this the bottom?
The Truth About Mortgage - Hope for Homeowners Program Has Helped Just One Borrower

Source [blownmortgage]

A rally does wonders for the psyche and complexion.  People have short-term memories, which is good for the sanity of relationships but not for investing and many forget that only on March 9th did the S&P 500 close at a low of 676, having fallen by 56 percent from the 2007 peak.  The current 20 […]

A rally does wonders for the psyche and complexion.  People have short-term memories, which is good for the sanity of relationships but not for investing and many forget that only on March 9th did the S&P 500 close at a low of 676, having fallen by 56 percent from the 2007 peak.  The current 20 percent market turn around is stunning.  However, to base this on anything but a technical bounce and a bear market rally is false and smells of denial.  The spin on the housing numbers is laughable and the new Private-Public Investment Program leaves much to be desired.  Moreover, whatever happened to those stress tests?  You know, the government acting as psychiatrist to the bi-polar market?  Instead, the government has prescribed lithium and decided that the talk therapy is for the client’s family, and not the client.  This week will show us how strong this rally really is in the face of the Case-Shiller numbers coming out, it’ll be the last few days before the end of the first quarter, and the unemployment numbers are out on Friday with another 500,000+ jobs lost on tap.  Get the meds ready because it is going to be a volatile week.

In the foggy midst of all the turmoil, many people have forgotten about sunny California.  People may want to pay attention since the California economy contributes $1.8 trillion to our nationwide economy.  Some have even forgotten that the state is loaded to the top with Pay Option ARMs and other questionable misfit loan products that have yet to see their glowing reflection in the sun.  The median price for the state is off by 50 to 55 percent depending on which source you look at.  Many will argue that this incredible price drop is based on the fact that over half of homes sold are foreclosure resales.  That is true.  However, that has been the case for over a year.  This is the market.  Until we start seeing a more balanced market where foreclosure resales make up possibly 20 percent or less of all homes sold each month, then we can begin talking about a bottom.  Until then, trying to surgically remove foreclosure resales from the bigger picture does not provide the true picture of the state housing situation.

Groupthink is a strong motivating force.  It rages in manias and panics.  In recent days, I have gotten e-mails from folks that go something like this:

“I keep seeing these 50 percent price drops in the median price but nice homes in nice areas are only down by 20 or 30 percent from their highs.  It seems like the market has bottomed.  I’m starting to think it makes sense to jump in.  Should I buy?”

Given the dire economic situation of California and the massive amount of inventory on the market, my answer would be no.  In fact, I have given 10 reasons why California will not see a bottom until 2011 and all the factors remain in place.  You need to remember that the odds of a massive bubble in real estate once again in the near term are virtually non-existent.  The California housing market was fueled by Pay Option ARMs, interest only, no-money down, and loans that were massively toxic.  Even with the government trying to push rates to 4.5%, the no-money down days with no checking of documents is over.  So if you do miss the bottom, you might be able to jump in a year later with prices going up 5 percent, which is more of a historical average.  That is why there is absolutely no rush right now to jump in.  Too many variables are in the air.  The true California unemployment rate is close to 16 to 19 percent although the headline number is 10.5 percent.  Virtually all forecasts have this number growing throughout the year with estimates putting the headline rate at 12 percent or higher.  The budget is still in a mess.  Does this sound like a good economy for rising home values?

The latest Case-Shiller number assigns the Los Angeles metro area a 171.46.  Where does the futures market see the Los Angeles bottom?

case-shiller-futures

The market is seeing a price bottom hitting in November of 2012 for the Los Angeles area.  Now let me add that for November 2011, which is whereabouts I am predicting a bottom, the future contract is trading at 155 and the 2012 contract is trading at 152, a negligible difference.  If we are to use this as an indicator, we can expect another 11 percent drop in prices overall.  This is your down payment right here.  Is it worth it to wait 2 or 3 years for $30,000, $40,000, or even $50,000 off?  I think so.  Unless I see some empirical evidence showing why prices will skyrocket again, this forecast seems right given all the external and internal forces.

This all leads us to today’s Real Home of Genius (hat tip BV) located in Los Angeles.  As I have mentioned, prime homes in prime areas are still moving with modest discounts.  Yet this is the next leg to fall.  But when this part of the market falls the overall regional median price will actually go up!  Why?  Because right now the market is selling like pancakes those homes in depressed areas like the Inland Empire for $100,000 to $150,000.  And as you know, the median cares not about numbers but more about the overall sample size.  The current sample size is being dominated by lower priced homes.  Yet when that trend is exhausted, then more middle to upper income areas will sell (at discounts) but this will still bring up the overall region median price.  So gear up for the pundits to use this angle in the upcoming year.

Today we Salute you Los Angeles with our Real Home of Genius Award.

Up and Coming Neighborhoods

la-1

For those of you not from the Southern California region, every once in awhile you will have major areas gain traction via a trend and suddenly become expensive over night.  Some areas have bohemian revivals and given our recent bubbles, many areas saw their own renaissance.  This happens on a continuous basis.  This home is located in a zone of Los Angeles that followed this trend.  This area once with a median price of over $500,000 is now selling in the low $400,000 range.  Yet the home above is nice (sort of looks like a mini White House if that is your thing) and is a good sized home.  The home has 5 bedrooms and 3 baths.  It sits on 4,392 square feet, which is gigantic in L.A. terms.

la-3

la-2

This home by the way is a REO-Bank foreclosure.  Makes you wonder how the bank has this accounted on their books?  The ad tells us that they are looking for “cash offers only” so forget about the easy government financing.  Now this home is a perfect example of the next trend we will be seeing in SoCal.  Nice homes in more semi-prime to prime areas selling for bargains.  We’ve seen a few of these recently but the deeper story is that prime areas have seen sales fall off a cliff yet prices remaining stubborn moving downward.  That will not be the case in the next couple of years.  Let us take a look at the sales history on this place:

home-price-la

What is shocking is that this home sold for over $1 million twice in a zip code where the median price is now $435,000.  The current list price is $499,900 which is a drop of 58 percent from the peak.  The irony however, is should this home sell at the current price, this will add fuel to boosting the SoCal median price which now stands at $250,000.  Let us run a quick example.  Let us say 10 homes sell for $150,000 and 4 sell for $500,000.  What is the median price?

Median price = $150,000

At some point, all those bargain foreclosures are going to be bought up and volume will start declining.  What is going to happen when you have higher priced foreclosures selling?  Let us now say we have 5 homes selling for $150,000 and 5 of those $500,000 homes selling for $400,000:

Median Price = $275,000

Is the market really better?  You can bet that perma-bulls will spin this like they tried to spin those home sale numbers.  In our example, the actual price of those higher priced homes fell by 20 percent but the median price jumped up by $125,000.  Southern California being so diverse has a complicated housing market with over 20 million people.

That is why the Case-Shiller numbers will be a better indicator moving forward but also, looking at niche zip codes and markets to see how they are comparing to internals.  I ran the numbers for rentals in the area and a home with 4 to 5 bedrooms will cost you $3,000 to $3,500 a month.  So we are in fact getting to more realistic price levels.  Let us run a quick analysis on this place:

Purchase price:           $499,900

Down payment:          $74,985                      (15 percent down)

PITI:                           $2,749             (4.8% APR with 2 points)

Rent:                           $3,000

Including tax benefits, at the current list price this home may make sense.  It would be cheaper than renting.  Yet the major hurdle now is that $74,985 down payment.  Or in this case, having all the cash to buy the home flat out.  I talked with a few contacts in the industry and from what I have been gathering you are looking at 10 to 15 down if you have relatively good credit (680+ FICO) to qualify for sub-five percent rates, give or take a few points.  Now this home of course is an exception since for every home like this you will find 6 overpriced homes with delusional sellers thinking the market is days away from going back to 2005.  More and more homes like this will be the case, not the exception.

Today we salute you Los Angeles with our Real Homes of Genius Award.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information.

Post from: Dr. Housing Bubble Blog

Real Homes of Genius: When a Home sells for $1.2 Million, the Next Logical Price is $499,900. Volatile Week Ahead for a Troubled Stock Market. Today we salute the Los Angeles Housing Market.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Naked Capitalism - Guest Post: HOOPPLA! The Beauty of Bonds?
Today’s Business Press - Bonus-Tax Back-Down
Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis - America’s Abandoned Cities
Infectious Greed - Dear A.I.G., I Quit
Financial Times - Successful bank rescue still far away

Source [blownmortgage]

Close
E-mail It