Archive for July 22nd, 2009

Filed under: Earnings reports, Industry

KeyCorp (NYSE: KEY) stepped into the earnings spotlight this morning, announcing that its second-quarter loss checked in at 69 cents per share (68 cents per share excluding charges). A year ago, the bank lost $2.71 per share in the second quarter. Although the results were better than those from a year ago, they were not better than the consensus estimate, which called for a loss of 41 cents per share.

The company also announced that it was cutting the amount of preferred shares that it plans to exchange by 71%. KeyCorp’s CEO (Henry Meyer III) stated that the company’s results “reflect the weak economic environment and the steps that it has taken to address issues in credit quality, strengthen capital and control costs.” Like many regional banks, KeyCorp suffered thanks to the credit crunch; even though the bank was not a major player in the subprime-mortgage fiasco. The company added that loan-loss provisions were $850 million, which was 31% greater than a year ago.

Continue reading KeyCorp’s quarterly loss is more than the Street expected

KeyCorp’s quarterly loss is more than the Street expected originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Earnings reports, Forecasts, Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), Yahoo! (YHOO), Apple Inc (AAPL), International Business Machines (IBM), Technology

Get ready for one of the biggies in a week of major earnings reports. Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT), whose tech colleagues include Google (NASDAQ: GOOG), Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL), International Business Machines (NYSE: IBM), and Yahoo! (NASDAQ: YHOO), will publish its Q4 results on Thursday, July 23, after the market closes. What should we be expecting?

Well, according to Earnings.com, expect a decline on the bottom line. Shareholders certainly don’t want to hear that, but we still are in a recession, so it’s most likely unavoidable. Last year at this time, Microsoft made 46 cents per share. This year, look for 36 cents per share in Q4.

Continue reading Is Microsoft a trade before its Q4 release?

Is Microsoft a trade before its Q4 release? originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Before the bell, International markets, Earnings reports, Apple Inc (AAPL), Pfizer (PFE), PepsiCo (PEP), Market matters, Boeing Co (BA), Morgan Stanley (MS), Economic data, Wells Fargo (WFC), Oil, Federal Reserve

U.S. stock futures declined Wednesday morning as investors took some profit off the table following seven straight days of blue chip gains. Some of the positive sentiment regarding corporate earnings faded despite Apple’s (NASDAQ: AAPL) strong showing Tuesday after the close. Yet another wave of bellwether earnings, including more financials, is due today.

Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS), PepsiCo (NYSE: PEP), Pfizer (NYSE: PFE), Boeing (NYSE: BA) and Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) are among companies reporting this morning.

Continue reading Before the bell: Stock futures decline ahead of another earnings wave

Before the bell: Stock futures decline ahead of another earnings wave originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:35:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Options

Terex (NYSE: TEX) closed at $13.66. TEX is expected to report Q2 EPS on July 23. TEX August option implied volatility is at 67, September is at 65; below its 26-week average of 86, according to Track Data, suggesting decreasing price movement.

iShares Trust FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Fund (NYSE: FXE), an index fund that seeks investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance of the FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index, closed at $40.72. FXI August and September option implied volatility of 37 is below its 26-week average of 55, according to Track Data, suggesting decreasing price movement.

Option Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.

Options Update: Terex volatility low into EPS and machinery-pricing outlook originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Wed, 22 Jul 2009 08:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]

Last week U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan sent a forceful letter to mortgage servicers that essentially stated that they were not pleased with the amount of loan modifications taking place.  Now I find it hard to believe that our U.S. Treasury with its brotherhood with the Federal Reserve has a […]

Last week U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan sent a forceful letter to mortgage servicers that essentially stated that they were not pleased with the amount of loan modifications taking place.  Now I find it hard to believe that our U.S. Treasury with its brotherhood with the Federal Reserve has a hard time advocating such a simple policy.  They have the power to circumvent the mortgage industry and Wall Street given that they have bailed out these sectors of the economy.  Did they conveniently forget that we nationalized (whoops, put into conservatorship) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac which now is the U.S. mortgage industry?

Yet in this bread and circus show we get another example of who is really running the show.  The U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve are working for Wall Street and the banking industry, not the American public.  One of the baffling items in the Making Homes Affordable initiative is the desire to help out with second lien mortgages.  After reading the details of the program, I couldn’t help but have the Jack in the Box commercial theme running in the background, “…mini option ARMs!”  First lien, second lien, and what else?  The solution apparently is to make these loan mods into Alt-A or option ARM products.  By the way, those Alt-A loans are now imploding at a higher rate than subprime with bigger balances.  Who would have figured giving out toxic nuclear waste mortgages would cause so much pain?

The irony must be clear to others because people take out second liens on their homes to make them more unaffordable.  That is, they increase the overall debt they owe.  In the real world people are still doubtful of the future of housing:

housing google

Now I have stated in a few examples, like a home Culver City and another in Palms how people used their homes like equity ATMs.  There is no basis for bailing out second liens.  It is incredible that we are now moving down the path of bailing out loans in which people took vacations, added Jacuzzis to their homes, or even bought a luxury vehicle.  Their idea of fixing this problem is making you pay for your 60″ flat screen 30 years into the future.  What does that have to do with making homes more affordable?  The tragic consequence of this housing bubble bursting is that in fact with prices falling, homes are indeed becoming more affordable.  If the goal is for homes to be affordable then trying to prop home prices up is a bad decision.  Yet aiding second liens or as I like to call them, mini option ARMs, is a very bad financial decision.  Let us examine two scenarios presented to us from the U.S. Treasury:

loan mod family a

My first argument would be what in the world was “Family A” doing taking out a $45,000 second on their home?  Heck, I’ve bought homes that are cheaper than $45,000!  But let us set aside those tidbits for a moment because the government here is lowering the monthly payment down to $154 a month for a $45,000 note!  How many of you would like to get $45,000 for $154 a month?  This is insanity.  What is being implicitly stated here by the U.S. Treasury is they don’t expect this family to ever pay this mortgage back.  Their idea is that by giving someone a mini option ARM that they’ll be able to sell the home in 5 years for a higher price and the new buyer will simply roll the 1st and 2nd into one note and all will be well.  I am amazed that our idea of fixing the mortgage crisis is by modifying loans to become option ARMs.  And what will the rate be in 5 years?  It will certainly be higher than the 1 percent teaser rate.  In 5 years (2014) the balance will be $37,000 yet who is paying for that low interest rate?  If the government is backing this up it is pure highway robbery.

Let us look at another family example:

interest-only-2nd

If you thought the first case was insane just look at “Family B” who took out an interest-only second mortgage to the tune of $60,000.  Maybe they needed a new pool with a water fountain (hey, if we’re going to be in a recession you might as well stay cool).  Interest-only loans are absolutely toxic junk and many Alt-A loans went this way yet here we are looking to modify this crap.  You really have to be careful here because the devil is in the details.  First, the initial term was over 12 years at 4.4%.  Let us run those numbers first:

loan-plan

The data above is for a 12 year note that includes both principal and interest.  So if this is an interest only mortgage, the payment is not $537 (P + I) a month but is set at $220 (I only) a month.   This is the same backward logic that has now setup the Alt-A and option ARM tsunami yet our solution is to just increase the term.  They make this example play out so well.  Their solution?  Increase the term to 27 years and drop the rate to 2 percent.  One tiny question?  Who is making up the payment?  Now from the perspective of a lender, why in the world would you want to give someone a 1 percent note?  This is like the government forcing a landlord to push rents down to $400 yet he is paying $700 on the mortgage.  Any investor is going to want to recoup that additional loss.  If the government is making up that shortfall, this would be simply another crony idea to help the housing industry.  And the underlying theme is what is even more disturbing.  What is being said is that no one has the intention of ever paying this money back.  Is anyone concerned about taking a 12 year second and taking it to a 27 year term?  This is a second mortgage by the way, not a first mortgage which is even more baffling.  Time to create millions of renters not only on real estate but on televisions, pools, vacations, cars, upgrades, etc.  Because when you only pay the interest, you are basically paying rent.

This kind of thinking is financially irresponsible.  As a general rule, any money you can get your hands on for less than 3 percent is usually a good take.  That is why these 1 and 2 percent mortgage refinances are flat out giving money away and not doing anything to adjust the principal.  I mean think about it.  If I had access to $1,000,000 in cash right now at 1 percent with a 30 year term, I’d take it in a second.  After all, the intent is never to pay it back at an accelerated pace.  Just more logic from the banking and housing industry.

And if you think the crony banking system is going to shoulder that additional gap think again:

“(Bloomberg) It is well understood that the four major banks would likely need an additional capital injection should they be forced to mark the second-lien mortgages on their balance sheets to a realistic value,” Greenwich Financial’s Frey said.

While under the Home Affordable program, servicers must offer the Hope for Homeowners aid to eligible borrowers, the plan otherwise doesn’t call for first-mortgage balance reductions, focusing instead on reducing housing payments to 31 percent of borrowers’ pay. Lawmakers authorized the FHA program last year, and then revised rules in May after limited use.”

This is such absolute nonsense.  They’ll need additional capital injections?  Screw them.  Seriously, are we now going to bailout second mortgages on top of all the trillions committed to the utterly corrupt banking sector?  The fact that you might have some lenders taking capital injections to reduce 2nd liens while leaving 1st mortgages intact is simply backward beyond any sensible financial policy.  My gut feelings when the private-public investment program was announced are being sadly confirmed.  That is, the government is going to stretch these toxic mortgages out long enough until they can figure out a way to dump these into the taxpayer’s wallet.  And keep in mind, lowering rates does have a cost.  How so?  With all the capital injections and debt you will be paying through this from loss in savings (since rates are artificially low) and also through the annihilation of the US dollar.  This was done with the S&L crisis and will be done again.  Here is a chart with a very subtle trend:

us dollar

I think the next prudent step to take is to jump on some interest-only seconds and load up on wheelbarrows since that is probably how we are going to be paying for groceries in the next decade.  The fact that a plan for second mortgages is even on the table is pure lunacy.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information.

Post from: Dr. Housing Bubble Blog

Mini Option ARMs - Second Mortgage Homeowner Program: Bailing out the Home Equity Withdrawal Machine.

Via [DrHousingBubble]


Last week the Commerce Department announced an unexpected 3.6% increase in housing starts in June. The 582,000 units started last month is a solid gain from May’s 562,000 and much more than the 532,000 analysts had been expecting. The increases were concentrated in single-family homes which were up 14% — the biggest rise since December 2004. Housing permits were also up; the 8.75% increase was the largest gain in a year.

This would seem to be good news. A sign that more people are buying or commissioning homes and that developers expect this trend to continue. However, developers have guessed very wrong in the very recent past. (See Florida, Phoenix, Las Vegas and the Case/Schiller index for examples.)

Many economic indicators suggest developers haven’t suddenly become a lot better in predicting the economy:

  • The nation currently has more housing stock than it needs. That is why the price of existing houses is going down. More stock continues to be placed on the market at lower prices each month by investors desperate to get anything back on their investments.
  • While the increase in the number of people claiming unemployment benefits nationally has slowed slightly (up only .1% in June) it is difficult to see that as a reason to build more homes.
  • Mortgage delinquencies have continued to increase. The most recent FHA numbers showed approximately 71,700 more loans became 60 days or more delinquent in April. Loans 60-plus-days delinquent increased approximately 7% that month to 1.2 million.
  • Commercial real estate prices dropped 7.6% in May. So it hardly seems that businesses are about to expand or staff back up.
  • Companies that sell to the construction trade are not optimistic about the coming year. Caterpillar announced dealer inventories had been cut $1.5 billion in the first half of 2009 and the company expects that to continue. The reasons: “Factors depressing construction included high inventories of unsold homes, lower selling prices and continued stringent standards for mortgage qualification.”

So why the increase? As with so much economic activity these days the cause seems to be wishful thinking. Developers think first time home buyers are going to flood the market before the Dec. 1 end to a federal program offering first-timers an $8,000 tax credit.

While there are undoubtedly a number of wise families who have kept their financial powder dry and will be able to take advantage of the federal aid, why would they buy a house that has either just been completed or is about to be? They are understandably going to want to get the most for their money. Why would they choose brand new construction over very recently brand new – for less money?

Housing starts are frequently referred to as a leading economic indicator. Perhaps we should change that to a leading economic prayer.

Related posts:

  1. Housing starts go up in February and no one knows why
  2. Housing Starts Jump in April
  3. Home builder confidence up as housing starts fall off a cliff

Related posts:

  1. Housing starts go up in February and no one knows why
  2. Housing Starts Jump in April
  3. Home builder confidence up as housing starts fall off a cliff

Source [blownmortgage]


Mortgage Modifications, Mine Field Or Land Of Milk And Honey

Mortgage modifications and loan refinance can be both a mine field or a promised land of mortgage savings. Knowing the difference between a good loan mod or mortgage refinance is not really that complicated, with some simple tips you can quickly see if a mortgage is for you or is a bad idea.
This article will discuss the real savings and advantages a loan modification can have on your mortgage and your monthly payments (notice that there is a difference). It will also discuss briefly what dangers you must avoid so that modifying your mortgage does not cost you more than it should
Lower interest mortgages, smaller is much better.

All things being equal lower interest loans are better than higher interest loans. The good thing with mortgages is that apart from fees all mortgages ARE equal so interest rate is a great measure of the desirability of a mortgage.

Just to illustrate how much you can save if you can modify your loan to a lower interest rate check out this example. Imagine you are paying for a $200,000 home at a 30 year fixed interest rate at 6%. What would you be saving if you modified your mortgage to 5.5% instead? Each month you would save $63, in a year $756 and $7560 in ten years. That is with a 0.5% interest saving, imagine what you could do with a 2% drop in your mortgage interest rate.
Increasing your loan or mortgage tenure.

Another option borrowers opt for when modifying their mortgage is to lengthen the period of a loan to lower their interest rates. Let’s illustrate this with a simple example. Imagine you borrow $1,000 and you agree to pay it in 10 months. That means you will pay $100 a month plus interest. If you are struggling paying your mortgage you could lengthen the period of your loan to 20 months, which would mean $50 a month plus interest. Of course the minefield to look out for is the increased interest rate you would pay on a longer loan because interest is generally paid either monthly or yearly.

Decreasing the length of your loan.
Reducing the length of your loan is  a great idea if you can afford it. A great time to do it is when the interest rates drop and you can use your interest savings to finance a portion of the increase in monthly payments. Again this is better explained with an illustration.
Imagine you have a 30 year loan at 6%. You would be paying around $1,199 a month and a total interest of $231,640 interest. If you reduce your loan to 15 years and find a lower interest rate  of 5.5% your monthly payments will rise but only from 1,199 to $ 1,634, but you would only be paying $94,120 dollars for the loan.

This means that you would be saving around $140,000 on your mortgage with this modification.

Related posts:

  1. Are Loan Modifications Worth your time
  2. What To Look For In A Loan Modification
  3. The perfect plan for refinancing your mortgage

Related posts:

  1. Are Loan Modifications Worth your time
  2. What To Look For In A Loan Modification
  3. The perfect plan for refinancing your mortgage

Source [blownmortgage]

Close
E-mail It