Archive for August 5th, 2009

$78 trillion.  In the third quarter of 2007 American households controlled $78 trillion in various assets including real estate, equities, pensions, and other forms of wealth.  Adding in the liability side of the equation, Americans in the peak year of 2007 had a net worth of $64.2 trillion.  A sizeable portion of that net worth […]

$78 trillion.  In the third quarter of 2007 American households controlled $78 trillion in various assets including real estate, equities, pensions, and other forms of wealth.  Adding in the liability side of the equation, Americans in the peak year of 2007 had a net worth of $64.2 trillion.  A sizeable portion of that net worth has evaporated.  In fact, that $64.2 trillion is now valued at $50.3 trillion.  A 21 percent cut to the American household balance sheet.  Now much of this has come because of the housing bubble bursting and the subsequent stock market crash.  Even in the Great Depression, household wealth did not evaporate so quickly.

I’ve been digging through research papers trying to find accurate measures of household balance sheets during the Great Depression to try to develop a reference point for our current bubble.  The trouble of course is that much of our new toxic instruments like Alt-A mortgages and massive amounts of commercial real estate debt really didn’t have a big impact during the Great Depression.  At the time, it is estimated that some 1 million Americans were invested in the stock market.  The homeownership rate was rather stable during the early half of the century:

home ownership rates

This goes in stark contrast to our bubble peak when homeownership neared 70 percent while the majority of Americans are now involved in the stock market either directly or through a pension fund.  Yet looking at research conducted on the American balance sheet during the Great Depression, we find that this current bust has caused more wealth destruction.

This is part XXVII in our Lessons from the Great Depression series:

21.  The Big Change

22.  The Infection of Consumerism and Living Fake Lives.

23.  The Worst Housing Crash in American History.

24.  Economic Crises Around the World in Synchronization.

25. Reconstruction Finance Corporation II

26. Pecora Commission Where Art Thou?

It is hard to grasp such a large drop in net worth.  Let us chart this out:

household assets and liabilities

*Click for sharper image

The growth in American household assets has been rather unrelenting since the 1950s.  We had a hiccup earlier in the decade with the tech bust but we were back on track in a very short time.  However, since the peak the asset side of the equation has imploded.  We also see on the chart above the increase in liabilities.  As in most busts including the Great Depression, assets adjusted quicker than liabilities.  While asset prices have come down $13.8 trillion the liability side of the equation has only decreased by $420 billion.  How is this disconnect remedied?  By massive amounts of defaults and foreclosures since the instrument that caused the bubble was real estate and the debt tied to it.

Now I know that during the Great Depression, the safety net was largely non-existent.  There was no FDIC.  No Social Security.  No large pension funds.  So for the most part, people were on their own.  It is no surprise then that the unemployment rate peaked at 25 percent with 14 million unemployed Americans.

It is hard to believe that we now have 14.7 million unemployed Americans with another 11.2 million either working part-time for economic reasons or some who have given up looking for work.  Yet the pain isn’t as visible as soup lines or men standing outside of manufacturing plants looking for work.  Unemployment benefits are done electronically through the internet and in some states, funds are disbursed through debit cards.  Yet on a percent basis, Americans have lost more household wealth in this crisis than in the Great Depression.  Let us look at the balance sheet from the Great Depression American household:

great depression household balance sheet

*Source:  Frederic Mishkin - The Journal of Economic History (Dec., 1978)

I struggled to find this data and even the author in the above work had difficulty constructing the data set.  Much of this is largely due to the poor record keeping done prior to the Great Depression.  As we can see from the above chart, the household net worth peaked in 1929 and didn’t hit a bottom until 1934.  From peak to trough, the amount loss was 11 percent.  Now why the lag?  For the most part, much of the wealth of the American household wasn’t in stocks contrary to popular belief.  Of course, the stock market rocked the economy and led to job losses which in turn hurt the balance sheet but many Americans did not have their money linked up in stocks.  The lag and hits came with many of the bank failures and subsequent foreclosures.  The most visible historical memory is the stock market crash with photos of anxious crowds gathering outside of Wall Street.

stock crash

It is interesting to note that the patterns of bubbles are rather similar.  That is, liabilities keep on increasing even after the peak.  Let us look at the liability side of things:

great depression household liabilities

Mortgages were not a gigantic part of the balance sheet.  Much of this had to do with mortgages being constructed with a 5 to 10 year term and a balloon payment at the end.  Let us take the peak year of 1929 for example.  While household net worth (in 1958 dollars - we are focused more on percent changes) was $844 billion mortgage debt was $29.6 billion, or 3.5 percent of net worth.  Let us look at our peak data.  Net worth peaked at $64.2 trillion and mortgage debt was $10.5 trillion, or 16.3 percent.  Now this would make sense since homeownership is much higher than during the Great Depression but it also shows how dependent we were to the housing industry.  In fact, that is why the government and Wall Street are so concerned about maintaining high home prices even though in many parts of the country they are still unaffordable.  We are approaching the bust in differing ways.  Take a look at a paper written in 1933 during the Great Depression addressing various government programs:

low cost

It is strange to see a government initiative during the bust seeking affordable housing.  How things have changed.  Most of the current legislation and programs seek to maintain high home prices (i.e., loan modifications, bailouts, etc).  Since much of the American balance sheet is tied to real estate when the housing industry busted, much of the bubble wealth also came crashing down.  At the peak real estate made up $24 trillion of the $64 trillion in household net worth.  That is a large portion.  It’ll be fascinating to look at the Q2 data since housing prices have been coming down but the stock market has rebounded.  Real Estate is still a larger segment so I would expect the net worth figure to decrease for the quarter.

What becomes clear is that even though there is more overall prosperity in 2009 than in 1929, there has never been a time in history when so much wealth has been lost.  Even the Great Depression did not see such large wealth destruction.  We have more humane safety nets in 2009 but these are being strained.  Many unemployment insurance benefits are reaching their end even with extended dates.  What then for these people?  Even though the freefall in unemployment may have stopped, companies are still not hiring.  So what then?  Trade is still hurting:

trade

The American household balance sheet will only begin to feel some relief when companies begin hiring again.  The balance sheet will only be helped when the liabilities side of the equation begins to reflect the real world value of the assets.  There are many lessons to learn from the Great Depression.  What those in Wall Street forget is that you have to create jobs to have a healthy economy.  Without that, this is going to be a long and drawn out recession.  Even Ben Bernanke had this to say:

“A lot of things happened, a lot came together, [and] created probably the worst financial crisis, certainly since the Great Depression and possibly even including the Great Depression,” Bernanke said at the start of a town-hall meeting in Kansas City.” - July 26, 2009

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information.

Post from: Dr. Housing Bubble Blog

The American Household Balance Sheet. Lessons from the Great Depression Part XXVII: Household Net Worth Drop in Great Depression 11 Percent. Current Net Worth Drop of $13.8 Trillion Equivalent to 21 Percent Drop.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Filed under: Analyst reports, Analyst upgrades and downgrades, Analyst initiations

Analyst upgrades:

  • Keefe Bruyette upgraded Intercontinental Exchange (NYSE: ICE) to Market Perform from Underperform following the company’s in-line quarter and extended buyback. The firm raised its target price on shares to $103 from $98.
  • Merriman upgraded Cree (NASDAQ: CREE) to Buy from Neutral after transitioning coverage of the stock as it believes HB-LED chips are gaining momentum and that the company can top its recently raised guidance.
  • Deutsche Bank upgraded Glatfelter (NYSE: GLT) to Buy from Hold following the company’s Q2 results due to falling net debt levels and valuation. The firm raised its target on shares to $14 from $8.
  • Corporate Executive Board (NASDAQ: EXBD) was upgraded to Neutral from Underperform at Baird.
  • Cognizant (NASDAQ: CTSH) was upgraded to Buy from Neutral at Goldman.
  • Unit Corp. (NYSE: UNT) was upgraded to Buy from Sell at Jesup & Lamont.

Continue reading Analyst upgrades, downgrades and initiations: ADM, ANN, GENZ, ICE, MON, RIMM …

Analyst upgrades, downgrades and initiations: ADM, ANN, GENZ, ICE, MON, RIMM … originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]


The new mortgage plan is out there, fresh out the box. The new loan mortgage plan has been designed to help more people dig themselves out the current crisis. There are actually some clever incentives for those who try and work with their mortgage even if it is upside down. So here are the two question we are all asking: What does this “new mortgage plan” offer? And who qualifies?

The mortgage plan has two main objectives:

1) To help people who are going to foreclose on their mortgage because they are late in their mortgage payments. This demographic is the priority of the plan with good reason. The avalanche in home foreclosures is affecting the whole housing and construction industry besides these are the families hardest hit by the housing crisis. The mortgage plan will help these homeowners to modify their mortgages and make them affordable.

2) The second objective is to help with the home mortgages of home owners that can’t refinance their home and take advantage of the current lower interest rates because the value of their home has dropped so much it is worth less than their mortgage. The new mortgage “deal” will help these home mortgage owners to refinance their homes with lower interest rates. Unfortunately the restrictions on this type of home mortgage are so high the number of homeowners that will benefit from it will be significantly lower.

In a nutshell the two-pronged working plan is to save the mortgages or homeowners that are behind in their payments and that would otherwise lose their homes with a mortgage modification that would reduce their monthly payments and make them affordable. The second prong aims to open under water mortgages that are worth more than the value of the home to refinancing with the current lower interest rates.

Who qualifies?

The devil is as usual in the detail but here are the main points homeowners must meet to qualify:

1) The mortgage must have been secured before January the first 2009.

2) The primary mortgage must be less than $729,500. This figure has actually been revise a few times to include the mortgages of homeowners in expensive states and areas.

3) The homeowner must live in the house he is requesting aid for. This mortgage plan is not there to save investments but family homes.

4) The homeowner must sign a financial hardship statement that documents his inability to pay his mortgage.

5) Tax returns and pay stubs must be fully documented.

6) If the homeowner pays over 55% of his income on debts he must sign up for counseling. I think this is probably one of the best ideas this mortgage plan sets out as so much of the debt trouble we get into is due to bad financial habits that can be un-learned with some practical help.

As you will have noticed the requirements on the new deal have been relaxed and more mortgage homeowners should be able to benefit, but will it be enough?

Related posts:

  1. Obama Mortgage Plan, Pays For Paying Your Mortgage
  2. The perfect plan for refinancing your mortgage
  3. Obama’s Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan

Related posts:

  1. Obama Mortgage Plan, Pays For Paying Your Mortgage
  2. The perfect plan for refinancing your mortgage
  3. Obama’s Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Insiders, Competitive strategy, Market matters

The SEC plans to ban “flash trades.” What are flash trades? Flash trades give some brokerages an advance look at orders. Most major exchanges, except the NYSE Euronet, use the flash trade system. It gives clients a look at orders a fraction of a second before the trades are routed to rival platforms. The practice is deemed unfair and is the reason for the ban.

A ban would reverse a 2004 SEC ruling permitting flash trades. Flash trades account for only 2.4% of shares traded in the US. The proposal to ban the activity by the SEC is subject first to a vote by SEC commissioners, then feedback is requested for a period of between 30 and 90 days. Then, commissioners come back and vote on whether or not to enact the ban.

Continue reading SEC plans to ban ‘flash trades’

SEC plans to ban ‘flash trades’ originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 04 Aug 2009 19:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]


Mortgage modifications have received a lot of publicity in the media due and with good reason, millions and millions (4-5 according to government projections) will be left homeless if they don’t make appropriate loan modifications to their mortgages.

However that does not mean that loan modifications are only for the poor and destitute. We can all take advantage of the historic low interest rates and modify our loan or mortgage. Of course this is not an option that will help everyone, in some cases loan modifications cost more than they save and the only benefit they provide is to reduce monthly payments in exchange of a huge increase in interest payments throughout the life of the loan.

How can you can find out if your are eligible for a loan modification that will save you money?

1)   Check the cost.

It doesn’t get much more basic than this but it is vital that we check the price tag before we buy it. To illustrate you might have heard about companies that install solar panels to save money on your electric bill. I actually looked into one of these systems for my home and when you put figures onto paper it would have taken decades to cover the cost of my investment. I happen to believe that solar panels would be a great idea and that all new homes should be forced to have them, but you get my drift, before you “purchase” a product that provides a saving it is wise to work out exactly how much you are saving.

2)    Are you planning to sell soon?

Loan modifications take time to pay off the initial cost of purchasing the mortgage modification, often two to three years. If you are planning to sell soon you might lose money.

3)  Have you had your mortgage for a long time?

Mortgages are set so that at the beginning of the loan you pay most of the interest of the mortgage while paying most of the principal towards the end of the mortgage’s tenure. For example in the first 5 years payments tend to be broken up in 85% to pay for the interest of the mortgage and 15% towards the loan’s principal. If you modify your loan, your outstanding loan will be reset and you will begin to pay mostly interest with your monthly payments again. This could actually reduce your equity and provide little or no benefits. Therefore if you are in the final years of your loan it might be best to stay put.

Loan modifications are generally best suited for people who have recently bought the mortgage, are planning to own the home for a long time and who have excellent credit ratings. Nevertheless it is always a good idea to contact your bank and tell them you are seriously considering refinancing your mortgage, if you are a good customer they are likely to bend backwards to keep you on their portfolio whatever your circumstances are.

Related posts:

  1. Mortgage Modifications, Mine Field Or Land Of Milk And Honey
  2. Are mortgage modifications cost effective
  3. Are Loan Modifications Worth your time

Related posts:

  1. Mortgage Modifications, Mine Field Or Land Of Milk And Honey
  2. Are mortgage modifications cost effective
  3. Are Loan Modifications Worth your time

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Recession

A victory of sorts, for Keynesian economics, and ultimately, for the American people.

Earlier this year author Amity Shlaes, who is a conservative and not a Keynesian, was a member of the chorus of market absolutists and conservative economists who opposed the U.S. government’s fiscal stimulus package, on philosophical grounds: government spending doesn’t stimulate the economy. (Shlaes should talk to automakers based in the U.S. about that one, particularly amid the ‘cash for clunkers’ fiscal stimulus plan.)

Continue reading Supply sider now believes fiscal stimulus leads to GDP growth

Supply sider now believes fiscal stimulus leads to GDP growth originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:20:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: General Electric (GE), PepsiCo (PEP), Allstate Corp (ALL), Eastman Kodak (EK)

This was one of those days where profit takers had the markets soft all morning, but strong pending home sales rallied the stock market and trumped an inverted spending and income figure. A revision for a lower hurricane season helped insurers.

Here were today’s unofficial closing bell levels:

Dow 9,315.51 +28.95 (0.31%)
S&P 500 1,004.86 +2.23 (0.22%)
Nasdaq 2,008.80 +0.19 (0.01%)

Top Analyst Upgrades/Downgrades

Continue reading Closing Bell: Overbought, yes… but who cares? (ALL, EK, GE, PEP)

Closing Bell: Overbought, yes… but who cares? (ALL, EK, GE, PEP) originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]

Much was made on Tuesday that the Case-Shiller Index showed a positive increase for the first time in many years.  This of course was for nationwide data and did not take into account seasonal adjustments.  However, there is noticeable change going on.  Yet the Los Angeles and Orange County data point was still trending lower.  […]

Much was made on Tuesday that the Case-Shiller Index showed a positive increase for the first time in many years.  This of course was for nationwide data and did not take into account seasonal adjustments.  However, there is noticeable change going on.  Yet the Los Angeles and Orange County data point was still trending lower.  Not exactly good news as we look into the exotic mortgage zoo with our Alt-A and option ARM waste.  On Monday, the big jump in home sales was led by the median price dropping by $13,000 but the media was spinning this as some kind of sign that housing bubble version 2.0 is around the corner.

I’m surprised how quickly some people are capitulating and thinking that somehow the market has suddenly turned around.  Didn’t our Governor just sign a budget to patch up the biggest deficit in the history of California?  The disconnect is amazing.  One simple question people fail to answer is what jobs are going to replace the 6,500,000 jobs lost since the start of the recession?  Keep in mind many of the lost jobs were good paying jobs.  Here in California, you had many people especially in the mid to upper priced areas buying overpriced homes with over sized incomes because of the bubble.  You had mortgage brokers, agents, bankers, and others connected to the housing industry that believed in the housing bubble and paid top dollar for a bubble home.  Unfortunately, they are facing a double-whammy with home prices plummeting and incomes drying up.  So if you want a simple question as a litmus test it should center on what industry is going to compensate for the lost housing industry?  I have yet to see a good argument about job growth.

Before I move on to the article investigating an interesting story of three homes on three blocks in Compton, I want to say thank you for helping this site reach the 5,000,000 hit mark.  Many of you have been reading this blog for years and I sincerely appreciate the long time loyalty.  Many of you may recall when we were a small minority in the middle of California bubble mania.  As we go forward, I will do my best to continue giving you an honest take on what is going on.  If I have learned anything in these last few years, it would be that you as a smart consumer of information should verify data and arrive at your own conclusion no matter who is saying what or where the large crowd is going.  I am appreciative of all the e-mails and from all the other dedicated bloggers who have been working so hard to create an alternative outlet for information.  With that said, let us now continue to the article.

Tip #1 - Please Refrain from Using M.S. Paint for Real Estate Ads

paint-home

We’ve discussed the need for agents to use better photography in advertising real estate.  One common theme in Southern California is garbage can photography where agents simply leave the garbage can in the photo of a home that is selling for large amounts of money.  Aside from the psychological association between garbage and a home, there are many aesthetic reasons for not doing this.  Beside, how much work does it take to get out of the car and move the bin?

Well this home in Washington State highlights a new kind of real estate ad.  It would appear that the grass is edited using Microsoft Paint or a similar photo editing software.  Now, I don’t have anything against MS Paint but I’m not sure that I would use it in editing the lawn on a $350,000 home in this current market.  This is like you having the ability to own only one family photo and you electing to go to your local strip mall and taking a picture on a bear rug with a waterfall background.  Either way, I was surprised to see this.  I did a double take but zooming in it becomes rather obvious:

zoom-photo

I guess nothing surprises me anymore.

I spent some time looking at a small area in Compton.  In this three-block region, I found three homes for sale that all tell the story of the housing bubble but also of easy finance.  Before we decide that loan modifications are the way to go, how about we pause and examine what really happened?  Here is the map of the area with the three homes:

compton-map

Today we salute you Compton with our Real Homes of Genius Award.

Compton Home A

compton-garbage-can-tech

It didn’t take much time to get our first home using garbage can photography.  This 711 (not the store) square foot home is selling for $53,000 and isn’t listed as a foreclosure or short-sale.  A $50,000 home in Los Angeles County.  Now before we get too excited that prices are making sense, let us look at the sales history:

Sales History

02/18/2009: $306,135*

11/01/2007: $357,000

01/24/2003: $112,500*

11/15/2000: $60,000

*Transaction data unclear

Some of the transaction data is unclear resulting from refinancing, transfers, or other recordings but the November 2007 price was a sale.  This home sold for $357,000 less than two years ago.  Who made this loan?  Have you noticed some silence regarding the public-private investment program?  It was initially slated to start in July but we have heard very little on this front because the entire program is a sham and would result in many toxic loans jumping into the pool that will be backstopped by the taxpayer.  If you didn’t do the math, the price drop on this place amounts to 85 percent in less than two years.

Compton Home B

2-compton-home

Another case of garbage can photography.  This home is larger at 1,280 square feet and has 3 bedrooms and 2 baths.  The home was recently listed at $131,700.  This is a bank owned home.  Let us look at some sale history to see why the bank now owns this place:

Sale History

01/22/2009: $147,435 *

12/13/2004: $288,000 *

04/25/2001: $131,000 *

11/07/2000: $139,526 *

07/09/1999: $134,000

08/04/1997: $25,000

*Transaction data unclear

We have a tremendous amount of action here.  On this place, we are seeing a lost decade in home prices.  We are below the 1999 sale price.  Who really knows the story on the remaining transactions but these are the kind of homes that are all over Southern California.

Compton Home - C

3-compton-home

Now here we have fence lens photography.  You would think that you would have a better picture for a home selling for $180,000 but this is it.  This is a 940 square foot home but once again, we see lots of activity on the home:

Sale History

04/13/2009: $88,000 *

02/17/2009: $115,758 *

06/12/2006: $370,000 *

05/10/2004: $226,000 *

01/30/2003: $44,000 *

*Transaction data unclear

What is fascinating is that from 1990 to 2000 sale and record activity is largely not present or very tiny.  Yet all of a sudden in this decade, you have multiple transactions occurring.  If we look at this place, the last action was in April for $88,000 yet the asking price is $100,000 above that.  This home is only a few blocks away from the slightly smaller 711 square foot home selling for $53,000 and the much larger $131,700 home B.

What should become apparent to you is this; the homes that will move are lower priced.  Some times the lower price is much lower than many would have imagined.  This data will be factored in future comps thus depressing the area home prices.  Many of these areas are dominated by foreclosures (still).  Now imagine what a few foreclosures in a mid to upper priced area will do for comps?  The Alt-A and option ARM wave will do the same thing as the subprime loans did in the lower priced areas which is push comps much lower.  It will lower prices and if agents use garbage can technology here, they are going to be in for a tough market.
Today we salute Compton with our Real Homes of Genius Award.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information.

Post from: Dr. Housing Bubble Blog

Real Homes of Genius All-Star Edition: Today we Salute you Compton. Investigating 3 Blocks of Housing Bubble History and Hundreds of Thousands of Dollars Lost.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Close
E-mail It