Archive for August 16th, 2009

Filed under: Amgen Inc (AMGN), Comfort Zone Investing

Biotechs are fascinating. They have such great promise, yet very few of them actually turn those promises into money. Cures for all types of cancers always seem imminent with promising (there’s that word again) results from mice or small control groups. Phase I testing is completed and all kinds of good stuff seems possible. Then something usually happens. Usually not very good things.

Most of the time, it’s discovered that what works in mice doesn’t work in men (or women). Or that the group was too small for meaningful data and when a larger group is studied, the efficacy isn’t there. Or as soon as there’s a bounce in the stock price, much more stock is issued and dilution occurs.

Continue reading Comfort Zone Investing: Beware pretty promises when buying biotechs

Comfort Zone Investing: Beware pretty promises when buying biotechs originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Sat, 15 Aug 2009 10:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]


If Mortgage providers cannot be coaxed into action maybe they can be shamed into action. That seems the line the Obama administration is taking with banks that are dragging their feet and digging their heels while the administration is flexing every muscle to push forward its Mortgage Modification program to help millions of Americans avoid foreclosure.

Naming and shaming has been a popular business tool to “encourage” people and companies to do what they don’t want but know they must. Banks realize they must help homeowners to save their homes just as banks were rescued with the recent bailout on banks. They understand that in the long run a healthy housing industry will mean larger profits for banks. However getting lenders to reduce loans and provide breaks that limit their profit or cost money to provide is never going to be an easy task.

So how did banks do in the shaming and naming game?
The leader of the pack in loan modification turnover (now that is a performance figure that wasn’t used before) is Saxon Mortgage Services a subsidiary of Morgan Stanley with a 25 percent of its loans in trial modifications. It is not only the smaller banks that have shown willingness to work with the administration. Larger banks like JPMorgan Chase with 20 percent and Citigroup with 15 percent are showing how it’s done even when you have to maneuver a behemoth of a company to reorganize the services you provide.

Unfortunately it is not all good news for banks. Wells Fargo parent of Wachovia showed a puny 6 percent of delinquent mortgages in trial modifications while Bank of America bottomed the list with 4 percent.

The Obama administration has responded to this with a clear target for banks to meet a cumulative magic number of 500,000 trial modifications by November the first. These trial modifications are part of the Mortgage Plan set by the Obama administration. The idea is that before a borrower is allowed to qualify for a final modification he or she must undergo a three month trial where he must pay every payment on time. If he or she does just that there is an incentive in cash that is deducted from the borrower’s principal. The incentives don’t stop there, for every year payments are made the government will pay cash to reduce the principal of the loan up to $3,000 which means larger sums when interest is calculated.

Why are banks so slow in responding to the mortgage plan?
There are various reasons, mainly two, banks are not geared to providing loan modifications and there are not always in the best interest of the bank. Let’s have a look at these two factors.

1)    Loan Modifications as a new bank service.
Up to recently banks tended to simply lend, collect and process mortgage payments. They of course have their fingers in all kinds of investments but in the retail mortgage sector lending and collecting is pretty much what a bank did. Other debt relief companies would specialize in providing debt consolidation loans and similar services. Now the government wants banks to become loan modification machines and FAST.
This is not as easy as it seems. It includes training staff, setting protocols and guidelines, a new type of management that can make fast and effective decisions on a relatively new product. In other words, changes, changes and changes. Something big banks are not that used to making.

2)    It just isn’t always that profitable.
Banks are profit organizations not charities. The decisions they make are based on profit analysis not a generous spirit and you could argue that is the only way our current economy model is going to work. Loan Modifications are simply not always profitable for companies. In some cases they are a win win  operation as they help borrowers make smaller monthly payments and increase the overall interest the bank makes on their investment. However on many occasions loan modifications simply cost the bank more money for no measurable benefit.

Encouraging banks to do that is not an easy task, which is probably why they are trying to shame them into doing it.

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modification And Loan Refinancing What Is The Difference
  2. What Is A Home Loan Modification
  3. What To Look For In A Loan Modification

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modification And Loan Refinancing What Is The Difference
  2. What Is A Home Loan Modification
  3. What To Look For In A Loan Modification

Source [blownmortgage]


We live in the age of information. That is good and it is bad. It is good because you can get information from a great variety of sources and have the choice of seeing the world from a number of perspectives. The bad news is that you really need to get your information from a variety of sources because it is hard to know who to trust or who got the story right.

An example of this occurred last Wednesday when we received conflicting reports. The Mortgage Bankers Association said mortgage loan applications were up 16.1% for the week ending August 7 in relation to the same week last year. This news item seemed feasible because there has been an increase in the home sales in the second quarter in 39 states.  Other figures also seemed to support this with mortgage refinancing accounting for 52.3% OF mortgage applications and adjustable rate mortgage applications also rose by 0.4%.

On the other hand, Reuters saw the situation in a completely different light by focusing on a different perspective of the situation.  Reuters looked at  a week over week seasonally adjusted  decline of 3.5% which is not exactly the good news the Mortgage Bankers Association reported.  Reuters cites the increase in interest rates as the reason for the drop coupled with the current 9.4% unemployment rate which is keeping homebuyers shy and cautions because of the economic climate.

So who is right? Are mortgage rates rising or dropping? The answer is that both are right, they just are focusing on different data to express their opinion. It is left to you to decide what argument is more compelling.

The Mortgage Bankers Association chose to compare this last week with the same week last year while Reuters analyzed the behavior of the market week over week.

To illustrate how this can affect our view of the situation look at these mortgage figures. The Mortgage Bankers Association reported that the cost to borrow on a 30 year fixed rate at 5.38% a rise of 0.21 percentage from the previous week. The lowest interest rate or cost to purchase a mortgage hit an all time low of 4.61% in the end  of March. If you look at these figures it does seem like things are going rather badly and that the Mortgage Market is falling.
However if you compare this week’s interest rate with last year’s in the same week you see that last year the 30 year fixed rate mortgage was a the hair rising rate of 6.57%! A far cry from the 5.38% we now have.

So are we rising or falling? We are both it just depends what point of reference you choose.

Related posts:

  1. Mortgage Applications Fall as Interest Rates Rise
  2. Mortgage applications off 10% from same time last year
  3. Mortgage loan applications & rates increase

Related posts:

  1. Mortgage Applications Fall as Interest Rates Rise
  2. Mortgage applications off 10% from same time last year
  3. Mortgage loan applications & rates increase

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Forecasts, Middle East, Market matters, Economic data, Oil, Recession

falling oil pricesOil took a beating tyesterday, as investors sold off the precious crude in the wake of a weak consumer confidence report that renewed pessimism towards economic recovery.

The University of Michigan reported that its consumer confidence index dipped to 63.2, down from 66 in July. This is the second straight month that the index has moved lower, after a four month streak of gains. In June the index was up at 70.8, which was the highest since back in February 2008.

Continue reading Oil prices close out the week lower

Oil prices close out the week lower originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Sat, 15 Aug 2009 10:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Earnings reports, Products and services, Management, Competitive strategy

We’ve seen a large percentage of companies reporting better-than-expected earnings. However, the earnings reports were not always compared to last year.

There is yet another factor, actually the most important factor that generates profits, and that key factor is sales. Without sales, the bottom line (net profit) remains stagnant.

Companies have slashed payrolls and expenses and that increased the bottom line for a time. However after all of this is over, the bottom line doesn’t improve until sales improve.

Continue reading Sales — the key to the bottom line — are still in the dumps

Sales — the key to the bottom line — are still in the dumps originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]


Via [bloggingstocks]

The invisible recovery is all around us if you would only close your eyes, and trust your instincts.  Contrary to the implosion of many state budgets, the Federal government amazingly seems to have an unlimited amount of money for select causes.  For example, Wall Street seems to get every single penny it desires without much […]

The invisible recovery is all around us if you would only close your eyes, and trust your instincts.  Contrary to the implosion of many state budgets, the Federal government amazingly seems to have an unlimited amount of money for select causes.  For example, Wall Street seems to get every single penny it desires without much question from both parties in Washington.  Sure, we’ll have politicians on both sides of the aisle argue their case and fight for the common good while they get their pockets lined by Goldman Sachs, the insurance companies, or the real estate industry.  When it comes to real reform the status quo is still here even after the near implosion of the markets.  The U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve are showing us that when push comes to shove, they are servants of the banking elite and protecting the financial health of American people is simply a secondary consideration.

If this is the start of the recovery it sure seems funny.  A federal judicial panel has given California 45 days to clean up its inmate overcrowding problem.  Of course, this might take two years to implement if things go through but apparently this is how the recovery will look like in the state.  Another wonderful story showing us the new economics of the recession, banks are set to collect some $38 billion in overdraft revenues.  Good times.  Once again, people struggling to buy food with their WaMu Chase debit card need to be careful since they may be slapped with an additional fee.  Apparently peak overdraft fees are a leading indicator of an economic recovery.  Another fascinating story we keep hearing about is the greatness of a jobless recovery.  Too bad that earnings are off from depressed levels a year ago and people forget that losing a big fixed expense like say, an employee, will actually help your bottom line in the short-term.  These are three of the stories we are going to talk about in today’s article.

40,000 Inmates or 40,000 New Potential Home Buyers?

ponzi

As we all know, California is in a dismal state of affairs.  In this year alone the state has had to balance some $60 billion in budget deficits including our latest battle with the $26 billion monster.  The disturbing thing is much of these cuts are going to be felt at a deeper level in the months to come as the cuts are enacted.  We will see this in less state spending but also with thousands being furloughed, you can expect people to be cutting back on purchasing goods and services.  The federal judicial panel is looking at the troubling state of the California prison system.  In California we have 155,000 inmates with 12,000 being housed in out-of-state institutions.  The 33 prisons in the state system were designed to hold 85,000 inmates but like our housing bubble, we like to overdo things a bit.

“(WSJ) California Attorney General Jerry Brown has said he plans to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. The order comes just two weeks after Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a budget deal that includes a $1.2 billion cut to the state prison system.

It is unclear how officials will execute the court’s decision. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation said it is working on proposals to reduce the prison population, but those plans need to be approved by the legislature. If the state doesn’t comply with the order, it could be held in contempt and fined.”

The state has two years to do this but given potential litigation, who knows if this will happen.  Yet the fact of the matter is cuts are being made and these are the implications:

corrections fund

Clearly this was unsupportable given the California budget situation.  Let us assume these inmates are released in the next year.  What work will they find?  Ironically, this would only add to the high 11.6% unemployment rate that the state currently faces.  Aspiring positive realtors will probably tell us that we will have 40,000 more potential homebuyers.  Maybe if we still had the subprime infrastructure in place they would qualify for $500,000 for a Real Home of Genius of their choice.  Apparently this is the sign of economic recovery here.

Over Draft This!

credit card

Banks now have to resort to higher and higher overdraft fees to find additional revenues.  It isn’t enough that their crony capitalist system is rolling out trillions in rescue funds; they now have to squeeze their much poorer client base with the Vise-Grip of money sucking vampires.  You might search in the seams of your couch for additional change but the bank is going to find additional methods to screw you each and every way without even thanking you for the generous life saving bailout.  Most of the headlines on Monday read:

“Americans pay $38 billion in overdraft fees a year.”

Which is stunning in itself.  But when you run the numbers, it becomes downright shameful

“(The Atlantic) There are 300 million Americans, and, the FT reports, 130 million checking accounts. $38 billion divided into 130 checking accounts puts the average yearly overdraft total at $300 dollars, which is the equivalent of 9 overdraft charges from large banks like Bank of America. How many Americans really overdraft 9 distinct times a year? Moebs Services discovers, however, that one bad day for a consumer can mean gangbusters for the banks:

At BofA, a customer overdrawn by as little as $6 could trigger a $35 penalty. If the customer does not realise they have a negative balance and continue spending, they could incur that fee as many as 10 times in a single day, for a total of $350.”

Many of you have experienced this once in your lifetime.  You decide to put the $10 sushi roll on your debit card and get reamed for $35 because you used the wrong card.  Most of us would suspect that this only happens once or twice in our lives.  But to account for $38 billion in fees?  Why not deny the transaction?  Clearly there is a systemic problem here.  I once had this occur and had to go through a long wait to talk with a bank representative to simply block any charges beyond the zero point.  The bank rep kept insisting the “just in case scenario” but given my love of paying the $35 fee, decided to simply block this by opting out.  Charging this kind of penalty is like having a loan shark pounding your knees for not coming up with the additional points.  So when you hear about those wonderful bank profits, just think of all those overdraft fees that are part of the new economic recovery.

No Jobs = 50 Percent Stock Market Rally

employment ratio

During the housing bubble one comment made me realize, “this is going to end badly in an epic way.”  A homebuyer who happened to buy one year before the peak had his home “appreciate” by $50,000 in one year.  What I thought was a joke was a serious contemplation on his behalf.  He uttered, “with my home going up $50,000 per year, who needs to work anymore?”  Indeed, in this recovery work seems to be optional like clothing at a nude beach.

If you haven’t noticed, we didn’t exactly add any jobs last month.  The only significant improvement as you may have heard is that “things are getting less bad.”  This is like getting kicked in the shins instead of the stomach.  As the chart above highlights, job losses are still occurring.  But a few things occurred last month that made the numbers appear better:

(a)  Big government hiring - a jump in auto activity with the wonderfully named cash for clunkers helped spur back some growth but also, the increased hiring for the 2010 Census helped.  Now you tell me, how many times are we going to do that 2010 Census?

(b)  Minimum wage - the increase in the minimum wage pushed up the overall hourly wage rate.  So those using this as a key point fail to miss a one-time gain.

(c)  Seasonal adjustments - We are still adding jobs through the BLS Birth/Death model which has to do with new business growth.  Now when you think of invisible recovery, this is your mascot.

And another key point is we have now lost nearly a decade of job growth.  Even though we only had 247,000 jobs lost last month, we have now lost 6,664,000 non-farm jobs since the recession started in December of 2007:

In 2000:  131,785,000 (non-farm employed)

In 2009:  131,488,000 (non-farm employed)

Welcome to the new recovery.  This kind of information is sufficient to cause a 50 percent stock market rally from the March lows.  Even though most institutions are way off in earnings from 2008, they have revised their earnings to beat the street.  Now you show me an analysis of what industry is going to create some 7 million jobs and then I might consider the recovery legit.  Until then, let the invisible good times roll.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information.

Post from: Dr. Housing Bubble Blog

3 Stories of the Invisible Economic Recovery: 40,000 Inmates Released or 40,000 Potential New California Home Buyers? Banks increase Revenues by Overdraft Fees. The Ultimate Invisible Jobs Recovery.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Close
E-mail It