Archive for October, 2009

Only looking at economics for an answer to the housing bubble mania will leave you with many questions unanswered.  As in most manias, there is a large element of speculation and irrational exuberance as the godfather of bubbles Alan Greenspan once said.  Yet what most on Wall Street and the government lack is some basic […]

Only looking at economics for an answer to the housing bubble mania will leave you with many questions unanswered.  As in most manias, there is a large element of speculation and irrational exuberance as the godfather of bubbles Alan Greenspan once said.  Yet what most on Wall Street and the government lack is some basic understanding of human psychology.  There was very little reason to believe in the economic long-term viability of a product like option ARMs for example.  These mortgages derived from an economic model that was operating in a mania.  They assumed the mania would run forever.  The Alt-A and option ARMs were simply manifestations of a human speculative fervor that believed in the housing mammon.  In fact, there was a large contingent of people that simply believed that housing values would never fall.  No basis in economics or market fundamentals.  In other words, it was a classic bubble.

Yet what is currently occurring in the housing market is similar to a victim suffering from Stockholm syndrome.  Stockholm syndrome is a response seen in some hostages in that they feel some sort of loyalty to the abductor.  Why does this even occur?  One of the theories is based on the framework of cognitive dissonance.  People don’t like being unhappy for long periods of time so the idea goes, that some of these victims start loving or identifying with their captors.  Now I see many elements of this in the way we are dealing with our current financial crisis.  All of a sudden, the government, Wall Street, and many Americans are starting to sympathize with the actual perpetrators of the biggest fraud in a generation.  Instead of punishing and fixing the system, many are looking to the banks for assistance.

As it turns out, some of the pricing in housing is now based on government intervention:

“(WSJ) Uncle Sam’s interventions in the housing market have pushed home prices 5% higher on a national average than they would have been otherwise, Goldman Sachs estimates in a report released late Friday.

The government over the past year has slowed the pace of foreclosures through moratoria and the drive to modify mortgage terms to keep more borrowers in their homes. It also has pumped up demand for housing by giving tax credits to many first-time home buyers and by driving down mortgage interest rates. As a result, home prices in some areas have risen in recent months, particularly for homes that appeal to investors and first-time buyers. Bidding wars for the more attractive bank-owned homes have become common.”

If we break down the mortgage market further, the government is the housing market:

Mortgagemarket

Source: San Francisco Federal Reserve h/t Calculated Risk

95 percent of the mortgage market is now backed by the government.  As we know, a large part of this growth also occurred with highly risky FHA insured loans that are now imploding at record levels.  Last month in Southern California 36 percent of mortgages were FHA insured loans.  Now applying the Stockholm syndrome, it would appear that many instead of being angry and calling out the banking fraud for what it is, are starting to believe in what the abductors are pushing.  They say things like, “see, the banks are now holding off on the shadow inventory to help the market.  Prices are now going up!”  As if the banks are concerned about the average American with some banks charging 79.9 percent on credit cards before dealing with the tougher legislation coming in 2010.  As you can see from the above chart, the mortgage market is the government which raises the question, why do we even need banks if 95 percent of the mortgage market is directly subsidized by the government?  We don’t and certainly not at the too big to fail level.  If anything, we should get on the move to start breaking up the banks and renewing a new stronger form of Glass-Steagall.  Until the government moves in this direction the current financial deep capture will continue and will siphon off the life blood of the real economy like a leech.

The California Dream Delusion

It is interesting that many people now think the housing market is in the clear.  Here in Southern California, we have a fleet of people now starting to love their captors.  Some are even capitulating and saying, “enough of this waiting.  I’m going to buy because the government seems to have an unlimited buffer to stop housing prices from falling.”  They also have given up on the fact that banks are simply not moving on foreclosures in a timely fashion or programs like HAMP have stunted a more normal flow of the market.  Yet the question remains, has this really aided the overall economy?  It hasn’t.  We now are hearing talk of a job-loss recovery.  To that I say this, are you kidding me?  Sure, people are going to have sufficient money to pay for their mortgage without jobs.  Makes total sense if we were in Wonderland.  This is the kind of logic you start getting when you start loving the people that have abducted our financial system into some perverted rabbit hole of economic waste.

In fact, there have been a few articles talking about the “brain drain” because of compensation limitations on Wall Street!  You have got to be out of your damn mind!  People mistake “intelligence” in kleptocracy, cronyism , and financial engineering with actual smarts.  They are smart at screwing over our economy so this brain drain argument is absolute insanity.  It would be one thing if they were creating life saving drugs or consumer goods but instead, they are an albatross on the rest of the economy sucking taxpayer dollars into their balance sheets.  Yes, let us feel sorry for our financial kidnappers.  How can they live on a few million dollars a year after all the good they have done?  Let us allow them to have the same system that gave them the key to drive our economy off the financial edge.

Look at some of this crap:

compesation

Oh no!  Our top commanders are leaving the ship.  As it turns out, they were on their laptops all day ignoring the financial iceberg ahead.  When it came time to jump ship however, they were the only people with lifesavers.  This is absolute nonsense.  What the above is saying is that AIG for example, will have a tough time paying back their government lifeline because some of their top gamblers will leave to work for another organized crew of financial misfits that apparently will allow more kleptocracy and cronyism since that is how they make their money.  Heck, even the notorious Al Capone had this to say about the stock market decades ago:  “Its a racket. Those stock market guys are crooked.”

Let us take a look at an area of Southern California where Stockholm syndrome is in full force.  Today we salute you Culver City with our Real Homes of Genius Award.

Culver City

Not all areas have felt the brunt of the housing decline.  Do people forget that Southern California as a region is still down by 45 percent from the peak?  The median price at the peak was $505,000 and we are currently at $275,000.  What an amazing recovery.  The “bottom” was supposedly hit a few months ago at $247,000.  If you factor the 5% artificial increase from the government, we are basically still at the bottom.

For months, I compiled my own home brewed U-6 for California and my rate was roughly 23 percent.  Well guess what?  I wasn’t so far off:

“(SF Chronicle) Because she works, Duran doesn’t count in California’s 12.2 percent unemployment rate.

But her situation is captured by a broader measure, the underemployment rate, which, in addition to the jobless, includes people who could get only part-time work as well as those who want jobs but were too discouraged to look.

The state Employment Development Department estimates that this underemployment rate hit 21.9 percent in September.

The chart they use is even similar to the one I have used in discussing the state of the economy:

ba-underemployed_SFCG1256520382

california-unemployment-rate21

Apparently job losses are good for real estate.  Give me a break.

Yet here is the issue.  You have people focused on one niche market and they fail to see the overall trend of things.  Forget the fact that the entire region is still near the bottom.  They want their piece of Pasadena, Culver City, or something in the Westside.  Well guess what?  Prices are still not in line.  Yet is that reason enough to buy a home just because you are tired of waiting?  Then do it.  No one will stop you.  But don’t make an economical argument for your purchase because it isn’t there.  Prices are still too high in these areas if measured by local area incomes and employment trends.

Plus, the dynamics are all over the map:

culver city price

The median price that includes condos is $460,000 for Culver City.  This is misleading because the 3/2 “starter home” market still has a median price of $625,000 – an increase of 6.6% on a year over year basis.  Say what?  If we look at the data in terms of housing prices, this is the latest data:

Median Price Homes

90230:                   $541,000 with 9 sales last month (-17.8 percent y-o-y)

90232:                   $753,000 with 6 sales last month (15.9 percent y-o-y)

Median Price Condos

90230:                   $353,000 with 18 sales last month (-8 percent y-o-y)

90232:                   $418,000 with 1 sale last month (-11.6%)

And there is your current break down.  If you look at the overall trend however prices are only moving sideways and this is in light of the massive financial bailouts:

culver city meidan sales price and sales

Culver City peaked at $620,000 (including condos) and is currently at $460,000.  Another way of looking at this is the entire region of SoCal is still down 45% while Culver City is down 25 percent from the peak.  As I have said, not all areas are created equally.  Yet this is an area full of Alt-A and option ARMs and many of these will recast in 2010.  Need an example?  Look at this preforeclosure that took a loan from a toxic mortgage specialist, Novastar:

culver city home

This home last sold officially in 1989 for $176,000.  This is a 2 bedroom 1 bath home and is listed at 798 square feet.  This isn’t on the MLS but is a pre-foreclosure.  Take a look at the ridiculous loan on this place:

nod data

Novastar has long imploded but look at the ridiculous loan amount.  $572,000 on a 2 bedroom 1 bath home with 798 square feet!  This was done in June of 2007 to the original owners.  The notice of default was filed in July of this year.  You can rest assured this won’t be selling for $572,000.  And don’t think this is the only inventory on the market.  Culver City has 173 homes in distress.  The MLS lists 80 homes, 12 of which are part of the 173.  So for Culver City, shadow inventory is twice the size of what the public can see.

I always defer back to local area incomes and jobs.  People ask for an answer and I have given it many times but people don’t want to hear it.  Prices in many areas are still too high.  The government is trying to  prop prices up but unless incomes grow, it will eventually fall again.  The overall region has fallen nearly 50 percent.  But like I have said, some people choose to ignore the macro trend for their pet areas.  Does anyone have a crystal ball of when prices will go lower?  Of course not.  But is that reason to jump into this highly artificial market?  I would say no.

Some say that the declining U.S. dollar will help real estate values.  Really?  If anything, this might provide a tiny boost for commercial real estate but do you see some foreign investor paying top bill for this  Culver City home for example?  Of course not.  They won’t be living there.  As a rental?  Okay, you might get $1,700 to $1,900 on this place which puts a true value of something in the low $200,000s.  We are far from that price point.  Clearly people that see things like this don’t understand how difficult it is to manage rental property from a distant location.  Plus, your renters get paid in U.S. dollars so they seem to forget that your tenant isn’t going to be paying you in Euros.

Now what do you think will happen when mortgage rates rise as they will?  Will the tax credit be forever?  The new proposed tax credit has a cap of $7,290 which is tiny in some of these mid tier neighborhoods.  Or what about the option ARMs which don’t even qualify for HAMP because of income and LTV ratios?  Many will recast in the next few years.  There doesn’t seem to be a lot of reasons to believe in prices rising in this area.

Today we salute you Culver City with our Real Homes of Genius Award.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information.

Post from: Dr. Housing Bubble Blog

Real Homes of Genius: Culver City and the Housing Stockholm Syndrome. Approximately 5 Percent of Current Home Price is related to Government Bailouts.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Filed under: Microsoft (MSFT), Target Corp. (TGT), Verizon Communications (VZ), Burger King Hldgs (BKC), Symantec Corp (SYMC)

Here are some highlights from last week’s earnings coverage from BloggingStocks:

Continue reading Earnings highlights: Baidu, Dreamworks, Honda, Microsoft, Target, Verizon …

Earnings highlights: Baidu, Dreamworks, Honda, Microsoft, Target, Verizon … originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:10:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Coach Inc (COH), Stocks to Buy

Coach Inc. (NYSE: COH) has a winning ‘accessible luxury’ formula, which is why I’m Reiterating my Buy rating for company, first recommended on April 13, 2009 at a price of $18.22. If you bought COH in April, you’re up an impressive 71%.

Most investors are aware that in the era of the ‘frugal consumer’ that’s driven by stagnant incomes, difficult labor market conditions, and an uncertain economic recovery timetable, the retail sector is best avoided.

Continue reading Coach’s shares are headed north

Coach’s shares are headed north originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:20:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Scandals, Politics, Federal Reserve

Remember when the Federal Reserve and general public were blasting companies like AIG for going on retreats and holding conferences at luxury resorts? Well, on October 29, it was reported that the Fed has held its conferences at “exotic high-prices locales.”

The Washington Post reported on October 28, that the San Francisco Fed hosted a conference at the “spectacular Bacara Resort and Spa” in Santa Barbara, where it paid $300 a night for the rooms — an off-season price. Perhaps we should be praising the frugal nature of the Fed, as suites can run $2,000 during the peak season. Ben Bernanke attended this conference, which has drawn the ire of some. This conference was followed by a conference held by the Boston Fed at an Inn that charges up to $320 a night for regular rooms and nearly two grand a night for suites.

Continue reading Federal Reserve holding conferences at luxury resorts — is that wrong?

Federal Reserve holding conferences at luxury resorts — is that wrong? originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]


It seems Obama’s administration has a program for every issue. If you are struggling with your mortgage but are keeping up with your payments (wouldn’t that be 90% of us) you can get help with HARP. If you are delinquent (behind in your monthly mortgage payments) you can try your luck with HAMP.

HAMP stands for Home Affordable Modification Program. The program is designed to help borrowers who are struggling to keep their loans current or who are already behind. HAMP does this by providing incentives to mortgage loan servicers to modify existing first lien (primary) mortgages. The Treasure hopes this will motivate mortgage providers to move faster with loan modifications. It doesn’t seem to be working quite as planned but the effort is certainly there.

What makes HAMP any different to the other loan modification programs? To start, as mentioned above you can apply for HAMP even though you are behind in your payments. You can also apply for a HAMP loan modification even if your mortgage is not provided or guaranteed by Fannie or Freddie, a requirement most other government programs have.

So what are the requirements for a HAMP Loan Modification?

1.) You must have a home and live in it. The home must have one to four units.

2.) You must owe a principal balance (the actual amount you borrowed without interest) that is equal or less than:
1 Unit: $729,750
2 Units: $934,200
3 Units: $1,129,250
4 Units: $1,403,400;

3.) Be the primary mortgage and have been contracted before January 2009.
Your monthly payments must be greater than 31 percent of your monthly income. If it isn’t we kind of assume you don’t need a mortgage modification.

Unfortunately for many the mortgage is the least of their “loan problems”.
Have a mortgage that is not affordable due to financial hardship that can be documented (that means you can prove it).

If you answered yes to all the above questions you MAY qualify for a HAMP loan modification. The final yes will have to come from your mortgage provider. You must contact your provider in order to find that out.

But what if you aren’t behind in your payments, can you apply for a HAMP Loan Modification.

Yes, the requirements are those stipulated above, no more, no less.  This is good news for borrowers that are making payments, want a loan modification in order to take advantage of the lower interest rates but can’t do so because their home value has dropped and they don’t have a mortgage with Fannie or Freddie.

What you will need to do is prove why you are struggling to make your payments. This will have to be documented so be ready to show paperwork to back your claim.

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modifications, Story Of Struggle For Banks And Borrowers Alike
  2. Loan Modifications and FHA Refinance What Is The Deal
  3. The Obama Loan Modification Aid Program, What Are The Benefits?

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modifications, Story Of Struggle For Banks And Borrowers Alike
  2. Loan Modifications and FHA Refinance What Is The Deal
  3. The Obama Loan Modification Aid Program, What Are The Benefits?

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Earnings reports, Forecasts, Products and services, Consumer experience, Wal-Mart (WMT), Netflix, Inc. (NFLX), Target Corp. (TGT), Hershey Co (HSY), Costco Wholesale (COST), Hormel Foods (HRL), Kraft Foods’A’ (KFT), DJIA, Stocks to Buy, Recession

Halloween, though not the blockbuster holiday that Christmas is, still results in some additional spending on the part of consumers as they stock up on candy and costumes, and maybe take in a scary movie or two. With those treats in mind here are some stocks that may give investors sweet dreams — and hopefully not nightmares.

As is well known, candy is all the rage at Halloween, and among the largest candy stocks are Hershey Co. (NYSE: HSY) and Cadbury PLC (NYSE: CBY). Last week, Hershey reported third-quarter earnings rose 30% despite weaker volumes affected by higher prices for its sweets. Last year’s numbers also included special charges. Still the company said it expects full-year earnings to be ahead of Wall Street forecasts. In 2010, the Pennsylvania company said it expects earnings excluding items to rise 6% to 8%. The stock has a forward-looking price-to-earnings ratio of 16 and a current dividend yield of 3.1%.

Continue reading Halloween stocks offer investors a chance at financial treats

Halloween stocks offer investors a chance at financial treats originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:40:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]


 Creative is probably not the first word that comes to mind when you think about loan modifications. There doesn’t seem to be many new ideas in the loan modification department.

The Government is definitely doing its best to reach the borrowers that need the help, especially those that reach those that can pay affordable mortgage payments. This helps “guarantee” the government is not throwing away good money after bad with borrowers that overstretched themselves and cannot afford any reasonably monthly payment.

However all signs show that these programs are not being as successful as they hoped. But how do loan modifications lower, or attempt to lower your monthly payments. The first and main way is by lowering your interest rate. Actually one of the main purposes of loan modifications is to allow homeowners whose homes have dropped drastically in price to still take advantage of the lower interest rates now available. The problems come when low interest rates are not enough. The government is currently trying to drop interest rates to around 2%. However if this level of interest rate is still too high to make your monthly payments affordable there are still some options open to you. You servicer or lender can still extend your payment term.

This means you will extend the amount of time you take to pay your loan. This idea is pretty intuitive if you owe $1,000 and you have to pay it in 10 months you have to pay around $100 plus interest. If you can pay it in twice the time your payments should be half as much plus interest. Servicers can extend the loan to up to 40 years which can have a drastic effect on your loan payments even though it keeps you in debt well into your eighties.

What if all this is not enough? What if you still can’t afford your monthly payments? Your lender or service provider can actually defer a portion of the principal (original) amount you owe until the maturity of the loan. We call this a principal forbearance. This does not mean the debt or part of it is forgiven just deferred or set aside until you sell your home or the rest of your mortgage has been paid. This option can be very effective in lowering your monthly payment but will create a balloon payment on your mortgage. This means that your payments will be lower monthly but you will have to make a very large payment at the end of the mortgage. This can be beneficial if you are planning to sell your home and cut short your mortgage anyway or if you want a break in your monthly payments now and expect your income to increase in the future.

Another option, not very popular with service providers is to simply forgive the principal owed. This is a long shot to say the least but still worth a try. Service providers are not required to do this so don’t keep your hopes too high. `

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modifications And Balloon Payments What Is The Cost
  2. What To Look For In A Loan Modification
  3. The Obama Loan Modification Aid Program, What Are The Benefits?

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modifications And Balloon Payments What Is The Cost
  2. What To Look For In A Loan Modification
  3. The Obama Loan Modification Aid Program, What Are The Benefits?

Source [blownmortgage]

California is still unable to find the key to job growth.  Last Friday new data showed that the California unemployment rate broke through another record coming in at 12.2 percent.  Data for August was revised upward to 12.3 percent.  Good news right?  Well the reason the unemployment rate fell in September was because thousands of […]

California is still unable to find the key to job growth.  Last Friday new data showed that the California unemployment rate broke through another record coming in at 12.2 percent.  Data for August was revised upward to 12.3 percent.  Good news right?  Well the reason the unemployment rate fell in September was because thousands of Californians gave up looking for work.  In fact, employers ended up cutting 39,300 jobs in September alone.  The California budget situation is still in a fragile situation.  The state has had to contend with $60 billion in budget short falls and already preliminary data shows the state is $1.1 billion behind on recent estimates.  These estimates were done with pessimistic expectations and even then, they over estimated the amount of tax revenues they would be collecting.

california unemployment rate

Source: BLS, EDD

I’ve compiled the U-6 rate for the state and it is over 23 percent.  That is why most people either know of someone that has been let go, has seen their hours cut back, or is one of the over 2 million unemployed in the state.  With the state hiking taxes, this impact has been felt by all.  Yet California isn’t alone.  Many other states have seen their tax revenues decline.  Unlike the federal government with access to the U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve printing presses, most states have balanced budget requirements.  A recent study shows the massive decline in state tax revenue:

state taxes

Source:  Rockefeller Institute of Government

The reason overall state taxes are falling much harder and faster than local taxes is many states take in a big chunk of money from personal income and sales taxes.  California in fact brings in over 50 percent of their revenue from personal income tax.  In recessions, the amount collected falls.  Combine this with another fluctuating revenue source like sales tax that also declines in recessions and you can understand why the state has had to deal with $60 billion in budget gaps.  We are already expecting a budget deficit of $5 to $8 billion depending on what analysis we look at.

Local taxes have faired better simply because of more stable income streams.  But even this hasn’t protected them completely.  Here in California the state has gone to battle with local municipalities in terms of paying on obligations.  This is not the way to handle major budget deficits.

For the second quarter of 2009, state tax revenues across all states saw a 16.6 percent revenue decline.  This is the largest decline on record dating back to the early 1960s.  This is not a typical recession.  This is the deepest protraction since the Great Depression.  This only adds fuel and a reason to be cautious and suspect of the California housing rebound.  The state is going to be left with two options to balance future deficits.  Either raise taxes further or cut spending (more job layoffs).  Both cases do not bode well for housing.

Let us now shift gears to the Home Affordable Mortgage Program (HAMP).  Much is now being made about the “success” of the HAMP program with nearly 500,000 mortgages now in the trial modification period.  We have major reasons to doubt this premature success.  Let us go into detail why the HAMP program is largely a smoke and mirrors exercise in trying to stem foreclosures.

Let us Smoke some HAMP

On the surface the HAMP seems like a good initiative.  Let us try to keep borrowers in distress in their homes.  After all, a major reason for our current problems are due to housing so why not work with borrowers?  Yet the problem is in the way the program is structured.  The way HAMP has been carried out is largely a big extend and pretend program.  In fact, HAMP is another reason adding to shadow inventory.  Instead of going to another source for data, let us go directly to the HAMP website and get some documents:

hamp guidelines

Source:  HAMP

I always took issue how the program was structured.  The essence of the program is the belief that the problem is the interest rate and terms of the mortgage.  Yet the real issue is something we all know.  The banking industry is the main culprit in setting up this housing bubble and gave loans to people it shouldn’t have.  Wall Street and banks made billions in profits and when things went bad, they took the taxpayer for trillions.  HAMP is actually designed to help the banks, not the borrower.
Look at the guidelines from the site above.  First, the borrower needs to be delinquent or face imminent risk of default.  That is easy to establish.  So what is the solution?  Look at the three steps given to us above.  Drop rates to as low as 2% and if necessary, extend the term of the note to 40 years.  They even give us the option of capitalizing principal to the note.  In other words, these are option ARM-lites.  This is straight from the program’s site.  We are even given a document that resembles option ARM terms:

hamp terms

This is provided to us as a sample modification agreement boilerplate.  Let us go back to those 500,000 trial modifications.  Keep in mind these are trials, the program is too early to show whether this is permanent.  JP Morgan announced a $3.6 billion profit last week based on their investment banking and private equity divisions.  Losses are still growing in their mortgage holdings and also with their credit cards.  In other words, JP Morgan is basically using taxpayer money to play the stock market casino.  Forget about traditional commercial banking profits.  It is now operating like an investment bank.

It is important to look at JP Morgan because they swallowed up toxic mortgage All-Star Washington Mutual who by the way, made billions in toxic option ARMs here in California.  JP Morgan by sheer size has entered into the most HAMP trials by any bank in the country:

hamp activity by lender

This data goes up to the end of September.  So 3 million mortgages are estimated to be eligible for HAMP and nearly 500,000 are now in the trial phase.  Keep in mind 757,955 offers were sent out.  Another brainy move by the U.S. Treasury was allowing servicers to use stated income in allowing for the trial program.  That is correct, the same style underwriting for Alt-A and option ARMs is being allowed for entrance into the trial period.

Initially the trial period went for 3 months but is now up to 5 months.  I am not making this up:

trial period

The announcement of 5 months was recent so it may not show up in some of these boilerplate documents.  So what does this mean?  We will know success in mid to late Q4 or early 2010.  Most of the trial modifications have occurred in the last few months:

hamp mods

So I would imagine that once we move from trial to permanent, many of these will re-default or will not qualify.  To move from trial to full mod there is a requirement to vet income.  Why not do that now?  Good question.  It is always good to put quick gimmicks in front of good public policy.  A good example of horrible public policy is the $8,000 tax credit.  A waste of time brought on by the lobbying arm of the housing industry and politicians with no backbone.

There is also interesting data out on the first trial modifications.  Look at the chart above again.  50,130 trial modification were entered into in May of 2009.  Even with the 5 month extension, we can now see how many entered the full modification phase.  How many went into a permanent modification?  1,711 or roughly 3 percent.  Some interesting data on this:

“(HuffPo) Here’s why: Permanent modifications under Obama’s Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) first go through a three-month trial period. Since the COP and Ocwen figures are as of Sept. 1, that means that those permanent modifications entered the trial phase back in April and May. As of the end of May, 50,130 borrowers were in trial plans (there are now 500,000). The low number of permanent modifications is partly due to the fact that “the initial volume of HAMP trial modifications was quite low,” the COP noted in its report.

Even at this preliminary stage, the low number of permanent modifications is still shockingly low. Warren’s panel said it is “concerned about the low rate of conversion from trial to permanent modifications.” Unless the rate increases “substantially… HAMP will come nowhere close to keeping up with foreclosures.”

The panel’s report discusses possible reasons behind the low conversion rate, including data reporting issues and the failure of borrowers to comply with the program, like making timely payments. One issue stands out: “the difficulties servicers have in assembling completed documentation on modifications commenced on a ‘verbal’ or ‘no-doc’ basis.”

Yes, not making a payment would somehow be a problem.  So let us assume a rate that is nearly twice (5%) that of the early trial modifications dating back to May.  This would mean that out of the 500,000 trial modifications some 25,000 mortgages will be helped!  $75 billion to help 25,000 mortgages?  This is insane!  This is like the $40,000 per house that taxpayers ended up footing because of the $8,000 tax credit.  In fact, let us be generous here.  Let us assume all the 3 million loans in the target range get a trial modification and 5 percent go into the permanent phase at the higher rate.  We are talking about 150,000 mortgages.  So do the math:

$75 billion / 25,000      =          $3,000,000 / for each fix

$75 billion / 150,000    =          $500,000   / for each fix

Dr. HB back of the napkin solution

$75 billion / 500,000 =             $150,000 / for each fix

This is nuts.  I even ran a back of the napkin scenario that does better.  It is simple.  The median home price in the U.S. is $170,000.  How about we pick all loans that fall under this number, see if they are delinquent, and then flat out pay off 500,000 of these mortgages via a lottery system.  I’m not even sure where all this money is going.  If we only have 1,711 loan mods and basically all they are doing is lowering the interest rate and extending the terms, something has to give.  Oh yes my friends!  It is another crony handout to the banks.  Let us look at some documentation provided to banks/investors to entice them to enter this program:

hamp payments

What an absolute waste to basically extend and pretend.  Keep in mind that principal reduction is basically absent in any of these loan modifications.  Yet right off the bat, even when a borrower can “make things up” to enter the trial period the servicer is paid!  Paid for what?  We already know the current success rate is only 3 percent.  Are we to expect a sudden jump over the months?  Even at 10 percent we are wasting money at the front end.  We would have better success just doing a lottery of delinquent loans and paying off 500,000.  I assure you we are not going to have 500,000 permanent loan mods given these current measures unless something drastically changes.  Also, you can modify all you want but unless we start seeing some job growth, what are people going to pay their mortgage with?

Now keep in mind I’m not advocating for the lottery option.  This is an extreme example to show where the money is being wasted.  But also, big banks love this.  Why?  Because these loans are still held on the books at full face value.  That is right, banks can extend and pretend and buy some time, another 5 months by simply extending the trial period to a large number of loans – they don’t even have to check for income.  Think that JP Morgan profit would be so huge if it had to deal with those 437,000 mortgages that are 60+ days late?  You can bet that with WaMu and California lending, they probably have a ton of $500,000+ mortgages that are going to go bad when the option ARMs recast next year.

Either way, HAMP is simply another handout to banks.  So far we only have 1,711 permanent modifications.  Banks are laughing at Washington D.C.  They did with the last administration and the current one.  Why not just go in and claw back those profits and clean house?  Why not tax bonuses on Wall Street up to 90 percent?  After all, they should be thankful because they would be gone without the taxpayer.  And who really knows if the loan mods won’t re-default since we don’t have that data.  But data from the OCC and OTS shows re-default rates of 50, 60, or even 70 percent depending on the loan category.  Even if all these mods go permanent, all you are doing is extending the problem.  The rate eventually will go up.  But they are betting on what, another housing bubble?

Policy has gotten so bad that we might as well do a lottery.  Seriously.  A random Vegas style lottery would have better results.  What a joke.  Banks are controlling this country and policy.  HAMP is $75 billion in the scheme of trillion dollar bailouts but the amount of loans that are now being shelved for another 5 months is a lot larger.  In other words, it is another way for banks to hide losses.

After seeing things like this you might need to role one and smoke some HAMP.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information.

Post from: Dr. Housing Bubble Blog

California Budget and HAMP: Is the Home Affordable Modification Program Helping? California Tax Revenues Falter and Employment Breaks Historical Record.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Filed under: Earnings reports, Newspapers, New York Times’A’ (NYT), Gannett Co (GCI), Media World

The Washington Post Company (NYSE: WPO) published data for the third quarter earlier today. Can’t say I was mightily impressed by the numbers. Sure, there was a profit increase, but the top line wasn’t exciting, and the newspaper division, as you might have expected, experienced a sharp decline in sales.

Net revenues rose 2%. Earnings per share came in at $1.81. That was sharply higher than the $1.08 per share recorded in the comparable period. Yet, I think you have to be careful in terms of reading too much positive spin into the growth rate.

Continue reading The Washington Post Company increases income, but shares sell off

The Washington Post Company increases income, but shares sell off originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:40:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Earnings reports, Dell (DELL), AT and T (T), Verizon Communications (VZ), Symantec Corp (SYMC)

While more and more software becomes free, there is one market for which consumers and businesses are willing to shell out money. Yes, it’s security software.

A mega player in the space, McAfee (NYSE: MFE), reported its latest earnings report Thursday, a day after its main rival Symantec (NASDAQ: SYMC) reported its own quite strong results.

Continue reading Investors less secure about McAfee

Investors less secure about McAfee originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]

Close
E-mail It