Archive for October 1st, 2009

The last week for whatever reason saw the resurgence in mainstream articles covering the option ARM fiasco.  Even those who are purported to be financial experts still miss the bigger picture.  That is, they fail to understand that the category of Alt-A loans covers the vast majority of option ARMs and Alt-A is basically a […]

The last week for whatever reason saw the resurgence in mainstream articles covering the option ARM fiasco.  Even those who are purported to be financial experts still miss the bigger picture.  That is, they fail to understand that the category of Alt-A loans covers the vast majority of option ARMs and Alt-A is basically a category assigned to loans that were no-doc or low doc, had weaker credit scores, and low to zero down payment.  In other words, mortgages that make Medusa look like the next Miss USA.  Some of the confusion also arises from the difference between a reset and a recast.  This is like saying dogs and cats are all the same because they are pets.  Resets are no problem in this artificially low interest rate environment (the future is another story).  Recasts are a gigantic problem.  Another issue being ignored is the fact that current owners of Alt-A infested homes have a selling environment that lacks these maximum leverage products.  That is, they bought at a time when leverage was flush in the market.  When I look at current reporting I would ask reporters this – think more like a criminal crony banker.

On the other side, I would ask reporters to also think like a California HGTV granite countertop obsessed housing speculator.  That is why even as far back as February of 2008 it was easy to see that people would be strategically defaulting on their mortgage.  People at the time thought that there would be no way that people would actually stop paying their mortgage if they had the money to do so because people in general were responsible.  Yeah right!  And option ARMs were only for high income actors and doctors that didn’t want to disclose the amount of boob jobs they did in the last year on their tax return.  But the no money down world essentially gave buyers a call option on their home with these craptastic mortgages.  If prices go up, you sell and keep the difference between the sale price and the premium.  If the price tanks, then you are out the premium.  But guess what?  Some didn’t pay a penny!  These were basically free call options.  The only incentive is a bad credit history but with 1 out of 10 mortgages in the U.S. being delinquent this isn’t such a tiny group anymore.  Many saw the chance of a foreclosure as a small price to pay to ride the easy appreciation gravy train if the market shifted into mania part two.

One of the popular articles sent in the last few days was from the San Francisco Chronicle highlighting the option ARM mess in the Bay Area:

“People think option ARMs (will be) a national crisis,” he said. “That’s not really true. It’s just in higher-cost areas like California where you see their prevalence.”

Of the 10 metro areas nationwide with the most option ARMs, three are in the Bay Area, according to Fitch Ratings, a New York research firm. They are the East Bay counties of Alameda and Contra Costa, the South Bay area of Santa Clara and San Benito counties, and the counties of San Francisco, Marin and San Mateo.

Together, these areas account for the second-most option ARMs in the country, although they are still far behind the greater Los Angeles area (including Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino and Orange counties), according to Fitch data.

Understated data

First American shows more than 54,000 option ARMs issued here with a value of about $30.9 billion. Fitch shows more than 47,000 option ARMs here with a value of about $28 billion. Both say their data underestimate the totals.”

$30 billion of option ARMs are sitting like ugly ducks in the Bay Area.  But we do things bigger here in Southern California.  We aren’t given the actual data regarding the LA/OC area but we can extrapolate from the Alt-A loans that we are in a world of hurt in Southern California:

alt-a california

Thankfully, I have some data on this.  We can try and get a figure for Southern California by looking at the Bay Area data.

Bay Area

Alt-A active loans:            136,000

Options ARMs:                  47,000

Ratio Alt-A/Option ARMs:            34.5%

Southern California

Alt-A active loans:            400,000

Option ARMs:                    138,000 (appx)

Now given that Southern California is the birth place of the option ARM, I would venture to say that the ratio would hold for Southern California.  We have various estimates on this data.  Some will say that option ARMs are not that bad, but given that 80 percent of option ARMs were low doc loans, they qualify as Alt-A loans.  Plus, we are only looking at one item and many of these loans can go from current to non-paying over night.  How many were zero down 80/20 loans?  100 percent loans?  So at the low range we know 80 percent will fall under the Alt-A category umbrella.  Bottom line is California is going to have a smack down with these mortgages.  Not only because these mortgages have no shine like Glitter, but we have a 23 percent unemployment and underemployment rate.

And Alt-A loan defaults are spreading like the plague:

saupload_alt_a_delinquency_rates

Source:  Bloomberg, Seeking Alpha

Keep in mind the Alt-A universe covers over 2 million active mortgages.  And with 2 million mortgages nearly 30 percent are already at the 30 days late mark.  22 percent are already 90 days late.  Given the size of these mortgage balances, you can rest assured those 90 days late are going to turn into foreclosures assuming banks move on shadow inventory.  If they don’t they are going to contend with negative cash flow issues.  But as we know negative cash flow hasn’t stopped the crony banking industry!

I want to go back to something that I have been kicking around in my head.  Much of this information has been out there for years.  This option ARM wave isn’t any surprise, certainly not to those that follow the housing market closely.  But why is the media suddenly catching on at a point where it really is too late to do anything?  My feeling is the lack of understanding in behavioral economics.  This is an area that I have studied extensively.  A field that also combines the psychology and sociology of human nature into the mix.  Neo-classical economists don’t want to hear about this because it interferes with their free market ideology of letting Wall Street do what it wants and the market will right everything.   The only problem is, when the abyss stares at them in the face they quake and suddenly become corporate welfare recipients.  Holding your values is about staying true in the toughest of times.  In good times everyone is a saint.

This would also explain a lot of behavior in the current market with Alt-A loans.  Of course people leveraged to the max on these loans.  It was a premium free call option on the biggest housing bubble in the world.  It was like buying a lottery ticket.  You won’t feel so hurt if you lose $5 but if you win, you better believe you’ll be running in the streets in your underwear.  But what if you had to pay $500 for that lottery ticket?  Or $1,000?  With housing, it is so vital to have a down payment because it makes the borrower take a place at the gambling table.  That is why anyone that even spends time with friends and family in California and talks about homeownership realized that if things imploded, many would simply walkaway.  This was the psychology.

Also, I’m not sure I like the term walkaway.  It is more like “stop making payments, save the cash, let the moronic banks sit back for more bailouts, and wait months until they even pay attention to your file” since that is a more accurate description.  Many aren’t walking away.  They are not paying and playing chicken with banks.  Those who are paying and want a modification usually find an incompetent boob who really has no idea what to do and can only follow the “higher crony” orders if you are 3 months behind.  Alt-A loans  and option ARMs are the mortgage version of Russian Roulette.

Now some people might think strategic defaults are only a minor problem.  588,000 strategically defaulted in 2008 and most happened in you guessed it, California and Florida:

“(LA Times)

* The number of strategic defaults is far beyond most industry estimates — 588,000 nationwide during 2008, more than double the total in 2007. They represented 18% of all serious delinquencies that extended for more than 60 days in last year’s fourth quarter…

* Strategic defaults are heavily concentrated in negative-equity markets where home values zoomed during the boom and have cratered since 2006. In California last year, the number of strategic defaults was 68 times higher than it was in 2005. In Florida it was 46 times higher. In most other parts of the country, defaults were about nine times higher in 2008 than in 2005.

* Two-thirds of strategic defaulters have only one mortgage — the one they’re walking away from on their primary homes. Individuals who have mortgages on multiple houses also have a higher likelihood of strategic default, but researchers believe that many of these walkaways are from investment properties or second homes.”

I bet if we drilled down deeper into the data, you would find that most of these strategic defaults are attached to Alt-A loans.  The problem (and rest assured there are many) with option ARMs isn’t the interest rate.  Resets are no problems here.  The issue is the recast.  The rate can be rock bottom and it is, but this doesn’t help someone making a $1,500 teaser payment on a $500,000 mortgage.  Even at the 5 year mark with a 5 percent interest rate the payment will virtually double because of negative amortization (90% made the minimum payment only) and the fact that you now have a 25 year time horizon to pay off your mortgage with no negative amortization option.  Basically the option ARM becomes a no option mortgage.  These mortgages are the absolute epitome of the crisis we find ourselves in.  Financially reprehensible mortgages that had no checks and played upon the greed and cynicism of Wall Street and the herd mentality of the get rich quick population.  Didn’t we learn any lessons from the Great Depression?

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information.

Post from: Dr. Housing Bubble Blog

Alt-A Loans and Option ARMs meet Strategic Defaults: The Perfect Recipe for a Toxic California Housing Market in 2010. Behavioral Economics of Housing and Top 7 California Regions with Active Alt-A Loans.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Filed under: Management, Market matters, Federal Reserve

Fed Chairman, Ben Bernanke wants a council of regulators to monitor systemic risk in the economy. In addition Bernanke wants all systemically important institutions subject to a consolidated regulator, whether or not the firm owns banks.

To further justify his concept of a council of regulators, Bernanke went on to say: “For both purposes of effectiveness and accountability, the consolidated supervision of an individual firm, whether or not it is systemically important is best vested in a single agency.”

Continue reading Bernanke seeks a council of regulators to oversee banks

Bernanke seeks a council of regulators to oversee banks originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Thu, 01 Oct 2009 11:10:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Analyst upgrades and downgrades, Microsoft (MSFT), Technology

As I write this, shares of Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) are down well over 3% to $24.83. That’s a drop of 89 cents per share. The catalyst? A downgrade from Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS).

According to Bloomberg, the institution removed the software giant from its conviction buy list. There’s concern that the first quarter won’t be overwhelmingly positive. Understandably, Wall Street got a little nervous and decided to book some profits. Microsoft has had a decent run as of late.

Continue reading Microsoft downgrade: Trading opportunity?

Microsoft downgrade: Trading opportunity? originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:20:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]


Loan Modifications are the way forward in the opinion of the Obama Administration. A number of federal programs have been placed and are ready to welcome droves of homeowners that need to modify their loans.

However many question the wisdom of loan modifications and if they are the real solution to the increasing number of foreclosures and unemployment. Some have compared the goals and resources of the loan modification program with bailing out water from the Titanic with a cup. It is understood that the task is so great the administration and the measures in place to control the situation will be completely overwhelmed.

The truth is that the goals the loan modification program has set itself are titanic in themselves. The administration is aiming to save three to four million homeowners from losing their homes through foreclosure. If this occurs it will be an amazing feat for many reasons. Not least is the fact that banks and mortgage servicers are not geared to modify loans. Their business up to now has been to set up the loans and collect the payments. The millions of homeowners that now seek a loan modification is challenging the banks to reinvent their work system, sometimes to their own detriment.

In order to make this possible the government has provided generous incentives to homeowners and mortgage providers. The idea is to provide bonuses and incentives to servicers and homeowners when loan modifications are made and honoured by borrowers. The loan modifications must be sustainable and fair for the homeowners to qualify. Homeowners on their part must be regular on their payments in order to qualify for the bonuses and receive the loan modification.

The sad part is that even if the government is successful in delivering the three to four million loan modifications there will still be about 4.6 million people or families that will nevertheless lose their homes by next year. This would be bring the grand total of foreclosed homes to 9 million homes by 2011.

So what can the government and homeowners do to minimize the effect of this crisis and increase the number of saved homes.

Information seems to be, as always, a key player. Many homeowners seem to let loan modifications go because they don’t understand the documents they must sign. Clear language and skilled counsel are key if this program is to have even the most modest success.

Another issue is that homeowners do not make it throught the three month trial period into the final loan modification. Of those that do, many will become delinquent later on in the loan tenure, nullifying the benefits of the loan modification with all the expense it involved.

Mortgage servicers themselves can be an obstacle. Many servicers are continuing to take foreclosure steps with homeowners that are participating in the program, undergoing the three month trial. The government is trying to motivate servicers to help homeowners to achieve the loan modification wherever this is possible.

One factor that could make the whole matter moot is the rising level of unemployment. The loan modifications the government is proposing are not designed for people who can’t afford any substantial mortgage payment due to unemployment. It is designed for homeowners that are not able to take advantage of the current lower interest rates and whose homes have dropped in value and are struggling to pay their mortgage.
If unemployment rates continue to rise the number of homeowners that don’t qualify for loan modification aid will rise increasing the number of foreclosures.

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modifications No Match For Rising US Foreclosures.
  2. Loan Modifications, Hope, Lies and Misinformation
  3. Loan Modifications and FHA Refinance What Is The Deal

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modifications No Match For Rising US Foreclosures.
  2. Loan Modifications, Hope, Lies and Misinformation
  3. Loan Modifications and FHA Refinance What Is The Deal

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Bad news, Citigroup Inc. (C)

If you’re a sixties-style artistic purist, you may want to skip this bit of news — or at least take a couple tranquilizers first.

Bob Dylan’s upcoming “Christmas in the Heart” album will be made available online to Citigroup rewards program customers one week before it hits stores. To be fair, Reuters reports that “Dylan, 68, will donate his proceeds from the Columbia Records release to charities that feed the needy. “

But still. Citigroup and Bob Dylan as partners? It’s hard to argue that it’s anything other than tacky, although the album does have some fantastic songs on it: “All I want for Christmas is a $700 billion bailout”, “A Christmas Overdraft”, “The Three Stupid CEOs” (featuring Vikram Pandit on the ukelele and Ken Lewis on the obo) and “God Rest Ye Merry Foreclosure Victims.”

Dylan’s decision to partner with Citi is puzzling. On the one hand, we can hardly accuse him of greed — all the money’s going to charity.

But it does raise questions about the legend’s judgement. Couldn’t he have found a less polarizing company to partner with?

Bob Dylan’s Very Citigroup Christmas originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:40:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]


Loan modifications are complex animals not because the concept behind them is complicated but because of all the elements that compose it and the various options and permutations of these options that must be decided. The jargon linked to loan modifications can also make it a challenge to understand the instructions you read in the literature.

This series of articles “Loan Modification Questions” is designed to clarify some of the most important questions you can ask yourself about loan modifications as well as busting some jargon by using plain English to explain what your options are.

Loan Modifications are based on a simple concept to renegotiate a loan or mortgage in order to provide some advantage or benefit to one or both of the parties. The loan modification the government is now backing is designed to allow struggling borrowers that have some form of income and can pay their mortgage if their monthly payments are reduced, their late fees are waivered or some other modification is carried out.

One of the ways this is carried out is to capitalize or include in the loan modification costs or fees the borrower must currently pay on top of his monthly payments.

Can a mortgagee capitalize an escrow advance for Homeowner´s Association fees when using a loan modification option?
The answer is yes. HUD Handbook 4330.1 REV-5, Paragraph 2-1, Section B under Escrow Obligations states: Mortgagees must also escrow fund for those items which, if not paid, would create liens on the property positioned ahead of the FHA insured mortgage.

In other words the FHA insured mortgage must have first rights on the loans security, the house. For this to happen pending fees and costs must be capitalized into the mortgage.

Interest Rates.
One of the reasons the government is pushing for loan modifications is so that homeowners whose homes have dropped in value can benefit from the current lower interest rates. Is there a new basis interest rate which mortgagees may assess when completing a Loan Modification?
The answer is again yes. Mortgage Letter 2008-21 explains that the new basis interest rate is 200 points above the monthly average yield on U.S Treasury Securities adjusted to a constant maturity of 10 years. This links the interest rate applicable to loan modifications to Treasury Securities.
An important issue when applying for a loan modification is that the loan modified is the primary loan. Will HUD subordinate a Partial Claim, if a mortgagor (the borrower) subsequently defaults and qualifies for a loan modification?
Yes, HUD will subordinate a Partial Claim if a mortgagor defaults and qualifies for a Loan Modification.
These are just a few of the questions you are probably dealing with if you are searching for a suitable loan modification. The best advice is to ask for free advice from a government institution and ask what your options are.

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modifications Questions: escrow analysis, unemployed homeowners and upfront premiums.
  2. Loan Modifications Questions: Fees, Inspections, Late Charges And Other Concerns
  3. What To Look For In A Loan Modification

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modifications Questions: escrow analysis, unemployed homeowners and upfront premiums.
  2. Loan Modifications Questions: Fees, Inspections, Late Charges And Other Concerns
  3. What To Look For In A Loan Modification

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Products and services, Launches, Internet, Competitive strategy, Google (GOOG), Media World, Technology

Google WaveInternet giant Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) sent out invitations to 100,000 developers to come in a test the waters of its newest creation, Google Wave.

Unfortunately, for most of us, since the service is being offered on an invitation only basis, we will have to wait a bit longer to see what Google Wave is all about, but it does seem to offer some really nice features that will probably become very popular with internet users.

Continue reading Google issues invites to Google Wave

Google issues invites to Google Wave originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:40:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]

Close
E-mail It