Archive for October 2nd, 2009

Some people when thinking of shadow inventory have images of poor rundown homes in suspect neighborhoods.  Yet the reality of shadow inventory sometimes include some of the most priciest and beautiful real estate in the world.  Take for example the Wells Fargo executive who was using an exclusive Malibu foreclosure for private parties.  The initial […]

Some people when thinking of shadow inventory have images of poor rundown homes in suspect neighborhoods.  Yet the reality of shadow inventory sometimes include some of the most priciest and beautiful real estate in the world.  Take for example the Wells Fargo executive who was using an exclusive Malibu foreclosure for private parties.  The initial owners in Malibu invested some of their money with Bernard Madoff only to have their home taken over by Wells Fargo.  Talk about trading one positive partner for another.

In recent days many articles have come out talking about shadow inventory and have silenced the tiny crowd that somehow believed that it was somehow a myth.  It was fun for them to believe but that argument is now over.  In fact, the shadow inventory amount is larger than one would have imagined:

“Sept. 23 (Bloomberg) — The crash in U.S. home prices will probably resume because about 7 million properties that are likely to be seized by lenders have yet to hit the market, Amherst Securities Group LP analysts said.

The “huge shadow inventory,” reflecting mortgages already being foreclosed upon or now delinquent and likely to be, compares with 1.27 million in 2005, the analysts led by Laurie Goodman wrote today in a report. Assuming no other homes are on the market, it would take 1.35 years to sell the properties based on the current pace of existing-home sales, they said.”

If that isn’t enough to satisfy the doubting Thomas in you, take the word from Bank of America:

“(WSJ) we are going to see a spike from now to the end of the year in foreclosures as we take people out of the running” for a loan modification or other alternatives, says a Bank of America Corp. spokeswoman. Foreclosure sales had dropped to “abnormally low” levels in response to government efforts to stem foreclosures, she adds.”

In other words, gear up for round two of the housing bubble burst courtesy of the shadow inventory.  7 million homes may seem like a gigantic number.  The reason the number will be huge is because we are now seeing problems in housing due to more historical reasons like unemployment.  Obviously a loan modification is pointless if someone doesn’t even have a job.  When you have banks openly acknowledging that more inventory will be hitting the market it is time to prepare and get your facts straight on Alt-A and option ARM products.

Today we have a very special Real Home of Genius.  It was once rare to see foreclosures reaching into the million dollar range but today’s home is a perfect example of the California gold rush mentality and living off of borrowed time.  Today we salute you Santa Monica with our Real Home of Genius Award.

Santa Monica Million Dollar Foreclosure

Now for those living in Los Angeles or in Southern California, we realize that a large portion of the population lives under the “fake it until you make it” mantra of economics.  The housing bubble fed into this mentality perfectly.  Easy credit allowed people to buy homes and cars beyond their means.  Being that many people are still guided by high school insecurities, they had to keep up with the Joneses and buy the latest car and home otherwise they would face the wrath of being called a loser.  Here in Los Angeles the Westside brings out the best in many.

Today’s home in Santa Monica is a good example of this lifestyle.  In fact, let us take a look at the place:

santa monica

This home is a 2 bedroom and 1 bath home.  Initially built in 1936 this place has 1,515 square feet.  The current list price is $784,900.  Let us look at some sales history here:

03/25/2005:                 $800,000

02/01/2006:                 $1,075,000

First, the 2005 sale was overpriced but the 2006 sale just put it over the top.  Given that this home is now bank owned, we realize that something went astray.  Let us look at some of the loan history:

santa monica foreclosure detail

Do the quick math:

$732,300 + $215,000 = $947,300

Buying a million dollar home with 10 percent down as you can tell is not a good plan if you are buying in an epic bubble.  In fact, whoever bought this home has now seen some $127,700 in an actual down payment money evaporate into thin air.  That is why all you folks itching to buy should think twice about jumping in before the second leg down hits in 2010.  Even a modest 10 percent decline in the mid to upper tier markets can wipe out $100,000 to $200,000 of your down payment.  And don’t bet on another bubble to rescue you.

If you want to see problems just look at the notice of default line above.  Notice of defaults are normally filed after 3 missed payments.  So let us do the numbers:

$36,285 / (3 months) = $12,095 monthly nut

Does this home look like a $12,095 per month home?  You can rent a nicer place in Beverly Hills for that amount.  Clearly whoever bought this home was unable to carry that amount and lost the home in August.
This home is viewable to the public and not part of the shadow inventory.  On the MLS I’m seeing 4 foreclosures listed for Santa Monica including this home.  But guess what is in the shadows?

Pre-foreclosure:            104

Bank owned:                25

And there are some bigger fish in the shadows that I’ll bring to you in the near future.  The public is only seeing 4 houses in the foreclosure column while the distress number is much larger.  Now who really knows what this home will fetch once it sells.  I doubt it will get the million in this market and so does the current bank owner.

Today we salute you Santa Monica with our Real Homes of Genius Award.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information.

Post from: Dr. Housing Bubble Blog

Real Homes of Genius: When a $127,000 Down Payment Evaporates in Santa Monica. Living the good life for 3 Years Courtesy of Easy Debt in the Westside.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Filed under: Columns, NIKE, Inc’B’ (NKE), Business of sports

To Mike Vick or not to Mike Vick, that is the question, and the controversy that is surrounding athletic apparel giant Nike (NYSE: NKE).

Actually it isn’t too much of a question, mainly because the company that once used Vick as a celebrity endorser dumped him and his products once he was arrested and charged with running a dog-fighting ring. Vick has spent his time in prison and has since been signed as a back-up quarterback for the Philadelphia Eagles.

Well, earlier this week Mike Principe (one of Vick’s agents) announced that Vick had recently inked a deal with Nike. This announcement caused quite a bit of Internet backlash toward the Swoosh, but there were many that thought the deal was “bogus.” (That quote is from a tweet by CNBC’s Darren Rovell.)

Continue reading JockStocks: A look at the Nike/Mike Vick saga

JockStocks: A look at the Nike/Mike Vick saga originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:10:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]

For now, I’m placing a Hold on Worthington Industries’ (NYSE: WOR) shares, first recommended with a Buy rating on June 10, 2009 at a price of $15.05.

The steel processing sector was one of those fields that was rudely treated by Wall Street as the U.S. and global recessions took hold, and niche player Worthington did not escape the aforementioned.

Continue reading Worthington Industries: Hold shares

Worthington Industries: Hold shares originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:20:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Management, Competitive strategy, Employees, Financial Crisis

Sam and Olivia are reading their morning papers and Sam says, “Imagine this! There’s going to be a country with no bank bonuses.” And Olivia says, “You must be kidding” Sam says, “No, I’m serious. It’s right here in the paper.” Olivia, still not convinced says, “OK, I don’t believe you but who is it?” Sam says, “Look right here. Its Britain.”

British Treasury chief, Alistair Darling, said that annual bonuses for bank executives will be outlawed. Darling went on to say: “We won’t allow greed and recklessness to ever again endanger the whole global economy and the lives of millions of people.”

Continue reading UK plans to scrap annual bonuses for bankers

UK plans to scrap annual bonuses for bankers originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]


Nationwide Judges are receiving complaints against banks and mortgage providers for dragging their feet and not providing the customer service that is to be reasonably expected. Especially since the government is paying for mortgage providers to deal with loan modifications as fast as possible.

Unfortunately Banks and service providers are not carrying out loan modifications as fast as was expected by the government or hoped by homeowners. I find this hardly surprising. If I had a business and was asked to spend money to reduce the monthly income I receive from a debtor I would make sure I was suitably compensated. The fact is that in some cases banks end up worse off when they modify a loan.

What is not so easy to empathize with is when banks systematically stall procedures, lose paperwork and change their requirements systematically. This has been the story that has been told nationwide and some judges are starting to tire of it all.

One case that has hit the news is that of Bobbi Giguere, initially published on the New York Times. Mrs Giguere submitted her paperwork three times to no avail. Last Thursday an interesting turn of events occurred at Judge Randolph J. Haines courtroom. Judge Haines instructed Mrs Giguere to question a Wells Fargo high ranking executive on the bank’s lack of response towards her loan modification.

Judge Haines explained the irregular procedure as a response to the growing concerns about Wells Fargo’s mortgage modifications practice.
The problem is that this is not an isolated case. Consumers nationwide are complaining (that is certainly not new) about the difficulty of getting a response from their mortgage servicers. This is threatening the success of the Obama Administration’s loan modification plan. While banks and mortgage servicers stall their response many homeowners foreclose on their mortgages and lose their homes which in many cases is good news, or the least of two evils for banks and loan providers.

The questioning of Mr. Ohayon the Wells Fargo executive was carried dramatic enough to be part of any lawyer movie. Mr Ohayon initially stated that Mrs. Giguere had repeatedly failed to provide a financial worksheet, a critical document for the loan modification to be processed.

Then came the fun part, what courtroom dramas are all about. Under cross examination Mrs. Giguere produced the letters Wells Fargo sent requesting the paperwork required for the loan modification. She asked Mr. Ohayon to read the letter and he was forced to concede that the letter did not ask for a financial worksheet.

This irregular procedure in which a Judge requires a large bank corporation like Wells Fargo to place an executive on the witness bench shows the federal frustration on the way loan modifications are being carried out throughout the United States.

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modifications: What to Do When Banks Don’t Play Fair
  2. Loan Modifications, 3 Nightmare Stories You Don’t Want To Copy
  3. Loan Modification: Wells and Fargo VP Vows To Improve Bad Service

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modifications: What to Do When Banks Don’t Play Fair
  2. Loan Modifications, 3 Nightmare Stories You Don’t Want To Copy
  3. Loan Modification: Wells and Fargo VP Vows To Improve Bad Service

Source [blownmortgage]


They say that crisis bring out who we really are. If that is so, things are not looking that hot in the financial sector. As the credit crisis deepens banks are acting more and more conservatively when it comes to loan modifications and mortgage refinancing.

Some would say that bailing out homeowners is wrong. We should all be responsible for our decisions and there is nothing wrong in renting. I would have to agree with this. My parents have worked all their life, still rent a humble apartment and are probably the happiest couple I know.
Having said that if the government have decided to provide breaks for families that are struggling to pay their mortgages and are willing to pay mortgage providers for the privilege the least banks and servicers can do is take the cash and help out as much as they can, especially as they have been recently recipients of bailouts themselves.

Instead of showing empathy to the situation of desperate homeowners that are scared of losing their homes they are acting as what they are, profit based organizations. No surprises there, a capitalist economy is based on the assumption that companies are going to do what is best for them, not for the greater good. However that does not mean they should be allowed to break the rules and stall procedures for their own advantage.

Banks that don’t seem to understand the rules of the game.

What is especially scary is when banks don’t seem to understand the requirements for a government sponsored loan modifications. As an example, a recent story was published that involved Citimortgage loan. After an arduous procedure the homeowner in question was able to qualify for a loan modification and enter the 3 month trial. His mortgage was reduced to $1503 from $1727 a great difference for a family with three kids under the age of 5.
Just before final approval was achieved Cit changed the monthly payment to $1817, a $90 increase to cover an increase in the insurance, even though they had not been approved for the loan modification. If they had have been approved for the loan modification there would have been no grounds for increasing the insurance as both the taxes and insurance are included in the reduction of monthly mortgage payments to 31% of the monthly income.

The homeowner then contacted the bank and was told that because he had recently filed bankruptcy he was no longer eligible for a loan modification. However there is not information in the loan modification literature provided by the government on bankruptcy disqualifying a homeowner that can afford the modified payments.

Contacting the government programs and asking for their help and assistance is probably the best way forward in these circumstances when banks are unwilling to budge.

Stalling to the eleventh hour.
Another practice that seems to be popular with mortgage providers is to stall proceeding until the last minute. That was the case with a homeowner whose mortgage was owned by Wells Fargo. Paperwork was lost twice (which seems to be a common happening with loan modifications) and resubmitted by FedEx at the homeowner’s expense. Once the homeowner contacted Wells Fargo they were required to fax further information even though they had been assured that they had all they needed. It does seem disturbing that the homeowner was the one that had to contact the bank to find out they needed to send further information.

After stalling a reply for months and when the mortgage was close to foreclosing the homeowner was told they did not qualify for a loan modification but that they could offer a $11,000 loan. Why a homeowner that is struggling to make payments on his mortgage would want another loan on which to make monthly payments, I don’t know. This does seem to be a bad way to carry business, dangerous to the economy and homeowners.

The only way to fight these abuses or mistakes is to arm yourself with information. Contacting government organizations is the best step. Explain your circumstances and ask what your best options are. In this case free advice is the best money can buy because it is unbiased which is much more than can be said of most loan modification companies.

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modifications, Judges Frustrated by Banks Nonchalant Attitude
  2. Loan Modifications, Hope, Lies and Misinformation
  3. Loan Modifications, 3 Nightmare Stories You Don’t Want To Copy

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modifications, Judges Frustrated by Banks Nonchalant Attitude
  2. Loan Modifications, Hope, Lies and Misinformation
  3. Loan Modifications, 3 Nightmare Stories You Don’t Want To Copy

Source [blownmortgage]

Close
E-mail It