Archive for November 1st, 2009


If you have been watching the business or economy sections of newspapers, news or blogs you will have got your fair share of loan modification horror stories. At the same time banks are increasing their capacity for loan modifications and seem to be keeping up with government targets, at least for now. So who is to blame?

Are borrowers complaints valid or simple self pity for a situation banks cannot be blamed for? Or, are banks dragging their feet and ignoring the plight of borrowers despite the government being happy to pay the cost for loan modifications.
The Sun Sentinel reported this week on the plight of Kraig and Ana Weiss. The Weisses first agreed to a loan mofication with Bank of America only to have the bank take the offer off the table. Now Bank of America is moving towards foreclosure even though the Weisses are making their mortgage payments.
The  strange thing is that federal reports show that banks are restructuring home loans for troubled borrowers, but stories like that of the Weisses are heard all over the country. Where does blame lay, do banks not care or are they doing the best to deal with bad clients that are struggling with unemployment and a worldwide credit crisis.

Counties like Broward and Palm Beach show how hard things are getting with 14,000 homes in risk of foreclosure in August. However banks and service providers claim to be doing their best to deal with the millions of foreclosures requiring a loan modification.
So far the Treasury Department announced they are on target to provide the projected 4 million loan modifications by 2012 after hitting their first goal of 500,000 trial loan modifications a month early.

However this apparent success might cover the fact that only 16 percent of eligible home loans have been modified so work has only begun. The Congressional Oversight Panel for one does not seem too optimistic of the loan modification program performance. Last week the Panel reported that the federal program may not reach the long term goal and encouraged the Treasury to improve their HAMP program or to create new programs to meet the expected rise in foreclosures due to the rise of unemployment.

This rise of foreclosures is fed by a change in the market since the HAMP program started. At the beginning of the year the big trouble were subprime mortgages with high interest rates and devalued price tags that did not allow borrowers to improve their interest rates. However the rise of unemployment has now caused borrowers that have prime mortgages and that would normally be within their means to be at risk.

This means that loan modifications’ main weapon to make mortgage payments affordable, lower interest rates will not be a significant help for prime mortgages that already enjoy low interest rates.

Related posts:

  1. Loan Delinquencies Fall As Banks Get Serious With Loan Modifications
  2. HAMP, Way Out For Delinquent Borrowers And Those Without Fannie
  3. U.S Loan Modifications Hit Obama’s target Early But Nobody’s Impressed

Related posts:

  1. Loan Delinquencies Fall As Banks Get Serious With Loan Modifications
  2. HAMP, Way Out For Delinquent Borrowers And Those Without Fannie
  3. U.S Loan Modifications Hit Obama’s target Early But Nobody’s Impressed

Source [blownmortgage]

Only looking at economics for an answer to the housing bubble mania will leave you with many questions unanswered.  As in most manias, there is a large element of speculation and irrational exuberance as the godfather of bubbles Alan Greenspan once said.  Yet what most on Wall Street and the government lack is some basic […]

Only looking at economics for an answer to the housing bubble mania will leave you with many questions unanswered.  As in most manias, there is a large element of speculation and irrational exuberance as the godfather of bubbles Alan Greenspan once said.  Yet what most on Wall Street and the government lack is some basic understanding of human psychology.  There was very little reason to believe in the economic long-term viability of a product like option ARMs for example.  These mortgages derived from an economic model that was operating in a mania.  They assumed the mania would run forever.  The Alt-A and option ARMs were simply manifestations of a human speculative fervor that believed in the housing mammon.  In fact, there was a large contingent of people that simply believed that housing values would never fall.  No basis in economics or market fundamentals.  In other words, it was a classic bubble.

Yet what is currently occurring in the housing market is similar to a victim suffering from Stockholm syndrome.  Stockholm syndrome is a response seen in some hostages in that they feel some sort of loyalty to the abductor.  Why does this even occur?  One of the theories is based on the framework of cognitive dissonance.  People don’t like being unhappy for long periods of time so the idea goes, that some of these victims start loving or identifying with their captors.  Now I see many elements of this in the way we are dealing with our current financial crisis.  All of a sudden, the government, Wall Street, and many Americans are starting to sympathize with the actual perpetrators of the biggest fraud in a generation.  Instead of punishing and fixing the system, many are looking to the banks for assistance.

As it turns out, some of the pricing in housing is now based on government intervention:

“(WSJ) Uncle Sam’s interventions in the housing market have pushed home prices 5% higher on a national average than they would have been otherwise, Goldman Sachs estimates in a report released late Friday.

The government over the past year has slowed the pace of foreclosures through moratoria and the drive to modify mortgage terms to keep more borrowers in their homes. It also has pumped up demand for housing by giving tax credits to many first-time home buyers and by driving down mortgage interest rates. As a result, home prices in some areas have risen in recent months, particularly for homes that appeal to investors and first-time buyers. Bidding wars for the more attractive bank-owned homes have become common.”

If we break down the mortgage market further, the government is the housing market:

Mortgagemarket

Source: San Francisco Federal Reserve h/t Calculated Risk

95 percent of the mortgage market is now backed by the government.  As we know, a large part of this growth also occurred with highly risky FHA insured loans that are now imploding at record levels.  Last month in Southern California 36 percent of mortgages were FHA insured loans.  Now applying the Stockholm syndrome, it would appear that many instead of being angry and calling out the banking fraud for what it is, are starting to believe in what the abductors are pushing.  They say things like, “see, the banks are now holding off on the shadow inventory to help the market.  Prices are now going up!”  As if the banks are concerned about the average American with some banks charging 79.9 percent on credit cards before dealing with the tougher legislation coming in 2010.  As you can see from the above chart, the mortgage market is the government which raises the question, why do we even need banks if 95 percent of the mortgage market is directly subsidized by the government?  We don’t and certainly not at the too big to fail level.  If anything, we should get on the move to start breaking up the banks and renewing a new stronger form of Glass-Steagall.  Until the government moves in this direction the current financial deep capture will continue and will siphon off the life blood of the real economy like a leech.

The California Dream Delusion

It is interesting that many people now think the housing market is in the clear.  Here in Southern California, we have a fleet of people now starting to love their captors.  Some are even capitulating and saying, “enough of this waiting.  I’m going to buy because the government seems to have an unlimited buffer to stop housing prices from falling.”  They also have given up on the fact that banks are simply not moving on foreclosures in a timely fashion or programs like HAMP have stunted a more normal flow of the market.  Yet the question remains, has this really aided the overall economy?  It hasn’t.  We now are hearing talk of a job-loss recovery.  To that I say this, are you kidding me?  Sure, people are going to have sufficient money to pay for their mortgage without jobs.  Makes total sense if we were in Wonderland.  This is the kind of logic you start getting when you start loving the people that have abducted our financial system into some perverted rabbit hole of economic waste.

In fact, there have been a few articles talking about the “brain drain” because of compensation limitations on Wall Street!  You have got to be out of your damn mind!  People mistake “intelligence” in kleptocracy, cronyism , and financial engineering with actual smarts.  They are smart at screwing over our economy so this brain drain argument is absolute insanity.  It would be one thing if they were creating life saving drugs or consumer goods but instead, they are an albatross on the rest of the economy sucking taxpayer dollars into their balance sheets.  Yes, let us feel sorry for our financial kidnappers.  How can they live on a few million dollars a year after all the good they have done?  Let us allow them to have the same system that gave them the key to drive our economy off the financial edge.

Look at some of this crap:

compesation

Oh no!  Our top commanders are leaving the ship.  As it turns out, they were on their laptops all day ignoring the financial iceberg ahead.  When it came time to jump ship however, they were the only people with lifesavers.  This is absolute nonsense.  What the above is saying is that AIG for example, will have a tough time paying back their government lifeline because some of their top gamblers will leave to work for another organized crew of financial misfits that apparently will allow more kleptocracy and cronyism since that is how they make their money.  Heck, even the notorious Al Capone had this to say about the stock market decades ago:  “Its a racket. Those stock market guys are crooked.”

Let us take a look at an area of Southern California where Stockholm syndrome is in full force.  Today we salute you Culver City with our Real Homes of Genius Award.

Culver City

Not all areas have felt the brunt of the housing decline.  Do people forget that Southern California as a region is still down by 45 percent from the peak?  The median price at the peak was $505,000 and we are currently at $275,000.  What an amazing recovery.  The “bottom” was supposedly hit a few months ago at $247,000.  If you factor the 5% artificial increase from the government, we are basically still at the bottom.

For months, I compiled my own home brewed U-6 for California and my rate was roughly 23 percent.  Well guess what?  I wasn’t so far off:

“(SF Chronicle) Because she works, Duran doesn’t count in California’s 12.2 percent unemployment rate.

But her situation is captured by a broader measure, the underemployment rate, which, in addition to the jobless, includes people who could get only part-time work as well as those who want jobs but were too discouraged to look.

The state Employment Development Department estimates that this underemployment rate hit 21.9 percent in September.

The chart they use is even similar to the one I have used in discussing the state of the economy:

ba-underemployed_SFCG1256520382

california-unemployment-rate21

Apparently job losses are good for real estate.  Give me a break.

Yet here is the issue.  You have people focused on one niche market and they fail to see the overall trend of things.  Forget the fact that the entire region is still near the bottom.  They want their piece of Pasadena, Culver City, or something in the Westside.  Well guess what?  Prices are still not in line.  Yet is that reason enough to buy a home just because you are tired of waiting?  Then do it.  No one will stop you.  But don’t make an economical argument for your purchase because it isn’t there.  Prices are still too high in these areas if measured by local area incomes and employment trends.

Plus, the dynamics are all over the map:

culver city price

The median price that includes condos is $460,000 for Culver City.  This is misleading because the 3/2 “starter home” market still has a median price of $625,000 – an increase of 6.6% on a year over year basis.  Say what?  If we look at the data in terms of housing prices, this is the latest data:

Median Price Homes

90230:                   $541,000 with 9 sales last month (-17.8 percent y-o-y)

90232:                   $753,000 with 6 sales last month (15.9 percent y-o-y)

Median Price Condos

90230:                   $353,000 with 18 sales last month (-8 percent y-o-y)

90232:                   $418,000 with 1 sale last month (-11.6%)

And there is your current break down.  If you look at the overall trend however prices are only moving sideways and this is in light of the massive financial bailouts:

culver city meidan sales price and sales

Culver City peaked at $620,000 (including condos) and is currently at $460,000.  Another way of looking at this is the entire region of SoCal is still down 45% while Culver City is down 25 percent from the peak.  As I have said, not all areas are created equally.  Yet this is an area full of Alt-A and option ARMs and many of these will recast in 2010.  Need an example?  Look at this preforeclosure that took a loan from a toxic mortgage specialist, Novastar:

culver city home

This home last sold officially in 1989 for $176,000.  This is a 2 bedroom 1 bath home and is listed at 798 square feet.  This isn’t on the MLS but is a pre-foreclosure.  Take a look at the ridiculous loan on this place:

nod data

Novastar has long imploded but look at the ridiculous loan amount.  $572,000 on a 2 bedroom 1 bath home with 798 square feet!  This was done in June of 2007 to the original owners.  The notice of default was filed in July of this year.  You can rest assured this won’t be selling for $572,000.  And don’t think this is the only inventory on the market.  Culver City has 173 homes in distress.  The MLS lists 80 homes, 12 of which are part of the 173.  So for Culver City, shadow inventory is twice the size of what the public can see.

I always defer back to local area incomes and jobs.  People ask for an answer and I have given it many times but people don’t want to hear it.  Prices in many areas are still too high.  The government is trying to  prop prices up but unless incomes grow, it will eventually fall again.  The overall region has fallen nearly 50 percent.  But like I have said, some people choose to ignore the macro trend for their pet areas.  Does anyone have a crystal ball of when prices will go lower?  Of course not.  But is that reason to jump into this highly artificial market?  I would say no.

Some say that the declining U.S. dollar will help real estate values.  Really?  If anything, this might provide a tiny boost for commercial real estate but do you see some foreign investor paying top bill for this  Culver City home for example?  Of course not.  They won’t be living there.  As a rental?  Okay, you might get $1,700 to $1,900 on this place which puts a true value of something in the low $200,000s.  We are far from that price point.  Clearly people that see things like this don’t understand how difficult it is to manage rental property from a distant location.  Plus, your renters get paid in U.S. dollars so they seem to forget that your tenant isn’t going to be paying you in Euros.

Now what do you think will happen when mortgage rates rise as they will?  Will the tax credit be forever?  The new proposed tax credit has a cap of $7,290 which is tiny in some of these mid tier neighborhoods.  Or what about the option ARMs which don’t even qualify for HAMP because of income and LTV ratios?  Many will recast in the next few years.  There doesn’t seem to be a lot of reasons to believe in prices rising in this area.

Today we salute you Culver City with our Real Homes of Genius Award.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information.

Post from: Dr. Housing Bubble Blog

Real Homes of Genius: Culver City and the Housing Stockholm Syndrome. Approximately 5 Percent of Current Home Price is related to Government Bailouts.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Filed under: Options, Stocks to Buy

World Series Trade #5 - Sonosite Inc. (SONO)The Yankees are led by a core of four men — Derek Jeter, Andy Pettitte, Jorge Posada, and Mariano Rivera — who all came to the club in 1995.

They’re no spring chickens, that’s for sure. Thankfully, the players are supported by a great organization, which includes top-notch medical care, oftentimes right there in the clubhouse, which is equipped with X-ray and sonogram equipment.

Continue reading World Series trade #5: Sonosite (SONO)

World Series trade #5: Sonosite (SONO) originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Sun, 01 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Kellogg Co (K), Colgate-Palmolive (CL), Procter and Gamble (PG), Economic data

Consumer spending had its largest fall this year, thanks to the end of the “Cash for Clunkers” program. And, incomes were flat. No change to the money coming in and a drop in the cash going out translates to an impediment to economic recovery.

In September, consumer spending fell 0.5%, the first decline in five months and the worst in nine. Wages and salaries dropped 0.2%, effectively offsetting the 0.2% up-tick in August. The economy did grow in the third quarter of 2009, hinting that the worst recession in 70 years may be coming to a close, but the tough September suggests we still have some work in front of us.

Continue reading Bad September, good Q3 for consumer spending, what’s next?

Bad September, good Q3 for consumer spending, what’s next? originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:40:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Cisco Systems (CSCO), Hewlett-Packard (HPQ), International Business Machines (IBM), EMC Corp (EMC), Technology

Neither company is saying a thing yet, but word is Cisco Systems (NASDAQ: CSCO) and EMC (NYSE: EMC) are joining up to sell a new collection of products designed to deliver cloud computing capabilities, Reuters reports. Called vBlock, the cloud solution is intended to help the companies compete more effectively with IBM (NYSE: IBM) and Hewlett-Packard (NYSE: HPQ).

The partnership, which no one is admitting to, involves a joint venture between Cisco and EMC that will sell vBlock. The former will supply the networking equipment and servers, with the latter kicking in the storage gear and virtualization technology through its VMWare (NYSE: VMW) subsidiary. The joint venture will put the systems together, integrate the components for clients, and make the whole pile of cables and silicon work. A formal announcement is expected next week.

Continue reading Cisco and EMC link up in the clouds

Cisco and EMC link up in the clouds originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Sun, 01 Nov 2009 10:10:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Forecasts, Indices, Economic data

Now that the U.S. economy is growing — GDP grew at a 3.5% annualized rate in Q3, according to U.S. Commerce Department data, one key question for investors large and small is: Is the U.S. economic expansion sustainable?

Investors can immerse themselves in data on consumer spending, retail sales, new home sales, auto sales, and factory output etc., and all of those provide clues, no question. But if you’re time-pressed and you want one metric to gauge the U.S. economy’s likely health 6-9 months from now, monitor: monthly non-farm payrolls, as tallied by the U.S. Labor Department. I.E., how many jobs the U.S. economy lost or created in the previous month.

Continue reading Want to know where the Dow is headed? Keep an eye on job growth

Want to know where the Dow is headed? Keep an eye on job growth originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]


 Creative is probably not the first word that comes to mind when you think about loan modifications. There doesn’t seem to be many new ideas in the loan modification department.

The Government is definitely doing its best to reach the borrowers that need the help, especially those that reach those that can pay affordable mortgage payments. This helps “guarantee” the government is not throwing away good money after bad with borrowers that overstretched themselves and cannot afford any reasonably monthly payment.

However all signs show that these programs are not being as successful as they hoped. But how do loan modifications lower, or attempt to lower your monthly payments. The first and main way is by lowering your interest rate. Actually one of the main purposes of loan modifications is to allow homeowners whose homes have dropped drastically in price to still take advantage of the lower interest rates now available. The problems come when low interest rates are not enough. The government is currently trying to drop interest rates to around 2%. However if this level of interest rate is still too high to make your monthly payments affordable there are still some options open to you. You servicer or lender can still extend your payment term.

This means you will extend the amount of time you take to pay your loan. This idea is pretty intuitive if you owe $1,000 and you have to pay it in 10 months you have to pay around $100 plus interest. If you can pay it in twice the time your payments should be half as much plus interest. Servicers can extend the loan to up to 40 years which can have a drastic effect on your loan payments even though it keeps you in debt well into your eighties.

What if all this is not enough? What if you still can’t afford your monthly payments? Your lender or service provider can actually defer a portion of the principal (original) amount you owe until the maturity of the loan. We call this a principal forbearance. This does not mean the debt or part of it is forgiven just deferred or set aside until you sell your home or the rest of your mortgage has been paid. This option can be very effective in lowering your monthly payment but will create a balloon payment on your mortgage. This means that your payments will be lower monthly but you will have to make a very large payment at the end of the mortgage. This can be beneficial if you are planning to sell your home and cut short your mortgage anyway or if you want a break in your monthly payments now and expect your income to increase in the future.

Another option, not very popular with service providers is to simply forgive the principal owed. This is a long shot to say the least but still worth a try. Service providers are not required to do this so don’t keep your hopes too high. `

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modifications And Balloon Payments What Is The Cost
  2. What To Look For In A Loan Modification
  3. The Obama Loan Modification Aid Program, What Are The Benefits?

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modifications And Balloon Payments What Is The Cost
  2. What To Look For In A Loan Modification
  3. The Obama Loan Modification Aid Program, What Are The Benefits?

Source [blownmortgage]

Close
E-mail It