Archive for November 7th, 2009


The news is full of loan modification horror stories describing how homeowners have struggled for months with lost documents, changing standards, unreasonable loan modification agents and the slow tides of bureaucracy. Bad news does always seem to travel faster and further so you don’t hear half as much about the hundreds of thousands of loans that have been successfully modified.

However the question still remains why loan modifications are moving so slowly if the government is willing to pay the bill for the expenses mortgage servicers and investors have to incur when modifying a loan. Recent studies seem to indicate the reason is that the incentives and handouts the government is making through HAMP and TARP just don’t cover the real cost of modifying the fast increasing volume of loan modification applications.

How can this be so when TARP and HOPE have deep pockets of over 75 billion dollars? The answer seems to lay in the mortgage servicers, the companies that collect monthly mortgage payments and then distribute them to the investors that lent the money in the first place. Mortgage servicers have found it is often cheaper to foreclose on homes than to offer a loan modification even though a loan modification would benefit both the borrower and the investor.

The key is not only the rate of return when managing loans and loan modifications but the expenses related to the operations. The assumptions we generally have as consumers is that foreclosures are a bad deal for everyone. Numbers that are thrown around for example are losses of 10 to 20 percent for lenders on short sales while lenders have to face 20 to 30 cents to the dollar when dealing with foreclosures.

These figures only tell part of the story, mortgage servicers have other ways of measuring profit and often have different priorities. A recent report examined foreclosures between 1995 and 2009 and found that loan servicers made more money by offering forbearance (a period of time where the borrower does not have to make payments so he can consolidate his finances) than by cutting principal or reducing rates of interest, which is what loan modifications do.

This means that when deciding between foreclosure and loan modification loan servicers have to choose between certain loss with loan modifications and potential profit if they foreclose the loan. What would you do? Exactly. This is why loan servicers have been dragging their proverbial feet with loan modifications. Of course there are also other issues to consider like public opinion and bad publicity. The government has tried to use this weapon by publishing loan modification leagues that encourage banks to reorganize their systems to increase loan modifications.

So what is the solution? No easy fixes obviously or they would have already been implemented. However the administration could enforce stricter rules that regulate foreclosure and make loan modifications more attractive like regulating loan originations, mandate loan modifications before foreclosure or have third party loan modification mediation programs that control what mortgage providers do.
The best thing you can do now if you are at risk of foreclosure or behind in your payments is to contact the HOPE program by visiting their website or calling 1-888-995-HOPE.

Related posts:

  1. Credit Crisis: Are Loan Modifications The Answer
  2. Loan Modifications No Match For Rising US Foreclosures.
  3. Loan Modifications No Match For Rising US Foreclosures.

Related posts:

  1. Credit Crisis: Are Loan Modifications The Answer
  2. Loan Modifications No Match For Rising US Foreclosures.
  3. Loan Modifications No Match For Rising US Foreclosures.

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Employees, Economic data, Recession

Employers are planning to cut fewer jobs for the third month in a row, according to a new report that Challenger, Gray & Christmas has supplied to BloggingStocks.

The executive outplacement firm says that the number of planned reductions fell 16% in October to 55,679 positions — from 66,404 in September. Last month’s level was the lowest seen since March 2008, when 53,579 layoffs were planned. And, it’s 51% lower than October 2008’s 112,884 result. Planned staff reductions have fallen in eight of the past 10 months.

Continue reading Layoffs slowing down, but upturn isn’t coming yet

Layoffs slowing down, but upturn isn’t coming yet originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:10:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Management, Industry, Market matters, Money and Finance Today, Politics, Headline news, Federal Reserve, Financial Crisis

US Senator Bernie Sanders, independent from Vermont, is known for his straightforward and unbiased positions.

His new legislative proposal is to break up big banks that are deemed “too big to fail.” To quote Mr. Sanders: “if an institution is too big to fail, it is too big to exist. We should break them up so they are no longer in a position to bring down our entire economy.”

Continue reading Senator Sanders proposes legislation to break up large banks

Senator Sanders proposes legislation to break up large banks originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]

Things are going so well for California, that the state now facing a $1 billion deficit after just patching up $60 billion in deficits, is now looking to withhold more taxes from your paycheck.  Of course this isn’t a tax hike (so we are told and technically, they are correct).  This is just a way […]

Things are going so well for California, that the state now facing a $1 billion deficit after just patching up $60 billion in deficits, is now looking to withhold more taxes from your paycheck.  Of course this isn’t a tax hike (so we are told and technically, they are correct).  This is just a way for the state to patch up more revenue gaps because after all, the economy is booming supposedly.  It boggles the mind that people seem to forget these facts.  Ask yourself if the state were doing so well, why would they be running so many gimmicks?  Not only are they going after withholdings earlier, but they just finished another round of selling bonds (aka borrowing).  Either way, the V-shaped recovery crowd is ready to overpay for housing once again.  Forget the fact that Alt-A and option ARM loans are still as toxic as they ever were and start hitting in full force in 2010.

It is always good to put things into context.  We can all admit that in 2009, sales did jump up in Southern California.  Over half the state lives here, so this is a good overall barometer of how things are playing out.  How significant is the sales jump this year in relation to other years during the decade?  Let us find out:

california data

At the peak over 362,000 homes and condos sold in Southern California in 2003.  Assuming the “torrid” pace of 2009, we are on track for 230,000 to 240,000 sales this year.  That doesn’t even come close to any of the boom years.  Also, 45 to 50 percent of all home sales in 2009 have been foreclosure resales.  So this is another factor to keep in mind.  The bottom line is even with massive price drops, the market is nowhere close to the bubble days.  Let us break down the data further:

socal sales data

What this chart tells us is that home sales increased because of massive price drops.  That is, if half the market is distressed sales and these are sold at markedly lower prices by default (otherwise they wouldn’t be distressed) then we are to reason that the movement has occurred because of lower price points.  In other words, wouldn’t you think an increase in price would stifle this trend?  Absolutely.  The Alt-A and option ARM issues will start resonating stronger in 2010 and this will begin to add pressure on the mid to upper tier markets.  Yes, delusional folks who can’t see outside their tiny niche market don’t look at charts like the above that show the median price falling by 50% and still being near the bottom for the entire region.  After all, their area is special.

And easy lending has allowed another surge in mini bubbles.  People are once again jumping into over priced homes in California.  Yet I believe this is merely a false bottom.  Why?  First, the state is still in a fiscal mess that really seems to go on for a few years.  People should gear up for more cuts and tax hikes.  Those that believe Prop 13 is sacred should ask Texas and New Jersey how their property tax rates look like.  California is a tax happy state.  High personal income tax, sales tax, and other taxes so why are we to believe that anything is off the table?  I’m not saying this is good or bad but when you box a big tiger like this in a corner, don’t be shocked if you get bitten.  And for better or worse, property tax revenues are a much more stable source of income than say, personal income taxes and sales taxes that directly fluctuate with recessions.

Setting that aside, the Alt-A and option ARM problem is still there.  Getting a loan is not as easy as you once thought.  Take this for an example.  Notice how much fewer credit card offers you are getting in the mail?  Well this is because in Q3 of 2006 credit card companies sent out a stunning 2.1 billion in direct mail solicitations.  For Q3 of 2009 389 million were sent out.  What do credit card companies know that the recovery cheerleaders don’t know?  Could it be that defaults are through the roof?  Possibly.  It could be that 22 percent of California is unemployed or underemployed:

unemployment

This above rate is unprecedented.  So why is it good news that we are lending big mortgages through FHA insured loans in many cases, to people that are stretching their dollar much too thin?  Isn’t this what got us into this crisis?  Yes.  Are we to expect a different outcome?  No.  And riddle me this.  If this economy recovery is legit why are we now talking about a second stimulus and needing to extend the home buyer tax credit welfare voucher?  Go by actions, not by words.

California Insurance Fund

As you would expect, our unemployment insurance fund is bleeding money:

“(OC Register) California’s unemployment insurance trust fund is bleeding money with state officials estimating it will be $27.3 billion in the hole by the end of 2011, according to a new state forecast.

Officials already were projecting major deficits in the fund a year ago, before the full impact of the banking crisis hit in late 2008.  The fund’s losses accelerated this year as the country plunged into its deepest recession in 70 years with California’s unemployment rate hitting a modern-day high of 12.3% in August.

Employers, who support the fund through a tax on each worker, are expected to contribute $4.3 billion  this year but that is nowhere near the $12.5 billion that is projected to be paid out in benefits. After eking out a $326.2 million surplus in 2008, the trust fund is expected to be $7.4 billion in the red by the end of this year.”

ui-trust-fund-2009

The federal government will forgive the interest for this year and next but the clock starts ticking in 2011.  As if we needed any additional future burdens.  Again, data like this shows us that the housing market is now at risk for a bigger risk factor.  The actual reality based economy.  This is more typical in previous recessions where housing would start declining after unemployment hit.  This time, so many toxic mortgages were floating out there that all it took was for home prices to level and the entire Ponzi scheme came crashing down.  With home prices declining as they have, it is revealing massive budget deficits.  This is to be expected when you plan revenues from nefarious and transient sources.  Those are not coming back.  Just ask Bernard Madoff how well that works in the long-run.

We also have to remember that in terms of prices, Alt-A and option ARMs helped boost housing prices and the ridiculous leverage buyers had in California.  Home buyers in California had maximum leverage of OPM (other people’s money) even though incomes did not reflect absurd valuations:

calif and nationwide median price 1968 to 2009

You look at the above and then you throw in the state income and it all becomes too apparent:

median household income

How in the world is a $60,000 median income going to support a $500,000 home?  At the maximum end, it would prudently be able to afford a $200,000 home (and that is stretching it).  The current state median home price is $251,000 but keep in mind, much of this is because of foreclosure resale homes.  The next ballgame to look at is the mid to upper tier markets that largely have not corrected based on their own bubbles.  Their dynamics reflect more esoteric loans such as the Alt-A and option ARMs.

The Path Ahead?

There will be many odd movements in the market next year.  You may see the median price move up because of lower priced mid to upper tier homes moving in larger amounts of volume.  That is, someone that bought a Culver City home in 1998 for $200,000 and at the peak in 2007 would have sold for $750,000, is now selling for $500,000.  This is actually a significant price increase from the first sale and will show up in the median price but also, the Case-Shiller repeat sale index.  So watch for things like this.  The Alt-A and option ARM recasts that will happen, will add higher priced distressed inventory on the market.  Much of the subprime problems are behind us now.  That is why you see homes in say the Inland Empire now selling for $100,000 to $150,000 that only a few years ago seemed impossible.

We can expect the state to have another major budget deficit.  Expectations range from $7 billion to $20 billion.  But the stock market is up and rich people pay most of the taxes right?  Yes.  But keep in mind they pay estimated taxes and these are significantly down even after the casino has gone up.  Why?  Many of the wealthy have accountants unlike the working stiffs that can carry over losses from 2008 over to many additional years.  In other words, don’t expect the state to get a 60 percent jump in revenues just because the stock market is up by this much.

So what should you look for in a bottom?  Well first, we need to see job growth.  Enough of this “job less” recovery non-sense.  People pay for bills from wages.  Also, if you buy that home today, your future buyer may not have your same incentives.  That is, the tax credit can’t go on forever.  FHA is now looking at a government bailout and will probably have to become more stringent because they are bleeding money thanks to their near toxic underwriting.  Plus, if you haven’t notice, the US dollar is getting hammered because what a stunner, we are simply spending money we don’t have.  If even a tiny currency crisis happens and the Federal Reserve is forced to raise rates (can’t go much lower than 0), you can kiss goodbye to those cheap 30 year mortgages (which are at 40 year historical lows – can’t get any lower).  In other words, a future buyer may not even be able to afford your home so get comfortable because you might be staying there for a very long time.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information.

Post from: Dr. Housing Bubble Blog

California Economy and Housing in Depth: SoCal Homes Sales up But Significantly Down from Peak. W-2 Earners Expect a Smaller Paycheck. And Unemployment Insurance looking at a $23 Billion Deficit by 2011.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Filed under: Personal finance, Housing

As expected, the popular home buyers tax credit has been extended. In fact, it is even more attractive.

OK, let’s first look at the extension of the current program, which includes a maximum $8,000 credit for first-time home buyers (which is someone who hasn’t owned a home in the past three years). The home must be a principal residence and the value may not exceed $800,000 (the credit is either 10% of the value of a home or $8,000, whichever is less). The credit is also refundable, which means that you can still get money even if you do not owe taxes.

Continue reading A new and improved home buyers tax credit?

A new and improved home buyers tax credit? originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]


Via [bloggingstocks]


If you have been watching the business or economy sections of newspapers, news or blogs you will have got your fair share of loan modification horror stories. At the same time banks are increasing their capacity for loan modifications and seem to be keeping up with government targets, at least for now. So who is to blame?

Are borrowers complaints valid or simple self pity for a situation banks cannot be blamed for? Or, are banks dragging their feet and ignoring the plight of borrowers despite the government being happy to pay the cost for loan modifications.
The Sun Sentinel reported this week on the plight of Kraig and Ana Weiss. The Weisses first agreed to a loan mofication with Bank of America only to have the bank take the offer off the table. Now Bank of America is moving towards foreclosure even though the Weisses are making their mortgage payments.
The  strange thing is that federal reports show that banks are restructuring home loans for troubled borrowers, but stories like that of the Weisses are heard all over the country. Where does blame lay, do banks not care or are they doing the best to deal with bad clients that are struggling with unemployment and a worldwide credit crisis.

Counties like Broward and Palm Beach show how hard things are getting with 14,000 homes in risk of foreclosure in August. However banks and service providers claim to be doing their best to deal with the millions of foreclosures requiring a loan modification.
So far the Treasury Department announced they are on target to provide the projected 4 million loan modifications by 2012 after hitting their first goal of 500,000 trial loan modifications a month early.

However this apparent success might cover the fact that only 16 percent of eligible home loans have been modified so work has only begun. The Congressional Oversight Panel for one does not seem too optimistic of the loan modification program performance. Last week the Panel reported that the federal program may not reach the long term goal and encouraged the Treasury to improve their HAMP program or to create new programs to meet the expected rise in foreclosures due to the rise of unemployment.

This rise of foreclosures is fed by a change in the market since the HAMP program started. At the beginning of the year the big trouble were subprime mortgages with high interest rates and devalued price tags that did not allow borrowers to improve their interest rates. However the rise of unemployment has now caused borrowers that have prime mortgages and that would normally be within their means to be at risk.

This means that loan modifications’ main weapon to make mortgage payments affordable, lower interest rates will not be a significant help for prime mortgages that already enjoy low interest rates.

Related posts:

  1. Loan Delinquencies Fall As Banks Get Serious With Loan Modifications
  2. HAMP, Way Out For Delinquent Borrowers And Those Without Fannie
  3. U.S Loan Modifications Hit Obama’s target Early But Nobody’s Impressed

Related posts:

  1. Loan Delinquencies Fall As Banks Get Serious With Loan Modifications
  2. HAMP, Way Out For Delinquent Borrowers And Those Without Fannie
  3. U.S Loan Modifications Hit Obama’s target Early But Nobody’s Impressed

Source [blownmortgage]

Close
E-mail It