Archive for November 22nd, 2009

Filed under: International markets, Indices, DJIA, Financial Crisis

European Central Bank President Jean-Claude Trichet jolted the markets Friday with the announcement that the ECB will gradually withdraw the emergency cash injections it has added to the financial system, in order to prevent an acceleration in inflation.

“Not all our liquidity measures will be needed to the same extent as in the past,” Trichet said at a conference in Frankfurt Friday, Bloomberg News reported. “Any non-standard measure whose continuation would pose a threat to the achievement of price stability must be undone promptly and unequivocally.”

Continue reading ECB Trichet’s comments show central banks’ delicate balancing act

ECB Trichet’s comments show central banks’ delicate balancing act originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:40:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]

America has built a large part of its economy on homeownership.  Owning a home is part of the ever more elusive American Dream.  Yet over time, owning a home became a larger and larger burden as new buyers were required to take on bigger debt loads merely to buy a basic home.  Incomes weren’t […]

America has built a large part of its economy on homeownership.  Owning a home is part of the ever more elusive American Dream.  Yet over time, owning a home became a larger and larger burden as new buyers were required to take on bigger debt loads merely to buy a basic home.  Incomes weren’t rising so debt was the new subsidy.  The apex of the bubble was reached in 2005 although prices didn’t start falling in drastic fashion for a couple years later.  The U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve are largely to blame for inciting the biggest housing bubble the world has come to know.  Wall Street is equally to blame for creating the structure that allowed this to happen as they championed de-regulation and completely neglected any fiscal responsibility.

In today’s article, I will dissect the housing market from every angle.  It is easy to get caught up in the day to day data but the bigger picture is usually missed.  Let us first look at the total number of housing units in the U.S.:

us housing units

us housing units

In the United States we have approximately 129,000,000 housing units.  These are made up of owner-occupied, rented, and vacant units.  The largest of these three categories is the owner-occupied category and most of the media focuses on this number.  Yet the other categories carry as much weight in determining a housing recovery.  Let us look at the vacant housing units:

vacant housing units

The vacancy rate for both owner-occupied and rental properties is still near all time highs.  With so many sales, how can it be that this number is so high?  I’ll get into this later in the article.  But part of this has to do with demographics, the makeup of current housing inventory, and years of over building.  It is also the case that we are shifting a large number of would be renters into homes and causing the rental vacancy rate to spike.  Many of these apartment projects are financed with commercial real estate loans and the Federal Reserve is essentially shifting defaults from residential loans to commercial loans.  That is why we are seeing rents fall as owners compete to fill vacant units.

So now we have the universe of housing units including vacant units.  Let us drill down and examine the number of owner-occupied homes and renter-occupied units:

owner and renter occupied

75 million Americans own their home.  The homeownership rate is derived from only looking at occupied units.  That is why it is important to also keep in mind the vacant units sitting on the market.

You’ll notice that the ownership rate does not factor in the vacant units.  The vacancy rate is at historical highs and this is another factor that will drag on the housing market for years to come.  37 million Americans rent their housing.  This can be apartments or actual detached homes.  The number of renters has recently increased as homeownership has fallen:

us home onwership rate

The chart has a few patterns worth noting.  From 1985 to 1995 the homeownership rate in the U.S. hovered around 64 percent.  The only recession during this time was in the early 1990s yet the rate remained steady.  The first spike started after 1995.  This trend went from 1995 to 2000 and pushed the homeownership rate from 64 to above 67 percent.  Part of this had to do with the technology bubble and the growth in the economy.  But then we hit the early 2000s recession largely brought on by the burst of the technology bubble.  Instead of homeownership declining which is typical in recessions, the homeownership rate expanded upward.  Much of this was due to Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan dropping the Fed funds rate to record lows.  Wall Street looking for the new-new thing, went from tech IPOs to mortgage backed securities and the toxic mortgage party started.

This easy access to credit and excessive risk pushed the homeownership rate to nearly 70 percent in 2005.  But that was it.  The bubble burst and the homeownership rate is now on a steady decline.  While the above chart is moving lower, one chart is moving higher.  The U.S. home vacancy rate:

home owner and rental vacancy rates

Rental properties always have higher vacancy rates merely by the nature of their use.  Someone renting a home is more likely to move than say someone who buys a home and plans to stay in their home for many years.  Yet the above chart shows an unmistakable pattern.  The rental vacancy rate from 1968 to 1984 hovered between 5 and 6 percent.  From 1985 to 1999, it was in a range of 6 to 8 percent.  And finally, from 2000 to our present situation it went from 8 percent to 10 percent.  This is historically as high as it has gone.  You will notice that the rental vacancy rate dipped after the peak in 2005 since many people opted for rental units instead of buying a home.  Yet the pattern is still holding steady.

Now looking at the homeowner vacancy rate shows another story.  Too much building.  From 1968 to 2004, the rate never crossed the 2 percent mark.  Now, we are closing in on 3 percent.  That rate may not be reached now that the market is shifting gears.  But if we do have another foreclosure wave, 3 percent is possible.  What happened here?  Too much building and ignoring demographic trends:

housing starts

From 2001 to 2006 home building was off the charts.  Single-family housing starts were up to a seasonally adjusted rate of 1.8 million a year even though population growth did not warrant this amount of new inventory.  From 1999 to 2001 the rate was hovering around 1.2 million.  So 600,000 properties were being added each year above the normal trend and this lasted for 6 years.  Of course, this number has collapsed at a pace not seen since the Great Depression but why did it occur?  People ignored the trend and demographics:

home demographic trends

The above data exemplifies the housing bubble.  Each year roughly 500,000 homes are destroyed for a variety of reasons.  This of course isn’t discussed in the mainstream media but it helps to figure out a more accurate figure of what is going on.  Most households will buy their first home in the 25 to 34 years age group creating a demand of 1.9 million homes.  We also have homes hitting the market because of the other side of the age equation.  We have 11.6 million households in the 65 to 74 age range and 9 million in the 75 to 84 age range.  Life trend dynamics (i.e,. death and downsizing) add 1.1 million units per year to the market.  In other words, here is the breakdown:

housing math

Now this data is using trends up to the end of 2008.  We were burning through 350,000 excess units per year at the end of 2008.  Of course, housing starts have now collapsed and are adding new units at an annual rate of 500,000 homes.  So a significant indicator of returning to a healthy market is more linked to the actual vacancy rate.  In fact, adding up the units we have about 3 million too many units on the market over historical trends.  Depending on our current burn rate, we have:

3 million / 350,000 = 8.5 years

3 million / 850,000 = 3.5 years

And this is the time it will take at current rates to get to a more normal market if there is such a thing.  Yet the 850,000 figure is too optimistic because we now have a new factor in the mix in the sales data.  Foreclosures:

nationwide-foreclosures

For the past year, each month over 300,000 homes enter some stage of foreclosure.  This is either a notice of default, a scheduled auction, or a home going back to the bank as an REO.  This number actually increases the length of time before we reach a stable housing market.  As you can see from the chart above, the rate is still at a record.  Now why is this the case?  Think of the dynamics of a healthy market.  Those in the household formation age, sell a home and in many cases will buy a move up home.  This can be a new home or an existing home.  Either way, they are clearing some of the vacant inventory off the market with typically two transactions taking place (buy and sell).  With foreclosures, it is normally a one and done deal.  Someone loses their home, and the person buying that home is merely taking over inventory that has already been accounted for.  This is why looking at foreclosure figures is so important.  Even in 2006 foreclosures were elevated.  If you consider that year as normal, foreclosure starts should range around 100,000 per month.  We are solidly over 300,000.

We still have many more foreclosures coming down the pipeline with Alt-A and option ARMs hitting significant recast dates.  This will only make it harder for us to clear that massive amount of excess inventory just sitting on the market.  With nearly one-third of homes sold nationwide as foreclosure re-sales, the excess inventory is sure to linger for a very long time.  Take a look at existing home sale data:

existing home sales

I’m taking the non-seasonally adjusted rate because with historical foreclosure rates, looking at typical data really does little in answering the real question of where we are going.  In September 472,000 existing homes sold.  Add in about 40,000 new homes sold and you are looking at 512,000 total home sales.  However, in the same month 343,000 homes entered into some stage of foreclosure.  Forget the data on HAMP for the moment since the 650,000 or so pre-trial loan mods means very little, the actual cure rates are extremely low:

cure-rates

We’ll be optimistic and use the 6.6% figure.  That means, of those 343,000 foreclosure starts 321,000 units are going to be additional inventory.  So even with 512,000 homes minus the 321,000 added units, we are not burning off excess inventory in any significant number.  And that is why the vacancy rate is still jumping and homeownership rates are falling.

It also doesn’t help that mortgages are delinquent at a rate never before seen (aside from the Great Depression):

percent-of-single-family-loans-delinquent

Over 9 percent of all mortgage holders are now delinquent on their mortgages.  Of the 75 million homeowners 51 million have mortgages.  So that means as things stand today, close to 5 million mortgage holders are delinquent on their loans.  Since we are not seeing this in the REO data, this must mean the following:

(a)  30+ days late and no notice of default

(b)  90+ days late and a notice of default (reflects in monthly foreclosure data) – or 90+ days late and no action at all

(c)  Auction scheduled

(d)  HAMP – 650,000 in pre-trial

Yet the cure rate is at 6 percent and this is for prime loans.  We know that we have Alt-A and option ARMs coming due in the next few months and none of these qualify for HAMP.  Wells Fargo announced that they are converting over $100 billion in Pick-A-Pay option ARMs to interest only loans but who really knows if this will even help.  Already for the option ARM universe, some 45% of option ARM borrowers are 30+ days late.

Conclusion

What can we gather from the above data?  Home prices are falling even though data in the short-term might state otherwise.  This is due to artificial inventory figures because of mortgage moratoriums and banks not moving on distressed homes in a typical fashion.  There is an enormous amount of overhang in the market.  Using typical measures the data doesn’t show up but does show up in shadow inventory data.  The reason home sales have increased recently is because prices have collapsed:

home prices

Why are we to assume that if prices go up, people will keep on buying?  The driving force right now is affordability brought on by:

-Large number of foreclosure re-sales (nationwide about one-third of all sales, in California it was up to 50 percent of all sales)

-Government programs including the $8,000 tax credit

-Federal Reserve buying GSE MBS – no one else is buying them

-Artificially lowering mortgage rates (hovering around 5% while 40 year average is closer to 9%)

With all the above, we are merely treading water.  What we can gather from the above is we have years to work through this.  Also, the growing number of baby boomers shifting into retirement will also add to the additional housing units at a higher pace since those in the 25 to 34 years of age group are no longer having families in large size.  Many may opt to rent for much longer since some are delaying having kids until later in life.  In other words, the trend is not conducive to the McMansion world.

There are many factors to consider in the current housing market and it is my hope that this article helps to show the bigger picture of what is going on.  This is how I learned to stop worrying and love the housing bubble.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information.

Post from: Dr. Housing Bubble Blog

The Comprehensive State of the U.S. Housing Market: Learning to Love the Housing Data and Forgetting the Economic Facts. Everything you wanted to know about U.S. Housing Trends.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Filed under: Deals, Media World

Playboy (PLA) tends to be associated with the magazine and sex. Not the hardcore, nasty kind, of course — Playboy has always been more than a tad distinguished, staying above board while the adult entertainment industry has chosen to compete in ways that my editor would delete if I even attempted.

With Iconix said to be interested in acquiring Playboy, it needs to think about where it can win with the ailing brand. The smart move may be to ditch the magazine and move away from sex — it can’t compete in either of these markets. Then, it needs to figure out how to make the brand relevant to everyone not in the Boomer generation … or treat Playboy as an investment with a clock on it.

Continue reading Iconix could make Playboy work: Kill the mag, take the sex out of the brand

Iconix could make Playboy work: Kill the mag, take the sex out of the brand originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:40:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Earnings reports

I was wrong about Ann Taylor Stores Corp. (ANN). Thought it might make a possible earnings trade. Well, Q3 earnings are out, and it looks like the market has given a thumbs down to my thesis. At the time of this writing, shares were off by almost 4%.

It’s funny, because Ann Taylor has done so well in 2009 as a stock that one could have supposed that a wide earnings beat would serve as a catalyst for capital appreciation. The retailer made 20 cents per share on an adjusted basis. According to my earnings preview, 6 cents was the analyst number. I mean, come on, that’s an example of solid performance, correct?

Continue reading Ann Taylor out of style with investors after Q3 report

Ann Taylor out of style with investors after Q3 report originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:20:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Microsoft (MSFT), Intel (INTC), Comfort Zone Investing

Intel Corp. (INTC) raised its dividend. Again. The 14th time since 1992 when it began paying quarterly sums to investors. The annual payout is now 63 cents or 15.75 cents every three months. That’s 12.5% higher than the previous dividend.

The stock is trading around $20 a share. With a 63 cent dividend, that’s a yield of 3%. Not a bad return when coupled with the 50% rise the stock’s seen in the past year.

Continue reading Comfort Zone Investing: Intel is saying something … can you hear it?

Comfort Zone Investing: Intel is saying something … can you hear it? originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]


Preparing mortgage aid programs and loan modification schemes is not easy. Not as hard as struggling with a mortgage you can’t afford and trying to get a loan modification from heartless corporations that simply want to milk the proverbial consumer cow, so I am not expecting any sympathy, but nevertheless it is hard.
The Government has provided a whole variety of programs in order to deal with the different type of struggling borrowers, or have they? I actually believe the government has a vested interest in making loan modifications work, they want to get reelected and people having a roof under which to live is a big part of what makes us feel a government is looking after our interests.

However there is an alternative way of looking at things. Loan modifications are designed so that only after an initial loan modification trial where the borrower proves he can pay the modified monthly payments faithfully does the full loan modification come into action.
This could seem fair and logical. Only after a show of good faith should borrowers get a second chance. The only catch with this reasoning is that banks do not have to show similar evidence of good faith.

Another problem with the loan modification’s program is that while borrowers are asked to pay for their mortgage religiously in the loan trial, the foreclosure process continues unfazed. This is very disturbing. To think that a borrower is lulled into a false sense of security while notices of default turn into repossessions and ultimately evictions while the borrower is sweating blood in order to pay the mortgage on a house that very well maybe hopelessly underwater is tragic.

Some would say that the whole loan modification program can be used by banks to take a failing loan into the process and with Washington’s blessing milk a final three months of payments while offering nothing more than an empty promise.

Although there very well might be some truth in these words I think we might be forgetting the cost of processing a loan modification for a bank, the paperwork, the time and the paperwork involved make loan modifications expensive. In fact many believe that foreclosures are actually cheaper than loan modifications for banks. It would be interesting to know if this is still the case if we put three extra mortgage payments into the equation.

Before we get too emotional, many of us get ourselves into trouble by over borrowing and over spending on overprized homes. Foreclosure could in these circumstances be the reasonable route.

Whatever may be the case how sad that loan modifications could, by error or design, end up being simply a way of milking struggling borrowers from an extra three months of payments before foreclosing their homes.

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modifications, 3 Nightmare Stories You Don’t Want To Copy
  2. Loan Modifications, lies, scams and misinformation
  3. Are Loan Modifications Worth the Hassle

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modifications, 3 Nightmare Stories You Don’t Want To Copy
  2. Loan Modifications, lies, scams and misinformation
  3. Are Loan Modifications Worth the Hassle

Source [blownmortgage]


Loan Modifications do not seem to be the solution Government hoped it to be. It is having some success, over 650,000 trial loan modifications, but the floodgates of foreclosure risk homes are not even close to being closed. Of the 650,000 trial loans only 1,711 borrowers got a permanent loan modification. Many experts predict that few of the trial loan modification will work long term and that most troubled borrowers will ultimately foreclose on their homes.

This bleak outlook has made Government and Federal Agencies look elsewhere to provide alternative options to loan modifications. One of these options, Deed for Lease, we mentioned last week and we are going to take a second look at it.

This option which has been kicked around in the nationwide housing crisis debate was finally taken on by Fannie Mae which has started to offer leases of up to 12 months when other avenues to keeping families in their homes, like loan modifications are unsuccessful.  Some like Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research see it as a great step forward in Government policy.

So will Dead for Lease, renting your own home be a viable option for struggling homeowners?

It is certainly an interesting idea. On one level it could be seen as a win-win option for pretty much everybody, at least in certain circumstances.

Win-win, because struggling homeowners get a chance to stay in their home when it has been settled that they can’t afford their mortgage but can afford the market rent of their home. It would also be good news for the neighborhoods struggling homeowners live in as it would avoid the drop in house prices foreclosed ridden neighborhoods are characterized by.

Even lenders may find this option appealing as an alternative to selling properties at cut rate prices. Lenders could turn landlords for as long as the market takes to turn around when they could sell the properties.

However few are predicting an avalanche of copy cat programs following Fannie Mae’s Deed for Lease program. Why? Two main reasons stand out.

1)      Legal liability. Once a bank turns landlord he acquires responsibilities towards his tenants, the previous homeowners. The tenants could demand work being carried out on their home if there are cases of mold, Chinese drywall or other hazards in the home.

2)      Banks are lenders not landlords. Most business like to stick to what they do best and not get into others types of business. As Chase spokesman Tom Kelly is reported to have said: “We’re not really equipped to be landlords”.  Lenders in the U.S are sitting on nearly half a million repossessed homes. The operation required to manage leases on such a volume of homes does not seem attractive to many lenders at this moment. Most prefer to dump the properties on the market even if it is a buyer’s market and prices are very low.

Fannie Mae has subcontracted landlord management duties to another country but it is doubtful other companies will follow suit.

3)      Leasing properties is often not as profitable as selling, especially when your business is not geared to managing a rental operation.

These reasons would indicate that Deed for Lease will not be a big deal in the mortgage market, at least for now. However there is no reason it won’t take off later on. There are many examples of housing policies starting small with federal housing agencies (like Fannie Mae) and then exploding to take nation and industry wide importance. A good example of this are loan modifications.

Many economists predict that loan modifications will not stop the avalanche of foreclosures caused by an ever increasing rate of unemployment and a nationwide drop in home prices. This might provide a chance for more attention to the idea of renting homes back to previous owners if the market is so saturated selling is no longer a viable option.

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modification Alternative: Is Renting Your Home a Good Option
  2. Loan Modification Alternatives: Wells Fargo Interest Only Loans
  3. $75 Billion Making Home Affordable Loan Modification Program Gets To Work

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modification Alternative: Is Renting Your Home a Good Option
  2. Loan Modification Alternatives: Wells Fargo Interest Only Loans
  3. $75 Billion Making Home Affordable Loan Modification Program Gets To Work

Source [blownmortgage]

In the last few days, we have gotten a better picture of macro trends impacting the California economy.  You would think that a bad overall economic climate would at least temper the bullish attitude of some folks that think California housing is somehow going to have another blowout year.  This week the non-partisan California Legislative […]

In the last few days, we have gotten a better picture of macro trends impacting the California economy.  You would think that a bad overall economic climate would at least temper the bullish attitude of some folks that think California housing is somehow going to have another blowout year.  This week the non-partisan California Legislative Analyst Office announced that California will be dealing with $21 billion in budget deficits in the current and next fiscal years.  Keep in mind that back in July when we patched up $60 billion in deficits, the government was projecting a $500 million surplus in the general fund for the current fiscal year.  The new update is showing a $6.4 billion gap that is as wide as the Grand Canyon.  Today, we also find out that the California unemployment rate is up to 12.5 percent; if we look at the underemployment rate it is now up to 23 percent.  The job losses keep coming but what is more troubling, the “help wanted” signs are not going up.

Without a doubt, Alt-A and option ARMs are already causing problems internally on the balance sheet of banks:

CFN055

Since 58% of option ARMs are here in California, this combined with the fiscal problems of the state will prove to put housing into a precarious state for the next few years.  Let us look at 10 charts as to why the California economy and real estate market will see no recovery in 2010.
Chart #1 – $21 Billion in Budget Deficits

lao forecast budget

Without a doubt, these are enormous budget deficits that we need to contend with.  In the last cycle, the state had to cut spending and also raise taxes.  There were also many gimmicks in the last fiscal budget since the state government was hoping for a Hail Mary pass that the economy would somehow recover in a few short months.  That didn’t happen and the gap has opened up again.  Combine the current fiscal year and the next, and we are looking at $21 billion to patch up.  Where is this going to come from?

Chart #2 – Deficits for Many Years

operating short falls

One of the large issues in the latest fix is cuts that were supposed to happen but didn’t.  For example, the correction system is over budget by $1.4 billion and Medi-Cal spending is over by $900 million.  If you don’t adhere to a budget, then problems will occur.  But this is more kicking the can down the road budgeting yet the reality is, California hasn’t improved much in the last year.  In fact, unemployment is now up to a record keeping high of 12.5 percent.  Is this good news for the California housing market?

Chart #3 – Optimistic Outlook

lao forecast

The California LAO does a good job at looking at data but their forecasts are a bit optimistic.  If you look at the above chart, the peak unemployment rate for the U.S. is 10 percent and for California it stands at 12.1 percent.  We are already beyond those points.  Given, these are yearly averages but so far the trend is moving in one way.  You will also notice that for California, the LAO sees a doubling in housing permits for 2010 and nearly a tripling by 2011.  So far, we have seen little reason to assume this is going to happen.  With many more foreclosures coming in the future through Alt-A and option ARMs, we are assured more inventory in the next few years.

Chart #4 – U.S. GDP Moves Sideways

us gdp forecast

The above is the optimistic scenario.  In fact, even the LAO is bringing up the Japan lost decade as a possible outcome.  I’ve talked about the Heisei boom and bust in Japan and mentioned this as a possible outcome for us.  Given the current government measures and actions, we will be lucky to have a Japan like outcome.  At this point, the Fed is trying everything it can to keep any audit from occurring since so much toxic financial waste is being funneled into that balance sheet.  So much for transparency.  What the Fed is basically saying is if you take an honest look at what they have, the economy will implode.  How is that for confidence?  The Fed will make Bernard Madoff look like a small town bank robber.
The above flat lining or “V” shaped recovery is not going to happen.  It is simply too optimistic.

Chart #5 – California Weak Housing Price Growth

calif home prices

You would think with budget deficits until 2015, unemployment at 12.5 percent, and a political system that resembles a developing nation, that all of that might throw a wrench into the housing growth crowd.  No way!  It is the immaculate housing recovery.  Who needs jobs for the stock market to go up 60 percent?  Like Wall Street, some people think that housing can recover even if the economy is in a mini-depression.  And in the current budget that we enacted, revenues are a problem but spending is the bigger issue.

In the July budget it was assumed revenues of $84.1 billion for 2008-09 and $89.5 billion for 2009-10.  So far, this year revenue is lower and LAO expects revenues of $83.6 billion for 2008-09, $496 million less than budgeted and $88.1 billion in 2009-10 and that is $1.5 billion less than budgeted.  Yet areas like corrections are over budget by $1.4 billion and Medi-Cal coming in over by $900 million.

So what does this have to do with housing prices?  A lot actually.  There is only a few ways to balance this out.  More cuts (higher unemployment), higher revenues (taxes), or more likely a combination of both.  With elections next year, you can rest assured candidates for Governor are going to be focusing on the economy as issue number one.  Either way, the average Californian is going to have less money one way or another.  The Alt-A and option ARM problem is unique.  This housing bubble is unique.  We have no historical parallel.  How can it be assumed that this will simply disappear with no repercussions like dirt being swept under the rug?  Some think that HAMP or other gimmicks are going to stem the losses.  An unemployed person is not going to be able to cover a $200,000, $300,000 or $400,000 mortgage (fixed, Alt-A, option ARM, subprime, interest only, etc) so how are prices going to go up?

Prices are going up right now for the following reasons:

=Tax credit

=Artificial lowering of inventory (big shadow inventory)

=Moratoriums like HAMP

=FHA insured loans – 2% in SoCal two years ago now nearly 40% of all purchases
We already know how disastrous FHA is becoming.  Defaults are flying off a cliff.  The median down payment for FHA insured loans is 3.5 percent.  Are some putting down more?  Yes.  But half are not.  Plus, California is in a total mess:

“(LA Times) The credit information supplier says that during the third quarter, nearly 10.2% of home loans in the Golden State were 60 days or more past due. That was up from 9.7% in the second quarter and 5.8% in the third quarter of 2008.”

Nationwide things are equally as bad:

“(UPI) In records going back to 1972, the delinquency rate in the third quarter was an all-time high, breaking the previous high of 8.86 percent set in the previous quarter.

The rate does not include loans in the process of foreclosure which, separately, was 4.47 percent in the third quarter. The combined delinquency and foreclosure rate was 14.41 percent, also a record, the MBA said.”

In other words, 1 out of 7 mortgages is in some form of distress.  So the government is left with hard choices.  FHA insured loans are imploding because of the pathetically low money down required (3.5%).  FHA is going to need a bailout in the next few months.  But some are going to expect a pound of flesh.  The only way to combat this is by increasing the down payment requirement to at least 10 percent.  No one is saying eliminate FHA but come on, is 10 percent too much to ask for?  Do that, and the California market is done.  Yet the median nationwide home price is around $177,000; all you need is $6,195 to buy a home!  In Southern California, that can be your first month and last month deposit on a leased place.  Without significant changes the nation is going to have to bailout all the additional failed mortgages coming from California that have a much higher average balance.  This isn’t speculation, this is already happening.

Chart #6 – New Demographics

women waiting to have children

I talk to many younger couples and many are waiting to have families.  The above chart merely verifies this trend.  “Family forming” is a big mover in people buying homes.  No longer does the couple feel like their apartment is big enough for a child so off they go to buy a home.  But if people are waiting longer, it is expected that many may not have that rush or desire to buy sooner.  People are hunkering down.  In fact, in some areas of the country people are lining up outside of Wal-Marts at the end of the month waiting for paychecks or government funds to clear just so they can buy food.

So people are shifting priorities.  In fact, just from speaking to many younger couples, they are perfectly fine in waiting.  Their primary concern is trying to survive through the recession first before making the biggest purchase of their life.  So this throws another factor into the bullish housing argument.  Many couples don’t “need” to buy a home because they are delaying having kids.  Nothing wrong with that.

Chart #7 – Revenues from Volatile Sources

calif revenue source

We have discussed that California receives revenues from very volatile sources.  Over half of all revenues for California comes from personal income taxes.  So with unemployment going sky high, it is no stunner that the state all of a sudden isn’t flush with money.  California has been artificially stimulated for two decades.  We had the tech bubble followed by the housing bubble.  There is no other bubble this time so we are basically fixing structural problems that have been decades in the making.  The forecast is dismal but as you can see, we suddenly see a miraculous recovery sprouting out like a card from David Blaine’s hand.  The LAO does a great job dissecting the numbers but doesn’t tell us what industries are going to make up for the lost income.

Also, the LAO is factoring in that COLAs are not going to happen for workers until 2015.  More reason to believe housing is going to go up right?

Chart #8 – Capital Gains

capital gains taxes

Within the personal income tax revenue section, a big portion of money comes from the wealthy, many who depend on the stock market casino.  If you look at the above chart, you can see how much money can come from capital gains.  During the tech bubble the state was pulling in 11 percent of the total PIT from capital gains!  It peaked over 8 percent in the real estate bubble but is now down to 2 percent.  The U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve have juiced the stock markets because clearly the average American is not feeling any of the trillions in bailouts.  Their belief is that crumbs will fall from the plates of the banking oligarchs and trickle down to the middle class.  It is hard to believe that with the wild California housing market, cap gains didn’t match the tech boom.

Chart #9 – Unemployment

california unemployment rate

Good luck finding any real estate analyst that connects housing prices to employment and income.  Like Wall Street, the real estate market doesn’t depend on income and jobs anymore according to this new version of the economy.  The official unemployment rate is 12.5 percent, a record keeping high.  If we look deeper into the data, 23 percent of the workforce is either unemployed or underemployed.  If you are working at a local retail store after losing your good paying job, you are considered fully employed.  If you are working 10 hours at your local Wal-Mart to pay for food but want full-time employment, you are not part of that 12.5 percent.

Employment is such an obvious data point in terms of looking at any housing price movement.  Recent data is showing prime mortgages defaulting in mass not because mortgages are toxic like Alt-A and option ARMs, but because people have now lost their jobs or have seen their incomes fall by the wayside.  Until employment stabilizes, housing recovery talk is nonsense.  People right now are focused more on taking care of their immediate needs as they should.  Yet where do we focus our energy?  Banking bailouts, cash for clunkers, and home buying tax credits.  I’ve been living in this Alice in Wonderland world long enough that being in this sunny rabbit hole we call Southern California, nothing else really surprises me.

And one thing people miss even with FHA insured loans is the amount of leverage that is now gone because of Alt-A and options ARMs:

fha loan

Take for example the above case.  Say you are looking at a good area like Culver City since I’ve discussed that area over the last year.  You are looking at a nice place that is going for $500,000.  The required household income is approximately $125,000.  Not out of reach for a working class couple.  So you can buy a home that is roughly 4 times your annual gross income.  Yet during the bubble, it was common for people making $50,000 to take on $500,000 mortgages.  Countless Real Homes of Genius were purchased like this.  But that leverage is now gone.  And keep in mind, if employment keeps faltering what if one couple gets hours cut back or fired?  FHA is providing roughly 4 times annual income leverage versus the ten (or even higher) during the bubble days.

Chart #10 – Unemployment Insurance

unemployment insurance fund

With so many people unemployed, the unemployment insurance fund has been running in the red for nearly a year.  We are in the hole to the tune of $4 billion.  The money is coming from somewhere:

“Because of the insolvency, EDD obtains federal loans on a quarterly basis to cover projected fund deficits. To date, the state has borrowed about $4 billion, permitting California to make benefit payments to UI claimants without interruption. Federal loans lasting more than one year generally will accumulate interest charges of about 5 percent per year on the outstanding balance.”

More debt and more borrowing.  We are loaded up with so much debt, that by 2015 the general fund is going to go to debt service and retirement benefits.

All this of course is somehow good for the housing market.  Yeah right.  No need for apocalypse movies when our budgets are this bad.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information.

Post from: Dr. Housing Bubble Blog

Forget about the 2012 Apocalypse Movies because California has Enough Problems in 2010. 10 Charts showing why there will be no Economic or Housing Recovery for California in 2010. Unemployment at 12.5 Percent and $21 Billion in Deficits don’t Help Either.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Close
E-mail It