Archive for December, 2009

Filed under: International markets, Products and services, Chasing Value, Technology, Raytheon Company (RTN)

If you are in the right place at the right time, then you have the most opportunity. That pretty much explains why I recently bought shares of the Raytheon Company (RTN) — and why it is one of my picks for 2010.

Raytheon (whose name means “light of the gods”) is a top 10 prime contractor to the Pentagon. The list of critical systems it makes include reconnaissance, targeting, and navigation systems. It is a leader in missile defense systems, which include the Patriot, Sidewinder, and Tomahawk systems. Raytheon also makes radios, air traffic control systems and radars, satellite communications systems and provides commercial electronics products and services as well.

Continue reading Chasing Value: 2010 — #8 Raytheon Company

Chasing Value: 2010 — #8 Raytheon Company originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Thu, 31 Dec 2009 12:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]


Loan Modifications have been touted as the solution to all evils brought about by the latest economic crises and as the worst idea an administration has ever had.

The administration shouts out that the whole point of Loan Modifications is to help the middle class by giving them a break on their underwater mortgages while many commentators claim that it is just one more ploy to funnel money to big bank corporations that have already received billions in bailout money.

How is it that such an apparently simple idea as modifying the interest rates, loan tenure, and if the borrower is really lucky, the loan principal, is received with such opposite feelings?

The reason is that it is a loose, loose program where neither lenders nor borrowers get what they really want. The intention was good when designing the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) but just as the Communist Manifesto sounded great on paper, the reality is that in practice it simply doesn’t work.

As nobody gets what they want everybody suspects it is a ploy to steal their money so nobody makes the effort needed to make it happen. Another way to see it is that the government is not creating the incentives that would make the ploy work.

Borrowers Loose:

The whole Loan Modification Program is based on a three month trial period that must be “passed” before the loan mod is permanent. In order to qualify borrowers must provide proof of income, pay their monthly payments on time every month, after which they must supply more paperwork. This creates a bottleneck where a lot of applications come in, 750,000 seems to be the last count, but only a very few actually make it to permanent loan modification, around 31,000. And of the few that make it even fewer are that much better off. The reason being that when a loan is underwater, or put another way, when a borrower owes more than his house is worth, the only real long term solution is to reduce the principal. If you don’t the borrower still owes more than his house is worth and there is little incentive to pay for an investment that is upside down when the borrower could simply walk away from a sour deal and put his money elsewhere.

Lenders lose:

Many feel that the only winners in the loan modification (a.ka. HAMP) program are corporate banks. One argument explains that the whole program is designed to squeeze three extra months out of underwater borrowers that would otherwise not think about paying another month. Others feel that it is only another way to get money to banks through the incentives the program offers.

The three month trial scam does carry some credibility because it costs the bank little to reduce payments for three months and carry on with foreclosure proceedings. The cost of manning the loan modification and running the paperwork would probably be covered by receiving payments from the three month trial.

However it seems silly to think that the whole program is designed to give bonuses to banks. The government only pays a “bonus” to banks when they complete a permanent loan modification and there has only been 31,000 of them up-to-date. The maximum incentive a bank can receive for a loan modification is around $4,000 over a period of three to four years, which means that in total the government will pay in the next three to four years around $124,000,000. Compare $4,000 with the loss a bank incurs when they reduce the interest rate of a loan which climbs into the tens of thousands plus whatever principal reduction might be involved. Although it is true that foreclosures are also expensive it is not as if the government’s measly incentive is going to make a loan modification a great deal. This is why banks are not in a hurry to carry out loan modifications, in most cases it is bad business, and even when there is a small margin to be made the rate of re-default with modified loans is high and banks might just be kicking the can down the road a few blocks.

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modifications, Story Of Struggle For Banks And Borrowers Alike
  2. Loan Modification Program, Good Intention Bad Idea
  3. U.S Loan Modifications Hit Obama’s target Early But Nobody’s Impressed

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modifications, Story Of Struggle For Banks And Borrowers Alike
  2. Loan Modification Program, Good Intention Bad Idea
  3. U.S Loan Modifications Hit Obama’s target Early But Nobody’s Impressed

Source [blownmortgage]


The Loan Modification Program is not exactly 2009 success story. Out of the 750,000 trial loan modifications around 31,000 have become permanent, not great odds even if you are a betting man (or woman).

What makes things worse is that in order to manage such a volume of trial loan modifications for HAMP (Home Affordable Modification Program) servicers are employed to do the paperwork and provide advice for the borrower. However some of these servicers have been known to provide bad advice, ask for illegal contracts to be signed and other examples of malpractice.

Keeping away from bad egg servicers is important if you are to be successful in your loan modification. This article will provide some pointers on what to look for to set apart the good from the bad and the ugly of HAMP servicers.

Unfortunately bad HAMP servicers are a uncomfortable reality. Just this week Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray filed a lawsuit against Barclays Capitol Real Estate working as HomeEq Servicing.

Why was Barclays sued? Although the complaints filed against Barclays are still to be proven and we all like to think we are innocent until proven otherwise, it will prove a good example for the point this article is making. Which is, choose your HAMP servicer wisely.

HomeEq was accused of:

1)      Violating Ohio’s Consumer Sales Practices Act (CSPA) through incompetent and inefficient service. More specifically HomeEq failed to return customer calls or reply to inquiries, lost borrowers paperwork and more importantly failed to provide timely and affordable loss mitigation options to their customers.

2)      Not reacting to repeated warnings by the  Attorney’s office. According to the Attorney General Richard Cordray, ample time has been provided to servicers in Ohio and  elsewhere to change their ways and stop their negligent behavior.

HomeEq services more than 10,000 subprime loans in Ohio alone, becoming a HAMP participant in August. HomeE            q is not exactly overachieving in the loan mod department being one of the lowest performing servicers.

Not surprisingly HomeEq feels the complaint is groundless and that they are commited to quality customer service and to work with financially distressed borrowers… bla,bla, bla.

What signs identify Roque Hamp Servicers?

There are many, too many to number but some big ones stand out.

-          For instance if your mortgage servicers asks you to sign one sided agreements that obviously are biased toward the lender the alarm bells you are hearing are not imaginary.

-          Upfront fees. It is illegal to ask for fees for servicers that have not been supplied.

-          If you are asked to waive your right to defense by a HAMP servicer, run, they are trying to take your for a ride.

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modification Administration Hawks Bring Out the Big Guns
  2. Loan Modifications, Servicers and Who Is Profiting From the Credit Crisis
  3. Loan Modification Low Numbers, Why?

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modification Administration Hawks Bring Out the Big Guns
  2. Loan Modifications, Servicers and Who Is Profiting From the Credit Crisis
  3. Loan Modification Low Numbers, Why?

Source [blownmortgage]


Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: International markets, Competitive strategy, Archer-Daniels-Midland (ADM), Bargain stocks, Chasing Value, Commodities, Agriculture, Stocks to Buy

How hungry are you? The world is becoming hungrier all the time and Archer-Daniels-Midland (ADM) seeks to fill that need.

It is one of the world’s largest processors of oilseeds, corn, and wheat. It turns corn into syrups, sweeteners, citric and lactic acids, and ethanol to fill your tank too. ADM also produces wheat flour for bakeries and pasta makers; cocoa and chocolate products for confectioners; animal-feed ingredients for farmers, and malt for brewers. It operates one of the world’s largest crop origination and transportation networks, through which it connects crops and their markets across the globe.

Continue reading Chasing Value: 2010 — #7 Archer Daniels Midland

Chasing Value: 2010 — #7 Archer Daniels Midland originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Analyst reports, Best Buy (BBY), Options, Technical Analysis

Deutsche Bank has reiterated its buy rating and a $48 price target on electronics retailer Best Buy (BBY). The price target implies expected upside of nearly 19% from BBY’s closing price on Tuesday.

“BBY reported that Black Friday comps were up double digits. While we expect some slowdown from that level, store checks show that trends remain solid throughout December,” wrote Deutsche Bank in a note to clients. “This, coupled with an easy comparison should enable positive high single digit comps domestically. We also believe that web sales, which were up 20% in 3Q continue to grow, which helps comps. Also, TV pricing remains relatively rational, which should help offset some of the margin decline from mix to laptops.”

Continue reading Deutsche Bank Still Bullish on Best Buy

Deutsche Bank Still Bullish on Best Buy originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:20:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]

The shadow inventory issue will be an important factor in how California home prices move in 2010.  It isn’t a question of shadow inventory existing since that has already been established but how banks are going to proceed with leaking out the inventory to the market.  One spigot used in 2009 revolved around the HAMP […]

The shadow inventory issue will be an important factor in how California home prices move in 2010.  It isn’t a question of shadow inventory existing since that has already been established but how banks are going to proceed with leaking out the inventory to the market.  One spigot used in 2009 revolved around the HAMP loan modifications but as we are finding out, much of these last minute deals simply delayed the inevitable since only a handful of trial modifications became permanent.  Yet banks realize the razor edge they are walking on.  Should the real inventory make its way onto the market local area comps will be depressed and prices will fall once again.  And keep in mind prices haven’t been surging up.  We have placed duct tape on the massive crack in the shadow inventory dam and homes are starting to leak out.

Here in California shadow inventory is massive.  It is likely that we have the same amount of inventory in the shadows as we do in the actual public MLS.  The way home values are derived come from recent local area sales.  Bank owned homes sell for much less so banks are holding off inventory trying to allow the artificial supply to juice prices so they can release inventory onto the market later creating a mini bubble.  The only reason banks can even do this is because of the crony banking laws and the fact that they have trillions in taxpayer bailout money.  The irony of course is that it is a win-win for banks.  They can hold off and sell homes at an inflated price with taxpayer money to taxpayers thus taking them for a ride twice.  At a certain point you wonder if the public will keep on taking this since lower priced homes will make more sense in this climate with high unemployment and lower wages.

The good news is the shadow inventory issue has gone mainstream:
la times shadow

Source:  L.A. Times

“A supply of 1.7 million homes headed for sale because of foreclosure or delinquency looms over the nation’s housing market, which could dampen progress toward recovery should the Obama administration fail in its efforts to aid struggling homeowners, researchers said.”

It is also hard to see what lurks in the shadows when banks have effectively issued a foreclosure holiday:

“Some lenders have declared limited foreclosure moratoriums this year to give troubled borrowers time to catch up on their payments or work out other solutions. Those announcements continued Thursday: Mortgage titans Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac said they would suspend foreclosure evictions from Saturday to Jan. 3, and Citigroup Inc. said it would suspend some foreclosures and evictions from today to Jan. 17.”

That is certainly a nice holiday gesture by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac but what does pausing the foreclosure process do for someone with no job?  And isn’t that really the problem here?  If incomes and our economy were healthy not many would be concerned about housing prices.  The problem is how we’ve dealt with this crisis.  Everything centered on housing because that is where crony Wall Street had placed its massive bets.  We had equity injections into banks.  Then we nationalized Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  When that didn’t work, we started with moratoriums.  Basically this was the “allow the scab to dry” fix to the housing market.  That still didn’t stunt the tsunami of foreclosures.  Then banks straight out allowed people to stay in their homes without them making payments.  The government then stepped in and issued the HAMP initiative.  With this, the government basically decided to give people option ARM lite loans for their problems.  And people are still stunned why foreclosures are near their peak:

nationwide foreclosures

9 consecutive months with foreclosure filings over 300,000.  Yet somehow the market is healthy.  Well with moratoriums and banks not moving on non-payers of course everything looks good.  This is like credit card companies only reporting data on those paying their bills.

Yet the underlying problem still hasn’t been fixed.  That is, millions of Americans still can’t afford their mortgage payments.  The growing backlog of shadow inventory is merely a reflection of this problem.  Even so-called prime cities don’t appear so prime when you cut into their data.  Today we salute you Culver City with our Real Homes of Genius Award.

Culver City Duplex versus Shadow on Same Block

culver city duplex home

The interesting thing about shadow inventory is your neighbor might be gearing up for a strategic default and you have no way of knowing it.  You probably don’t care but what you should care about is what a foreclosure sale will do to your own property values.  If there were only a handful of distress sales it wouldn’t factor too much in a large city.  But have a distress inventory the size of the MLS and then you have problems.

The above home is a duplex for sale in Culver City. The property has been listed on the MLS for 270+ days.  This two unit property has two bedrooms and one bath and another one bedroom and one bath unit.  Let us look at the pricing history on this place:

Price Reduced: 06/03/09 — $695,000 to $650,000

Now for someone buying this place, you would need to approach it as an investor.  Let us assume that you wanted to live in one of those units and rent the other.  Let us first run the numbers on your FHA insured loan:

3.5% down payment:     $22,750

fha numbers

This above chart is so incredibly important.  Just because you can technically afford a mortgage doesn’t mean you should get it.  To buy this duplex someone will need to have a gross income of $180,000 and a down payment of $22,000.  But that is only the first step.  FHA insured will work if you occupy one of the units.  Do you think someone making nearly $200,000 wants to live in a 2 bedroom duplex?  Nothing wrong with that of course but you are spending $650,000 here.  In some states you get a helicopter launching pad for that price.

Some obsess with the monthly payment number.  Okay.  Let us look at that as well.  Your monthly outlay comes to $4,200.  Assuming you live in one of the units, how much do you think you can get for the other unit?  Do you think that you can justify a $4,200 a month outlay here?  That works out to $2,100 per unit (give or take for the bigger unit).  Yet this is the kind of amateur logic that is used when valuing real estate.  What if you have a vacancy?  What if the roof needs repairing?  What about upkeep issues?  Your costs keep on increasing.  It is nice to simply run the numbers and assume you will have a full rent check each month but anyone who owns rental property understands this is merely a hopeful dream.  Reality is much different.

So this duplex is on the market for sale for all to see.  But what you don’t see on the same block is part of the shadow inventory:

nts culver city home

The duplex is listed as “A” on the map above.  Oh, and after a bit of investigation we find out that the property is next to the freeway.  At least you have easy access.  The shadow inventory bank owned home is a 3 bedroom and 2 baths home.  It is listed at 1,169 square feet.  This home has an interesting history:

loan history

At foreclosure this home had $625,500 in loans.  The home fell back on payments and ended up being foreclosed.  What price did the bank take it back?

nts culver city

The initial loan amounts were $625,500 but the bank took it back for $427,500.  That is a 31 percent drop.  But you know what?  Does a falling tree in the forest make a sound?  Apparently not because this price adjustment isn’t factored into the current median price data.

Culver City (90230):         Median Price ($530,000) y-o-y drop of 9.3%

Culver City (90232):         Median Price ($715,000) y-o-y drop of 4.5%

Now don’t you think that if this home was on the market the above data would be different?  The home was taken back by the bank in September.  So it has been a few months.  Why isn’t it back on the market?  Because banks are using your taxpayer dollars to create an artificial market and trickle inventory back into the city.  This is a lose-lose for taxpayers.  How?  Prices are artificially kept in a bubble while banks keep sucking money like financial vampires on taxpayer money so they don’t write down loans that they made at the peak of the market.  Make no mistake, this is their fault.  And if you think about it, they are the only entity not suffering.  Everyone else suffers above.  Why?

-The previous owner got his punishment by losing his home to foreclosure and bad credit.

-The taxpayer gets taken for a ride because they now are funding the banks little experiment of keeping inventory off the market.  Prices artificially go up so a new buyer pays more because of his own bailout!

-The bank wins because they can keep sucking money from the taxpayer while allowing inventory to trickle out into the market one by one and buffer their write-downs.

This model is clearly unsupportable.  Starting next year, a new commission will be looking into the causes of this financial meltdown.  The fact that they are starting the approach in the past tense is completely wrong.  The crisis is still going on.  Banks are largely responsible for this mess.  This form of corporation run government is troubling.  Clearly people can see the sham that is going on with shadow inventory. This is a complete robbery of the American people.  Think of the case above.  If the REO home were to sell at the market rate prices would depress for the block.  Is this so bad?  Doesn’t that mean that a future home buyer would have to take on less debt to buy a home?  Plus, local area incomes do not support current prices.

The phony numbers will keep coming out but 2010 will be a critical year.  Do people demand transparency in shadow numbers or even the Fed balance sheet or do they turn a blind eye and allow our entire financial system to be run as if it were a Bernie Madoff fund?

Today we Salute you Culver City with our Real Homes of Genius Award.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information.

Post from: Dr. Housing Bubble Blog

Real Homes of Genius: Culver City Housing Bubble. Housing Shadow Inventory in Action. Countrywide Bank Owned home versus Duplex on Same Block. Foreclosure Holiday.

Via [DrHousingBubble]

Filed under: Broadcom Corp’A’ (BRCM)

Tech firm Broadcom (BRCM) announced that it has agreed in principle to settle a pending class action litigation against the company and some of its current and former officers. The litigation surrounded the company’s historical stock-option accounting practices, and was settled for $160.5 million in cash.

The legal action was on behalf of persons and entities that bought or acquired shares of BRCM between July 21, 2005 and July 13, 2006. The $160.5 million cash payment will result in the release and dismissal (with prejudice) of the claims against both the company and its officers and directors. In December 2006, BRCM was singled out as a company participating in backdating of stock options, an illegal practice.

Continue reading Broadcom Settles Stock-Option Dispute

Broadcom Settles Stock-Option Dispute originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:40:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]


This is the question administration consultants and officials are asking themselves. After using every trick in the book and more to “encourage”, “bribe” and “bully” servicers in providing loan modifications, loan modification conversion rates are still terribly low.

Ineligible Applicants.

Some have reasoned that the reason loan modification conversion rates are so slow is that many borrowers are simply ineligible under the current loan modification program, also called Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). HAMP does condition acceptance into the program, homeowners must be able to afford the modified payments, the cost of housing must not exceed 31% of the households income and the NPV test (Net Present Value) must be passed among other requirements before a loan modification is granted permanently.

Wrong Crisis.

A parallel argument is that the HAMP program is simply targeting the wrong problem. The issue, in the opinion of those that voice this argument, not a mortgage crisis, but a credit or unemployment crisis.  It must be granted that with many homeowners their mortgage is the least of their worries or at least only one of many.

This argument seems to be validated by the fact that more and more troubled homeowners have prime loans with excellent interest rates and conditions but are struggling with their mortgages because they are unemployed. Modifying the mortgage payments will not help these homeowners which in most cases aren’t eligible for a modification anyway.

Greedy Servicers.

Some have pointed out that in many cases loan modifications simply don’t make sense for servicers because they cost more than they are worth, at least for servicers. Servicers, often banks, manage mortgages for lenders. They don’t supply the cash but deal with customer service, collect payments and pass them on to the lender or lenders of the mortgage.

Loan Modifications are too expensive.

A similar line of reasoning points to high cost of modifying a loan. Lowering the interest of a loan or reducing the principal can cost lenders tens of thousands of dollars with the added risk that borrowers can re-default despite the money invested in the loan modification. From a business standpoint if can seem logical for banks to say no thanks to government incentives which are often inadequate and cash in on a foreclosure.

If any of these explanations are true of if they all contribute to the program is hard to say. What does seem clear is that we are dealing with a complex crisis that will not be defeated with any one silver bullet. A combination of economic and social measures will be required to fight the housing, credit and unemployment crisis the U.S and world as a whole faces.

Related posts:

  1. Obamas Loan Modification Success Explained
  2. Rogue Loan Modification Servicers, What Are The Signs?
  3. TARP, Loan Modification And Other Disaster stories.

Related posts:

  1. Obamas Loan Modification Success Explained
  2. Rogue Loan Modification Servicers, What Are The Signs?
  3. TARP, Loan Modification And Other Disaster stories.

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Stocks to Buy, best stocks for 2010

This post is part of a special report, Top Picks for 2010, the 27th annual survey in which TheStockAdvisors.com asks the nation’s leading advisors for their single favorite stock for the new year. See all 80 stocks listed here.

“Universal Insurance Holdings (UVE) is my stock pick for 2010,” says Neil Macneale, editor of the In his 2-for-1 advisory.

Incidentally, Neil’s top stock pick in last year’s report — Teck Resources — soared 650%. Here’s his new favorite for the coming year.

Continue reading Top Picks for 2010: Universal Insurance (UVE)

Top Picks for 2010: Universal Insurance (UVE) originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]

Close
E-mail It