Archive for January 13th, 2010


This is the question administration consultants and officials are asking themselves. After using every trick in the book and more to “encourage”, “bribe” and “bully” servicers in providing loan modifications, loan modification conversion rates are still terribly low.

Ineligible Applicants.

Some have reasoned that the reason loan modification conversion rates are so slow is that many borrowers are simply ineligible under the current loan modification program, also called Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). HAMP does condition acceptance into the program, homeowners must be able to afford the modified payments, the cost of housing must not exceed 31% of the households income and the NPV test (Net Present Value) must be passed among other requirements before a loan modification is granted permanently.

Wrong Crisis.

A parallel argument is that the HAMP program is simply targeting the wrong problem. The issue, in the opinion of those that voice this argument, not a mortgage crisis, but a credit or unemployment crisis.  It must be granted that with many homeowners their mortgage is the least of their worries or at least only one of many.

This argument seems to be validated by the fact that more and more troubled homeowners have prime loans with excellent interest rates and conditions but are struggling with their mortgages because they are unemployed. Modifying the mortgage payments will not help these homeowners which in most cases aren’t eligible for a modification anyway.

Greedy Servicers.

Some have pointed out that in many cases loan modifications simply don’t make sense for servicers because they cost more than they are worth, at least for servicers. Servicers, often banks, manage mortgages for lenders. They don’t supply the cash but deal with customer service, collect payments and pass them on to the lender or lenders of the mortgage.

Loan Modifications are too expensive.

A similar line of reasoning points to high cost of modifying a loan. Lowering the interest of a loan or reducing the principal can cost lenders tens of thousands of dollars with the added risk that borrowers can re-default despite the money invested in the loan modification. From a business standpoint if can seem logical for banks to say no thanks to government incentives which are often inadequate and cash in on a foreclosure.

If any of these explanations are true of if they all contribute to the program is hard to say. What does seem clear is that we are dealing with a complex crisis that will not be defeated with any one silver bullet. A combination of economic and social measures will be required to fight the housing, credit and unemployment crisis the U.S and world as a whole faces.

Related posts:

  1. Obamas Loan Modification Success Explained
  2. Rogue Loan Modification Servicers, What Are The Signs?
  3. TARP, Loan Modification And Other Disaster stories.

Related posts:

  1. Obamas Loan Modification Success Explained
  2. Rogue Loan Modification Servicers, What Are The Signs?
  3. TARP, Loan Modification And Other Disaster stories.

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: Other issues

One aspect of American life that has to change is the scattershot quality of the U.S.’s infrastructure.

New York Times (NYT) Columnist Thomas Friedman has written and spoken about it often, and he offers many illuminating observations on conditions in Western Europe and in Asia, given his many travels.

Friedman has written about how the U.S. — despite being the strongest, most dynamic, and technologically advanced economy in the world — nevertheless has managed to tolerate sub-standard infrastructure conditions (such as too small airports), compared to our Asian and European neighbors. Anyone who has flown into New York’s John F. Kennedy or La Guardia airports (as I frequently do) can attest to the need to upgrade these transportation facilities, and many others.

Continue reading U.S.’s Infrastructure: Hardly Ready for the 21st Century

U.S.’s Infrastructure: Hardly Ready for the 21st Century originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]


Loan Modifications sponsored by Obama’s administration HAMP (Home Affordable Modification Program) program does not a have a very long history but Wachovia has lagged at the bottom of it from the very beginning.

Wachovia has over 82,000 borrowers with home loans, the economy is doing pretty bad which has caused a large percentage of those borrowers struggle to make their payments. However Wachovia has only provided loan modifications for 3% of their struggling borrowers, those 60 days or more behind their payments and that includes borrowers that are still fighting through a loan modification trial. To give you an idea of how many borrowers get through the trial loan modification to date over 750,000 loan modification trials have been filed but under 40,000 have qualified for permanent loan modifications.

Wachovia is not the only large lender and servicer that has poor a poor loan modification conversion but it 3% is bad even at the bottom of the loan modification conversion league.

The reasons for low conversion numbers are complex. Pointing fingers at servicers and banks is easy and the fact that some banks are doing much better than 3% shows that Wachovia and other servicers can do more, however there are many other factors. Loan Modifications do involve paperwork and depend on Net Present Value tests. Borrowers are not always as good at filling and filing paperwork as they would like and the sad truth is that many people don’t qualify for loan modifications under the current rules. For instance banks are only required to approve a loan modification if the Net Present Value test shows that it would be profitable for the bank to grant the loan modification instead of simply continuing with the foreclosure.

Are Wachovia Loan Modifications damaging your credit score?

Another issue with loan modifications is how they affect your credit rating. As most of the borrowers that qualify for loan modifications can a) afford a modified loan payment, b) have a mortgage that is not terribly “underwater” and c) the will and stamina to endure the painful ordeal of a loan modification it is likely they care about their credit rating after having their loan modification approved.

Various horror stories from the “lucky” 3% of Wachovia’s borrowers that qualified for a loan modification have mentioned how Wachovia guaranteed there would be no negative information reported to their credit file to later realize Wachovia had reported them as undergoing Paying Partial Payment Agreement which is actually way worse than being reported for a loan modification program under the current HAMP program.

It is possible that these cases are isolated to “private” agreements between the borrower and Wachovia without falling under the HAMP program, which does not approve of this kind of reporting. This does not change the fact that it is a straight lie and measures should be taken to stop this if it has become a matter of course with Wachovia. Borrowers can easily destroy their credit by becoming delinquent on their loan quite easily on their own without any servicers “help” in the form of a paying partial payment agreement.

It seems that one of the reasons for these complaints is that when Wachovia was bought out by Wells Fargo loan modification terms were changed and that included credit rating report procedures.

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modifications and Mortgage Modifications Can They Affect Your Credit Score
  2. Loan Modification Low Numbers, Why?
  3. Loan Modifications, Servicers and Who Is Profiting From the Credit Crisis

Related posts:

  1. Loan Modifications and Mortgage Modifications Can They Affect Your Credit Score
  2. Loan Modification Low Numbers, Why?
  3. Loan Modifications, Servicers and Who Is Profiting From the Credit Crisis

Source [blownmortgage]

Filed under: China

In a surprise move, The Peoples Bank of China (PBOC) raised the reserve requirement ratio (RRR) for its banks by 50 basis points. This move came one day after China reported surging imports and exports. It will drain 200 — 300 yuan, $20 — 43 billion from its banking system.

In a one-two-three punch, the PBOC also raised the yield on the sale of one year bills by 8 basis points. The third salvo was reverse repos of 200 billion yuan.

Continue reading China Raises Bank Reserve Ratio to Drain Excess Liquidity from Its Banking System

China Raises Bank Reserve Ratio to Drain Excess Liquidity from Its Banking System originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]

The housing market in many areas in California is still in a solid bubble.  Yes, in a speculative bubble.  In the last report we looked at shadow inventory for Los Angeles County in great detail.  This generated a lot of questions and hopefully shined more light on what really is going on in the housing […]

The housing market in many areas in California is still in a solid bubble.  Yes, in a speculative bubble.  In the last report we looked at shadow inventory for Los Angeles County in great detail.  This generated a lot of questions and hopefully shined more light on what really is going on in the housing market.  People in manias have hard times judging things correctly.  First, even if nationally home prices might be correcting to more reasonable levels, even in hard hit areas like the Inland Empire, many counties like Los Angeles and Orange are incredibly overpriced.  In short, they are still in a bubble.  Now this might seem stunning given that the median California home has fallen in price by 50 percent.  But keep in mind the fall was not evenly distributed.

It helps to put the numbers in perspective:

Los Angeles County Peak Price:                 $550,000 May of 2007 (DataQuick)

Los Angeles County Current Price:           $329,000 November of 2009 (drop of 40%)

Orange County Peak Price:                          $645,000 June of 2007

Orange County Current Price:                    $436,500 (drop of 32%)

Yet as we showed in our last report, most of the drop has occurred for two primary reasons:

[1] The bulk of home sales have come from lower priced homes thus skewing the median price lower

[2] Higher end areas have large numbers of shadow inventory because homes are not moving as fast (aka the volume of buyers is low)

Now when the MLS lists about 19,400 homes for Los Angeles County yet in total close to 100,000 properties are either on the MLS, have a notice of default filed, are scheduled for auction, or are bank owned you know something is sketchy.  Plus, we have additional properties that are 90+ days late that just don’t show up anywhere.  The fact of the matter is that prices are too expensive in many areas regardless of government intervention.  All the government is doing is prolonging the inevitable correction while propping up the failed banking sector.  Keep in mind the California unemployment rate is 12.3 percent and if we include underemployment, it goes up to 22 percent.  Have people forgotten how households actually pay for the mortgage?  You pay from actual income yet somehow this is all lost in the hustle of bailouts.

Today we are going to look at a zip code in Burbank to really deconstruct what is going on.  Today we salute you Burbank with our Real Homes of Genius Award.

Burbank California

Let us examine the 91501 zip code of Burbank.  This is one of those areas with nice homes that many professionals are looking at but prices still seem to reflect a bubble.  Now many real estate agents are now buying the argument that the government has saved the housing market.  Really?  Let us look at the real data for this zip code in Burbank:

In the latest month of data five homes sold for this zip code.  The MLS has 31 homes listed.  A little over 6 months of data.  On the surface this seems healthy.  But look at the shadow data.  130 homes are here.  Now one of the big concerns in the last report was how many homes are double counted.  Not much.  The 91501 has 3 foreclosures listed publicly of the 14 REOs.  That is a tiny number.  So in total we have 161 properties listed minus the 3 double counts (1.8 percent of the pool) and we have over 31 months of housing inventory if we use shadow inventory figures.  Plus, how many homes in this area are 90+ days late with no notice of default filed?  But you are skeptical.  Fine.  Let us run an example.  In fact, let us run a fresh example (just listed on 1/5/2010):

Given the e-mails I get from readers, this is probably a sample of the most sought after “starter home” for people that read Real Homes of Genius.  They’re looking for a prime city with the cache that’ll make them feel like they’ve made it.  It is the same fuel that led many to over leverage but this time, you actually have to have the income to back up your bet and not go gangbusters with an Alt-A or option ARM product to leverage yourself into disaster.  Yet prime mortgage defaults are now soaring because the fact that you can buy something doesn’t mean that you can afford it or that employment is still hemorrhaging.

The above home is one example of why we still have much correcting to do in many markets.  This is a 4 bedrooms and 2 baths home that is listed at 3,219 square feet.  A rather large sized home for a starter but a good structure for working professionals.  This home is banked owned but the history of what occurred shows us that delaying the inevitable doesn’t delay a meeting with financial reality:

Let us walk through what happened here.  The home was purchased in August of 2007 for $905,000.  Amazing and thoughtful Countrywide thought it would be prudent to make the first and second mortgage on this property:

First Mortgage:                 $614,500

Second Mortgage:           $200,000

Total:                                     $814,500

So it looks like these buyers actually came in with 10 percent down ($90,500) if I’m working the numbers out correctly.  So even in August of 2007 right when the market was in full implosion Countrywide decided to make a loan at peak value on a property that was “valued” at almost one million with only 10 percent down.  Is it any wonder why many Alt-A loans are simply exploding on the balance sheet of banks?

So the home is now purchased.  Less than one year in, the borrower is already having problems.  The notice of default was filed on September of 2008:

09/04/2008:        NOD Filed for $26,461

Now this is what people forget about mega California mortgages.  If you miss a payment on say a home in practically any other state, you fall behind $1,000 or so a month.  So after the NOD if it is filed after 3 months, you may owe somewhere around $3,000 to $4,000 depending on late fees and penalties.  Catching up on that is doable.  Try catching up to $26,461 when you are already struggling.

So if the NOD was filed in September of 2008, this probably means the borrowers started missing full payments back in June or July of 2008.  Now here is where the process drags out and shadow inventory builds.  So the NOD is put on the place in 09/2008 and the first auction is scheduled in January of 2009.  Then, it looks like another auction is placed in March of 2009.  When is the home finally taken over?  By October of 2009.  Now do you think this borrower was making payments all that time?  Yet the process isn’t complete.  Only on Tuesday of this week was the home listed!  So let us recap the time it took from first missed payment to MLS listing:

June/July of 2008 first missed payment to January 5, 2010 MLS (18 to 19 month process)

And what is the current listing price?

List Price: $699,900

So the bank is simply writing off that second mortgage completely and hoping to recoup on the first.  These kind of cases simply point to a major drawn out housing market for the state.  When we consider all the option ARMs and Alt-A loans, many people are going to face similar problems.

It is troubling to see so many people eager to jump on any home even if they have to spend every hard earned penny they have saved during the bubble times (they assume the bubble has fully burst).  They somehow think the market has already bottomed.  It has not.

Now you might say, people in this zip code of Burbank must be making tons of money.  Let us take a look:

It would take over 12 times the median annual income of this zip code to purchase this home!  That is flat out bubble land to the next dimension.  I mean run the numbers.  Let us assume you go with an FHA insured loan with 3.5 percent down:

Down Payment:                               $24,365

The family looking to buy this home will need an income of $200,000 which doesn’t seem to be reflected from the income tax data pulled for this zip code.  Let us run the net income numbers for someone not living in the area:

So even assuming a family with a $200,000 household income wants to buy this home, nearly 50 percent of their net pay is going to their housing payment.  That is nuts!  Plus, the median household income for the area is not even close to $200,000 but $56,000.  This is why California is still largely facing major pocket bubbles in areas like Burbank, Culver City, and Pasadena to name a few.

Incomes do matter by the way.  And one thing people forget is that over 40 years, the average 30 year fixed mortgage hovered around 9 percent.  You want to run the numbers at 9 percent?

Let us assume you buy this home.  In a few years, rates go up to 9 percent.  A family looking to buy this home at the current price, no price adjustment, will now need an income of $263,000!  And keep in mind mortgage rates can’t go any lower.  The Federal Reserve has now gambled the entire security of our nation’s well being.  They have purchased some $1.25 trillion in mortgage backed securities since no one else in their right mind would buy these toxic products.  That game is going to end badly and rates will go up once that hits as is typical in any high risk investment.  When?  Who really knows but making a bet on California housing right now is a major gamble.  If you feel the need to gamble go to Vegas and satisfy your need.  At least there your odds in some games are close to fifty-fifty.  In California housing, it is hard to see how you’ll win in many cases.

Today we salute you Burbank with our Real Homes of Genius Award.

Did You Enjoy The Post? Subscribe to Dr. Housing Bubble’s Blog to get updated housing commentary, analysis, and information.

Post from: Dr. Housing Bubble Blog

Real Homes of Genius: Today we Salute Burbank Housing. A $905,000 Foreclosure that Lasted 18 Months. Now Listed for $699,000.

Via [DrHousingBubble]


Via [bloggingstocks]

Filed under: Earnings reports, Alcoa Inc (AA)

Aluminum entity Alcoa (AA) is down in the dumps today. As of this writing, shares are off by over 10.5% to $15.60. Many, many shares have traded hands. Much higher than an average day’s volume.

Driving the selling pressure was the earnings report, of course. For the fourth quarter, sales decreased 4% compared to the year-ago period. On a reported basis, the company lost 27 cents per share from continuing operations. This was a big improvement over the previous loss of $1.16 per share. Unfortunately, according to Bloomberg, the adjusted profit of a penny per share missed projections by 5 cents.

Continue reading Alcoa Down on Q4 Results — What Should Investors Do Now?

Alcoa Down on Q4 Results — What Should Investors Do Now? originally appeared on BloggingStocks on Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:40:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Add to digg Add to del.icio.us Add to Google Add to StumbleUpon Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati


Via [bloggingstocks]

Close
E-mail It